What's new

Powers warn Iran 'now is the time' for nuclear deal

what Negatives you think with removal of Iran Sanctions ? please elaborate honestly. :lol:
Go open a browser page, look at Iran's military pacts and read them. Like I know you are a mindless bot but still try and read them, and understand what I meant. It will be hard I know to understand why, honestly it is for me also, but read. Irani military relations with other countries.
 
.
Why go above 3%?

Only one reason. you know it and I know it.

Listen my friend. You guys actually have nukes. So keep quiet. Better yet, STFU. There is a difference between more than 3% and 97%. Medical research etc.
 
.
This pact will haunt down every country who is nuclear power and haven't sign NPT. Pak has some very " unwise friends" who are putting Pak in dire strait in the name of their personal rivalry.
 
.
Why go above 3%?

Only one reason. you know it and I know it.

What you know that we don't know? that you've got nukes and ain't a signatory of NPT?
By the way 20 percent enrichment uranium was meant to supply Tehran research reactor that provides medicine and isotopes for at least 800k Iranian patients ... we asked the IAEA to buy it from international market as every country does they refused to sell it even they put conditions therefore we produced by ourselves ...
 
.
Quite rich, coming from the country that developed nuclear weapons against everyones wishes (at least officially). And besides, Iran isn't developing nuclear weapons, it's stupid, you can't use them. It has a civilian nuclear program. That's about it. If you don't like that, well, tough titty.
You cant compare Pakistan example here because our Nuclear Program was to preserve the Balance of Power in South Asia while Iran doesnt have any Enemy close by who could be claimed to be a Nuclear Power. Israel is still quite far away from Iran and as for Civilian Nuclear Program no one is Doubting it but everyone wants to be sure that it remains Civilian and doesnt become anything further and I dont think there wrong on that one either at the same time some of their Demands which are regarding any kind of access to Military are wrong as well so whatever finalize this deal they should go for it just for the sack of a region which is already getting too toxic due to Proxy Wars, religious and centuries old cultural rivalries right now.
If Iran set the precedence of total nuclear inspection , then next door is Pakistan...Because Iran listen to IAEA, now Pakistan should follow the pattern.
They cant demand something like that with Pakistan because Pakistan doesnt have any extra ambitions with its nuclear so far as its for preserving Balance of Power in South Asia it doesnt meant for any cultural or religious rivalries in the region so we are way more clear in our Acts then Iran.
 
. .
Because tehran reactor work with 20% uranium
Who built the main reactor?
--- company / country (countries)?

Tehran research reactor that provides medicine and isotopes for at least 800k Iranian patients ......
While hold a nation of 90 million hostage for 800 k patients?


... we asked the IAEA to buy it from international market as every country does they refused to sell it even they put conditions therefore we produced by ourselves ...
Wrong!

Their refusal is only there as long as iran has Clandestine nukie ops.
 
.
Why go above 3%?

Only one reason. you know it and I know it.
Low-enriched uranium (LEU)[edit]
Low-enriched uranium (LEU) has a lower than 20% concentration of 235U. For use in commercial light water reactors (LWR), the most prevalent power reactors in the world, uranium is enriched to 3 to 5% 235U. Fresh LEU used in research reactors is usually enriched 12% to 19.75% U-235, the latter concentration being used to replace HEU fuels when converting to LEU.[3]


Highly enriched uranium (HEU)[edit]
Highly enriched uranium (HEU) has a 20% or higher concentration of 235U. The fissile uranium in nuclear weapon primaries usually contains 85% or more of 235U known as weapons-grade, though theoretically for an implosion design, a minimum of 20% could be sufficient (called weapon(s)-usable) although it would require hundreds of kilograms of material and "would not be practical to design";[4][5]
 
.
Low-enriched uranium (LEU)[edit]
Low-enriched uranium (LEU) has a lower than 20% concentration of 235U. For use in commercial light water reactors (LWR), the most prevalent power reactors in the world, uranium is enriched to 3 to 5% 235U. Fresh LEU used in research reactors is usually enriched 12% to 19.75% U-235, the latter concentration being used to replace HEU fuels when converting to LEU.[3]


Highly enriched uranium (HEU)[edit]
Highly enriched uranium (HEU) has a 20% or higher concentration of 235U. The fissile uranium in nuclear weapon primaries usually contains 85% or more of 235U known as weapons-grade, though theoretically for an implosion design, a minimum of 20% could be sufficient (called weapon(s)-usable) although it would require hundreds of kilograms of material and "would not be practical to design";[4][5]

And you need it to add to popcorns or chicken pulav?


and if its for a nuckie power reactor, then please mention which country/company is supplying it or supplied it.
 
.
And you need it to add to popcorns or chicken pulav?
Oh am not arguing with you in any way, just said 3 percent is old school, historian saab, 20 percent is not even the issue, the issue is how much 20 percent they are stocking. That is the problem here, which is why the world is saying nuclear ambitions
 
.
Who built the main reactor?
--- company / country (countries)?


While hold a nation of 90 million hostage for 800 k patients?



Wrong!

Their refusal is only there as long as iran has Clandestine nukie ops.
Dear uncle sam made it so that it work with 95% uranium after revolution with the help of argentina we modified it so it can work with 20% uranium.

Oh am not arguing with you in any way, just said 3 percent is old school, historian saab, 20 percent is not even the issue, the issue is how much 20 percent they are stocking. That is the problem here, which is why the world is saying nuclear ambitions
The amount we have is enough for around 5 years or less of reactor at full capacity.
 
.
The amount we have is enough for around 5 years or less of reactor at full capacity.
That is the problem here, which is why the world is saying
I did not state my opinion which is immaterial here, we are talking about the different opinions of the world. Go to the first page, read my longer post and contribute constructively on your opinion on that. :)
 
.
While hold a nation of 90 million hostage for 800 k patients?

This is your mentality? As a country, you think we should say **** off to our patients, just so the rest of us can have cheaper iphones?

Sanctions isn't killing us. Our country, even under the 36 year economic siege has Iranians in a better standard of living than many people around the world.
 
.
Go open a browser page, look at Iran's military pacts and read them. Like I know you are a mindless bot but still try and read them, and understand what I meant. It will be hard I know to understand why, honestly it is for me also, but read. Irani military relations with other countries.

No doubt after reading all this one is easily convinced that all kinds of the wahabi and Israeli allies are worried today
despite all their resources and giant militaries.

Rest what are the secrets between Pakistan and Wahabis is no more secrets.

IRAN never asked Pakistan to create Lashkars of Minority Wahabis :lol:

Creating Lashkars of minority wahabis to spread wahabi fitna in Pakistan will not bring any good to Pakistan.

No one is responsible for the Wahai Fitna in Pakistan except PA.

Those who created the minority wahabi lashkars in Pakistan will be shackled in Iron Chains one day and will answerable to the people of Pakistan.

whatever is done by the Wahabi Fitna, it has nothing to do with Islamic IRAN.

Only Wahabi and Israeli allies fear Islamic IRAN. Plz Get this into your head.
 
Last edited:
.
....

IRAN never asked Pakistan to create Lashkars of Minority Wahabis :lol:.

you know bhai jaan,

I am the first one to raise my voice in defense of our Shia brothers.

But your response smacks of ignorance.

Do remember, there is nothing to lol on very serious issue.

Khomeni was the first one to create Shia gangs in Pakistan. (let alone in other Shia population countries like Lebanon).

Just remember how these gangs fired and killed police from within imam bargah Quetta.

Then the whole deal with Shia militant group Jaish Mohammdi (or Lashkre Mohammdi something like that) was all with Iranian financing.

Situation got so bad that there was an active target killings between Shia and Sunni gangs, that culmnated in assassination of a Iranian Shia diplomat in Punjab (could be south punjab but I am forgetting).

So please be balanced in your pov.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom