What's new

Poverty reduced to half in Musharraf’s regime: WB report

Musharraf will face the same singing as Mr. Zardari facing now. Economic downturn started during the time of Mushrraf only. Instead of criticizing a person why not you guys criticize the policy. What the PPP government done policywise which Musharraf might had done differently?
 
.
Musharraf will face the same singing as Mr. Zardari facing now. Economic downturn started during the time of Mushrraf only. Instead of criticizing a person why not you guys criticize the policy. What the PPP government done policywise which Musharraf might had done differently?

Musharraf would have kept rupee strong for lessor export bill
 
.
"Data suggests that between 2005 and 2009, over 12 to 14 million people may have been added to the ranks of the poor in Pakistan. This would translate into an increase in poverty from 22.3 percent of the population in 2005/06 to between 30-35 percent in 2008/09,” the report added."

I've read this over and over again and my brain can't take it in.
 
.
Saturday, August 07, 2010
By Mehtab Haider

ISLAMABAD: A World Bank survey has revealed that poverty in Pakistan was reduced by 50 percent on consumption-led growth of the economy under the rule of the former president, Pervez Musharraf.

“The percentage of the people living below the poverty line in Pakistan fell from 34.5 percent in 2001/02 to 17.2 percent in 2007/08,” World Bank said in its Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) paper, based on a survey conducted in fiscal year 2007/08. The bank is going to provide $6 billion to Pakistan on the basis of CPS findings.

According to Planning Commission officials, the PPP-led government asked the commission to conceal the results of the survey because the poverty started rising after the Musharraf’s regime.

According to the WB survey, poverty in urban areas fell from 22.7 percent in 2001/02 to 10.1 percent in 2007/08. In rural areas, it declined from 39.3 percent in 2001 to 20.6 percent in 2007/08, it said.

“This progress was a result of growth in real per adult consumption expenditure and declining inequality from 2005/06 to 2007/08,” the report said.

Key human development indicators of educational attainment, health outcomes and unemployment rates also corroborated these figures, the officials said.

The report showed that the pace of poverty reduction varied across provinces. Poverty in Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa steadily declined from 1998/99 onwards. “In Sindh and Balochistan, it recorded sharp rises in 2001/02 and 2005/06, possibly owing to weak agriculture performance in those years,” the report said.

The reduction in poverty in KP is particularly noteworthy as officials believe that it was facilitated by higher remittances through both foreign and domestic channels. “The large volatility in poverty suggests that a substantial portion of Pakistan’s population is vulnerable, living close to the poverty line, and could fall into poverty as a result of shocks,” the report said.

The overlap between vulnerable and poor households is low as about 60 percent of the highly vulnerable population does not belong to the poorest 20 percent. This means that a significant share of the non-poor population is as vulnerable as poor households, it said.

The WB report conceded that the gains in poverty reduction may have been partly reversed in the wake of the recent economic crisis.

“Food and fuel prices rose by 23.7 and 18.4 percent, respectively in the review period, resulting in a 21 percent reduction in the purchasing power,” it said.

The 2007/08 household survey results also suggest that poverty started rising towards the end of the fiscal year.

Officials said that the impact of the recent economic downturn on poverty levels in the country will only be known when the next household survey is conducted.

The Task Force on Food Security estimated that poverty headcount increased to 33.8 percent in 2007/08 and 36.1 percent in 2008/09. This means that about 62 million people were below the poverty line in 2008/09.

Data suggests that between 2005 and 2009, over 12 to 14 million people may have been added to the ranks of the poor in Pakistan. This would translate into an increase in poverty from 22.3 percent of the population in 2005/06 to between 30-35 percent in 2008/09,” the report added.


Poverty reduced to half in Musharraf’s regime: WB report
 
. .
Wait never mind, someone already made a thread on this. Sorry, mods please close/delete this thread.
 
. . .
Musharraf is the most hated person among indians.
All their media and intelligence machinery is after him.
 
. . .

I hope greater numbers of Pakistanis will take the time to read this thread, regardless of one's political position - we must give credit where credit is due


Concealed for 15 months


Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Dr Ashfaque H Khan

Mehtab Haider, a well-respected economic journalist of The News, published a story headlined "Poverty reduced to half in Musharraf's regime: WB Report." (Aug 7.) Quoting from the World Bank's July 30 report, "Country Partnership Strategy," the writer, Mehtab Haider, reported that the percentage of Pakistanis living the below poverty line had fallen from 34.5 per cent in 2001-02 to 17.2 per cent in 2007-08.

This news item has vindicated my position, thanks to the World Bank. I had been urging the government over the last 15 months through my columns to release the poverty numbers for 2007-08. The government, in particular the Planning Commission, failed to release the numbers, obviously for political reasons.

The Planning Commission's Centre for Poverty Reduction and Social Policy Development (CPRSPD) had estimated the extent of poverty in Pakistan by using the Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement (PSLM) Survey for 2007-08. The CPRSPD found that the number of people living below the poverty line declined from 22.3 per cent in 2005-06 to 17.2 per cent in 2007-08. During that period, rural and urban poverty also registered declines from 27 to 20.6 per cent and 13.1 to 10.1 per cent, respectively.

These results were presented to the Planning Commission in March 2009. However, the "experts" there were unwilling to accept the results, for obvious reasons. Some of these experts, who retired almost a decade ago but continue to work on contracts, wanted to protect their jobs. They advised the government not to accept the results unless these were validated by World Bank experts. So the government approached the World Bank to send in its own experts to validate the CPRSPD estimates
.

The findings of the experts sent by the World Bank, Nobu Yoshida and Tomayuki Sho, who presented their results to the Planning Commission on May 29, 2009, were exactly the same as those of the CPRSPD. They not only recommended that the government release these numbers, they argued that "not releasing the numbers is not an option." Therefore, the World Bank released them, after waiting for 15 months; the government has still not done so.

Why is the government so reluctant in releasing the poverty figures? There are two reasons for this. First, as Mehtab Haider has said "poverty reduced to half in Musharraf's regime…" The government wanted to suppress the figures because it never wanted to tell the people that they inherited only 17.2 per cent people living below the poverty line. Furthermore, it was politically suicidal to admit that poverty reduced to one-half in just six years during "Musharraf's regime".

Secondly, the government had formed a "Panel of Economists" headed by Dr Hafiz A Pasha in April 2008. The panel found that 35-40 per cent of the population was living below poverty line in 2007-08–up from 22.3 per cent in 2005-06. It is important to note that when the panel was working on poverty estimates, the PSLM Survey data for 2007-08 were not available. The panel estimated the numbers under a methodology that was never revealed. It is now exceedingly clear that the panel's estimates were based on flawed methodology.

Some professional economists like to put themselves into potentially advantageous position whenever a change of government takes place in Pakistan. Some retired "experts" would do anything to please the new political leadership to protect their jobs. Some would try to secure lucrative jobs or consultancy positions. Jobs and consultancies would be available only if they painted a horrible picture of the state of the economy inherited by the new leadership. A combination of all these motives was enough to persuade the political leadership to prevent the release of the poverty figures.


I have been pointing out these facts through four of my columns, urging the government to release the numbers for the sake of transparency. And the World Bank has now released the numbers. Isn't it an embarrassment for the government? The World Bank wrote everything which the present government never wanted to hear.

For example, the report (page 8) said: "Pakistan saw an impressive decline in poverty during 2001-02--2007-08; the share of the population living in poverty halved, down from 34.5 per cent in 2001-02 to 17.2 per cent in 2007-08. Both urban and rural areas saw significant reductions.

"This progress was made possible by growth in real per adult consumption expenditures and declining inequality during 2005-06--2007-08. Key human development indicators of educational attainment, health outcomes, and unemployment rates corroborate these trends through 2007-08."

Even a cursory look at these figures would reveal that not only poverty declined sharply in Pakistan from 2001-02 to 2007-08 but inequality was reduced as well. Meanwhile, social indicators improved and the unemployment rate dropped. Are such outcomes not the cherished goals of every government? If something good happened from 2001-02 to 2007-08, there is nothing wrong in acknowledging the facts.

Should the government still not release the poverty numbers even after the World Bank has done so? Where are those so-called "experts" in the Planning Commission now? Where are the members or the head of the Panel of Economists? Wouldn't they advise the Planning Commission to release the numbers now? Or would they continue to live in a state of denial? Suppressing the figures, thereby misguiding the people of Pakistan, is highly deplorable
.



The writer is director general and dean at NUST Business School, Islamabad. Email: ahkhan@nbs.edu.pk
 
.
"Data suggests that between 2005 and 2009, over 12 to 14 million people may have been added to the ranks of the poor in Pakistan. This would translate into an increase in poverty from 22.3 percent of the population in 2005/06 to between 30-35 percent in 2008/09,” the report added."

I've read this over and over again and my brain can't take it in.

Exactly. I don't see how you can go from 17% poverty rate to 36% in 2 year time. The panel that was used to calculate the 36% figure must have been bought out by PPP to manufacture figures that would hurt Musharraf.
 
.
Pakistan needs intellectuals and "go-to" men....not bloody politicians....perfect example...Shaukat Aziz....

Politicians can play roles of Foreign ministers, Home ministers etc....Prime Minister and FM have to be smart, economy minded and fearless....

Oh yeah....I forgot....HONEST!!!
 
.
Musharraf is gone , down in the dustbin of history , move along people

His shenanigans have brought the country to its current dissmal state and he will never be head of Pakistan again.

The World Bank is indeed controlled by the jews who liked Musharraf's slogans of 'enlightened moderation' basically anybody working to twist main stream Islamic teachings will be showered with praises and laurels so take this report with a pinch of salt.

Mooosharraf was bad for Pakistan , good riddiance , we have to move forward an not move backwards.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom