Politics of Language & Partition of India

[r3alist]

Who cares? Partition of Bengal is done with. You Bangladeshis are free to Arabize/Persian-ize your language as much as you want, change your language completely to Arab/Persian, for all we care.

Having words like Allah and Roja in a Sanskrit based pure language like Bengali is beyond blasphemy, as these words have nothing to do with Indian culture, religion or heritage. India will always be a country that is going to live by its roots, we aint no leftovers of imperial invasions like the Muslims of the subcontinent...

The moghuls and british are just two of the most recent.....but dont you guys have a rich history of being invaded and ruled, so no doubt you are gonna be someones "leftovers"...maybe you need to freshen things up

 

[LaBong]

The moghuls and british are just two of the most recent.....but dont you guys have a rich history of being invaded and ruled, so no doubt you are gonna be someones "leftovers"...maybe you need to freshen things up

Every nation has been invaded at some point of time, even being an island couldn't save the England from being invaded by Romans, Scandinavians and most recently Normans. The part of subcontinent you are coming from mostly ruled by either maharaja, samrats of North/east India or sultans, shahs of parsia, Afghanistan through out the written history. May be you should become a bit more of a realist.

 

[r3alist]

Every nation has been invaded at some point of time, even being an island couldn't save the England from being invaded by Romans, Scandinavians and most recently Normans. The part of subcontinent you are coming from mostly ruled by either maharaja, samrats of North/east India or sultans, shahs of parsia, Afghanistan through out the written history. May be you should become a bit more of a realist.

But it was not only the british....the dutch and portugese got a piece of mother india.......but before that you had alexanders army, then some more greeks, iranians, central asians, turks.......and before them the aryans


That makes a significant chunk of your countrymen "leftovers".

 

[INDIC]

But it was not only the british....the dutch and portugese got a piece of mother india.......but before that you had alexanders army, then some more greeks, iranians, central asians, turks.......and before them the aryans


That makes a significant chunk of your countrymen "leftovers".

Applicable more to Pakistan instead of India. Don't forget wannable Arab or Turkic ancestry.

 

[Android]

That makes a significant chunk of our both countrymen "leftovers".

corrected for you

 

[RazPaK]

Apolicable more to Pakistan instead of India. Not not forget wannable Arab or Turkic ancestry.

Many people in Pakistan are descendants of Arab and Turkish background.

What do you know about the tribes of Pakistan?

 

[LaBong]

But it was not only the british....the dutch and portugese got a piece of mother india.......but before that you had alexanders army, then some more greeks, iranians, central asians, turks.......and before them the aryans


That makes a significant chunk of your countrymen "leftovers".

Off course any sedentary civilization will be and has been attacked by nomads, the greatness of civilisation lies in retaining it's own identity and absorbing the nomads. That's what happened with all of them except British who had a civilization of their own.

 

[RazPaK]

Off course any sedentary civilization will be and has been attacked by nomads, the greatness of civilisation lies in retaining it's own identity and absorbing the nomads. That's what happened with all of them except British who had a civilization of their own.

Let's be honest. You have no clue from where even Bengali culture originates.

 

[r3alist]

Applicable more to Pakistan instead of India. Don't forget wannable Arab or Turkic ancestry.

But on another topic some indians argue that pakistan has no history to speak of and it was your indian ancestors who inhabited these lands?
So which is it?

 

[INDIC]

Many people in Pakistan are descendants of Arab and Turkish background.

What do you know about the tribes of Pakistan?

Some do have but even those people claim it who don't have. Pakistanis never stop claiming how they have Alexander's genes, now one of your guy @r3alist calling such people as leftovers.

 

[RazPaK]

Some do have but even those people claim it who don't have. Pakistanis never stop claiming how they have Alexander's genes, now one of your guy @r3alist calling such people as leftovers.

Many of the people that even have Arab or Turkish backgrounds would now be intermixed with local populations.


However tribe history does not lie.

 

[INDIC]

But on another topic some indians argue that pakistan has no history to speak of and it was your indian ancestors who inhabited these lands?
So which is it?

Do you know your own pre-Islamic history.

 

[INDIC]

Many of the people that even have Arab or Turkish backgrounds would now be intermixed with local populations.


However tribe history does not lie.

Those foreigners who came to the sub continent and adopted Hinduism were allowed to marry local woman and constituted as a new caste of Hindus. Tribe means 'Adivasis'. Since, Pakistani Muslim don't want to claim their caste as remanant of Hinduism, they started to call it as tribes.

 

[LaBong]

Let's be honest. You have no clue from where even Bengali culture originates.

Why wouldn't have I any clue?

 

[r3alist]

Off course any sedentary civilization will be and has been attacked by nomads, the greatness of civilisation lies in retaining it's own identity and absorbing the nomads. That's what happened with all of them except British who had a civilization of their own.

Ah, so now the tune has changrd...there are no leftovers, just a wonderfully inclusive place which absorbs any people.....seems like its hard to juggle delusional chauvanism with a wannabe image of racial, cultural and religious harmony.

Do you know your own pre-Islamic history.

Why not answer the question instead of dodging it....