What's new

[POLL] Su-34 vs F-35. Rate the best strike fighter in the world.

which


  • Total voters
    19
This is a troll thread bro, created by @undertakerwwefan who fall in love with Russian military tech with blindness @Foxtrot Delta :angel:

Su-34 replaces Su-24 and Su-25. F-35 replaces F-16 and A-10. They have the same role. Attack.

I think there us something wrong here. I thought sukhoi 34 was supposed to be a fighter bomber.. While f 35 a multi role.

Su-34 replaces Su-24 and Su-25. F-35 replaces F-16 and A-10. They have the same role. Attack.

Su-34 has limited data fusion/system integration etc etc, F-35 is world most electronically advance jet without a doubt @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:

Both have sensor fusion.
 
.
Su-34 replaces Su-24 and Su-25. F-35 replaces F-16 and A-10. They have the same role. Attack.
Su-34 is for more attack/strike and have limited AAM/self defense capabilities, F-35 is truly multirole jet with air defense/antiship/SEAD/DEAD/EW/ES/ELECTRONIC ATTACK CAPABILITY IN ONE AIR-FRAME your logic are insane and stupid @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:
Both have sensor fusion.
No where near as F-35, F35 is way way ahead in the term of senor fusion/system integration from Su-34 @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
. . .
Su-34 is for more attack/strike and have limited AAM/self defense capabilities, F-35 is truly multirole jet with air defense/antiship/SEAD/DEAD/EW/ES/ELECTRONIC ATTACK CAPABILITY IN ONE AIR-FRAME your logic are insane and stupid @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:

No where near as F-35, F35 is way way ahead in the term of senor fusion/system integration from Su-34 @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:

Su-34 replaces Su-24 and Su-25. F-35 replaces F-16 and A-10. Neither are built for air to air combat. That would be Su-35 and F-22.
 
. . . .
I already said your opinion worth nothing, world defenses expert knows better me and you and they said one is fighter bomber (Su-34) and one is truly multirole jet (F-35) @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:

Both are multi role. Neither is built for air to air combat. Both are built for attack. They have reduced speed and no thrust vectoring and reduced agility.
 
Last edited:
. .
A
i already told you your personal opinion worth nothing but defense expert opinion worth, beleive whatever you want @undertakerwwefan ;):enjoy:

Do you know what multi role is? Both planes can perform 2 roles: fighter, attack.

Russia's 'Duckbill': Su-34 combines features of both bomber and fighter

The new multirole aircraft can perform aerobatic maneuvers and strike well-defended targets with its high-precision weapons with equal ease.

https://www.rbth.com/defence/2017/0...es-features-of-both-bomber-and-fighter_777707
 
.
Do you know what multi role is? Both planes can perform 2 roles: fighter, attack.

Russia's 'Duckbill': Su-34 combines features of both bomber and fighter

The new multirole aircraft can perform aerobatic maneuvers and strike well-defended targets with its high-precision weapons with equal ease.

https://www.rbth.com/defence/2017/0...es-features-of-both-bomber-and-fighter_777707
Believe whatever you want, net is full of these kind of stupid articles that supports your narratives @undertakerwwefan ;):enjoy:
 
. . .
non existent? lol

you do realize beast mode is just attaching pylons and doesn't require any upgrades right? attaching pylons is fast and can be done anywhere.

View attachment 531588

View attachment 531589
Do you realize beast mode needs a n specialized pylon not your normal pylons ,it's double railed pylons that allow it to carry as much as 16 air to air missile , and they didn't built that pylon yet.
do you knew in beast mode you are supposed to carry 6 AIM-120 in internal bays and they don't have the necessary pylons for that ?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom