What's new

Possible Reaction of Pakistan after India's AGNI V 5500KM

Possible Reaction of Pakistan after India's AGNI V 5500KM

  • Pakistani Should also Test an ICBM

    Votes: 35 26.5%
  • Keep Silent,

    Votes: 22 16.7%
  • Focus on Economics

    Votes: 75 56.8%

  • Total voters
    132
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear Shaheen missile are already operational, so no need to test it. However operational tests are conducted regularly during war games annually.
Babur, RAAD, NASR, ghaznavi have been tested many a times, Go and update your self before writing some thing.

I know that Babur, RAAD, NASR and ghaznavi have been tested.what I meant is do you have any recent reports on shaheen missiles?Because I`ve been wondering for a long time where did these missiles go.I only mostly here about Babur, NASR, RAAD
 
Yesyou are right Agni isn't pakistan specific. Brahamos is operational but surayia isn't. Brahamos range is very short just 290 km, it can only target the major cities of punjab near boarder. Major Urban centers and military installations are of sindh ,Balochistan and KP are far away from brahamos range.

Brahmos can target 80% of the big cities in Pakistan including Islamabad, Lahore, Multan Sialkot, Karachi, Hyderabad...from Inside the Indian borders... yes since it is available on every platform.. land based, sea based, air based... and the range is not just 290km but much more for later blocks... specifically block III but that've been designed to be based near Chinese borders.
 
Hi,

It is very easy---wait for the weather to be down wind from pakistan going into india----then explode multiple weapons within 5 to 50 muiles inside of india---or any distance---that can be managed----.

My good kid---the radiation and dust clouds travelling down wind---those would be as bad as the actual nuc strike----you can't escape radiation death---. They will have terrible effects----after the first signs of deaths from radiation appears---the whole of the nation would be in a panic and chaos---which would lead to restlessness and anarchy---once the chaos sets in---the population would be moving and acting with a herd mentality----.

The winds will do the job for us. That is why I can on saying----india can never come ahead in a nuclear conflict---it is a mutual demise----.

Death from radiation will be from continuous uncontrolled DIARRHEA----can you imagine---the question being asked in the history books after a few centuries---how did so many indians died even though none of the nuc strikes were direct---and no insult meant----yessirs---they died horrible deaths due to diarrhea caused by exposure to radiation----.

Let us not do this to each other---please.

I thought we had 500km of desert against the Pakistan border....

BirdMap.jpg


With population density lower than 50 people per square km...

india_population_densities_est._1995.gif


even on that note monsoon winds and easterlies(winds from the Himalayas) are far stronger in our region... than the western wind which flows for a couple of weeks from Pakistan... in the month of January...

as a matter of fact all of the main Pakistani rivers originate in India... so any radiation fallout is clearly going to contaminate the drinking water of whole Pakistan.. since I doubt there are Nuclear reactors purifying sea water in bulk.. or those expensive treatment plants as in UAE.

300px-Pakistan_Rivers.PNG


In a few months all of Indus would carry contaminated water poisoning crops killing cattle and people... How is Pakistan going to Survive... In such a case.

Also the Radiation effect can trigger Increase in temperature during summer and cause mass melting of Himalayas causing something like this...

_48757647_pakistan_indus_flow_624.gif


Hence the Nuke weapon is the Ultimate suicide pill for Pakistan while the larger India with its resource can survive the blow.
 
"while the larger India with its resource can survive the blow. "

We will Insha Allah keep this point in our mind and then we will strike on "Mother India"
 
"while the larger India with its resource can survive the blow. "

We will Insha Allah keep this point in our mind and then we will strike on "Mother India"

Any Strike would be a Disaster for Pakistan Itself as explained... we need to mount dirty nukes from our FBRs on our Rocket Artillery and Bomb Pakistan to Eternity.. and flow the waste from our Rectors in the river Indus along with Chemical and Biological agents... Cluster bombs of White phosphorous on population centers etc... and let me remind you we have about half a dozen FBRs with their Number only Increasing.. with 500-550MW capacity...

So Its better you keep preserving your Nukes If not destroying your Nuclear capability.. SO that any Mad General doe not make you people eat that suicide pill... For Completely destroying India you would need 10000 thermonuclear bombs.. But you don't have any.
 
I am just thinking, what should be the appropriate reaction of Pakistan after India will test Agni V, 5500KM Intercontinental Medium Range Missile, either Pakistan Should Test ICBM in reply back, as there are some unauthenticated news about Pakistani ICBM, or Pakistan will keep silent. Please appropriate suggestion and Ideas are welcome, there should keep away.

Thankyou

well it seems that 5000 KM is maximum Range of Agni 5

so unless India develops Agni 6 and inducts it Pakistan doesn't need to build ICBM

i think currently India is making secret diplomatic effort to convince EU and US that Agni 6 is much needed and it is not to threaten any nation other than PRC

if i am right, India will promise to EU and US not to develop any BM having greater range than Agni 6 ( 6000 to 6500 KM )
 
Pakistan is a narrow country and even the furthest towns in Baluchistan are less than 1000 KM from Indian border. On this basis any missile with 1500KM range should be able to target all towns in Pakistan. Pakistan would on the other hand need a missile of about 3000 Km to reach Kania Kumari.

Agni 1 was developed way back in early 1990’s and its modified version as Agni 2 has been in Indian arsenal for more than 10 years. This missile has 1500 KM range. Any longer range missile has no effect of the strategic balance except in numbers.

Pakistan has two missiles (Ghauri 2 & Shaheen 2) with more than 2000 Km range. We don’t have any ballistic missile with 3000 KM range. Only when Pakistan develops a 3000 KM range missile, it will make a difference to India.

Agni 2 came first and Agni 1 came later

and range of Agni 2 is 2000 to 2500 KM and not 1500 KM

i think you were referring to Agni TD (1400 KM Range)
 
well it seems that 5000 KM is maximum Range of Agni 5

so unless India develops Agni 6 and inducts it Pakistan doesn't need to build ICBM

i think currently India is making secret diplomatic effort to convince EU and US that Agni 6 is much needed and it is not to threaten any nation other than PRC

if i am right, India will promise to EU and US not to develop any BM having greater range than Agni 6 ( 6000 to 6500 KM )

Agni 5 can Hit targets as far as 8000-10000km with less payload... It is similar to DF-31... even Agni III can Hit targets at ranges upto 6000km but It won't be as accurate... Agni 6 would be SLBM version of Agni 5 as said by Avinash Chandar.
 
Agni 5 can Hit targets as far as 8000-10000km with less payload... It is similar to DF-31... even Agni III can Hit targets at ranges upto 6000km but It won't be as accurate... Agni 6 would be SLBM version of Agni 5 as said by Avinash Chandar.

no it cant

have a look at the below example

Reducing payload by 20% won't increase range by 20-25%. This is a serious rumor spread on PDF and other forums.

Only the last stage will have its range increased in case of reduced payload. The other stages will not be affected much.

Let assume a 2 stage missile with a weight of 50 tons carrying a 1 ton payload here.

Its first stage has to lift 51 tons. And its second stage will lift some 5 tons.

If its payload is reduced by 50%,

Its first stage will have to lift 50.5 tons, and its second stage will lift some 4.5 tons.

So you see, that the difference in weight is very less, and can not increase range up to 50%. If that was the case, an empty missile would have twice the range.
 
Any Strike would be a Disaster for Pakistan Itself as explained... we need to mount dirty nukes from our FBRs on our Rocket Artillery and Bomb Pakistan to Eternity.. and flow the waste from our Rectors in the river Indus along with Chemical and Biological agents... Cluster bombs of White phosphorous on population centers etc... and let me remind you we have about half a dozen FBRs with their Number only Increasing.. with 500-550MW capacity...

So Its better you keep preserving your Nukes If not destroying your Nuclear capability.. SO that any Mad General doe not make you people eat that suicide pill... For Completely destroying India you would need 10000 thermonuclear bombs.. But you don't have any.

Thanks a lot for your non sense post in response to a stupid post.

Grow up dude, Plz Grow up.
 
Don't see what reaction they should have for everything we do. Their missiles cover us and our missiles covered them decades ago. This missile is having a much longer range and is not meant for a country that is already covered.
 
That there is no point in matching with India as far as defense tech is concerned! Neither we can afford it nor it is required! Better to concentrate on economy and compete with India in that area!
 
I am just thinking, what should be the appropriate reaction of Pakistan after India will test Agni V, 5500KM Intercontinental Medium Range Missile, either Pakistan Should Test ICBM in reply back, as there are some unauthenticated news about Pakistani ICBM, or Pakistan will keep silent. Please appropriate suggestion and Ideas are welcome, there should keep away.

Thankyou

Please don think this much about reaction …already your country is having economic infection.
 
Hence the Nuke weapon is the Ultimate suicide pill for Pakistan while the larger India with its resource can survive the blow.

Yes and that way Pakistan would cease to exist and folks across the border will live happily in their land that has been wasted, knowing that they defeated their enemy.

I don't know why you'd even post this. After a nuclear fallout in the subcontinent, we'd cease to exist as nations, only decimated lands with some minor pockets of actual civilization.

I'll end by quoting Mastan Khan... I think he sums it up quite nicely...

Let us not do this to each other---please.


---------- Post added at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:00 AM ----------

Any Strike would be a Disaster for Pakistan Itself as explained... we need to mount dirty nukes from our FBRs on our Rocket Artillery and Bomb Pakistan to Eternity.. and flow the waste from our Rectors in the river Indus along with Chemical and Biological agents... Cluster bombs of White phosphorous on population centers etc... and let me remind you we have about half a dozen FBRs with their Number only Increasing.. with 500-550MW capacity...

So Its better you keep preserving your Nukes If not destroying your Nuclear capability.. SO that any Mad General doe not make you people eat that suicide pill... For Completely destroying India you would need 10000 thermonuclear bombs.. But you don't have any.

Would you risk the lives of millions for destruction of your enemy?

Posts like this that I genuinely find disturbing! I pray that it never even comes to this.
No point debating about it and no need to even go that far! :hitwall:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom