PMLN, PTI and other parties sub forum

[P@kistan]

PMLN, PTI and other parties sub forum

I request admin to make subforums of political parties because noticed that some pro pti mods allowing anti pmln posts but deleting anything pro pmln even in sticky thread of PMLN.

This is unfair. Why are PTI supporter mods insecure, just by saying "youthia" they take an action but they don't take any action if someone says "patwari".

Very huge numbers of PMLN supporters are getting banned for small things because of some insecure mods and pti workers on this forum.

My suggestion:

1. Subforums for each political party
2. Just like you have option to select branch of armed forces, add an option for political party support also and it should be visible.
3. No PTI users should be allowed in PMLN forum and same for other forums.

Moderator of PMLN forum should be PRO PMLN user.

Admin don't turn this forum into siasatpk where only you see PTI supporters gaali galouch. They make the place dirty and leave the place.

I dont care if suggestion is implemented or not but this forum will get damage more like this specially the political talk/section.

 

[Maula Jatt]

At this point only solution is *** of this forum start demanding Chak Bamu to come out of retirement and save Thier butts

 

[hunter_hunted]

Management is Neutral as how it should be. You ****are not special, Everyone gets kick on their rear end from mods

 

[Black.Mamba]

PMLN, PTI and other parties sub forum

I request admin to make subforums of political parties because noticed that some pro pti mods allowing anti pmln posts but deleting anything pro pmln even in sticky thread of PMLN.

This is unfair. Why are PTI supporter mods insecure, just by saying "youthia" they take an action but they don't take any action if someone says "patwari".

Very huge numbers of PMLN supporters are getting banned for small things because of some insecure mods and pti workers on this forum.

My suggestion:

1. Subforums for each political party
2. Just like you have option to select branch of armed forces, add an option for political party support also and it should be visible.
3. No PTI users should be allowed in PMLN forum and same for other forums.

Moderator of PMLN forum should be PRO PMLN user.

Admin don't turn this forum into siasatpk where only you see PTI supporters gaali galouch. They make the place dirty and leave the place.

I dont care if suggestion is implemented or not but this forum will get damage more like this specially the political talk/section.

Oh so you are back again with one of your old ID's.

Wonders of having a VPN, you can get to travel the whole world while in reality, I reckon you might not have moved beyond chechawatni

 

[shayyman]

3. No PTI users should be allowed in PMLN forum and same for other forums.

Lol. ***** are really feeling the heat. But forgetting that "Beggars can't be choosers. "

Live with it.

 

[P@kistan]

and warning and ban on below post, which rule was broken in below post. If pti users can post shahbaz sharif not getting good welcome on foreign visit, i cant post same for IK?

Oh so you are back again with one of your old ID's.

Wonders of having a VPN, you can get to travel the whole world while in reality, I reckon you might not have moved beyond chechawatni

Lol. Patwaris are really feeling the heat. But forgetting that "Beggars can't be choosers. "

Live with it.

Is this not trolling?

 

[IceCold]

What are you on about? We regularly get warnings as well, I did too. Why should you be treated special? Haven't you lot got enough of special treatment by establishment, courts and every other institution? Courts open for you at 12 AM while PTI struggles to even get their application submitted, forget about a decision on a reference filed by the President of Pakistan.
The mockery which is being made of the entire judicial system to support your party isn't enough?
PMLN bot teams are creating fake accounts to spread propaganda. Everyone can see that. You are not here to debate but just to spread the propaganda of one party.
Stop whining!

 

[Black.Mamba]

and warning and ban on below post, which rule was broken in below post. If pti users can post shahbaz sharif not getting good welcome on foreign visit, i cant post same for IK?

Is this not trolling?

No, it's not. My post highlighted two aspects; Having multiple IDs and the Use of a VPN
are not allowed here while you create multiple IDs on daily basis and you travel from the US to France to Sweden to Pakistan faster than the speed of light. It is about time you have some introspection.

 

[Rahil khan]

What are you on about? We regularly get warnings as well, I did too. Why should you be treated special? Haven't you lot got enough of special treatment by establishment, courts and every other institution? Courts open for you at 12 AM while PTI struggles to even get their application submitted, forget about a decision on a reference filed by the President of Pakistan.
The mockery which is being made of the entire judicial system to support your party isn't enough?
PMLN bot teams are creating fake accounts to spread propaganda. Everyone can see that. You are not here to debate but just to spread the propaganda of one party.
Stop whining!

ISLAMABAD:
Islamabad High Court (IHC) Chief Justice Athar Minallah on Monday sought a response from PTI Chairman and former premier Imran Khan whether he “reposes trust in the court to proceed with the petitions in hand” till May 12 (Thursday).
The orders came as CJ Minallah was supposed to hear the petition filed by former information minister Fawad Chaudhry challenging the registration of blasphemy cases against the PTI leadership.
However, the IHC CJ refused to conduct the hearing, saying that Advocate Faisal Chaudhry must first ask the party leadership whether they trusted the court.
“The narrative that the Supreme Court and the high courts are compromised is still being spread," CJ Minallah observed.
"This court can work for 24 hours a day," he said, asking if the petitioner had any objection with the court that the court may look into.
Justice Minallah criticised the rhetoric of the ousted government, reminding that it was the same court that provided relief to the PTI at 11pm during the 2014 sit-in.
“This court in the case titled ‘The State vs Dr Firdous Ashiq Awan’ has highlighted the legal provisions and duty of a court to allow access to any aggrieved person to file a petition of an urgent nature at any time. It was pursuant to this duty that a constitutional petition was allowed late at night and several workers of the PTI arrested in FIR No 330, dated 12-09-2014, were ordered to be released.
“It is only in exceptional circumstances that petitions are entertained and appropriate orders are passed even after the notified timings of the court. Nonetheless, neither the august Supreme Court nor this court had held any proceedings nor orders were passed in the evening of April 9, 2022.”
The court said that notwithstanding that no proceedings had caused any prejudice to the petitioners or the leadership of PTI, it was of utmost importance that they “have trust and confidence in the independence and impartiality of the court”.

“If you have the slightest doubt that the high court and the Supreme Court were compromised, let me know,” the high court justice reiterated.
The chief justice also questioned the "irresponsible reporting", saying that “some analysts created an atmosphere that a martial law was imminent.”
He further censured the PTI for flaming doubts on the country's institutions when Imran questioned courts opening at night
On the IHC CJ's remarks, PTI counsel Faisal Chaudhry said that he would again ask the petitioner if they wanted to withdraw the petition from the IHC.
CJ Minallah said the PTI did not have confidence in the courts and had been telling the public that the courts had been compromised.
In efforts to prompt a response, the CJ stated, “Imran Khan is constantly questioning the court, do Imran Khan and PTI not trust the court?”
Advocate Faisal stated that he had confidence in the high court and urged the judge to hear the case.
CJ Minallah expressed his disappointment with the party’s comments, stating, “it is unfortunate that a political leader stands in a meeting and tells workers that the courts have been compromised.”
The IHC CJ stated that the court respected the leaders of all the democratic parties. However, the PTI had accused him of owning an apartment in Manchester, adding that Honorable Justice Mansoor Ali Shah was also not spared.
The IHC directed counsel Faisal to take instructions and inform the court whether PTI chairman Imran had confidence in them, otherwise the case would be sent to a different bench.
The IHC also extended the protective bail of PTI leaders Fawad Chaudhry and Shahbaz Gilll till May 12.
Furthermore, the court issued notices to the parties, including the interior ministry and the Islamabad IG to submit their replies by May 12.

IHC wants to know whether Imran trusts courts | The Express Tribune

Seeks reply from PTI chairman till May 12 in blasphemy case

tribune.com.pk

 

[P@kistan]

No, it's not. My post highlighted two aspects; Having multiple IDs and the Use of a VPN
are not allowed here while you create multiple IDs on daily basis and you travel from the US to France to Sweden to Pakistan faster than the speed of light. It is about time you have some introspection.

Fools Nightmare getting banned every other day just because he supports PMLN
Retired mods getting -ive rating from "The -PTI- Accountant" for smallest things but they ignore if some pti supporter call other person "b****"
Many others are also getting banned.

Quality of this forum is at stake because of these insecure PTI supporters and mods. If they can remain civil maybe then others will, but they dont remain civil but when they get reply in same way. They cry and run to pti mods.

 

[Black.Mamba]

Fools Nightmare getting banned every other day just because he supports PMLN
Retired mods getting -ive rating from "The -PTI- Accountant" for smallest things but they ignore if some pti supporter call other person "b****"
Many others are also getting banned.

Quality of this forum is at stake because of these insecure PTI supporters and mods. If they can remain civil maybe then others will, but they dont remain civil but when they get reply in same way. They cry and run to pti mods.

Do not change the goal post, first answer about your multiple IDs and use of VPN then I'll ponder over your other concerns.

 

[IceCold]

ISLAMABAD:
Islamabad High Court (IHC) Chief Justice Athar Minallah on Monday sought a response from PTI Chairman and former premier Imran Khan whether he “reposes trust in the court to proceed with the petitions in hand” till May 12 (Thursday).
The orders came as CJ Minallah was supposed to hear the petition filed by former information minister Fawad Chaudhry challenging the registration of blasphemy cases against the PTI leadership.
However, the IHC CJ refused to conduct the hearing, saying that Advocate Faisal Chaudhry must first ask the party leadership whether they trusted the court.
“The narrative that the Supreme Court and the high courts are compromised is still being spread," CJ Minallah observed.
"This court can work for 24 hours a day," he said, asking if the petitioner had any objection with the court that the court may look into.
Justice Minallah criticised the rhetoric of the ousted government, reminding that it was the same court that provided relief to the PTI at 11pm during the 2014 sit-in.
“This court in the case titled ‘The State vs Dr Firdous Ashiq Awan’ has highlighted the legal provisions and duty of a court to allow access to any aggrieved person to file a petition of an urgent nature at any time. It was pursuant to this duty that a constitutional petition was allowed late at night and several workers of the PTI arrested in FIR No 330, dated 12-09-2014, were ordered to be released.
“It is only in exceptional circumstances that petitions are entertained and appropriate orders are passed even after the notified timings of the court. Nonetheless, neither the august Supreme Court nor this court had held any proceedings nor orders were passed in the evening of April 9, 2022.”
The court said that notwithstanding that no proceedings had caused any prejudice to the petitioners or the leadership of PTI, it was of utmost importance that they “have trust and confidence in the independence and impartiality of the court”.

“If you have the slightest doubt that the high court and the Supreme Court were compromised, let me know,” the high court justice reiterated.
The chief justice also questioned the "irresponsible reporting", saying that “some analysts created an atmosphere that a martial law was imminent.”
He further censured the PTI for flaming doubts on the country's institutions when Imran questioned courts opening at night
On the IHC CJ's remarks, PTI counsel Faisal Chaudhry said that he would again ask the petitioner if they wanted to withdraw the petition from the IHC.
CJ Minallah said the PTI did not have confidence in the courts and had been telling the public that the courts had been compromised.
In efforts to prompt a response, the CJ stated, “Imran Khan is constantly questioning the court, do Imran Khan and PTI not trust the court?”
Advocate Faisal stated that he had confidence in the high court and urged the judge to hear the case.
CJ Minallah expressed his disappointment with the party’s comments, stating, “it is unfortunate that a political leader stands in a meeting and tells workers that the courts have been compromised.”
The IHC CJ stated that the court respected the leaders of all the democratic parties. However, the PTI had accused him of owning an apartment in Manchester, adding that Honorable Justice Mansoor Ali Shah was also not spared.
The IHC directed counsel Faisal to take instructions and inform the court whether PTI chairman Imran had confidence in them, otherwise the case would be sent to a different bench.
The IHC also extended the protective bail of PTI leaders Fawad Chaudhry and Shahbaz Gilll till May 12.
Furthermore, the court issued notices to the parties, including the interior ministry and the Islamabad IG to submit their replies by May 12.

IHC wants to know whether Imran trusts courts | The Express Tribune

Seeks reply from PTI chairman till May 12 in blasphemy case

tribune.com.pk

Pakistan ranks 130 out of 139 countries on rule of Law. Nuff said!

 

[P@kistan]

Pakistan ranks 130 out of 139 countries on rule of Law. Nuff said!

Pakistan slides 16 spots on corruption perceptions index, now ranks 140 out of 180 countries: report​

Pakistan slides 16 spots on corruption perceptions index, now ranks 140 out of 180 countries: report

Under the PTI govt, Pakistan's ranking on Transparency International's index has deteriorated every year.

www.dawn.com

"Under the PTI government, the ranking of Pakistan has gradually slid. In 2019, it was 120 out of 180 countries, in 2020, it was 124 and in 2021 it worsened further to 140. In 2018, during the PML-N government, the ranking was 117 out of 180 countries."

 

[Jango]

I request admin to make subforums of political parties because noticed that some pro pti mods allowing anti pmln posts but deleting anything pro pmln even in sticky thread of PMLN.

This is unfair. Why are PTI supporter mods insecure, just by saying "youthia" they take an action but they don't take any action if someone says "patwari".

I won't comment on the rest of the post, will leave that for the more active and senior moderators here, but for the above quoted part, I myself have deleted multiple posts where the word patwari was used, and even pro-PTI people were warned.

Just laying it out there.

Admin don't turn this forum into siasatpk where only you see PTI supporters gaali galouch. They make the place dirty and leave the place.

This is interesting. If majority of the members of this forum and also siasatpk and other forums are pro-PTI, then doesn't it mean the majority of the public and general users are PTI followers? Doesn't it speak about the popularity of PTI?

To jab zyada awam PTI supporter hai, to phir is main masla kia hai?

 

[Raja420]

This forum should be equal to every Pakistani. I say we should ban the Indian posters on this platform.