What's new

POF Targets NATO Standards.

.
Yaaar job can be done by arrow than why G 3 chalti ka naam is not gadi

Adopt yourself with tech compare G 3 with it latest succesor G 36 you see majpr differen e

G 3 was best when in 70s time has gone yes it is fine even ww2 weapons of german was great like usa made thompson was a great machine gun of time do u keep it because it was great gun no when you have somethimg better than why not
I promote advancement... But most of our soldiers are used and experienced to G3. Our necessity right now does not require much modernization though when we have a stable country,we can plan to replace it.
 
.
I'm not sure if you mean Pakistani soldiers, but the export version of the POF-5 has plenty of reviews and describing videos (videos made by foreigners):


PK-08
View attachment 228916[/QUOTE
I'm not sure if you mean Pakistani soldiers, but the export version of the POF-5 has plenty of reviews and describing videos (videos made by foreigners):


PK-08
View attachment 228916
Again these videos are not produced locally and the pictures are of HK33 not PK8
 
.
Again these videos are not produced locally and the pictures are of HK33 not PK8
The weapons are produced locally. Undeniably though, PoF needs to improve its marketing.
The pictures were labelled PK-8 where I found them, but since the PK-8 is essentially a modified version of the HK33/G-3 Platform, it's easy to confuse.
 
.
Some pof stuff is good others need improvement. Until or unless the govt dosnt invest to upgrade the infrastructure of both POF and HIT we cannot compete with western arms industry.
 
.
Sell us some Guns too. Promise we won't use them against you.

INSAS is crap!!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom