What's new

Pentagon: Pakistan Uses 'Proxy Forces' in India and Afghanistan

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sher Malang

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
2,800
Reaction score
-2
Country
Afghanistan
Location
Afghanistan
An October 2014 Pentagon report calls out Pakistan for its use of terrorist proxies in India and Afghanistan.

The Pentagon released a report earlier this week that directly condemns Pakistan for its use of terrorist proxies against India. The report, titled “Progress Toward Security and Stability in Afghanistan,” is atypically candid and is intended for consumption by U.S. legislators. While a growing chorus of experts and former officials in the United States has remarked that the U.S.-Pakistan bilateral relationship is sliding into dysfunction and delusion, the U.S. government has generally kept things civil, refraining from overtly condemning Pakistan. U.S. officials, however, have long privately acknowledged Pakistan’s support of anti-India militant groups. Most notably, the United States’ former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, testified that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence had links to the Haqqani Network.

India, naturally, applauded the release of the report. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs remarked, “If the international community is saying Pakistan is using terrorists as proxies to counter Indian army then its welcoming [sic]. Issue of terrorism should not be segmented.” As one report in The Hindu noted, the release of this report following Narendra Modi’s visit to the United States could signal a coming rapprochement between the United States and India. Historically, Indian officials have remained skeptical of the United States given its long term support — both rhetorically and materially — for Pakistan. By acknowledging Pakistan’s use of terrorist proxies, U.S. officials are saying what Indians have long waited to hear. Amid worsening relations between India and Pakistan in recent weeks, the report will likely reverberate in both India and Pakistan.

Earlier this year, in a speech in Kashmir, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi slammed Pakistan for its use of proxies against India. Specifically, Modi said Pakistan “has lost the strength to fight a conventional war, but continues to engage in the proxy war of terrorism.” Given Modi’s comments and this Pentagon report, it appears that both the United States and India are starting to arrive at a common understanding of Pakistan’s use of proxy groups.

The report also acknowledges the Pakistan’s role as an inhibitor for stability in Afghanistan — a significant admission ahead of the United States’ military withdrawal from that country at the end of this year. The report praises India’s role in aiding Afghan reconstruction as well.

Pakistani officials were unequivocal in their condemnation of the report. The Pakistan Foreign Office released a statement noting that “the Government of Pakistan takes serious exception to comments contained in the U.S. Department of Defense report sent to the Congress under the title ‘Progress Towards Security and Stability in Afghanistan’.” ”While noting Pakistan’s cooperation with the U.S. in areas of mutual interests, the recently-released report also carries unsubstantiated allegations of the existence of terrorist ‘sanctuaries’ or that proxy forces are operating from here against Afghanistan and India,” it added. ”Such allegations are of particular concern at this point when Pakistan government has launched comprehensive operations against militants in North Waziristan. The military operation ‘Zarb-e-Azb’ has been broadly welcomed internationally, including in the U.S.,” the report continued.

The entire report is available at the U.S. Department of Defense website. I’ve excerpted some revealing passages here.

Afghan- and Indian- focused militants continue to operate from Pakistan territory to the detriment of Afghan and regional stability. Pakistan uses these proxy forces to hedge against the loss of influence in Afghanistan and to counter India’s superior military. These relationships run counter to Pakistan’s public commitment to support Afghan-led reconciliation. Such groups continue to act as the primary irritant in Afghan-Pakistan bilateral relations.

The report implies that the timing of a Lashkar-e-Taiba attack on the Indian consulate in Herat was tied to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s swearing in:

In May of this reporting period, the Indian consulate in Herat Province was attacked by a group of four heavily armed militants. The attack came three days prior to the swearing in of the new Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi.

On the Indian role in Afghanistan:

India supports a variety of high-visibility projects and initiatives in Afghanistan. These ventures are focused primarily on major infrastructure projects, including electricity generation and transmission, road construction, and mining. India has shown increased interest in Afghan security assistance, though activities in this area remain limited. India currently offers India-based training to ANSF personnel across a number of specialties, and the Indian government committed to expand this program. India does not provide direct military support or training in Afghanistan.

On Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan:

However, suspicion has surrounded the relationship between Kabul and Islamabad, inhibiting bilateral cooperation on border security protocols. It is possible that the new Afghan President, Dr. Ghani, will seek to change this dynamic, which Pakistan is likely to welcome. Although stability in Afghanistan is in the interest of Pakistan, Pakistan also seeks sufficient Pashtun representation in the Afghan government to prevent Pashtun discontent along the Afghan-Pakistan border and limit India’s influence.

The report might make for a refreshing read coming from U.S. government offices, but don’t expect it to affect policy.

Pentagon: Pakistan Uses ‘Proxy Forces’ in India and Afghanistan | The Diplomat
 
An October 2014 Pentagon report calls out Pakistan for its use of terrorist proxies in India and Afghanistan.

The Pentagon released a report earlier this week that directly condemns Pakistan for its use of terrorist proxies against India. The report, titled “Progress Toward Security and Stability in Afghanistan,” is atypically candid and is intended for consumption by U.S. legislators. While a growing chorus of experts and former officials in the United States has remarked that the U.S.-Pakistan bilateral relationship is sliding into dysfunction and delusion, the U.S. government has generally kept things civil, refraining from overtly condemning Pakistan. U.S. officials, however, have long privately acknowledged Pakistan’s support of anti-India militant groups. Most notably, the United States’ former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, testified that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence had links to the Haqqani Network.

India, naturally, applauded the release of the report. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs remarked, “If the international community is saying Pakistan is using terrorists as proxies to counter Indian army then its welcoming [sic]. Issue of terrorism should not be segmented.” As one report in The Hindu noted, the release of this report following Narendra Modi’s visit to the United States could signal a coming rapprochement between the United States and India. Historically, Indian officials have remained skeptical of the United States given its long term support — both rhetorically and materially — for Pakistan. By acknowledging Pakistan’s use of terrorist proxies, U.S. officials are saying what Indians have long waited to hear. Amid worsening relations between India and Pakistan in recent weeks, the report will likely reverberate in both India and Pakistan.

Earlier this year, in a speech in Kashmir, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi slammed Pakistan for its use of proxies against India. Specifically, Modi said Pakistan “has lost the strength to fight a conventional war, but continues to engage in the proxy war of terrorism.” Given Modi’s comments and this Pentagon report, it appears that both the United States and India are starting to arrive at a common understanding of Pakistan’s use of proxy groups.

The report also acknowledges the Pakistan’s role as an inhibitor for stability in Afghanistan — a significant admission ahead of the United States’ military withdrawal from that country at the end of this year. The report praises India’s role in aiding Afghan reconstruction as well.

Pakistani officials were unequivocal in their condemnation of the report. The Pakistan Foreign Office released a statement noting that “the Government of Pakistan takes serious exception to comments contained in the U.S. Department of Defense report sent to the Congress under the title ‘Progress Towards Security and Stability in Afghanistan’.” ”While noting Pakistan’s cooperation with the U.S. in areas of mutual interests, the recently-released report also carries unsubstantiated allegations of the existence of terrorist ‘sanctuaries’ or that proxy forces are operating from here against Afghanistan and India,” it added. ”Such allegations are of particular concern at this point when Pakistan government has launched comprehensive operations against militants in North Waziristan. The military operation ‘Zarb-e-Azb’ has been broadly welcomed internationally, including in the U.S.,” the report continued.

The entire report is available at the U.S. Department of Defense website. I’ve excerpted some revealing passages here.

Afghan- and Indian- focused militants continue to operate from Pakistan territory to the detriment of Afghan and regional stability. Pakistan uses these proxy forces to hedge against the loss of influence in Afghanistan and to counter India’s superior military. These relationships run counter to Pakistan’s public commitment to support Afghan-led reconciliation. Such groups continue to act as the primary irritant in Afghan-Pakistan bilateral relations.

The report implies that the timing of a Lashkar-e-Taiba attack on the Indian consulate in Herat was tied to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s swearing in:

In May of this reporting period, the Indian consulate in Herat Province was attacked by a group of four heavily armed militants. The attack came three days prior to the swearing in of the new Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi.

On the Indian role in Afghanistan:

India supports a variety of high-visibility projects and initiatives in Afghanistan. These ventures are focused primarily on major infrastructure projects, including electricity generation and transmission, road construction, and mining. India has shown increased interest in Afghan security assistance, though activities in this area remain limited. India currently offers India-based training to ANSF personnel across a number of specialties, and the Indian government committed to expand this program. India does not provide direct military support or training in Afghanistan.

On Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan:

However, suspicion has surrounded the relationship between Kabul and Islamabad, inhibiting bilateral cooperation on border security protocols. It is possible that the new Afghan President, Dr. Ghani, will seek to change this dynamic, which Pakistan is likely to welcome. Although stability in Afghanistan is in the interest of Pakistan, Pakistan also seeks sufficient Pashtun representation in the Afghan government to prevent Pashtun discontent along the Afghan-Pakistan border and limit India’s influence.

The report might make for a refreshing read coming from U.S. government offices, but don’t expect it to affect policy.

Pentagon: Pakistan Uses ‘Proxy Forces’ in India and Afghanistan | The Diplomat
--
US just wake of after decade of sleep
nothing else..
world knows it before
 
False report. India and afghanistan uses proxies against pakistan and latest example is wahgah suicide bomb.
 
Let's be real............
Yeah we do.
And US is real angel with wings like CIA & Marines...
And KAAD and RAW are distributing sweets in Pakistan...................:usflag::usflag::close_tema:
 
wtf is the author that stupid or something


its the other way round
 
How many more threads to be made for this report bumping Indians and Afghani scums?
 
--
US just wake of after decade of sleep
nothing else..
world knows it before


World affairs don't work like that. After the Soviet, Americans have the largest network of spies. They know everything. But for them, their interests come first, India is way behind in line.

However, tides are changing everywhere. Apart from this accusation (of using proxies against India), there has also been a praise for the Pakistani Army for doing a great job in Zarb e Azb.

So, if we were to take on face value what the Americans say, then the future is great for Afghanistan, because if Pakistani Army has indeed weakened the Haqqani network, then it signals a significant change in Pakistani policies vis a vis Afghanistan.

And if the policy changes in Pakistan (Army) are as real as Americans have noted (and do not include Haqqani group anymore), then it means that Pakistan is looking forward to deal with a democratic and progressive Afghanistan.

The only worrisome part here is the huge number of refugees resulting from Zarb e Azb. For the way I see it (purely my opinion), those refugee camps will be like vast unprotected orchards for the extremist/terrorist groups to pick new and willing recruits.
 
World affairs don't work like that. After the Soviet, Americans have the largest network of spies. They know everything. But for them, their interests come first, India is way behind in line.

However, tides are changing everywhere. Apart from this accusation (of using proxies against India), there has also been a praise for the Pakistani Army for doing a great job in Zarb e Azb.

So, if we were to take on face value what the Americans say, then the future is great for Afghanistan, because if Pakistani Army has indeed weakened the Haqqani network, then it signals a significant change in Pakistani policies vis a vis Afghanistan.

And if the policy changes in Pakistan (Army) are as real as Americans have noted (and do not include Haqqani group anymore), then it means that Pakistan is looking forward to deal with a democratic and progressive Afghanistan.

The only worrisome part here is the huge number of refugees resulting from Zarb e Azb. For the way I see it (purely my opinion), those refugee camps are like vast unprotected orchards for the extremist/terrorist groups to pick new and willing recruits.
--
i know..
USA is not helping anyone else other than itself..
now no proxy is good for usa may good in next 2-3 decades . never know
if these proxy in afg -pak who created it USA
who printed jiad material in their university for these peopl USA
india fortunanly since beginig knows the game and fairly have indepedant forign policy expcept few cases ..
---
Pak amry- zarb
even kayani said . its internal risk whihc may cause more risk to pak than western border..india
extremis made people day to day life diffuclt..
made human .. shia suni hindu, chirtan but not human and pakistani
zarb may be 1st step of many diffuclt step pak need to take if they want to be strong nation ie. strong poeple unity for pakistan
--
Refugee ..
yes..
army may be trying to do min civlian causalty but these are there
war is diffuclt for all people..
it strange that pak have most of refugges whom they are helpin
but getting boomrang for wrong reason ..
--
 
wtf is the author that stupid or something


its the other way round
157344.jpg
 
There is a basic difference in the outlook shared by indians and pakistanis..

I dont know why, but atleast 75% of the pakistanis i've met or conversed have this wierd superioty complex over afghans, often gloating on how they "liberated" them from soviets and how Pakistanis feed the afghan populace.- in short it sees afghanistan as something it can get away toying with..Im sure this mentality is present in the decision makers.

But as can be seen , these are failed policies being aimlessly followed- hey who needs logic when you have religious fanaticism.
 
--

Refugee ..
yes..
army may be trying to do min civlian causalty but these are there
war is diffuclt for all people..
it strange that pak have most of refugges whom they are helpin
but getting boomrang for wrong reason ..
--

Re the refugee help: There is a Geneva Accord, signed by Pakistan and Afghanistan and guaranteed by the United States and the Soviet Union, that clearly, and on numerous occasions states that repatriation of the Afghan refugees will be entirely voluntary. Meaning, the refugees must volunteer to return to Afghanistan and that too comes with a strict condition that for the refugees to volunteer, Afghanistan should be peaceful. The refugees were supposed to remain in Pakistan for just 2 years, but the condition in Afghanistan failed to improve, and Pakistanis did not seem to be in any hurry to repatriate the refugees. Now Pakistan has become their home.
 
Re the refugee help: There is a Geneva Accord, signed by Pakistan and Afghanistan and guaranteed by the United States and the Soviet Union, that clearly, and on numerous occasions states that repatriation of the Afghan refugees will be entirely voluntary. Meaning, the refugees must volunteer to return to Afghanistan and that too comes with a strict condition that for the refugees to volunteer, Afghanistan should be peaceful. The refugees were supposed to remain in Pakistan for just 2 years, but the condition in Afghanistan failed to improve, and Pakistanis did not seem to be in any hurry to repatriate the refugees. Now Pakistan has become their home.
--
why condition in afg failed to improve
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom