PDF handles: What do the 'unusual' ones mean philosophically?

[Chinese-Dragon]

You forgot DSI.

Your avatar makes me cry.

Ten thousand years (of DSI)!

Ten thousand years (of DSI)!

 

[Daneshmand]

Don't worry I am mostly lurk here and post when I am bored

But your boredom is causing a philosophical dilemma every time you post anywhere. The title of the thread perfectly matches your situation but your handle even negates the purpose of being here. Now that is something to go on.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

I see now. And this comment of yours in addition to its link, refers to post number 10 which can also mean post number 10 here. Some clairvoyance.

It wasnt Pakistani members bringing up DSI, it was superboy, who would bring it up whenever, even in unrelated topics. Almost religiously.

He was a force of nature in the Indian section.

 

[SQ8]

Isn't the meaning of Oscar supposed to be friendly? Now that is a monster with thick eyebrows and you are a mod.

A groucy monster who lives in a trash can and is stingy.

 

[Daneshmand]

Do I have an unusual username?

Now that is in itself an unusual question making the handle unusual.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

A groucy monster who lives in a trash can and is stingy.

Living in a trash can is very cost efficient.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

@ptldM3

Sir Ruskie is also a convert due to the teachings of superboy. He also has an unsual ID.

 

[untitled]

Some of the most creative user ids (which are sometimes very abusive) I have seen are used by suicide trolls

 

[WAJsal]

Mine has a deep meaning to it....

 

[Zibago]

A cartoon character
Doctor Zibago

 

[Daneshmand]

Mine has a deep meaning to it....

I would vehemently want to know. Could you please tell its meaning?

A cartoon character
Doctor Zibago

A spin-off on Dr Zhivago?

 

[Zibago]

I would vehemently want to know. Could you please tell its meaning?



A spin-off on Dr Zhivago?

Not at all

 

[New]

Or @New , how can it be? The moment someone or something names itself such, it becomes old and redundant.

Or, you might get ride of the concept of the time frame, then in the absence of the time axis, everything is new at it's essence, since there is neither before nor the after.
You might wonder in that case the word new wouldn't even exist, then I have to mention that even the existence itself would be irrelevant.
So you have to choose, even every thing exits (Including the name New ) , or there exists nothing at all.

 

[Daneshmand]

Or, you might get ride of the concept of the time frame, then in the absence of the time axis, everything is new at it's essence, since there is neither before nor the after.
You might wonder in that case the word new wouldn't even exist, then I have to mention that even the existence itself would be irrelevant.
So you have to choose, even every thing exits (Including the name New ) , or there exists nothing at all.

Well, that is the modus St. Augustine used to counter the philosophical objections raised against Christianity by atheists: The God Question: In the beginning was the beginning

St. Augustine in response to the question, what existed before God or what God was doing before He created universe, said the time was creation of His and therefore from the point of view of God, everything is "New". St Augustine put God outside the universe.

But within a universe such as ours, such is not possible without some extreme cosmological gymnastics. The second law of thermodynamics is so fundamental to our universe that even time depends on it: The Arrow of Time | Exactly What Is Time?

They say if tomorrow you bring in a theory which goes against the relativity of Einstein, it will be good for you and bad for Einstein. But if tomorrow you bring in a theory which goes against the second law of thermodynamics, then it is only bad for you.

Some laws are not meant to be broken.

 

[New]

Well, that is the modus St. Augustine used to counter the philosophical objections raised against Christianity by atheists: The God Question: In the beginning was the beginning

St. Augustine in response to the question, what existed before God or what God was doing before He created universe, said the time was creation of His and therefore from the point of view of God, everything is "New". St Augustine put God outside the universe.

But within a universe such as ours, such is not possible without some extreme cosmological gymnastics. The second law of thermodynamics is so fundamental to our universe that even time depends on it: The Arrow of Time | Exactly What Is Time?

They say if tomorrow you bring in a theory which goes against the relativity of Einstein, it will be good for you and bad for Einstein. But if tomorrow you bring in a theory which goes against the second law of thermodynamics, then it is only bad for you.

Some laws are not meant to be broken.

Thanks for the post, but I have to recommend you to get rid of this universe of all gravity, and see the beyonds, then you'd see it was never about US or else, it's all about singularity of one and one alone. Then and there, you can legitimately claim there is no New, but at the same time you can't claim it's non existence either.