What's new

Peng Shuai and China’s mistress problem

When we discuss personality like Mao, his private life is no longer important and relevant. Focusing on how many women he fcuk is trivial, compared to Korean War, anti-imperialism and the nation renewal under Mao.

Douglas McArthur also fcuk a lot. No one cares, and people even worship he fcuk a lot.
 
.
The book is full of lies. First of all, Mao Zedong's personal doctor is Wu Xujun. Li zhisui is just a health doctor in Zhongnan Hai Security Bureau. The author can only contact Mao Zedong's guards, not Mao Zedong himself. The author lied about his identity, so there was no need to read the content, because it must be written by the CIA.

https://baike.baidu.com/item/吴旭君/5088251

Lmao...classic "written by the CIA" :lol:
When we discuss personality like Mao, his private life is no longer important and relevant. Focusing on how many women he fcuk is trivial, compared to Korean War, anti-imperialism and the nation renewal under Mao.

Douglas McArthur also fcuk a lot. No one cares, and people even worship he fcuk a lot.

Wait what?? :lol:
Naive and non sophiscated readers often mis-understood political infighting in white man land as democracy and press freedom. When someone hurt the western ruling class such as Assange, he be in jail.

No such thing as free press in white man land.

Lmao....free press is what's allowing you to be on PDF while China blocks PDF. :D
Then what makes u supportive of US or flying the US flag fit to lecture us?

Look into the mirror before u talk again.

Supportive of the US? on what??

I fly the US flag because I live in the US. Isn't that easy to guess? :lol:
 
.
Man, I love it when on any China related thread....the PDF Chinese always pull up the "This is what the US did also" card.


Like the US is their role model in all things, good or bad. :lol:


Do these guys not realize that just cuz someone else did it, it doesn't make their crime any less?? :rolleyes:
Cause you guys always use American "golden standard" to judge China, which is a very bad standard by the way, try to use India next time.
Other than Bill Clinton.....and maybe some others....
Maybe some others, LOL, Do you care to show me your evidence againt Chinese leaders? Peng Shuai said she didn't have evidence, but maybe you do, lol..
 
.
Cause you guys always use American "golden standard" to judge China, which is a very bad standard by the way, try to use India next time.

Not much of a difference between India and China if we're talking about "mistresses". :lol:

Maybe some others, LOL, Do you care to show me your evidence againt Chinese leaders? Peng Shuai said she didn't have evidence, but maybe you do, lol..

Lmao "didn't have evidence"....:rolleyes:

It was posted all over the Chinese internet before it got removed by the benevolent CCP. :D

I can dig it up again if you want...

Otoh, I posted stuff about Mao earlier in post #12.

Another Chinese user already called it "written by the CIA". :lol:
 
.
It is true that small number of CPC cadre did have 100 mistress. It is also true that Hunter Biden fcuk his own niece. Meanwhile large number of western elites are implicated in Epstein pedo sex slave ring.

The CPC will not allow an epstein on the very least.

The elites are always depraved.
Yeah, Epstein just committed suicide at the very moment that all the guards disappeared out of thin air.
 
.
Yeah, Epstein just committed suicide at the very moment that all the guards disappeared out of thin air.

Whataboutism at its best...

At least he got thrown in jail. Mao got to boast about his "exploits". I'm sure Peng Shuai did too.

Difference between "Western justice" and Chinese justice. :D
 
.
Not much of a difference between India and China if we're talking about "mistresses". :lol:
So, any difference between China and other countries? humans are humans, don't try to play saint.
Lmao "didn't have evidence"....:rolleyes:

It was posted all over the Chinese internet before it got removed by the benevolent CCP. :D
Did you actually read her original post at all? She personally said she didn't have any evidence. Do you know what you sound like when you know nothing about what she said in her post?
 
.
Whataboutism at its best...

At least he got thrown in jail. Mao got to boast about his "exploits". I'm sure Peng Shuai did too.

Difference between "Western justice" and Chinese justice. :D
Don't give me that whataboutism. If your country cant do better, just fix your own country first before accuse other just based on rumor.
 
. .
Lmao...classic "written by the CIA" :lol:


Wait what?? :lol:


Lmao....free press is what's allowing you to be on PDF while China blocks PDF. :D


Supportive of the US? on what??

I fly the US flag because I live in the US. Isn't that easy to guess? :lol:
Do you know why the Chinese don't believe your book? Because there is a logical error.
Mao Zedong deprived General Wang Jinshan of his party membership and military position in accordance with CCP discipline because of his affair with his wife and sister. If Mao Zedong has 300 mistresses as you said, I don't know how he can maintain his dominance over the army and control over Party discipline. Especially when they are hostile to the two superpowers of the USA and the USSR and face famine at home.
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/王近山
 
.
Other than Bill Clinton.....and maybe some others....show me proof of "every single US president" doing it....heck, bring out anyone other than Bill Clinton. :D

China's "mistress problem" is nothing new. Chinese have been practicing this for a long long time....way before the US was even made. :lol:

We only know about Peng Shuai.....how many other Peng Shuai's are there in China and under CCP? 🤔

Oh and did someone forget Mao and his concubines?

Source: https://factsanddetails.com/china/cat2/sub6/item71.html


The only reason why you have that pic is because this guy was exposed by Western media.

So there goes the "tolerated" theory of yours. :D

Sources: New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Times of London, National Geographic, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Reuters, AP, Lonely Planet Guides, Compton’s Encyclopedia and various books and other publications.
Facts and Details

Lmao doesnt compute. Classic selfmasturbation by U.S. regime propaganda mouthpieces. 🙄

Questions or comments, e-mail ajhays98@yahoo.com
Jeffrey Hays has run a website called Facts and Details for a long time. Jeff is an American teacher, based in the Hiroshima area of Japan. To quote his website:
‘When I started this project in the 1990s I used mostly print sources such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Daily Yomiuri (a Japanese newspaper), The Times, National Geographic, Smithsonian magazine, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report, The Guardian, Atlantic Monthly, Archeology magazine, Natural History magazine, news services used by these periodicals such Reuters, Associated Press and AFP, information from national tourist offices, tourist brochures I have picked up from places I have visited, Lonely Planet Guides, other travel guides, Compton’s Encyclopedia and various books and other publications.
Now in addition to sources listed above I use: 1) Google searches; 2) public domain sources found on the web such as those from the Library of Congress, CIA World Factbook, U.S. State Department and Project Gutenber; 3), blogs that have collections of articles; and 4) searches of news sources such as the Guardian and the New York Times


Where do you shills even find these random *** noname blogs of some random *** weeb, just laundering U.S. regime disinformation campaigns?
 
Last edited:
.
Sources: New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Times of London, National Geographic, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Reuters, AP, Lonely Planet Guides, Compton’s Encyclopedia and various books and other publications.

Lmao classic U.S. regime propaganda mouthpiece selfmasturabation. 🙄

Lmao and all your sources are Chinese??

So what should I call that?? :lol:
 
. .
Peng Shuai and China’smistress problem
From magazine issue: 27 November 2021


View attachment 796601


A high-flying Chinese businessman once told me his secret to happiness: ‘Before a man is 35, women are tools; after 35, women are toys.’ It worked for him. He married an educated woman from a good family who helped him climb the career ladder; but once established in his career, he began seeking more exciting female company.
I’ve been thinking about that man since the story of the Chinese tennis player Peng Shuai broke. Peng detailed a three-year affair she had with the retired vice premier Zhang Gaoli, 40 years her senior. During the good times, they would ‘talk for hours, play chess, play tennis no end… our personalities fitted so well’. But when he got bored, he ‘disappeared’ and ‘tossed me aside’, she wrote on Weibo.
Chinese social media was treated to an insider view of the salacious lifestyles communist officials still lead. This was no ordinary affair. Peng says it started when Zhang forced her to have sex after they played tennis — ‘that afternoon I cried and didn’t agree at first’ — but she stayed for dinner, and Zhang kept up the pressure. ‘Yes, we had sex. Emotions are complicated, hard to put into words. From that day on, I decided to open my heart [to him].’ A far cry from your average ambitious mistress, Peng seems to be someone who was abused, groomed and abandoned. She was at pains to say she didn’t take a penny from Zhang.
The #MeToo scandal hit China’s celebrity world earlier this year with the arrest of the actor Kris Wu, a Chinese R. Kelly. Beijing leapt on the bandwagon when pop stars were the ones being accused. What would the Chinese Communist party do once the scrutiny turned on one of its own?
Censor, of course. It wasn’t long before Peng’s post, account and all references to the statement were scrubbed clean from social media. For a time even the word ‘tennis’ was censored as a search term. Then came radio silence from Peng — until last week. Presumably in response to growing international pressure (the Women’s Tennis Association has threatened to cancel all China events, and tennis stars from Serena Williams to Novak Djokovic rallied around the hashtag #WhereIsPengShuai), a series of ‘proof of life’ videos, photos and emails of Peng in public have surfaced. But these have all come from state media sources, such as the Global Times, leading to questions about how scripted they are. One video even starts with a director off-screen cueing Peng’s coach to start talking. In the coming weeks, state media outlets are likely to continue disseminating these staged appearances. It allows the Chinese government to present interest in Peng’s story as ‘western media hysteria’. But while no one is quite sure where Peng is, she has revealed a rot at the highest level of the party, a dangerous thing to do in Xi’s China.
It’s a story as old as sin. In China’s imperial past, men were entitled to have a wife and as many (legally inferior) concubines as they could afford. Emperors would have hundreds, and even now a mistress is referred to as a ‘concubine’; a wife is an ‘empress’. Polygamy was officially abolished in 1949 with the communist takeover, but the mindset didn’t change much.

Peng Shuai’s story has highlighted the salacious lifestyles that communist officials still lead
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, when China started to get very rich again, it became fashionable for men of a certain stature to have a mistress. Young, pretty, often uneducated and poor girls offered intimate company, yet some men wanted more: the former head of propaganda at Chongqing, for instance, required his lovers to have a bachelor’s degree. The more generous men gave their mistresses pocket money, cars and even flats. One neighbourhood in Shenzhen was dubbed ‘concubine village’ in the 1990s, reportedly being home to 50,000 mistresses. Their lovers, mostly businessmen in Hong Kong, were a short train ride away, and much wealthier than anyone in the mainland. One Jiangsu party official had 146 mistresses, detailing them all in a sordid little notebook. The former head of the Nanjing Dairy Industry Group (also known as ‘the Milk King’) put it well when he said: ‘What official at my seniority doesn’t have a few lovers? This isn’t just a biological need, it’s more crucially a status symbol. How else will you get the respect of others?’
For a time, stories of such philandering made the news, especially when officials got done for corruption (the two tended to go hand in hand, as the mistress lifestyle can get expensive — one disgraced Shenzhen official’s harem cost him almost £3,000 a day). Then came Xi’s 2012 anti-corruption campaign: a root-and-branch operation that indicted 100,000 officials within a few years. Almost all those arrested were having some kind of extramarital affair, according to Renmin University. After the purge, there was silence on the romantic lives of high-ranking officials. Had it scared politicians into monogamy? Peng’s story suggests otherwise.
Most mistresses don’t have such harrowing stories, but what is a status symbol for the men is a mark of shame for the women involved. Nobody wants their daughter to be a mistress. It’s telling that Peng announced her affair with the words: ‘I admit I’m not a good girl.’ Grisly videos circulate online of mistresses getting their comeuppance as angry wives enlist family members to beat and publicly humiliate them.
More often, the wives can only turn a blind eye. My businessman friend was upfront with his wife, telling her upon proposing that she should never expect him to be faithful to her. She agreed to marry him on three conditions: that he would never bring a mistress home, that he would not have children with his lovers, and that he would not financially ruin his family. Zhang’s wife seems to have gone one step further and ‘stood guard’ while Zhang forced himself on Peng that first time. Peng compares her to ‘the empress in Zhen Huan Zhuan’ (a TV drama about the palace intrigues of a Qing dynasty harem), saying the wife shot snide comments at her when Zhang wasn’t around.
Under Xi, the CCP has made a big show of abandoning its old reputation for corruption and extravagance. But Peng Shuai’s story — and the way the party quickly closed ranks — raises the question of how much decadence still goes on beneath the surface. And outside of politics, successful men like my businessman friend continue their lifestyles as their wives ignore the goings-on. China hasn’t yet said farewell to the concubine.



Once a famous pious man said: "Grab em by the Pu*sy" - Donald J. Trump

(End quote, period, full stop. Thank you for your time.)
 
.
It's a non issue. Powerful men had mistresses as long as humanity existed and it will continue. If those men can afford it and the women are happy to be mistresses, it's all good.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom