What's new

Philippines well poised to lead ASEAN

Pinoy

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 14, 2013
Messages
566
Reaction score
1
EDITORIAL FROM THAILAND’S ‘THE NATION’

The Nation/Asia News Network
November 25, 2016

Duterte-Asean-Chair.jpg


Since coming to power in June, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has made global headlines, a rarity for national leaders in Southeast Asia. His comments on his country’s relations with major powers – the US, China, Japan and Russia – have been extraordinary for their divergence from conventional wisdom. Now the time has come for him to demonstrate his leadership finesse in representing the region.

The Philippines is the incoming chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, succeeding Laos, which has done a good job despite limited resources and modest expectations. In contrast, the Philippines has the most outspoken leader in Asean and expectations are high that it will raise the bloc’s profile to a new level in the year ahead as it takes over the rotating duty at the helm. Adding to this sense is the fact that the chairmanship coincides with the association’s 50th anniversary. Manila has indicated it is ready for the task, even conceiving the sweeping, snappy new theme “Partnership for changes, engaging the world”.

It’s clear that whatever the Philippines has in mind for its tenure as Asean chair will have to take into account the historic importance of this milestone, coming at a time when the region is facing serious challenges. Several agenda items stand out as being the most critical.

Firstly, the Philippines will give top priority to making Asean a people-centered, peopled-oriented community. The Asean Economic Community has entered its second year and Manila must guide decisions to establish greater equality between the wealthy and powerful and those citizens who enjoy less prosperity. Asean has to be more inclusive than it is now, fostering participation by all stakeholders regardless of background and connections. The region’s leaders must forge or improve alliances with civil-society organizations and work towards a common cause that benefits all – one of the founding objectives of the association.

Second, comprising more than 7,000 islands, the Philippines will understandably emphasize regional cooperation on maritime security. Due to worrying disputes over territory in the South China Sea, it will have eager listeners as it proposes fresh initiatives. It is fortunate that Duterte has already sought to reduce tensions by travelling to Beijing and acceding to bilateral talks on the matter rather than China-Asean negotiations. Malaysia and Brunei have followed suit in their own sovereignty issues with China and Vietnam appears to be conducting discreet consultations.

If these countries can achieve fair and peaceable resolutions in their conflicts and Beijing agrees to abide by the rule of maritime law, Asean as a whole benefits. And the signs are good. Already Manila and Beijing have agreed that the Scarborough Shoal, over which they’ve been at loggerheads, should become a marine park protected by a ban on commercial fishing in the area.

The Philippines might be able to offer its neighbors something else. The country has often been pummeled by natural disasters, chiefly tropical cyclones and typhoons, and yet the Filipino spirit of fighting against daunting odds has always won the day. In such resiliency other nations can learn a valuable lesson. It is to be hoped that Duterte prods Asean to be better prepared for natural calamities, with a mechanism in place for a region-wide response to incidents wherever they might occur. That’s what neighbors are for.

Finally, with a garrulous maverick like Rodrigo Duterte acting as the face of Southeast Asia in the coming year, we might expect this small brotherhood of nations to face the world less shyly, more assertively, and find new ways to link with the international community. With clear direction and strong leadership, Asean can move forward as one voice.
 
. .
The world seems overpopulated by countries that want to be leaders of others despite nobody calls for. I make here a suggestion: if any country pays let say $10 billions a year to Vietnam I will call it as master of universe.
 
.
The world seems overpopulated by countries that want to be leaders of others despite nobody calls for. I make here a suggestion: if any country pays let say $10 billions a year to Vietnam I will call it as master of universe.
Cheap call.
But nobody gives a damn!
 
.
A true leader, free from white masters' bullying
china pays him good; something like $50 billion usd for the entire package. He would be stupid if he rejects the offer. The U.S only pays him $100 million a year. Duerte is the richest businessman in Asia now.
 
.
Cheap call.
But nobody gives a damn!
the pinoys want to lead Asean then they should pay for the role. nothing is free. not even the death. if you want to be the boss, then show me the money. germany pays more 14.3 billion euro to the EU budget than it receives from the club. by the way, that is the reason why the british quit the EU. they have no longer interest to pay for the poor.

I don´t mind whether the pinoys or the indo want to be the boss of Asean, but they must show the money. $10 billions for vietnam is ok. what is cheap in this world?

infografik-die-groessten.jpg
 
.
the pinoys want to lead Asean then they should pay for the role. nothing is free. not even the death. if you want to be the boss, then show me the money. germany pays more 14.3 billion euro to the EU budget than it receives from the club. by the way, that is the reason why the british quit the EU. they have no longer interest to pay for the poor.

I don´t mind whether the pinoys or the indo want to be the boss of Asean, but they must show the money. $10 billions for vietnam is ok. what is cheap in this world?

infografik-die-groessten.jpg
Who are you to question the decision of ASEAN? Remember the Chairmanship rotates annually. Whether you like it or not, Duterte is the person to look up to for his leadership and stewardship working hard for the best interest of our people and now for the best interest of people in ASEAN.

china pays him good; something like $50 billion usd for the entire package. He would be stupid if he rejects the offer. The U.S only pays him $100 million a year. Duerte is the richest businessman in Asia now.
We are just sick and tired about your preaching on human rights while your drones are busy dropping bombs on innocent civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and elsewhere.
 
.
Who are you to question the decision of ASEAN? Remember the Chairmanship rotates annually. Whether you like it or not, Duterte is the person to look up to for his leadership and stewardship working hard for the best interest of our people and now for the best interest of people in ASEAN.
I am a simple poster like you. if you post a thread, nobody should comment?

your president is your choice, not the people of Vietnam, least the people of Asean in general. it is simply both ignorance and arrogance to say you are the boss and know what is good for me. you can stick your asean leader attitude into elsewhere.
 
.
I am a simple poster like you. if you post a thread, nobody should comment?

your president is your choice, not the people of Vietnam, least the people of Asean in general. it is simply both ignorance and arrogance to say you are the boss and know what is good for me. you can stick your asean leader attitude into elsewhere.
ASEAN always work/decide on a consensus basis and every year there is a rotating chairmanship. If Vietnam can't accept. You are free to leave and we don't give a damn.
 
.
ASEAN always work/decide on a consensus basis and every year there is a rotating chairmanship. If Vietnam can't accept. You are free to leave and we don't give a damn.
what are you talking about man? where do I say am against ASEAN way work/decide on a consensus basis and every year there is a rotating chairmanship? I am against indo Asean leader attitude, now against yours. yes, every year there is a new chairman. no, there is no leader. there is nothing to lead. got it?
 
.
what are you talking about man? where do I say am against ASEAN way work/decide on a consensus basis and every year there is a rotating chairmanship?

the thread you posted is full of bullshit in red and blue. I am against indo Asean leader attitude, now against yours. yes, every year there is a new chairman. no, there is no leader. there is nothing to lead. got it?
The reason why there is a chairman is to lead our people's best interest in ASEAN. If you can't accept that it's our turn this 2017. Your country can always protest.

Why is it bullshit? I just posted an article from Thailand's news editorial. If you want, you can complain directly to them.
 
.
The reason why there is a chairman is to lead our people's best interest in ASEAN. If you can't accept that it's our turn this 2017. Your country can always protest.

Why is it bullshit? I just posted an article from Thailand's news editorial. If you want, you can complain directly to them.
I believe I am talking to a wall. no, the chairman leads nobody. the chairman chairs the meeting. any decision is based on consensus of all members. thailand or antarktis, bullshit is bullshit, no matter from which country.
 
.
I believe I am talking to a wall. no, the chairman leads nobody. the chairman chairs the meeting. any decision is based on consensus of all members. thailand or antarktis, bullshit is bullshit, no matter from which country.
As stated:

The Chair performs three duties: (a) being spokesperson for the ten member regional organisation, (b) being ‘chief executive’ in chairing and facilitating official meetings and task forces, (c) tabling new initiatives and programmes to advance regional cooperation.

So yes there is no boss because everyone is given a voice. Yes there should be someone to lead for our people's best interest in the region.

And if you cannot accept that you can convince your leaders in Vietnam to withdraw or leave ASEAN.
 
Last edited:
.
As stated:

The Chair performs three duties: (a) being spokesperson for the ten member regional organisation, (b) being ‘chief executive’ in chairing and facilitating official meetings and task forces, (c) tabling new initiatives and programmes to advance regional cooperation.

So yes there is no boss because everyone is given a voice. Yes there should be someone to lead for our people's best interest in the region.

And if you cannot accept that you can convince your leaders in Vietnam to withdraw or leave ASEAN.
Why should I do anything for a no name illiterate poster who can't understand a simplest thing? You are wasting my time.
 
.
The reason why there is a chairman is to lead our people's best interest in ASEAN. If you can't accept that it's our turn this 2017. Your country can always protest.

Why is it bullshit? I just posted an article from Thailand's news editorial. If you want, you can complain directly to them.

Ignore that Viet guy, no one in this forum takes that guy seriously.
 
.
Ignore that Viet guy, no one in this forum takes that guy seriously.
Obviously the Viet thinks we're claiming to be a boss in ASEAN just because we are the incoming chair and we have the outspoken president.

Why should I do anything for a no name illiterate poster who can't understand a simplest thing? You are wasting my time.
FYI we do not aspire to be a boss in ASEAN. Maybe that is your wish to your country. So stop accusing us that we're claiming to be one. If you don't like the article. You are free to ignore you fool.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom