What's new

PLA Air to Air Missiles/ PAF AA--Details

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
This topic will give a brief view of Pak China AA defence. Some recently inducted Chinese missile and,where Pakistan armed forces standing in comparison to our rival neighbor AA inventory,which has front line Russian AA inventory.A short history of Chinese missiles and import of technology


Background

The PLA-AF and PLA-N operate a diverse mix of indigenously manufactured and imported Russian Air to Air Missiles (AAM), carried by a no less diverse fleet of combat aircraft.

While imported Russian R-27 / AA-10 Alamo, R-73 / AA-11 Archer and R-77 / AA-12 Adder AAMs are primarily used with the imported Russian built Su-27SK / J-11A and Su-30MKK/MK3 Flankers, indigenous Chinese built weapons are dominant across the Chinese built fleets of J-10A/S Sinocanard, J-11B Sino-Flanker, J-8 Finback, J-7 Fishbed, J-6 Farmer, A-5/Q-5 Fantan, and JH-7 Flying Leopard.
China manufactures only two Beyond Visual Range (BVR) guided AAMs, the active radar guided PL-12/SD-10 “Sino-AMRAAM” and a reverse engineered semi-active radar guided Selenia Aspide Mk.1, designated the PL-11.

A much more diverse inventory of heatseeking short range weapons exists. These include analogues or derivatives of a range of Western missiles, such as the AIM-9 family and Rafael Python 3 series, and uniquely Chinese developments such as the TY-90, designed for air combat between helicopters.

Most Chinese built AAMs have been adapted for use as SAMs, either land based, naval, or both. Most are also being offered widely for export.

In perspective, the unpalatable reality of this decade is that Australia's RAAF faces a genuine 'rainbow threat' environment across the wider region. The sheer diversity of missile types in service or being introduced, be they of US, Russian, EU, Israeli or Chinese origin, and the prospect of evolving regional clone variants and derivatives, presents a genuine long term problem in intelligence gathering, analysis and countermeasures library maintenance.

Two key issues have arisen during this decade. The first is the large scale export of advanced variants of the Russian R-74, R-27 and R-77, arming MiG and Sukhoi fighters. These weapons are highly competitive against US and EU sourced AAMs operated by the RAAF, and can be expected to further evolve over time. With diverse mixes of seeker types in the BVR missiles, defending against them will present real challenges. A robust apporach will require investment in training, including simulation, tactics development, and adequate electronic and infrared countermeasures on RAAF aircraft. none of these considerations have been addressed to date in existing or planned RAAF aircraft.

The second issue to arise is the future export of very long range 'AWACS killer' missiles, which are the poor man's equaliser against an opponent with an advantage in AEW&C capabilities. Much of the current force structure plan is predicated on the RAAF holding an assymetric advantage in AEW&C capability over any opponent, indefinitely. Missiles such as the R-172 and R-37 allow any Sukhoi operator to threaten an opposing AEW&C aircraft from a safe distance.

There can be no doubt that a future RAAF force structure will have to be planned around missile capabilities now developing across the region, and compromises are simply not an option in the long term.
Resources

Australian Aviation - August 2004 - The Sleeping Giant Awakens (PLA-AF/PLA-N)
Defence Today - Sept 2004 - 2010+ Regional Futures
Defence Today - January/February 2006 - Regional Developments 2005
R.D. Fisher - IASC - China’s Emerging 5th Generation Air-to-Air Missiles (Recommended)


LETRI “PL-13” “Sino-Meteor”

PL-13-Illustration-1S.jpg

In 2008 an image appeared on the Chinese internet showing a solid ramjet powered AAM evidently based on the existing PL-12 design. The status of this design is not clear. Conceptually it is closest to the MBDA Meteor AAM planned for the Royal Air Force.

If such a missile is in development it would likely be similar in performance to the Meteor, which has exceptionally high endgame lethality due to the increased sustained G capability arising from persistent engine thrust, compared to conventional single and dual pulse rocket AAMs.
MBDA-Meteor-BVR-AAM-1S.jpg

MBDA Meteor (MBDA).


LETRI SD-10/PL-12 “Sino-AMRAAM”

PL-12-SD-10A-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-1S.jpg

China's indigenous equivalent to the AMRAAM is the PL-12/SD-10, claimed to use the seeker and other components from the Russian R-77 AMRAAM-ski. Credited with competitive performance against the AMRAAM, the PL-12 is expected to be deployed on the Su-27, Su-30, J-10 (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

While some confusion remains about designations, most sources identify the SD-10 and PL-12 as the same missile, China's equivalent to the AMRAAM. This weapon is in sizing and configuration very similar to the AIM-120A, but employs a unique tail planform. Equipped with an active radar seeker, and datalink aided inertial midcourse guidance, this missile is a credible player against the AMRAAM and R-77 series. The indigenous AMR-1 active seeker is identified with the PL-12, and numerous reports exist claiming that it is a derivative of the Russian Agat 9B-1348E seeker package used in the R-77 series. The missile is widely credited with superior range performance to the AIM-120A-C variants.

The production status of the PL-12 is unclear, but the missile has been claimed as a future weapon for the indigenous J-10 fighter and the Su-27SK and Su-30, replacing imported R-77s on the latter. The missile has been photographed on the J-10A, J-10S and J-11B.

A variant with an all aspect infrared seeker may exist, analogous to Russian heatseeking variants of the R-27 / AA-10 Alamo and R-77 / AA-12 Adder.

There is little doubt that the PL-12 closes most of the technology gap between Chinese built BVR missiles, and in service Western BVR missiles.
PL-12-SD-10A-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-3S.jpg

Radome of PL-12 / SD-10A on display at Zhuhai 2008 (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

PL-12-SD-10A-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-4S.jpg

Tail section of PL-12 / SD-10A on display at Zhuhai 2008 (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

SD-10A-Sino-AMRAAM-PLAAF-APA-1S.jpg

PL-12 / SD-10A on display at Datangshan in 2010 (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010, Air Power Australia).

SD-10A-Sino-AMRAAM-J-8F-PLAN-APA-1S.jpg

PL-12 / SD-10A being loaded on PLA-N J-8F Finback D fighter (Chinese Internet).
SD-10A-Sino-AMRAAM-PLAAF-APA-2S.jpg

Detail of RF proximity fuse antennas on PL-12 / SD-10A (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010, Air Power Australia).
 
Luoyang PL-ASR/PL-10 High Agility Close Combat Missile

PL-ASR-AAM-Illustration-1S.jpg

This illustration of the PL-ASR, also labelled the PL-10, emerged on a Chinese internet site during 2008. The weapon is claimed to include a Lock On After Launch (LOAL) capability, suggesting a high performance strapdown inertial midcourse package in the guidance section. The design includes coupled TVC vanes and tail controls to permit over the shoulder shots, intended for use with a Helmet Mounted Sight or Display. Conceptually the missile appears closest to the joint South African - Brazilian Denel A-Darter.

Denel-A-Darter-Cutaway-1S.png

Denel A-Darter Cutaway (Denel).

SAST PL-11/FD-60 Aspide

PL-11A-Aspide-AAM-1S.jpg

The PL-11 was the first Chinese built radar guided AAM to be deployed in large numbers. The design is a direct derivative of the monopulse semi-active homing Aspide Mk.1 carried by Italian F-104S Starfighters, both of the latter systems now retired.

The PL-11 is derived from a licenced copy of the Selenia Aspide, itself an improved variant of the AIM-7E Sparrow. China had initially experimented with cloning the AIM-7B as the Luoyang PL-4, with a heatseeking and semi-active radar variant planned. This project was abandoned during the 1980s, in favour of the improved PL-10, itself abandoned later in favour of the licenced Aspide, the latter having the advantage of a jam resistant monopulse seeker.

While it is known that Selenia withdrew support for the Aspide licence following 1989, the PL-11 was nevertheless deployed in the 1990s, on the indigenous J-8B Finback. Three variants are cited, the basic semi-active homing PL-11 equivalent to an Aspide Mk.1, the improved PL-11A with more range and a midcourse inertial unit permitting terminal phase only illumination, and the PL-11B or PL-11AMR, claimed to be equipped with an active radar seeker and equivalent to the defunct UK BAe Active Skyflash or Aspide Mk.2 - both AIM-7 derivatives.

The export variant is designated the FD-60.
PL-10-AAM-1S.jpg

PL-11 Aspide.

AMR-1-Active-Radar-Seeker-1S.jpg

AMR-1 monopulse active radar homing seeker developed for the PL-11B.
 

Luoyang PL-9


PL-9C-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-1S.jpg

The PL-9 was introduced during the 1990s, and is a separate evolution of the PL-5 series, with capabilities similar to the AIM-9L/M (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

The PL-9 is conceptually closest to the AIM-9P and appears to be an evolution of the PL-5 series missile, although Chinese sources claim the missile outperforms the AIM-9L/M. Production status of this missile remains unclear.
PL-9C-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-2S.jpg

Detail of the PL-9C displayed at Zhuhai 2008 (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

PL-9C-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-3S.jpg


Luoyang PL-8 / Rafael Python 3

PL-8-Python-3+PL-11-Aspide-J-10S-2009-1S.jpg


PL-8 Python 3 and PL-11 Aspide AAMs carried by a Chengdu J-10S Vigourous Dragon of the PLA-AF (Chinese internet image).

The PL-8 is a legally licenced copy of the Israeli Rafael Python 3 WVR missile, the predecessor to the widely exported and highly agile Python 4. Production of the PL-8 commenced during the late 1980s, five years after initial negotiations, the weapon has been integrated on a wide range of aircraft, including the J-7E Fishbed, J-8B/D Finback and new J-10 and J-11B. Comparable to the AIM-9L in basic performance, the PL-8 is an all aspect WVR missile designed for close combat, and credited with a 35 G capability. Chinese sources claim it has been integrated with a helmet mounted sight.

The Python 3 is credited with between 35 and 50 kills during the 1982 Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon.
PL-8-Sino-Python-PLAAF-APA-1S.jpg

PL-8 on display at Datangshan in 2010 (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010, Air Power Australia).

PL-8-Sino-Python-PLAAF-APA-4S.jpg

PL-8 seeker window. This example appears to be a training round and may not use authentic window materials, the grey colour suggests the use of a Magnesium Fluoride glass for all aspect 4 micron band operation (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010, Air Power Australia).

PL-8-Sino-Python-PLAAF-APA-2S.jpg

PL-8 canard controls and laser proximity fuse windows (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010, Air Power Australia).

PL-8-Sino-Python-PLAAF-APA-3S.jpg

PL-8 tail section. The roll stabilisers are concealed by protective covers (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010, Air Power Australia).
 
Vympel R-3/R-13, Luoyang/Hanzhong PL-2/PL-5 / AA-2 Atoll

PL-5E-II-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-1S.jpg

The PL-5E-II is the latest evolution of the cloned Chinese R-13, and is comparable in configuration to the AIM-9L/M Sidewinders (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).


The R-3 and R-13 missiles were the first clones of the Sidewinder, based on captured examples of the early AIM-9B. The initial R-3S/K-13A/K-13T) was a direct cone entering production during the early 1960s and widely exported to Soviet clients. A semiactive homing variant, similar to the AIM-9C on the F-8 Crusader, the K-13R/R-3R entered production during 1966. The subsequent R-13M/R-3M/K-13M and improved R-13M1 were introduced during the 1970s, equivalents to the AIM-9G.

The Soviet R-13 was cloned by China as the PL-2, which later evolved into the PL-3 and PL-5 missiles. No less than four variants of the PL-5 are identified. The PL-5A was equivalent to the K-13R, but the program was cancelled during the 1980s. The PL-5B did not enter production until the 1980s, despite initial development starting two decades earlier. The PL-5C is an improved PL-5B widely used by PLA-AF and PLA-N units. The latest PL-5E is an attempt to outperform the AIM-9L/M series, using an all aspect seeker, AIM-9L style double delta canards, a 40 degree off boresight capability, and 40G manoeuvre capability. PL-5 variants are used on the J-7 Fishbed, J-8 Finback, FH-7 and Q-5 Fantan, J-7s and Q-5 having been widely exported in Asia.

PL-5E-II-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-2S.jpg

PL-5E-II Magnesium Fluoride seeker window. The choice of material indicates a 4 micron band detector (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

PL-2A-AAM-1S.jpg

Early models of the PL-2, PL-2A above and PL-2B below, were cloned Soviet K-13 / AA-2 Atoll derivatives.

Vympel-K-13A-Atoll-AAM-1S.jpg

The Vympel K-13A is a reverse engineered AIM-9B Sidewinder (Wikipedia image).
 
TY-90/PL-90 Helicopter Air Air Missile

TY-90-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-2S.jpg

TY-90 short range AAM (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

TY-90-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-3S.jpg

TY-90 short range AAM (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

TY-90-AAM-Zhenguan-Studio-1S.jpg

TY-90 short range AAM (image © 2009, Zhenguan Studio).

Russian AAMs in PLA Service

Vympel R-77 / RVV-AE / AA-12 Adder
R-77-Adder-Launch-1.jpg

The R-77 was developed as a counter to the AIM-120 AMRAAM, and is often dubbed the AMRAAM-ski. This weapon uses large strakes for lift enhancement, and unique lattice tail controls, derived from an TBM design. Developed during the 1980s, it entered service a decade later on the MiG-29 and Su-27/30 series fighters.

The R-77 employs conceptually similar guidance to the AMRAAM, with an inertial unit, datalink uplink receiver and a terminal seeker, specifically the 9B-1348E in the baseline active radar variant. The missile is credited with an A-pole range of 54 NMI, the capability to defeat a 12G target, can be launched at 8 G, and requires an AAKU/AKU-170 launcher.

More recently reports have emerged of new seeker options for the missile, following the pattern in the R-27. The R-77T uses an MK-80M seeker from a later model Archer, the R-77P a variant of the 9B-1032 X-band anti-radiation seeker.

A rocket-ramjet variant of the missile has been in development since the 1990s, as a counter to the EU Meteor. Designated the RVV-AE-PD, and often labelled the R-77M, this weapon is claimed to achieve an A-pole range of 86.5 NMI. It is unclear what the production status of this model is.

Variants of the R-77 have been exported to most current operators of late model MiG-29 and Su-27/30 series fighters, and there are claims the missile may have been licenced by China. The seeker and guidance package are known to have been licenced by China for use in the PL-12/SD-10 Sino-AMRAAM.

Vympel R-73/R-74 / AA-11 Archer
Vympel-R-73E-Archer-4S.jpg


The R-60 was superceded in frontline Soviet units during the 1980s by the R-73 missile, at that time the most capable WVR missile in service and the first fourth generation design. The R-73 introduced key design innovations, including thrust vectoring for post launch agility, canard vanes for high turn performance, a gimballed agile MK-80 seeker capable of 45 degree off boresight acquisition, and an interface to the Shchel 3U series helmet mounted sight. The AIM-9X, ASRAAM and Python 4 were developed to counter the early models of the R-73. The R-73 has been primarily deployed on the MiG-29 Fulcrum and Su-27/30 Flanker, and is part of the standard weapons kit supplied with either fighter for export. R-73 missiles are carried on APU-73 launchers.

The R-73 has further evolved. The R-73EL introduced a laser proximity fuse during the mid 1990s, replacing the radio-frequency fuse in earlier models. The R-73M increased range and improved off boresight capability to 60 degrees. The latest R-74 includes digital processing techniques, and is claimed to have a 75 degree off boresight capability. It is likely that future R-74 derivatives will include FPA seeker technology.

Vympel R-27 / AA-10 Alamo

Vympel-R-27R+R-27T-1S.jpg

Comparison of short burn R-27T1 heatseeker and long burn R-27ER SARH variants. Note the larger motor of the latter variant (KnAAPO).

The Vympel R-27 was introduced as a BVR missile to arm the MiG-29 Fulcrum and Su-27/30 Flanker, making it a contemporary to the R-73 missile. Much larger than the competing AIM-7 series, the R-27 outranged the AIM-7 by a respectable margin.

Unlike the Sparrow, the R-27 is supplied with two distinct rocket engine configurations, and a range of seekers. R-27 missiles are thus divided into 'short burn' and 'long burn' variants, recognised by the length of the missile fuselage.

In terms of seekers, the baseline semi-active radar guided variants are equipped with a 9B-1101K seeker, these being the short burn R-27R1 credited with 43 NMI range, and the long burn R-27ER1 credited with 70 NMI range. These employ midcourse datalink support, but require terminal illumination. The R-27T1 and R-27ET1 employ derivatives of the R-73's MK-80 agile infrared seeker, compatible with a helmet mounted sight. The R-27P and R-27EP employ a 9B-1032 X-band passive anti-radiation seeker, intended to force an opposing fighter to go 'nose cold'.

The most recent enhancement to the R-27 series is the upgrade option of fitting an Agat 9B-1103M active radar seeker and supporting midcourse guidance package, based on the 9B-1348E seeker in the R-77. A fully digital derivative of this seeker, with improved acquisition performance, is available, using Texas Instruments TMS320 processing hardware. Upgraded missiles are designated the R-27A and R-27EA.

The R-27 despite its size and 1970s origins remains a formidable missile, and with the diversity of seekers possible presents genuine issues for a defending aircraft's countermeasures suite. The weapons is in service with all regional operators of MiG-29 and Su-27/30 series fighters, and Chinese sources claim the R-27P has been sighted on the J-8II Finback.

Su-35-R-27ET1-P8210525.jpg

Long burn R-27ET1 heatseeker variant under the wing of an Su-35 demonstrator (KnAAPO).
 
shd be posted in WMD and missiles section - i fail to understand why people act like i****s!!!
 
Great information. PAF should be the biggest forces in the future of the Pakistani Armed Forces. The battle in the air will decide the course of all future wars anywhere in the world. The PAF needs to diversify its missile inventory for all (short, medium and long) range targets. Thanks for sharing this information.
 
Great information. PAF should be the biggest forces in the future of the Pakistani Armed Forces. The battle in the air will decide the course of all future wars anywhere in the world. The PAF needs to diversify its missile inventory for all (short, medium and long) range targets. Thanks for sharing this information.

the PAF is all set with US, French, Chinese & AWC missiles of all types!
 
Great information. PAF should be the biggest forces in the future of the Pakistani Armed Forces. The battle in the air will decide the course of all future wars anywhere in the world. The PAF needs to diversify its missile inventory for all (short, medium and long) range targets. Thanks for sharing this information.
Thanks and Pakistan has biggest inventory of Chinese missile tech, which is quite helpful to understand the Russian technology India has. Because majority of missile are reverse tech of Russians. Plus few western missile are tech transfer from US. Which is not necessarily superior in class.
 
Chinese defence products were once thought of as being moderately capable copies of previous-generation hardware that contained attributes of Russian, European and Israeli designs. Some of those bloodlines can still be seen in their designs, but the products now being seen at an expo like CIDEX show that Chinese firms have capabilities that approach first world industrial, state-of-the-art levels of sophistication.

In the 1990s, when the Russian defence was in danger of drying up and closing its doors due to an almost complete collapse in any funding from their own government, it was China that saved the day. China bought billions in military hardware from Russia, but it also sent its engineers, designers and technicians to study inside of Russian industry to learn how the weapons it was purchasing had been developed in the first place.

This transfer of technological know-how, plus some enormous investments by the Chinese military into its state-owned industries (what more than one Russian has referred to as “uncontrolled and rampant modernisation”) has produced a defence electronics industry that far outstrips the size and capacity of that which existed in Russia when Chinese industry first began their cooperation with Moscow in the early 1990s.

Today the former students (the Chinese) have become the masters. Chinese industry now has the ability to produce components that the Russian electronics industry (after almost two decades of no investment by their government) is no longer capable of either designing or manufacturing. The initial failure rates on the production of transmit/receive (T/R) modules for the Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars being designed for the Mikoyan MiG-35 and the Sukhoi T-50/PAK-FA 5th-generation fighter, for example, were so high that it would have bankrupted any western firm involved in a similar programme.

Not surprisingly, this year’s CIDEX show saw groups of Russian specialists going through the halls and looking for components that they could source out of China to be utilised in Russian-designed weapon systems. Russian specialists will point out that they are now at a huge disadvantage to the Chinese in two very significant respects.

One is that the commitment by the central government in resources to the defence electronics sector is both sustained and serious. “They can take a field where there is nothing but flat land and wild grass,” said one Russian company representative, “and the next thing you know there is a full-blown factory or design centre there turning out a world-class product.”
International Assessment and Strategy Center > Research > Report from the 2010 Chinese Defense Electronics Exhibition (CIDEX): Growing Industry – Advancing Technology
 
Well, its not a doubt, in present day tech scenario, countries are more incline to develop weapon rather then platforms. Now the countries are refurbishing their old planes and reusing them as " flying platform or launching pad". Where they have more emphasis on inducting latest radar and increase BVR capability of older plane. We have living example of B1 bomber still work horse for precision strikes in Afghanistan. Which was developed in 60s.
 
Back
Top Bottom