Permanent bans for ISIS apologists.

[Solomon2]

ISIS-related discussions are not banned, propaganda is

And the difference is...?

 

[Darth Vader]

We are re enforcing our old policy of handing out permanent bans for terrorist supporters. This should serve as a reminder that Pakistan Defence team will immediately and permanently ban any members who'd express support, pledge 'bayah' or distribute propaganda from the terrorist ISIS / Daesh organization. Any such posts must be reported to the red team ASAP.

We expect your cooperation in order to maintain a clean and fair platform.

Horus from Pakistan Defence Team.

Shukriya/Thanks

u shd add ttp bla in this list 2

 

[jamahir]

I have known him for a while and I don't agree with what you say here. anyway you have your own POV and have a right to raise it.

sorry, but me talking against his acceptance of female infanticide is not my "point of view"... there cannot be any "point of view" about this... it is a crime and promoters/accepters must be identified and punished... he is no different from taliban.

edit : you can ask him about his conversations with me on that topic.

 

[ranjeet]

sorry, but me talking against his acceptance of female infanticide is not my "point of view"... there cannot be any "point of view" about this... it is a crime and promoters/accepters must be identified and punished... he is no different from taliban.

edit : you can ask him about his conversations with me on that topic.

how about you give me links about where what you said.

 

[jamahir]

And the difference is...?

propaganda == promotion.
discussion == talking about crimes of isis/taliban.

 

[Solomon2]

@Solomon2 s logic is rare and priceless.

Thank you. You've probably noticed I prefer argument to bans.

 

[AXO4D]

DICTATORSHIP...

 

[Solomon2]

propaganda == promotion.
discussion == talking about crimes of isis/taliban.

Already you've set it up so that "isis/taliban" can only be discusses in terms of their crimes. That neatly wipes away the possibility that their enemies are more guilty than they of some things, yes? It's a difficult call and open to being abused so I hope the mods pay careful attention.

 

[jamahir]

That neatly wipes away the possibility that their enemies are more guilty than they of some things, yes?

who exactly??

 

[Solomon2]

who exactly??

Like the Assads: link

 

[jamahir]

Like the Assads: link

you realize my question was to bring out your promotion of white house propaganda...

i think any nato apologist should also be banned... nato is creator of isis/qaeda/taliban/fsa/nusra/jemah etc

 

[TankMan]

Already you've set it up so that "isis/taliban" can only be discusses in terms of their crimes. That neatly wipes away the possibility that their enemies are more guilty than they of some things, yes? It's a difficult call and open to being abused so I hope the mods pay careful attention.

There is a huge difference between criticizing states and endorsing terrorism or spreading terrorist propaganda - the former should be allowed but the latter should be, and will be, banned.

 

[Al Bhatti]

 

[SamantK]

Not just ISIS but any radical organization, like Taliban, Hizbollah, Al-Qaeda, RSS, VHP, LeT etc

Did not know you were so desperate

 

[jamahir]

Did not know you were so desperate

when isis/taliban supporters must be banned, why not those of rss and vhp??