Care to tell me how you know? And which Indian armoured division you want to send to test out this contention?
Tac nukes are very 70s.
The game moved on a long time ago.
Taking off .... later.
Cheers, Doc
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Care to tell me how you know? And which Indian armoured division you want to send to test out this contention?
yet 3 days ago your own country was testing tactical missile everything we have is useless but still last 50 years your country is not ready to attack usYour tactical nukes are a joke bro.
Cheers, Doc
I must say Indians do take the initiative which Pakistanis don't or can't... either way India's primary goal here is to unnerve the investors who may seek to invest when a new government in Pakistan is just about give an impression of taking on corruption and bringing transparency. You do have to understand India has a lot of internal contingencies, being on a back foot in Indian Punjab and souther India along with rising nationalism in Marathas. So, their aim is also to divert peoples attention to a foreign enemy to keep internal cohesion. Pakistan has never really tried to test the internal Indian dynamics.
I would have given every one of them medals. Tell me if Rommel, Patton, Montgomery, Runstedt were in charge of the eastern command how could they have changed the outcome?How many generals were court martialed, imprisoned, or hung for 1971 when you lost half your country.
I don't think so that it'll have some territorial objectives ... What I expect is a operation launched to punish and humiliate the enemy and then retrieveThe next war with Pakistan will have clear territorial strategic objective/s.
India will not be drawn into a hot war otherwise.
Cheers, Doc
but only stupids like USAF RUSSIANS CHINES AND PAKISTANIS ARE USING IT AND ONE MORE STUPID CALL INDIA TRYING TO MAKE THEMTac nukes are very 70s.
The game moved on a long time ago.
Taking off .... later.
Cheers, Doc
Nukes themselves are very 1940s but that does not take their sting away ...Tac nukes are very 70s.
There is no international community. It is just about sanctions but taht we are ready.In it the aggressive party will try to punish and humiliate the other one in a short burst before the international community intervenes ...
Why is that? Give a reason? The small battles will be avoided as it is wasteful.I don't think so that it'll have some territorial objectives ... What I expect is a operation launched to punish and humiliate the enemy and then retrieve
yet 3 days ago your own country was testing tactical missile everything we have is useless but still last 50 years your country is not ready to attack us
its from todayLol! What are you speaking man? India has no problems except with Jihadis like in Kashmir. Maratha nationalism! lol! Khalistan etc are already dead. Have sense
Your generals have zero accountability.
How many generals were court martialed, imprisoned, or hung for 1971 when you lost half your country.
Please provide references.
As far as I know, only Bhutto, a politician, got the noose.
Cheers, Doc
Nukes are big bombs but tactical nuke are like small bombs but nuke. They are not much more effective than 1000Kg LGB dropped from planeNukes themselves are very 1940s but that does not take their sting away ...
a gun like SKS made in WW2 sill can kill any human in range .Nukes themselves are very 1940s but that does not take their sting away ...
Maoists will be under control soon. Their footprint is shrinking badly. DOn't worry about Maoists, They are a small threatits from today
India becomes 3rd worst terrorism hit state in the World after Iraq and Afghanistan: Report
22 Sep, 2018
According to a US survey, India after Iraq and Afghanistan becomes the third largest victim of terror attacks across the world due to the hands of Maoists, which carried out 53% of the total attacks in India
A war with India means that both nations lose, because nukes.
In the event that nukes aren't used, both sides would suffer greatly, but because India has made so many big strides in the last 2 decades, India would be favored by quantity AND quality wise, when it comes to man power and technology.
Not to mention that Pakistan has gear it's military more towards fighting insurgencies. While this has given Pakistan invaluable experience and kept it's swords sharp, it also means that the PA needs to, once again prioritize conventional capabilities, if war is inevitable with India.
All in all, war with India should be avoided. If nukes are used, both nations cease to exist. If nukes aren't used, India would suffer, but likely come out better than Pakistan.
You did not give an example of decent fire control radar made by Pakistan or any proper ship made in Pakistan. First name thesea gun like SKS made in WW2 sill can kill any human in range .
Hehehe! What have you seen exactly? Did Indian army soldiers surrender ever?We have seen in the border skirmishes that Indian forces don't have the stomach and appetite for war. Pakistan's defenses, arsenals and it's soldiers are the toughest in the world.