What's new

peopels beat Indian army soldier in Kashmir

So if a state is benefited well financially then its ok and people can occupy it ? what a logic this my friend is called hipocrasy one rule for one and another rule for another.
Hmm AFAIK tibet wanted to be a part of China but rejected the idea of communism. Plus mi6,cia and even hitler had activities in tibet.

you can ask @Chinese-Dragon for more info if you like
 
Baluchistan has a better chance of merging with Afghanistan than being in Ur country and they hate Pakistan more than anything and regarding the racism i have never faced any racism during my year stay in Delhi so no complaints

I know your Indian media/government likes to portray Baluchistan as such. But the ground realities are much different.
 
Will China quit Tibet and grant them freedom ? Why hipocrasy ?



Lol hipocrasy is when you do try and do selective understanding.

Tibet is not a contested area. Kashmir is. India need to quit Kashmir and follow UN arbitration.
 
@waz can you let me know which part of my comment should be given a negative rating? . Bcoz the only criteria @Mugwop gives -ve rating is when he cant answer a question

Removed, but it was off-topic.
That Baluch war is more or less over.
Anyway, back to topic.
 
Back
Top Bottom