What's new

Pentagon 2 | US building its 'Colonial Headquarter' in Pakistan?

They are actively containing us: playing India against China and Pakistan is in the mix. I'm surprised at Indian pride at being a tool for continual Western hegemony at their expense.

We are not the ones who is inviting USA, we do not allow foreign bases. Pakistan's instability and USA's presence in S.Asia in the name of WOT are a worrying things for us.

USA do not want to win the war in Afghanistan but rather want the pot boiling and when the time is right wants to play its end game.
 
.
Vote, speak, educate. India has a stronger civil society than Pakistan or perhaps even China.

Secondly, you guys are not being accurate: depopulation by nuclear warfare is not in anyone's plan. The radioactive fallout will kill millions by contaminating the water and air ways. Ever heard about 'nuclear' winter? It'd be disastrous for the world, the US included.

Even the scarcity is artifical and being created by environmental and Drug laws. If India started growing Hemp,it would fulfil our fuel,food and steel needs .But hemp is banned globally under UN drug laws



When the politicans are bought by the US corporate lobbies ,what can we do.
 
.
Indian fears of China have been well played on by the US and India is readily being pulled into the equation. Pakistan has little choice, boyo, it should be China and India to resolve their differences and work for a more productive region. The West wins when it's China vs. India

India and China are some what wiser here, They will have some pacts and treaties even though some misunderstandings are there.
But in Pakistan's terrorists are out of control and can implement any one's agenda like instigating war between India and Pakistan.
 
.
I told you, Pakistan has little choice. India and China do; it's not about their bases but diplomacy, mate.

We are not the ones who is inviting USA, we do not allow foreign bases. Pakistan's instability and USA's presence in S.Asia in the name of WOT are a worrying things for us.

USA do not want to win the war in Afghanistan but rather want the pot boiling and when the time is right wants to play its end game.
 
.
Even the scarcity is artifical and being created by environmental and Drug laws. If India started growing Hemp,it would fulfil our fuel,food and steel needs .But hemp is banned globally under UN drug laws
When the politicans are bought by the US corporate lobbies ,what can we do.

Yes I agree, these guys control the economy and basic needs of countries around the world. They go unnoticed since media works according their agenda.

These guys are sole reason for famines in countries which opposed their hegemony. They are the worst human rights violators indirectly.
 
. .
Despite what the media states Indian politicians are aware about the polarised and independent nature of the insurgents here. It's unlikely that a confrontation would occur on that case but relations would worsen.

India and China are some what wiser here, They will have some pacts and treaties even though some misunderstandings are there.
But in Pakistan's terrorists are out of control and can implement any one's agenda like instigating war between India and Pakistan.
 
.
That beanbag would have been claiming that they are housing a marine expeditionary force in there. :cuckoo:

NBC proofing in the national capital of Pakistan is a bit odd though, anyone who deploys a salted bomb or ERW on the embassy will end up killing countless number of people in and around the area.

they are present in numbers - not sure about the exact figures ( we dont like to keep a track ) :smart:
 
.
Vote, speak, educate. India has a stronger civil society than Pakistan or perhaps even China.

Secondly, you guys are not being accurate: depopulation by nuclear warfare is not in anyone's plan. The radioactive fallout will kill millions by contaminating the water and air ways. Ever heard about 'nuclear' winter? It'd be disastrous for the world, the US included.

nuclear winter is an exaggeration. That is clear from Russian civil defense doctrine. This myth was made so that the American public could be convinced that nuclear war is unwinnable and its not worthwhile to divert hundreds of billions in building thousands of bunkers for the people like how the soviets/russian were/are doing.

The elites have their bunkers. They even consider their own population useless eaters. Think what they will think of us?

Vote, speak, educate.


You underestimate the power of corporate lobbies and the way Congress manipulates EC. Ask @GURU DUTT on how Congress manipulated EC .

Yes I agree, these guys control the economy and basic needs of countries around the world. They go unnoticed since media works according their agenda.

These guys are sole reason for famines in countries which opposed their hegemony. They are the worst human rights violators indirectly.

Yes, do you know that British empire was responsible for 1.8 billion deaths in the Indian sub continent?

http://bharatrakshak.wikia.com/wiki/Famines_in_British_ruled_India:_Their_Causes_and_Consequences
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
they are present in numbers - not sure about the exact figures ( we dont like to keep a track ) :smart:

A marine expeditionary force is present in Pakistan? When did that happen?:woot:

Oye mazaak na kar khoche.
 
.
Depopulation is the easiest thing to do. Just overtly or covertly invest in reducing birth rate to below 1.7 and it is matter of few years population will decrease. By reducing birth rate to 1.7 they will achieve a reduction of 15% per annum (circa) towards population input.
Your point is very valid about West against Taliban.

They also want India and China to destroy each other. They do not want to see east rising. These guys are specialized in instigating wars and implementing their agenda.
 
.
Actually, no. Full blown nuclear war might be worse because of the long half lives of the nuclear materials. It's a hard reality; we have seen similar effects on our planet by external radiation (sun). So be aware, there's nothing 'safe' about it.

nuclear winter is an exaggeration. That is clear from Russian civil defense doctrine. This myth was made so that the American public could be convinced that nuclear war is unwinnable and its not worthwhile to divert hundreds of billions in building thousands of bunkers for the people like how the soviets/russian were/are doing.

The elites have their bunkers. They even consider their own population useless eaters. Think what they will think of us?




You underestimate the power of corporate lobbies and the way Congress manipulates EC. Ask @GURU DUTT on how Congress manipulated EC .



Yes, do you know that British empire was responsible for 1.8 billion deaths in the Indian sub continent?

Famines in British ruled India: Their Causes and Consequences - Bharat-rakshak Wiki
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. . .
Actually, no. Full blown nuclear war might be worse because of the long half lives of the nuclear materials. It's a hard reality; we have seen similar effects on our planet by external radiation (sun). So be aware, there's nothing 'safe' about it.

Actually, no. Full blown nuclear war might be worse because of the long half lives of the nuclear materials. It's a hard reality; we have seen similar effects on our planet by external radiation (sun). So be aware, there's nothing 'safe' about it.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/strate...ial-headquarter-pakistan-8.html#ixzz2hDYPBjeV

Fukushima has spewed much worse stuff than what nuclear bombs can ever do into the jetstream.Particulates of Plutonium in hundreds of tonnes into jetstream,ocean etc. Scientists were claiming that Fukushima can kill entire humanity. But this did not happen.

Nuclear bombs are pretty clean ,compared to what Fukushima has done.


Agreed. Its not safe. But nuclear fallout is not much issue if you can stockpile food for some months. Russians have massive underground grain facilities the size of football fields that can store food for 3 years to feed entire population.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom