What's new

Photographs of beaten Israeli soldiers aboard Mavi Marmara Gaza Aid Flotilla

Such as...??? And please provide a credible source that said those options were never tried.

Options:

Fair enough i will answer, but i want to get 1 thing crystal clear: I am all for Israel's right for survival and existance and its soverign right to security.

What i am not for is the way Israel conducts itself in the middle-east, this approach is very counter-productive and stoaks the embers of hatred and terror.

Now back to your question:
Options available: Well both Navy CGS use the following:

Ram the Vessel "Oldest tactic of forcing compliance" - This has been tried and tested.

Using Warning Shots from the Gun boats to obtain compliance: - internationally recognized tactic

Or Shouldering the vessel: Whilst IDF do not have ships capable of this they do have access to propoller imobilisers such as the Buccaneer:
BCB International

Have these tactics been used before by IDF on Aid Workers/poeple attempting to breech the blockade: Yes

Source: Gaza relief boat damaged in encounter with Israeli vessel - CNN.com

Times similar tactics have been used by IDF:
2008-2009
 
. .
What do you mean, exactly?

I think it was clear what i meant. Israel says "it wants to ensure the safety and security of it's civillians" but at what cost? They refuse to recognise that there is a genuine humanitarian crisis in Gaza, they only let in a quater of the aid required in the area.

Source: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=31779&Cr=&Cr1

Gaza's real humanitarian crisis - Focus - Al Jazeera English

What is worse is that they have barred the import of Construction Material and Electric Generators. Al- Shifa Hospital suffers from 12-18 Hour power outages, many patients on cardiac monitors end up dying because the hospital does not have enough power or back up power "Israel has banned Generators".

The same goes for concrete and construction materials, people are living in shacks and huts because those made homeless after 2009 are unable to reconstruct due to the embargo on "Construction Material".

WATSAN: Water and Sanitation:
Gaza’s water conditions have always been critical because of geographic reasons; the area lacks access to conspicuous surface water and is therefore fully dependent on groundwater and rainwater harvest. However, the aquifer beneath the Gaza Strip proves to be an insufficient source of fresh water to the 1.5 million inhabitants living enclosed in mere 365 square kilometers. -http://www.phg.org/news.asp?i=20

(Israel bans Water Purification systems from time to time on its list of contraband)


And there is so much more. Poor George Mitchell is trying to keep the indirect talks going, but words alone do not sort out the problems of the masses.

Both parties need to work towards a tangible solution for their peoples. And whist Israel's need to guard it's citizens is a internationally recognised right, it's treatment and labelling of Palestinians as non committed or agitators will not stand.

It is absurd and it is not sustainable, even uncle sam knows this... Lets hope for both parties that a amicable solution can be saught.
 
.
Where did you learn this sort of history? In school? In a church or mosque?

From reading history and eventually, getting a degree in it from university.

Solomon said:
Not only Europeans, but (as I've pointed out previously) the Ottoman Caliphs themselves desired Palestine to become a national home for the Jews.

They had no right to the land either or it's disposition. It belonged to the Arabs who tilled it and called it home.

Solomon said:
Jews were already long-established as residents in Jaffa, Jerusalem, and Hebron.

I have no problem with Jews living there, but that is a separate issue from Israel.

Solomon said:
As the Zionist movement took hold, hundreds of thousands of dunams of land were purchased by Jews and Jewish organizations from Arabs.

Thousands of parcels of land were sold by absentee landlords, mostly non-Palestinians. As of 1947 only a tiny portion of what was to become Israel was owned by Jewish settlers.

http://lw.palestineremembered.com/Maps/New/JewishOwnedLandInPalestineAsOf1947.gif

Solomon said:
The establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine was seen as part of that process. Under the British Mandate Jewish families were transferred out of Transjordan into Palestine in 1920.

And the British had absolutely no right to do that. It was not their land to parcel out.

Solomon said:
What happened after independence was declared in 1947 is a more complex story; yet if more of the Arabs affected had remained in Palestine rather than depart, Israel would nevertheless be a reality. Much of the Zionist leadership had no desire for the Arabs (many of whom had helped build and defend the Yishuv and moved to Palestine to take advantage of the advanced economy the Jews brought to the area) to leave the Jewish State. Israel is still 20% Arab today.

That may all be true...but, Israel was still the product of Britain and the United Nations. It may have happened without them, but the fact is that they were the primary cause. Israel was a country largely made up of Europeans, who used partition to declare a country's existence on land that did not belong to them. The world has paid the price for it and will so in the future. After over half a century of continuing conflict do you really see it changing?

Solomon said:
What difference did the Holocaust make? The nations of the world realized that had a Jewish State existed before WWII then six million Jews need not have perished at the hands of a vicious regime and hate-filled people. Clearly, a Jewish State was a necessity, not an option. The homelessness of Europe's few remaining Jews, homeless and languishing in Displaced Persons camps, made establishing the Jewish State a matter of immediate urgency, not something that could be put off any longer, just to satisfy a Britain that was itself tired of playing with Imperialism.

The war created tens of millions of homeless. The guilt of the west's treatment of the Jews was in everyone's minds as the camps were liberated and the trials at Nuremberg convened. The Jews may have even needed a secure home, (although the Nazis had been pretty effectively eradicated), but I still sympathise that they would not trust a future in Europe. OK fine, but that did not give anybody, Jew, European, American, British, or the UN, the right to effectively cause the stripping away of land from their rightful owners, the Palestinian Arabs, and their subjugation to a state they did not desire, vote for, or wish to live under. That is the kind of injustice, whether done by our country or another, that creates a wound that will not heal. It will never be solved. Both Israelis and Palestinians will pay for that land with their blood from now on, generation after generation.

Solomon said:
That wasn't for lack of trying, as various the various riots against and massacres of Jews celebrated by Arabs makes clear. ("Eyeless in Gaza" even cited a few of these a day or two ago as inspiration.)

Say what you will, the Arabs have been far kinder to the Jews historically than the record of the West and of the Christians...and I am one.

Solomon said:
Once the Ottomans and British departed, most Arab countries (Egypt, Yemen, Algeria, Sudan, Iraq, Lebanon, etc.) eventually expelled their remaining Jews and seized their property without compensation, for the benefit of local dictators, of course. Most of these Jews went to Israel.

That is a bit simplistic, but I will grant you that the Jews of the Middle East, after the founding of Israel primarily, were treated much more poorly than what was historically the case, but that rather proves my point of the flood of hatred that over half a century of fighting over this issue has caused.

My caveat to this post is, I do not think there is an easy solution. Now that Israel exist and is the home of so many, nothing can be done to truly rectify the past. Israel has a right to exist therefore, but unless and until an effective peace can be made with the Arabs, this conflict will lead to an even bigger, and by that I mean nuclear, disaster.
 
Last edited:
.
Options:

Fair enough i will answer, but i want to get 1 thing crystal clear: I am all for Israel's right for survival and existance and its soverign right to security.

What i am not for is the way Israel conducts itself in the middle-east, this approach is very counter-productive and stoaks the embers of hatred and terror.

Now back to your question:
Options available: Well both Navy CGS use the following:

Ram the Vessel "Oldest tactic of forcing compliance" - This has been tried and tested.

Using Warning Shots from the Gun boats to obtain compliance: - internationally recognized tactic

Or Shouldering the vessel: Whilst IDF do not have ships capable of this they do have access to propoller imobilisers such as the Buccaneer:
BCB International

Have these tactics been used before by IDF on Aid Workers/poeple attempting to breech the blockade: Yes

Source: Gaza relief boat damaged in encounter with Israeli vessel - CNN.com

Times similar tactics have been used by IDF:
2008-2009
The methods you brought on are COERCIVE. Am asking that in light of the fact that 5 out of 6 ships responded to PERSUASIVE methods, can you show us a credible source that said Israel did not use the same PERSUASIVE methods on the 6th ship? Persuasion would be verbal or signal communication or for today -- radio. The blockading authority would communicate to the potentially trespassing ship that: You are approaching a blockade, state your intention and prepared to be boarded if your intention is not to avoid the blockaded zone.

What follows after one or several shots across the bow? The ship either comply when it is clear that the blockading navy is going to escalate to the next level of violence, aka coercion, or the ship resist and continue its present course. That next level after one or several shots across the bow will be one or several shots into the ship itself. Is that what you are looking for?

Ramming the ship? Easier said than done but physical contact often result in damages for both ships and in your source, the damages to the civilian ship were severe enough that people were expected to abandon ship. For this coercive method, near catastrophic damages should be expected, even if undesirable. Is this what you are looking for?

Same for mechanically disabling the civilian ship. The problem here is that you are leaving the ship vulnerable in a potentially hostile area. Granted, there was no other hostile navy nearby, but a mechanically stranded ship still constitute a navigation hazard to all.

Like it or not, the fact the 5 out of 6 ships responded to persuasive methods will not be lost on any investigation, done by Israel or by anyone else. Maritime legal experts will point that out and Israel will make full use of their legal expert opinions. Ramming the ship or shooting across the bow, in those maritime legal experts' opinions, are worse options than sending troops armed with paintball guns and pistols.
 
.
Keywords search: 'reuters cropped knife'.

Reuters is now under fire for possible violating journalistic ethics in cropping weapons out of images.
 
.
Photos recovered from memory cards and acquired by daily Hürriyet provide an inside look at what happened when Israeli commandos raided the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara and how they were treated, in the early morning hours of May 31.




[

[

[

[

[



id_55_b67a7088.jpg

If I could, I'd beat up thugs (Israeli Commandos in this case) forcibly and illegally entering my home too.
 
.
If a ship was set upon by armed pirates (many have likened the Israelis to them) on the Somalian coast, the advice given to the crew would be not to resist and thereby endanger their lives. This advice is given when the pirates in question are small in number & poorly trained. Attacking armed commandos automatically implies that those aboard embraced that risk thereby assuming atleast partial responsibility for the consequences.
The advice to not offer resistance to Pirates setting upon a ship, or a burglar in a house or mugger on the street is indeed sane advice keeping in mind safety, but heeding or not heeding the advice does not validate the actions of the Pirates, thieves, burglars or in this case the IDF thugs enforcing an illegal blockade that the UN and various other international organizations have voiced opposition to and indicated is contributing to massive suffering in Gaza.
 
.
to add to desertification's candid and factually correct post, there are Jews who took refuge in Iran during time of the holocaust. There are holocaust survivors ON RECORD showing gratitude to the nation of Iran, which historically had a Jewish community (as it does now)


and israel (and America in tandem) label Iran an axis of evil. A country that hasnt even WAGED war on another country in its existence.

I am amazed by how much we as Muslims have in common with the Orthodox non-zionist Jews. Zionism as a concept is apartheidism, and state-sponsored terrorism with lots of international funding from sympathizers who dont even have nationality from any country in the middle east --especially the land occupied by israel (save for the sephardics)


it's a huge joke. And it is costing the U.S. a lot in terms of its reputation; to support a rogue state like israel which acts on its own and uses propaganda to keep its hands ''washed''
 
.
The advice to not offer resistance to Pirates setting upon a ship, or a burglar in a house or mugger on the street is indeed sane advice keeping in mind safety, but heeding or not heeding the advice does not validate the actions of the Pirates, thieves, burglars or in this case the IDF thugs enforcing an illegal blockade that the UN and various other international organizations have voiced opposition to and indicated is contributing to massive suffering in Gaza.

Not my argument. Please read.

Many here have argued the finer details of who is legally in the right. Whatever be the arguments on that score, the attacking of armed commandos by the protesters must rank high on the stupidity scale.

Presumed legal sanction is not a justification for stupidity.
 
Last edited:
.
Five out of six ships responded to Israeli orders and Israeli troops boarded them with no incidents. Did the 6th ship knew before their journey that Israel would send boarding troops armed with only paintball guns and pistols? No one sane would make that assumption. That mean the sixth ship was warned by the other five and they prepared themselves for violence.
 
.
to add to desertification's candid and factually correct post, there are Jews who took refuge in Iran during time of the holocaust. There are holocaust survivors ON RECORD showing gratitude to the nation of Iran, which historically had a Jewish community (as it does now)


and israel (and America in tandem) label Iran an axis of evil. A country that hasnt even WAGED war on another country in its existence.

I am amazed by how much we as Muslims have in common with the Orthodox non-zionist Jews. Zionism as a concept is apartheidism, and state-sponsored terrorism with lots of international funding from sympathizers who dont even have nationality from any country in the middle east --especially the land occupied by israel (save for the sephardics)


it's a huge joke. And it is costing the U.S. a lot in terms of its reputation; to support a rogue state like Israel which acts on its own and uses propaganda to keep its hands ''washed''

and what about the Islamic world,which continuously waged war against Israel,from the day of its creation it was under attack from various Islamic nation,first it was the Nazis,then the Islam which continued its atrocities on Israel

its like a situation of inserting fingers in one's mouth and then complain he spit out
 
.
Hoyer Floor Statement on Flotilla Incident

WASHINGTON, DC – House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (MD) released the following statement on the House Floor tonight. Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:

“In the early morning hours of Monday, May 31, Israeli naval forces intercepted six ships, carrying mostly Turkish demonstrators, attempting to break the blockade of the Gaza Strip. While five of the six ships complied with IDF requests, the largest of them, the Mavi Marmara, refused—clearly bent on a violent confrontation—and was boarded by Israeli Defense Forces.

“These IDF troops were violently attacked with knives, clubs, and other weapons. At the end of the skirmish, seven members of the IDF had suffered injuries including gunshot wounds and head trauma, and nine demonstrators on the Mavi Marmara had been killed.

“Those deaths are tragic. The events leading up to them deserve and a full and scrupulous investigation. But this much is already clear: to call all the passengers of the Mavi Marmara nonviolent ‘peace activists’ would be a victory for propaganda, not for fact. Peace activists don’t launch attacks with knives and guns—and they certainly don’t do so while chanting slogans calling for the death of Jews, as an Al Jazeera broadcast showed. However much we lament those nine deaths, the fact is that the IDF was faced with an organized, violent assault and responded in self-defense.

“Unfortunately but unsurprisingly, this incident has renewed international condemnation for Israel’s blockade of Gaza. But that blockade exists for a reason: to keep weapons out of the hands of Hamas, a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel and to random attacks on Israeli civilians. The blockade was launched, with the cooperation of Israel’s neighbor Egypt, when Hamas staged a violent coup to expel its political rivals and seize total control of Gaza; and the blockade could end today, if Hamas recognized Israel’s right to exist, gave up its commitment to murdering civilians, and released the Israeli soldier it holds captive.

“To the extent that life is hard for those in Gaza, the prime cause is the terrorist organization that keeps them hostage, holds power through violence, and monopolizes the food and humanitarian supplies that Israel allows across the border. Indeed, it is Hamas, not Israel, that is currently preventing the humanitarian goods from this very flotilla from reaching the Palestinians in Gaza.

“Finally, the United States should and will resist all one-sided attempts to condemn Israel at the United Nations. The UN, a body committed by its Charter to universal human rights, has for much of its history been sadly fixated on singling Israel out for condemnation, as much more serious crises have gone unaddressed. That biased record extends beyond the infamous 1975 resolution equating Zionism with racism. The UN General Assembly has convened in emergency special session ten times: six of them focused on Israel, while no emergency session was ever held on the Rwandan genocide, ethnic cleansing in the Balkans, or genocide in Sudan. The 2001 UN World Conference Against Racism neglected racism around the world to again single out, almost exclusively, Israel and Zionism. The UN Human Rights Council—whose members include Saudi Arabia, China, and Cuba—has only one permanent topic on its official agenda: Israel. Even Secretary-General Kofi Annan criticized the Human Rights Council for its ‘disproportionate focus on violations by Israel.’

“This troubled history is exactly why I am skeptical that the United Nations will treat Israel justly now. What happened on the Mavi Marmara needs a real investigation—not one colored by years of one-sided bias.

“Mr. Speaker, despite what happened last Monday, the fundamentals of this conflict remain just as they were the day before: the overwhelming majority of Israelis want to live in peace with the Palestinians, side-by-side in two states. So do most Palestinians—but the extremism and hate of groups like Hamas stands in the way.

“Finding a way to peace is fiercely difficult; it should not be made more difficult by those who see more propaganda value than human value in these lost lives.”
 
.
How much did they pay that guy before they sent him in there ?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom