What's new

Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates

Didnt he recently resigned from Ministry of Interior ? Or are you guys talking about resignation from PML N?

He didn't resign from sh!t. Cabinet stood dissolved due to Court Verdict against Nawaz. He vowed to resign from ministry and his MNA seat as soon as the verdict delivered... Not keeping his word as usual.
 
Panamagate case: Justice Ijazul Ahsan to oversee proceedings by NAB
Haseeb BhattiAugust 02, 2017

Chief Justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar has appointed Justice Ijazul Ahsan as the "monitoring judge to supervise and monitor the implementation" of the Panamagate case and oversee the proceedings by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and accountability courts.

This appointment was announced in a notification issued by the Supreme Court deputy registrar on Tuesday.

Since Justice Ijazul Ahsan is currently abroad, Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan will act on his behalf, read the notification. Justice Ahsan and Justice Khan were part of the bench that heard the Panamagate case.

Last week, in the much-awaited Panamagate verdict, the SC had disqualified Nawaz Sharif from holding office of the prime minister over non-declaration of an Iqama — a United Arab Emirates work visa — in his nomination papers for general elections in 2013.

The five-member bench had ordered NAB to file multiple references against the Sharif family and former finance minister Ishaq Dar within six weeks of the judgement, and requested the chief justice to appoint a judge to oversee the implementation of the order.

NAB had approved filing four references in line with the SC order on Monday, but decided not to file a reference regarding Hudaibiya Paper Mills, reasoning that the case had already been decided by the Lahore High Court.



Hudaibya Paper mills case is dropped by NAB. Breaking News!


The judicial system is the most expensive machine ever invented for finding out what happened and what to do about it.
 
Noothiyas laying in front of tanks to protect their disqualified godfather

20431202_1440495359371136_2709119859707065210_n.jpg
 
Article: 19A Right to Information
1 [19A. Right to information.—
Every citizen shall have the right to have access to information in all matters of public importance subject to regulation and reasonable restrictions imposed by law]

Volume 10 of Joint Investigation Team’s report, in Panama case, should be made public in terms of Article 19-A of the Constitution of Pakistan.
 
Panama Case verdict Post discussion

NS and Patwaris okaat pe agaye hain aur prove kardia hey NS nay 30 saal ke political career say KUCH NAHE SEKHA.. jo 90s may kya wohi 20 30 saal baad dubara wohi kya.. character assassination of others ...
 
Panama Case verdict Post discussion

NS and Patwaris okaat pe agaye hain aur prove kardia hey NS nay 30 saal ke political career say KUCH NAHE SEKHA.. jo 90s may kya wohi 20 30 saal baad dubara wohi kya.. character assassination of others ...

they did the same with Benazir also when zardari was in jail .... judges were right, they are a mafia !!
 
yeh din bhool gayee hain.... yeh din phir anay waly hain
 

Attachments

  • 20292993_1421821334570515_9053652609817896611_n.jpg
    20292993_1421821334570515_9053652609817896611_n.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 59
What u people think regarding last press conference of Javed hashmi in which he said that supervision of small court by higher court is illegal because first small court should given its verdict and then it can be challenged or discussed in higher court.
What our supreme court did is that case has been referred to NAB and supreme court will directly monitored it, Is it right to do legally ?
 
We want the original thread to be opened. this is none-sensical. We shall boycott this thread @Emmie @Farah Sohail @PakSword @QatariPrince @Realistic Change @MastanKhan

@Verve @Baghial and all others who have been contributing positively on that thread.
LolZ!
Wait brother!

Actually I requested for this thread. This is normal practice. Whenever a thread get TOO big we have to open up a part 2 of the same. A massive thread makes access to information difficult. You can continue with the discussion here. I mean, it not point scoring right? We all need to share information and present it forward for others to see and review in a manageable form. This was the reason.

You can check with ANY OTHER such topic and whenever a thread get TOO big (ours was 1350+ pages) we open a Part-II. Dont worry. Feel free to continue here.

@war&peace ; @Arsalan

Let us open a new thread to discuss if we need a new thread or not :partay:
I am a bit surprised by the reaction to be honest!
 
What u people think regarding last press conference of Javed hashmi in which he said that supervision of small court by higher court is illegal because first small court should given its verdict and then it can be challenged or discussed in higher court.
What our supreme court did is that case has been referred to NAB and supreme court will directly monitored it, Is it right to do legally ?
Now a political nobody will decide what is legal and illegal

@The Sandman @Hell hound @PakSword
 

Back
Top Bottom