What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Safdar denies Maryam held any offshore entity
| Seeks a seemingly unending probe by Panama Leaks commission | Rashid’s ToRs target Sharifs
November 05, 2016
safdar-denies-maryam-held-any-offshore-entity-1478297419-2184.jpg

Terence J Sigamony/Agencies



ISLAMABAD - PML-N MNA Capt (r) Muhammad Safdar and AML President Sheikh Rashid yesterday filed in the Supreme Court the terms of reference for proposed commission on Panama leaks controversy.

Whereas the Awami Muslim League chief’s ToRs targeted the Sharifs, Safdar wanted the commission to initiate such an extensive probe as probably would have no ending.

The son-in-law of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif also submitted his reply to the five-member bench hearing petitions on Panama Papers in which he denied having any offshore account.

Safdar also said his wife Maryam Nawaz Sharif ‘does not own’ any offshore company. He asked the court to reject the applications against her, claiming she did not own the alleged properties.

The data from the Panama Papers released in April this year allegedly described Maryam as the owner of two British Virgin Islands-based firms “incorporated in 1994 and 1993”.

The MNA stated that Maryam’s father, Nawaz Sharif, had gifted her piece(s) of land and she has been paying her taxes regularly, around Rs2.4 to 2.5 million yearly.

Safder also asked for reject PTI’s application seeking his disqualification saying Imran Khan did not file any reference against him with the NA speaker, and seeking disqualification directly through SC was un-constitutional.

Safdar in his ToRs urged that the proposed commission on Panama leaks should examine information relating to involvement of Pakistani citizens and persons of Pakistan origin as well as legal entitles in offshore companies in Panama or any other country.

He said the commission “shall determine whether the provisions of laws relating to income tax, wealth tax, foreign exchange, companies and elections in force at the relevant time have been infringed”, and if so, it should also fix responsibility.

He proposed investigating: (a) details of properties held by offshore companies; and (b) sources of income used for it; (c) Income tax details of the owner; and (d) details of sellers.

He also sought investigating the bank loans that were got written-off by former or present holders of elective public office, and determine if any wrongdoing was involved.

Safdar further said the commission should examine transfer of any black money from Pakistan, identify the culprits, and recommend action.

According to Sheikh Rashid’s ToRs, prime minister’s family - including his parents, spouse, sons, daughters, grandchildren, brothers and sisters- should be probed. He wanted the probe of Sharifs’ properties, income tax paid from 1985 to 2016 and sources of funds involved in buying or selling of properties – held in their own name or others name.

His ToRs further sought getting the date and banks’ names which were used in the sale/purchase of properties abroad, and see if the accretion or acquisition of assets commensurate with the income tax paid by each corresponding year by the respondent and his family since 1985.

“What was the money trail of transfer or funds into their offshore accounts and money trail/transfer of funds of such account for purchasing of properties or other investments in foreign countries?” the ToRs raised the question.

The ToRs stated that before the proposed commission enters upon any inquiry, PM and his family shall place all and complete information of all their worldwide moveable and immoveable assets and interests in properties, held at any time since 1985 along with full details of the income tax paid year-wise since that year.

“The commission will appoint a committee of experts in international forensic audit to carry out an exhaustive investigation and audit into the offshore companies and their accounts owned by PM and his family - including all transactions, sales and purchases of all assets, or benami interests and opening and operation of all bank accounts including offshore bank accounts and companies,” it stated.

“The commission shall direct the respondent to give a mandatory authorisation by an irrevocable general power of attorney empowering the committee and/or its designated members to access all offshore companies and accounts,” Sheikh Rashid’s ToRs further stated.

It stated that every respondent and his/her family shall present themselves before the commission for examination and cross-examination by any person(s) permitted by the commission. The case of any respondent who volunteers publically for accountability shall be taken up first to enable him to clear his name in the first instance, it said.
 
.
Safdar denies Maryam held any offshore entity
| Seeks a seemingly unending probe by Panama Leaks commission | Rashid’s ToRs target Sharifs
November 05, 2016
safdar-denies-maryam-held-any-offshore-entity-1478297419-2184.jpg

Terence J Sigamony/Agencies



ISLAMABAD - PML-N MNA Capt (r) Muhammad Safdar and AML President Sheikh Rashid yesterday filed in the Supreme Court the terms of reference for proposed commission on Panama leaks controversy.

Whereas the Awami Muslim League chief’s ToRs targeted the Sharifs, Safdar wanted the commission to initiate such an extensive probe as probably would have no ending.

The son-in-law of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif also submitted his reply to the five-member bench hearing petitions on Panama Papers in which he denied having any offshore account.

Safdar also said his wife Maryam Nawaz Sharif ‘does not own’ any offshore company. He asked the court to reject the applications against her, claiming she did not own the alleged properties.

The data from the Panama Papers released in April this year allegedly described Maryam as the owner of two British Virgin Islands-based firms “incorporated in 1994 and 1993”.

The MNA stated that Maryam’s father, Nawaz Sharif, had gifted her piece(s) of land and she has been paying her taxes regularly, around Rs2.4 to 2.5 million yearly.

Safder also asked for reject PTI’s application seeking his disqualification saying Imran Khan did not file any reference against him with the NA speaker, and seeking disqualification directly through SC was un-constitutional.

Safdar in his ToRs urged that the proposed commission on Panama leaks should examine information relating to involvement of Pakistani citizens and persons of Pakistan origin as well as legal entitles in offshore companies in Panama or any other country.

He said the commission “shall determine whether the provisions of laws relating to income tax, wealth tax, foreign exchange, companies and elections in force at the relevant time have been infringed”, and if so, it should also fix responsibility.

He proposed investigating: (a) details of properties held by offshore companies; and (b) sources of income used for it; (c) Income tax details of the owner; and (d) details of sellers.

He also sought investigating the bank loans that were got written-off by former or present holders of elective public office, and determine if any wrongdoing was involved.

Safdar further said the commission should examine transfer of any black money from Pakistan, identify the culprits, and recommend action.

According to Sheikh Rashid’s ToRs, prime minister’s family - including his parents, spouse, sons, daughters, grandchildren, brothers and sisters- should be probed. He wanted the probe of Sharifs’ properties, income tax paid from 1985 to 2016 and sources of funds involved in buying or selling of properties – held in their own name or others name.

His ToRs further sought getting the date and banks’ names which were used in the sale/purchase of properties abroad, and see if the accretion or acquisition of assets commensurate with the income tax paid by each corresponding year by the respondent and his family since 1985.

“What was the money trail of transfer or funds into their offshore accounts and money trail/transfer of funds of such account for purchasing of properties or other investments in foreign countries?” the ToRs raised the question.

The ToRs stated that before the proposed commission enters upon any inquiry, PM and his family shall place all and complete information of all their worldwide moveable and immoveable assets and interests in properties, held at any time since 1985 along with full details of the income tax paid year-wise since that year.

“The commission will appoint a committee of experts in international forensic audit to carry out an exhaustive investigation and audit into the offshore companies and their accounts owned by PM and his family - including all transactions, sales and purchases of all assets, or benami interests and opening and operation of all bank accounts including offshore bank accounts and companies,” it stated.

“The commission shall direct the respondent to give a mandatory authorisation by an irrevocable general power of attorney empowering the committee and/or its designated members to access all offshore companies and accounts,” Sheikh Rashid’s ToRs further stated.

It stated that every respondent and his/her family shall present themselves before the commission for examination and cross-examination by any person(s) permitted by the commission. The case of any respondent who volunteers publically for accountability shall be taken up first to enable him to clear his name in the first instance, it said.

:lol::lol::lol:
 
.
Safdar also said his wife Maryam Nawaz Sharif ‘does not own’ any offshore company. He asked the court to reject the applications against her, claiming she did not own the alleged properties.
 
.
Safdar also said his wife Maryam Nawaz Sharif ‘does not own’ any offshore company. He asked the court to reject the applications against her, claiming she did not own the alleged properties.

So it seems Safdar has shot himself in the foot for claiming none of the offshore companies are owned by Maryam, umm interesting.
 
.
Safdar also said his wife Maryam Nawaz Sharif ‘does not own’ any offshore company. He asked the court to reject the applications against her, claiming she did not own the alleged properties.

This also means that princes Maryam Nawaz on Monday is going to disown London properties registered with two offshore companies. In other words, revelation pertaining princes made in Panama papers is false.
 
.
This also means that princes Maryam Nawaz on Monday is going to disown London properties registered with two offshore companies. In other words, revelation pertaining princes made in Panama papers is false.
Well as per claims it seems that they are going to disown but if someone finds out the documents, it will contradict her. This loose-mouthed lying creature has denied it before but her brother Hussain Nawaz told in an interview that she is the owner of those properties.
 
Last edited:
.
Well ap per claims it seems that they are going to disown but if someone finds our the documents, it will contradict her. This loose-mouthed lying creature has denied it before but her brother Hussain Nawaz told in an interview that she is the owner of those properties.

Telling lies for a politician is a mundane thing. Lets see what her brothers have to say on allegations, it will be interesting. Prince Hussain Nawaz I think claimed that he was the beneficial owner of those offshore campaniles and flats, princes however held those companies/properties. IDK what he meant by "holding"

Ao jee!

ISLAMABAD: Barrister Zafarullah Khan of the Watan Party has challenged formation of commission for investigation into Panama Papers Leaks, Samaa reported Saturday.


According to our correspondent, Zafarullah Khan, whose petition was disposed of by the Supreme Court in Panama case last month, filed another petition in the apex court, challenging formation of a single-member judicial panel that was proposed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Anwar Zaheer Jamali.

The CJP, while hearing the case on Tuesday, said a single member bench comprising a sitting judge of the Supreme Court will be constituted for investigation into the scandal, adding that the commission will have all the powers.

In the application filed by Barrister Zafarullah Khan, who supports constitution of a parliamentary committee or panel to look into the Panamagate scandal, has submitted that the court can’t constitute a commission since Enquiry Commission Bill 2016 is already pending n the Parliament for approval.

“Supreme Court is not entitled to make TORs for the inquiry.… The Parliament is mother of all institutions while courts are bound to implement the Parliament’s legislation,” he said.

“It’s not in court’s jurisdiction to hear a dispute of political family,” he said, adding that such cases could be exploited by anti-judiciary elements. – Samaa

http://www.samaa.tv/pakistan/2016/11/formation-of-panama-commission-challenged-in-sc/
 
. . .
Telling lies for a politician is a mundane thing. Lets see what her brothers have to say on allegations, it will be interesting. Prince Hussain Nawaz I think claimed that he was the beneficial owner of those offshore campaniles and flats, princes however held those companies/properties. IDK what he meant by "holding"

Actually I am searching for the clip in which he revealed about the ownership of properties.
But I can see that the princess will now turn her guns towards the king (her father) to protect herself. Her disowning means that then these properties are owned by Nawaz Shareef and bingo then he will get disqualified on the basis of wrong declaration or hiding his assets :)
 
.
On 7th February 2006, Mariam declared herself as Sole Shareholder of Niescoll Limited when £7m was borrowed with 4 flats declared as security against that loan.
https://www.theguardian.com/global/...z-sharif-children-deutsche-bank-panama-papers

More will come out.

Shariff family's western masters have decided that they won't escape the SC and lo and behold investigations start here as well.

And what did Nawaz say on the floor of the house? That they bought the flats in 2007!

These lot were taking bank loans against these flats at the start of 2006!
 
.
i am not having much hope or in other words, keeping my hopes very very low so not to get much disappointed later from the outcome of panama case; if the panama scandal is proved in court with available evidences and his royal highness and the royal family is involved in corruption then the win win situation is IF the properties abroad are sold and the hefty amount is brought back in Pakistan otherwise disqualification or any similar verdict which fails to takeover these properties will in fact a big failure.
 
.
Safdar denies Maryam held any offshore entity
| Seeks a seemingly unending probe by Panama Leaks commission | Rashid’s ToRs target Sharifs

Hussain Nawaz also denied & said they don't own any offshore company but later in an interview he proudly said he owns offshore companies & mayfair property. Maryam also denied panama papers at first but later Hussain Nawaz revealed that Marium Nawaz is trustee in offshore company.
Actually I am searching for the clip in which he revealed about the ownership of properties.
at 22:00, he confesses
 
.
Hussain Nawaz also denied & said they don't own any offshore company but later in an interview he proudly said he owns offshore companies & mayfair property. Maryam also denied panama papers at first but later Hussain Nawaz revealed that Marium Nawaz is trustee in offshore company.

at 22:00, he confesses
Thank you for sharing the video...I basically want just that clip (2-3 min) where he claimed the ownership of these properties a few days before the leaks and the related clips of Maryam Nawaz and Hassan Nawaz and others and then combine those into a single video.
 
.
Actually I am searching for the clip in which he revealed about the ownership of properties.
But I can see that the princess will now turn her guns towards the king (her father) to protect herself. Her disowning means that then these properties are owned by Nawaz Shareef and bingo then he will get disqualified on the basis of wrong declaration or hiding his assets :)

Do share that clip with me. The strategy apparently seems to put the court/commission on a track with no destination, Sharifs want the commission to be lost in a maze of ownership of the property. If two price don't submit their replies by Monday (preferred not to respond), mark my words the court or commission is set to end up in a cul de sac.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom