At the end if they check out which is very likely
Even on the money laundering, after the defendant's story checks out which is more likely
Sir ji can't do anything about "main na manoon" attitude of yours.
Several times myself and other members have told you that PTI has not objected to the Hamad's self declaration yet that is all based on the "suni sunai baatain". Let me tell you what PTI has to get this statement rejected:
1 - The character of the person is very important when it comes to accepting evidences. Your guys name is also appearing in Stolen Asset Recovery database. He returned 7 million pounds as well that were believed to be earned through illegal commissions and kickbacks.
2 - Hamads statement can't be considered due to the fact that their are several evidences available with, and submitted to court, by PTI. Only one document, that is the judgement, a decree, against Sharifs is available that is dated 1999. So Mr. Hamad (another pathological liar) statement that the settlement of the properties happened in 2006 will be considered a false statement. PMLN has not submitted any transfer deed, settlement documents etc dated 2006 to substantiate the personal statement of a random guy named Hamad.
3 - There are other evidences that PTI has yet to obtain and they are obtaining to make this case strong. One such evidence that they are looking for is the ownership of Neilson and Nescol before 2006. Since they are not authorized to obtain such documents in UK due to privacy laws without a court order or government request, it is taking time. It was the task of NAB to obtain such documents but the institution is not working as noticed by court in yesterday's proceedings as well.
Anyway, in the presence of court decree, this evidence is not required to prove the random guys statement wrong. PTI needs to establish that the companies were under Sharifs ownership in 1993 and flats were under these companies ownership as well from that date.
4 - There is another document dated 2001 that says that the "beneficial owner" of the companies is your Shahzadi sahiba. PTI needs to get the attested copy of this document and they are getting it. Thanks God it is UK document otherwise record would have already been burnt.
Now if again you believe that the RANDOM GUYs statement stands a chance in court, I will only trust you if the judges turn out to be sissy later. This has happened countless times in our history.
One more thing to clear the picture, ONLY ONE JUDGE HAS MADE SUCH REMARKS like newspapers, pkora, alif laila etc etc. Sanity is still prevailing among the majority which you guys are ignoring.
By the way, yesterday your Vakeel Akram Shaikh suddenly stood up and said Hassan Nawaz owned the apartments in 1999. Read the judges remarks after that.
Was your vakeel smoking something? He contradicted the RANDOM GUYs statement himself in the court.