Kashmiri Pandit
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2015
- Messages
- 3,023
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Peace or not, India & Pak first need to unite to save Basmati - The Times of India
NEW DELHI: It will be a 'do or die' situation for India's Basmati, which occupies pride of place in the country's agricultural trade, when the Chennai-based Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) next week takes a call on granting 'GI' (geographical indicator) tag to the world famous long grain aromatic variety of rice. Chances of it getting the tag depends on whether India joins hands with Pakistan to get a joint registration by prevailing upon Madhya Pradesh to withdraw its claim of being included in the geographical area for Basmati.
READ ALSO
Geographical Indication tag sparks a bittersweet debate on rasgulla
If Basmati fails to get the tag, India and Pakistan will lose its exclusivity in the world market. Obviously, India will be the bigger loser because it has more than 95% of the share in the exclusive geographical zone for this unique variety Besides, the share of Basmati is also quite high in India's overall rice export. Roughly, Basmati contributes Rs 33,000 crore out of total Rs 40,000 crore worth of the country's annual rice export.
READ ALSO
Research lab to help fight patent war
If India does not get the tag, there is a possibility that China may get this variety from Pakistan and go for large-scale cultivation in newly acquired big farms in different African countries under different agreements.
"Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia are among certain east African countries where conditions are conducive for Basmati cultivation. China has acquired big farms in these and other east African countries," said an Indian scientist on condition of anonymity.
Though MP had not traditionally been part of the areas that cultivate Basmati, it staked its claim for getting specific areas in 13 of its districts included in geographical areas when farmers there opted for this high-paying variety in the past few years. Pakistan, which has traditionally been cultivating Basmati in its Punjab province, opposed MP's move, forcing the matter to reach before the IPAB.
Besides MP, Rajasthan and Bihar had also staked their claim for being included in the geographical areas for Basmati. But Indian agriculture scientists claimed these two states preferred not to be parties to the dispute in larger national interest.
Sensing the urgency ahead of the crucial hearing, India's premier agriculture research institute — the Indian Agricultural Research Institute — has requested the government to join hands with Pakistan in India's interest. The issue was flagged by IARI joint director K V Prabhu during a conference in New Delhi on October 16, where he had said, "We do not want others like China to introduce Basmati in global trade at low prices and spoil our market, which is potentially imminent."
NEW DELHI: It will be a 'do or die' situation for India's Basmati, which occupies pride of place in the country's agricultural trade, when the Chennai-based Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) next week takes a call on granting 'GI' (geographical indicator) tag to the world famous long grain aromatic variety of rice. Chances of it getting the tag depends on whether India joins hands with Pakistan to get a joint registration by prevailing upon Madhya Pradesh to withdraw its claim of being included in the geographical area for Basmati.
READ ALSO
Geographical Indication tag sparks a bittersweet debate on rasgulla
If Basmati fails to get the tag, India and Pakistan will lose its exclusivity in the world market. Obviously, India will be the bigger loser because it has more than 95% of the share in the exclusive geographical zone for this unique variety Besides, the share of Basmati is also quite high in India's overall rice export. Roughly, Basmati contributes Rs 33,000 crore out of total Rs 40,000 crore worth of the country's annual rice export.
READ ALSO
Research lab to help fight patent war
If India does not get the tag, there is a possibility that China may get this variety from Pakistan and go for large-scale cultivation in newly acquired big farms in different African countries under different agreements.
"Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia are among certain east African countries where conditions are conducive for Basmati cultivation. China has acquired big farms in these and other east African countries," said an Indian scientist on condition of anonymity.
Though MP had not traditionally been part of the areas that cultivate Basmati, it staked its claim for getting specific areas in 13 of its districts included in geographical areas when farmers there opted for this high-paying variety in the past few years. Pakistan, which has traditionally been cultivating Basmati in its Punjab province, opposed MP's move, forcing the matter to reach before the IPAB.
Besides MP, Rajasthan and Bihar had also staked their claim for being included in the geographical areas for Basmati. But Indian agriculture scientists claimed these two states preferred not to be parties to the dispute in larger national interest.
Sensing the urgency ahead of the crucial hearing, India's premier agriculture research institute — the Indian Agricultural Research Institute — has requested the government to join hands with Pakistan in India's interest. The issue was flagged by IARI joint director K V Prabhu during a conference in New Delhi on October 16, where he had said, "We do not want others like China to introduce Basmati in global trade at low prices and spoil our market, which is potentially imminent."
