What's new

People to people verdict: Peace is the answer

sonicboom

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
704
Reaction score
2
People to people verdict: Peace is the answer

January 2010, 12:05pm

aman ki asha

About two-thirds of those polled in India and almost three-fourths of those in Pakistan said they desire a peaceful relationship between the two countries. Only a tiny minority, 17% in India and 8% in Pakistan, are opposed to the idea of consigning hostility to the dustbin of history.

The neighbourhood we live in may be the deadliest in the world, but it also is one in which the yearning for peace is enormous. Indeed, the very fact that the horrors of hostility have been brought home so forcefully to all those who live in this neighbourhood may explain why two nations that have had such an embittered relationship voice such a strong cry for some sanity. In an extensive poll conducted jointly for The Times of India and the Jang group of Pakistan, what we found was that an overwhelming majority want a peaceful relationship. Most hearteningly — and unexpectedly — there is also a high degree of optimism about the possibility of an end to hostilities and there is a widespread recognition that bringing about that happy denouement is not a task that can be left to the two governments alone.

Aman ki Asha polled people in six Indian cities as well as respondents in eight Pakistani cities and 36 villages to feel the pulse of a sub-continent besieged by violence and fear. About two-thirds of those polled in India (66%) and almost three-fourths of those in Pakistan (72%) said they desire a peaceful relationship between the two countries. It’s not as if the rest were opposed to the idea of harmony. A sizeable chunk in both countries — 17% in India and 20% in Pakistan — neither agreed nor disagreed with the statement that

“I want peaceful and friendly relations to prevail between India and Pakistan”. In other words, only a tiny minority, 17% in India and 8% in Pakistan, were opposed to the idea of consigning hostility to the dust bin of history. For countries that have fought three wars and one mini-war and have accused each other of abetting terror, those figures are a whole lot better than what you might expect.

In India, the urge for peace was more or less uniform across gender, age and socio-economic categories, but in Pakistan male respondents were surprisingly more strongly in favour of the idea than their female counterparts (77% to 66%).

The survey tapped respondents in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore and Hyderabad in India. In Pakistan, the cities covered were Karachi, Hyderabad and Sukkur in Sindh, Islamabad/Rawalpindi, Lahore, Multan and Faisalabad in Punjab and Quetta in Baluchistan.

Desiring peace is one thing, but is there a genuine feeling that it is possible? Once again, we were pleasantly surprised by the findings of the poll. A clear majority in both cases — 59% in India and an even higher 64% in Pakistan — said they were either “very hopeful” or “quite hopeful” that they would see our current state of antagonism becoming a thing of the past within their own lifetimes. In India, the women were more optimistic than the men on this count, though not by a huge margin. Also, respondents from the SEC B socio-economic category were somewhat more hopeful than those from the more elite SEC A category and the relatively young (ages 18 to 19) were just a touch more hopeful than the older lot aged 30 to 45 years.

Can people-to-people initiatives — which is what Aman ki Asha is really all about — be effective in bringing about the peaceful relationship that is so fervently desired? The vote in this case was decisive. In India, 78% said they were an “effective” or “very effective” instrument of peace. If that sounds massive, the verdict was even more unequivocal in Pakistan, where 85% chose one of these two responses. In fact, an impressive 43% in Pakistan said it would be “very effective”. We couldn't have asked for a more resounding endorsement of our earnest belief that civil society initiatives can and must make a difference.

Indeed, we wouldn’t have imagined the response would have been so clear.

What explains the scale of this endorsement? A large part of the explanation would seem to lie in the answers to another of the questions asked in the survey. We asked the respondents to rank the current state of the relationship between the two countries on a scale of 1 to 9, where 1 indicates “hostile” and 9 indicates “friendly”. We also asked them to do this rating separately for relations between the two states and between the two peoples. On both sides of the troubled border the responses were revealing.

While the average rating given by Indian respondents to state-to-state relations was 3.65 (indicating “cold”), the same respondents rated people-to-people relations at 4.15 indicating something closer to “neutral”. On the Pakistani side, state-to-state relations were rated on average at 3.79, while people-to-people relations were rated at 4.61 on average. In other words, while Pakistanis had a more positive view of the relationship than Indians, both sides agreed that the rapport between people was better than that between the two governments. It is not difficult to see why they believe civil society initiatives are the way forward from here.

On each of these questions, there were significant variations in the responses from different Indian cities and there was at least one clear pattern to those variations. Delhi and the southern cities of Chennai, Hyderabad and to a lesser extent Bangalore were more inclined to take a positive view of both the current state of relations and the prospects of peace than the other cities.

In contrast, Mumbai was clearly the city with the most gloomy perspective on each of the questions asked.

A majority, 54%, for instance said they were not hopeful of peace being achieved in their lifetime. Given the horror of 26/11 that is hardly surprising. But the fact that even in Mumbai 50% said they wanted peace against the 42% who didn’t and 52% voted for people-to-people initiatives as the way to move towards that peace must be seen as a vindication of Aman ki Asha.

People to people verdict: Peace is the answer - Specials - Home - The Times of India
 
.
I think pakistan should not be given any leverage and sympathy by India now. As far as history suggests pakistan has a history of gladly sitting on Indias shoulders and then peeing in its ears. Sorry, pakistan can not be trusted. every peace move by India is reciprocated by a very hostile act by pakistan, be it Kargil or 26/11.
 
.
India can not do anything for peace because we are not the reason for troubles. Pkistan is the problem.:hitwall::hitwall:

The biggest myth
People of India belive that we have same type of people on either side of border but it is not true. The Pakistan have India/Hindu hater muslim specially Punjabi Sunnis & Wahabis. The muslims who truly belive in Quran and peaceful co existence are happily living in India. so dont/ get fooled by pakistanis have 2 eyes 1 nose, 2 hand 2 legas type of BS.
If it is not true then why don't they befriend Israel. Hitler was also looking like human being but what he have done to innocent Jews like that pak is doing to innocent Indians.


How can we expect anything good from them when they have raped and butchered fellow Bengali Muslims. If they Punjabi Sunnis/Wahhabi can not stand bengali muslim/shia/ahmadiyas/bohras how can we expect friendship from them.:hitwall:

1.) Pak's existence is on India/hindu's hatred.
2.) Pakistan is sheltering Dawood.
3.) Masterminded 26/11.
4.) Patronizing, training and funding LeT, JuD, HM, JeM, Taliban
5.) Pak is running a racket of fake indian currency.
6.) Pak is running bollywood piracy industry.
7.) Pak is occupied some area of Kashmir and given some area to China.
8.) Pak is doing everything it can to harm India politically, militarily, economicaly etc.

Moreover ISI/Pak Army/China/US/Wahabis/Punjabis will not allow the peace to happen.
:angry:
 
.
I think there is hope now ..... because now they too are begining to feel what we have been suffering for the last few decades.

Once the cross-border terrorism stops, the mood for peace will be much more conducive.

Compared to India, Pakistan has always been a fragmented society. Just read the Karachi blast thread to know what I am talking about.

One cannot engage a fragmented society ..... cause whoever you engage with, has someone else with a diametrically opposite point of view and his own personal axe to grind ..... and who will do all i his power to see the peace process fall through.

The current violence across Pakistan may actually be what opens Pakistan's eyes to the reality and brings them together as a united people.

And this time they will not be united because of/against India ..... therein lies the basis of my hope.

Lets see how things pan out ..... whether the so-called "track II" initiative gathers some steam ..... or simply fizzles out like other new year resolutions.

Incidentally, this very forum is an excellent "track II" initiative in its own right, however acrimonious our exchanges may be at times ..... and if there are representatives of TOI and Jang/Geo here, they should really look at the possibility of arranging for a get-together/exchange visits and debate series of members from both sides here :tup:

Cheers, Doc
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom