Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In your desperation you have missed the PAF losses also listed there.NATO losses 31 fixed wing aircrafts and 107 rotary wing aircrafts in Afghanistan against a few to none losses of Taliban. According to your logic this means " Taliban is better than NATO in air power".
how many aircraft did Nato lose in Aerial engagements and dog fights?NATO losses 31 fixed wing aircrafts and 107 rotary wing aircrafts in Afghanistan against a few to none losses of Taliban. According to your logic this means " Taliban is better than NATO in air power".
But what about number of sorties by these air forces...In your desperation you have missed the PAF losses also listed there.
well have seen Taliban lose a fighter aircraft....total stealth technologyNATO losses 31 fixed wing aircrafts and 107 rotary wing aircrafts in Afghanistan against a few to none losses of Taliban. According to your logic this means " Taliban is better than NATO in air power".
oh yes and indian fart bolts of lightening too until they see PAFBut what about number of sorties by these air forces...
IAF used air power extensively compared to PAF... PAF having suffered an attrition rate of 1.8189 aircraft lost per hundred sorties flown during the war, that is, an attrition rate of 1.82 per cent. But IAF attrition rate works out to 1.4986 aircraft lost for 100 sorties flown. In other words, the Indian Air Force suffered an attrition rate of 1.50 per cent compared to Pakistan’s 1. 82 per cent.
Also 35 of IAF aircraft lost on the ground during pre-emptive strikes...
Let me make it easy for you, in the Western sector during the 1971 war, the IAF flew some 4000 sorties compared to some 2840 for the PAF.... possessing three times the strength of the PAF, that is an impossibly low sortie rate.But what about number of sorties by these air forces...
IAF used air power extensively compared to PAF... PAF having suffered an attrition rate of 1.8189 aircraft lost per hundred sorties flown during the war, that is, an attrition rate of 1.82 per cent. But IAF attrition rate works out to 1.4986 aircraft lost for 100 sorties flown. In other words, the Indian Air Force suffered an attrition rate of 1.50 per cent compared to Pakistan’s 1. 82 per cent.
Also 35 of IAF aircraft lost on the ground during pre-emptive strikes...
NATO losses 31 fixed wing aircrafts and 107 rotary wing aircrafts in Afghanistan against a few to none losses of Taliban. According to your logic this means " Taliban is better than NATO in air power".
and these are all from PAF selfi cameras ? i could just count nine and not even in one, it clearly identifies a IAF planLet me make it easy for you, in the Western sector during the 1971 war, the IAF flew some 4000 sorties compared to some 2840 for the PAF.... possessing three times the strength of the PAF, that is an impossibly low sortie rate.
In any case, the topic here is air to air kills (hence the gun camera images) where IAF again always had the numerical advantage....the extensive IAF ground losses are another chapter
Well, maybe you can recognise some of the dozens IAF pilots shot down and captured as POW.and these are all from PAF selfi cameras ? i could just count nine and not even in one, it clearly identifies a IAF plan
good one, all sardar pilots.. by the way, 90000 **** POW will not even fit into a hundred photographsWell, maybe you can recognise some of the dozens IAF pilots shot down and captured as POW.
BTW, this is in just one camp alone.
View attachment 445186
Typical Indian escape to salvage their tiny ego, i guess you people are lead to believe that those 90 000 were all military personal and there were no Indian POW.good one, all sardar pilots.. by the way, 90000 **** POW will not even fit into a hundred photographs