PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
Which advocate?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which advocate?
Which advocate? Nisar is waiting until Monday to see which way the camel rests.
قدم بڑھاؤ نواز شریف ہم تمھارے ساتھ ہیں
It WILL go to NAB but not before the PM is disqualified for being a liar. That is the only way to uphold the judges' comments about the need for justice to be seen.
PMLN is crying that JIT mandate was to investigate ownership of flats.
This is what Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said in his court order
"There is yet another company under the name and style of Capital FZE, Dubai presumably registered under the laws of UAE. Funds also appear to have been routed through the said company from time to time by / and on behalf of Respondent No.7. The real ownership and business of the said company is unclear from the record which needs to be explained. No effort has been made on the part of the Respondents to answer the questions on the afore-noted matters.
In our opinion, considering the high public office that Respondent No.1 holds and the requirement of honesty, transparency, clean reputation, unquestionable integrity, financial probity and accountability for a person who holds the highest elected office of the land, it was necessary and incumbent upon Respondent No.1 to place all information, documents and record before this Court to clear his own position and that of the members of his family. Very serious and damaging questions were raised and grave allegations levelled by the Petitioners and the local as well as international Print and Electronic Media regarding money laundering, tax evasion, corruption and misuse of authority on the part of Respondent No.1 and members of his family. Although lofty claims were made by and on behalf of Respondent No.1 regarding readiness and willingness to face accountability and clearing his name, the claims remained hollow rhetoric. Regrettably, no effort was made either on the part of Respondent No.1 or that of Respondents No.7 & 8 who are his sons before this Court, to come clean, to clear their names, place the true facts and relevant record before us and the people of Pakistan by producing all documentary evidence which was either in their possession, control or accessible to them which could have answered all unanswered questions, removed all doubts and put all allegations to rest and cleared their names once and for all. This was not done and an opportunity squandered for reasons best known to the Respondents. Instead refuge was taken behind vague, ambiguous, fuzzy and hyper technical pleas.
Regrettably, most material questions have remained unanswered or answered insufficiently by Respondent No.1 and his children. I am also constrained to hold that I am not satisfied with the explanation offered by
Respondent No.1 (Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, the Prime Minister of Pakistan) and his children regarding the mode and manner in which the said properties came in their possession and what were the sources of funds utilized for acquisition of the same. Further, the source(s) of funding for Azizia Steel Mills and Hill Metals Establishment in Saudi Arabia, Flagship Investments Limited and a number of other companies set up/taken over by Respondent No.8 also need to be established. In addition to the affairs of Capital FZE, Dubai which also appears to be owned by Respondent No.7 need an inquiry. The aforesaid investigation and inquiry under normal circumstances should have been conducted by NAB. However, it has become quite obvious to us during these proceedings, Chairman NAB is too partial and partisan to be solely entrusted with such an important and sensitive investigation involving the Prime Minister of Pakistan and his family. Further owing to the nature and scope of investigation a broader pool of investigative expertise is required which may not be available with NAB."
JIT mentioned this part in its report [1 Vol-IX (Assets Beyond Means - MNS) pg # 6 point d]
I am fully expecting Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan to give harsh remarks against PMLN goons who are continuously saying this was not under JIT jurisdiction.
#
Javed Kiyani ne tou sab ugal diya..
Bara afsos hua..
Pata nahi..woh harsh remarks hum kab parhein ge..of Justice Ijazul Ahsan.... Pata nahi...kitna time lagay ga decision aanay main?
Pehlay Ishaq Dar, ab Javed Kiyani sahi
PMLN monday ko aur time mangay gi kay hamain aur time do parhnay key lye.
TBH 1 month say zada time nahi lagna chaye.
PMLN monday ko aur time mangay gi kay hamain aur time do parhnay key lye.
TBH 1 month say zada time nahi lagna chaye.
1 month tu hearing khatam honay ke baad...sirf decision aanay main hi lag jayega
Yaad hai, hum ne discuss kia tha yeh matter.. Yeh Javed Kiyani kaheen mukar na jaey.. Voice recordings ki koi legal value nahi hai..
I don't know what will happen if everyone says that "What they said in JIT, they didn't mean it"..
Mujhay 1-2 weeks ki game lag rahi hai..
Capital FZE main pakki disqualification hai.. koi defense hai hi nahi..
I agre.. NAB main tu case jayega..but after disqualification of NS
Ek cheez samajh nahi aarahi..why is everyone expecting decision on Monday? Even PTI is saying ke next week...faisla aajayega ya monday ko hi aajayega.. Even lawyers are saying tht
Jab ke monday ko tu arguments honge..as judges said last week..ke sab log tayyari kar ke aayein...arguments ki... Tu abhi tu atleast next week tu hearing hogi... Aur uske baad decision aanay main bhi...na jaanay ke kitnay days..lagein...? Last time 2 months lagay thay.. Ab atleast 1 month tu lag hi sakta hai... Even IK has said ke next week will be last week of NS as PM.. Samajh nahi aarahi ..ke how can decision come next week..or why are they even expecting this?
Short order..