What's new

Pakistan's War......AQ, AT, TTP and USA?

Afghan Taliban rely on funds generated by TTP which is through foreign agency work, extortion and drugs.

One day they are TTP, the next day they are Afghan Taliban, there is no real clear distinction.

I suggest when NW op is finished we move on to Kunar and Nooristan and destroy bases regardless if it is Afghan Taliban or TTP. We can't have any militant group operating within 100 miles of border.

Afghan drug trade is a multi billion dollar industry, even if TTP/Taliban are not great businessmen they will still generate millions and can afford to build bases and buy arms. To have their base of operations so close to the border is asking for trouble in the future.

The last thing the country needs is another major terrorist attack a year after a successful operation.
 
Fear of drones makes Sajna agree to talks

The News
Amir Mir
October 28, 2014

ISLAMABAD: Days after being tagged as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist by US State Department and the consequent fear of becoming a target of the American drones, a central Taliban leader from South Waziristan, Commander Khalid Mehsud alias Khan Said Sajna, has agreed to begin peace talks with the government through a tribal jirga.

The US State Department had tagged Sajna a global terrorist on October 21 and slapped sanctions on him under Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists. Giving reasons for tagging him a key global terrorist, the US State Department notification said that Sajna, who has had experience fighting in Afghanistan was not only involved in the May 2011 attack on the Mehran Naval base but is also credited with masterminding the April 2012 Bannu jail break in which 400 terrorists were freed.

While strongly criticising Sajna’s tagging by US State Department, his spokesman Azam Tariq had said in an audio message: “The American decision is recognition of our jehad against Jews and Christians. We thank Allah Almighty that infidels are offering bounty for our leaders”. While realising that he has now become a target of the drones after being tagged a global terrorist by US State Department, Sajna has apparently decided to initiate peace talks with at least one of the key foes - the state of Pakistan. Therefore, he has given a go ahead to a tribal jirga [which had recently called on the Corps Commander Peshawar] to initiate talks with the ‘Mehsud Taliban’. Before being tagged a global terrorist, Sajna was averse to the idea of holding talks with the Pakistani authorities.

The member of the tribal jirga are set to hold peace talks with the elders of the Mehsud tribe and the commanders of different factions of the Mehsud Taliban at a secret place in South Waziristan to explore the prospects of a peace accord with the government. The jirga is led by Maulana Ikramuddin, the father-in-law of the TTP founder Baitullah Mehsud who was arrested and interrogated after his son-in-law’s death in a US drone attack in August 2009. The TTP founder was droned to death while he was getting a leg massage by her second wife on the roof of his father-in-law’s house in Zangarha village of South Waziristan.

The day he was droned, a diabetic Baitullah Mehsud had been feeling feebly in the sizzling summer heat of South Waziristan and a local doctor called round to give him a glucose drip. Commander Waliur Rehman Mehsud, the then ameer of the TTP’s South Waziristan chapter, kept Maulana Ikramuddin, his son Ziauddin and Ikramuddin’s brother Saadullah in detention for six months after TTP’s intelligence unit Lashkar-e-Khorasan concluded that a paid agent, possibly a relative of Baitullah, had helped signal his whereabouts to the Pakistani security agencies which eventually passed on the information to the American CIA that immediately took him out through a drone attack.

As per the Khurasan findings, Saadullah, the brother of Ikramuddin, a paramedic who lived nearby, had been called to treat Baitullah’s sugar problem on August 5, 2009, the day he was droned. The missile targeted Ikramuddin’s house shortly after Saadullah had left, arousing the doubt that he had passed on the information. While Ikramuddin and his son Ziauddin were released after six months’ detention, the whereabouts of Saaudllah are still unknown. Five years after Baitullah’s death, as the Pakistan Army is conducting a military operation in North Waziristan, a tribal jirga has been constituted under the leadership of Ikramuddin to hold peace talks with the government on behalf of the Mehsuds of South Waziristan.

The other eight jirga members are Shah Rang, Matab Khan, Rafah Khan, Maulvi Abdur Rahim, Azizullah, Haji Mohammad, Maulvi Asamullah and Zafar Ali Shah Barki. The jirga has been empowered to hold talks with all Mehsud factions, including the groups of Khan Said alias Sajna and Shehryar Mehsud alias Shahbaz. The jirga will also discuss the possibility of a peace deal with two more obscure Taliban factions - Hazratullah group and Shamim group. While Khan Said Sajna had already discarded the TTP umbrella in May 2014 after developing differences with Mullah Fazlullah and launched his own Taliban faction, Shehryar Mehsud alias Shahbaz is still loyal to the fugitive TTP ameer.

However, there are reports that after the launching of Operation Zarbe-a-Azab, Sajna and Shehryar groups had ended their rivalry, although the establishment was hoping that Sajna would side with them in the military operation against Fazlullah. Sajna’s spokesman Azam Tariq has already claimed last week that the Mehsud faction had no more differences with Fazlullah because they have their own organisation now. The formation of Mehsud jirga is part of the government’s reconciliatory policy towards the Taliban, particularly Mehsud factions. The peace plan was mooted when a Waziristan tribal jirga called on the Corps Commander Peshawar at his office in Peshawar early this month. The jirga had a one-point agenda of persuading the Mehsud Taliban of Waziristan to reach a pact with the government.

Three secret meetings had been held by the Mehsud tribal jirga with the political agent of Waziristan and it was agreed to facilitate the talks. The peace initiative by the Corps Commander Peshawar [despite the fact that an army operation is also going on in North Waziristan against the Taliban] seems to be prompted by the fact the Mehsud group of Taliban led by Sajna continues to be a key and equally effective component of the jehadi mafia in Waziristan region, in terms of providing manpower for the battle against the security forces and the territory for safe havens for the warring Taliban leaders in their stronghold of South Waziristan and other key areas straddling the troubled Pak-Afghan border. In a public statement at the time of launching his own Taliban faction, Sajna had stated his commitment to continue carrying out terrorist acts. And he has lived up to his announcement, having already claimed responsibility for the August 15, 2014 fidayeen attacks on two airbases in Quetta.

However, it was the May 22, 2011 fidayeen attack on the PNS Mehran base in Karachi and the subsequent destruction of two US-supplied P-3C Orion maritime surveillance planes which apparently prompted the US State Department to tag Sajna as a global terrorist. The PNS Mehran is the headquarters of Pakistan Navy’s Naval Air Arm which is located near the PAF’s Faisal Air Force Base of Karachi. In the course of the assault, 15 attackers had killed 18 military personnel and wounded 16 others. The American and Pakistani security agencies consider Sajna to be a close ally of al-Qaeda in Pakistan. The 36-year-old commander belongs to the Shabikhel clan of the Mehsud tribe in South Waziristan.

Sajna was nominated as the deputy ameer of the TTP on May 30, 2013, a day after the then deputy ameer of the TTP Commander Waliur Rehman was killed in a US drone attack. He was also appointed the commander of South Waziristan chapter of the TTP, a slot which was being held by Waliur Rehman before his killing in a drone attack. Like many other Taliban commanders, Sajna too has been involved in fighting against the US-led Allied Forces in Afghanistan which is also a prime reason for his tagging as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist by US State Department. Another major reason was his involvement in the May 2011 fidayeen attack on Mehran Naval Base in Karachi which had destroyed two precious US-supplied P-3C Orion maritime surveillance planes. Before becoming the closest aide of Waliur Rehman as well as his deputy, Sajna used to command “Baitullah Karwan”, a small but lethal jehadi unit which was named after Baitullah Mehsud and was responsible for recruitment and training of the suicide bombers belonging to the Mehsud clan.
 
First of all, I apologise for hijacking this thread and bringing India into it. Please feel free to delete this post if it disrupts the conversation here.

From what Rabzon has been posting, most of the complaints that Indians have against the Pakistani military establishment seem to be true. In particular, support for the Haqqani network and the Afghan Taliban (and the Punjabi terrorist organisations directed against India - Rabzon did not mention them but they are seen as ISI sponsored in India) and the involvement of the ISI in playing good terrorist/ bad terrorist (Hamid Gul is seen as one of the worst offenders in this regard in India). You could argue that all of this is well known and is stating the obvious, but these facts have been consistently denied by almost all Pakistanis speaking in India or abroad. Those Pakistanis (and some western authors) that have made these claims have been branded as liars/conspirators. Yet, from what I read here, these facts are common knowledge in Pakistan.

Also, if the Pakistani establishment is indeed trying to strike a deal with the Afghan Taliban and Haqqanis, don't you think that it'll be playing with fire and repeating the mistakes of the past? Ultimately, these groups are thirsty for political power and use Islam as a cover for their aims. Once they deal with their immediate objectives they'll come back to bite the hand that fed them if it suits their political ends. This has happened to Pakistan on innumerable occasions (as it has to India, albeit in a different context- the LTTE).
 
http://www.dawn.com/news/1142198/those-who-kill-profiles-of-pakistans-terror-outfits

Dawn
Nov 4 2014

Journalist Hasan Abdullah's Consortium of Terror published earlier this year, and updated below, serves as a primer to the complex world of militancy in Pakistan.
Despite hundreds of attacks and the deaths of thousands of Pakistanis, there is still a great deal of confusion about the number, nature and end goals of the militant organisations operating in Pakistan.

For some, they remain figments of a fevered imagination. To others they are proxies of foreign powers.

This belief has not come out of the blue. It is part of an obscurantist narrative the state itself created and propagated.

The problem with this narrative is that while it may have delegitimised some jihadi groups within public ranks, it is counter productive in the long run for a number of reasons.


As Pakistan debates engaging the militants in the tribal areas and beyond, it is imperative that the policy-makers as well as the public understand the militant groups and their interrelations.
Fatalities in Terrorist Violence in Pakistan 2003-2014
Data up to November 2014

The big four

It is difficult to draw hard lines around these groups, as there is a great deal of cooperation and inter-linkage. Sometimes, for operational and propaganda reasons, a Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) attack on Shias will be claimed by the Lashkar-i-Jhangvi (LJ) and so on.

This also helps maintain the fiction that these groups are somehow entirely distinct entities.

Total Fatalities in Terrorist Violence in Pakistan 2003-2014. 54,855

Al Qaeda (AQ)

AQ is not just a conventional group but the fountainhead of a violent ideology.
The organisation was founded at the end of the 1980s by Osama bin Laden while he was in Afghanistan/Pakistan waging war against the Soviets. According to Al Qaeda literature, the organisation’s ultimate goal is to establish a hardline global caliphate. It seeks to fight America and her “apostate” allies in the Muslim world.

While the organisation maintains a relatively low profile in Pakistan, it is behind much of the coordination between different jihadi groups in a bid to “channelise” and “streamline” the effort.
In contrast with many other jihadi groups, the overwhelming majority of their cadres in Pakistan are university graduates hailing from well-off urban families.
Al Qaeda regards Pakistan as a “Daar-ul-Kufr wal harb” (abode of disbelief and war). It classifies the rulers as “apostates” against whom it is obligatory to rebel and fight.
Al Qaeda considers Shias as disbelievers “in the garb of Islam”.
As such, the militant organisation considers it permissible to shed the blood of Shia Muslims and confiscate their wealth. However on strategic grounds, the Al Qaeda chief has advised the operatives not to engage minority groups anywhere in a confrontation unless “absolutely required” such as in Syria and Iraq.
The organisation rejects the concept of nation-states. It seeks to expand the theatre of war, topple governments in Muslim countries and form a global caliphate.



Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan
Formally launched in 2007, the TTP is effectively Al Qaeda’s local franchise in Pakistan. Among anti-state jihadi groups here, TTP maintains the strongest footprint with operatives all over the country.
Its stated objective is to turn Pakistan into an “Islamic state”.
Up till its recent splintering, The group regarded the leader of the Afghan Taliban, Mullah Umar, as its supreme leader.

As with Al Qaeda, the TTP regards Pakistan as a “Daar-ul-Kufr wal harb” (abode of disbelief and war) and considers its rulers apostates.
While the TTP also considers Shia Muslims to be apostates, there is currently a debate within the organisation on whether a front should be opened against them.

The TTP is also increasingly looking at global operations, most recently with top TTP leaders forming splinter group TTP Jamaatul Ahrar; the group has openly pledged their allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).



Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)

The IMU was founded by Tahir Yuldashev and Jumma Kasimov (both Uzbeks) in 1991. The two had earlier fought in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion of the country.
The initial objective of the organisation was to topple Islam Karimov’s regime in Uzbekistan and to establish an “Islamic state” in the country. They also fought alongside the Taliban against the Northern Alliance.
Kasimov died in the fighting while Yuldashev, along with his fighters, managed to escape into Pakistan’s tribal areas during the 2001 US invasion of Afghanistan. IMU maintains strong contacts with Al Qaeda and Afghan Taliban as well as the TTP.
For now, its focus remains on strengthening the group as it prepares for the war in Central Asia.



Lashkar-i-Jhangvi

An offshoot of the Sipah-i-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP), the virulently sectarian LJ was formed in 1996. Its founders Riaz Basra, Akram Lahori and Malik Ishaq had differences with the SSP and believed that the parent organisation had drifted from its original ideals.
LJ’s primary targets are Shia Muslims and it has indiscriminately targeted them through both assassination and mass casualty attacks.
The LJ has killed thousands of people, including many women and children. Its largest attacks to date have been against the Shia Hazaras of Quetta.
LJ leaders say their aim is to turn Pakistan into a Sunni Islamic state and consider it a “priority” to target Shia Muslims. The group also seeks to establish stronger ties with anti-Iran groups operating in the region.



Splinters, subdivisions and shadow groups
The lines blur when it comes to differentiating between militant groups in Pakistan. They share space, tactics and resources and sometimes, subdivisions are created for specific purposes and for creating confusion in the public’s minds.


TTP Jamaat ul Ahrar

On August 26, 2014, key commanders belonging to the TTP announced the formation of a new group by the name of TTP Jamatul Ahrar, with Maulana Qasim Khorasani as the new Ameer and also comprising other commanders.
The new group comprises of members from four of the seven tribal districts bordering Pakistan and Afghanistan, namely Mohmand, Bajaur, Khyber and Orakzai.
Former TTP spokesperson Ehsanullah Ehsan, who has been nominated as the spokesman for the splinter group says the new group only wants the Shariah system to prevail in the country.
At least 60 people were killed on Sunday November 2, 2014 in a blast near the Wagah border, the responsibility of which was claimed separately by the outlawed Jundullah and TTP-affiliated Jamaat-ul-Ahrar outfits.



Ahrar ul Hind

The group's name literally means freedom fighters of India (referring to the Indian subcontinent as a whole).
According to a commander of a Taliban group, the group derived its name of “Ahrar” from Majlis-i-Ahrar-ul-Islam, because the Ahraris were against the formation of Pakistan, and they believed that the entire subcontinent was their homeland.
The commander said that the group planned to expand their operations to the remaining part of the subcontinent.



Ansar al-Aseer

A North Waziristan based group primarily concerned with the “welfare” of locked-up jihadis. Its tasks include intelligence gathering about Pakistani jails and planning jailbreaks to release militants. It is closely allied to TTP and draws many of its fighters from TTP and IMU.
Its basic agenda is to free all militants locked up in jails across the country.


Lashkar-i-Khorasan

Al Qaeda allied group with a single point agenda to track down and eliminate “spies” in North Waziristan.



Ansar al-Mujahideen

A small organisation affiliated with the TTP. Its primary focus is targeting armed forces personnel and politicians.
As with AQ and TTP, Ansar al-Mujahideen aims to turn Pakistan into an “Islamic State” and use the state to launch “jihad” against other belligerent states.



Jandullah
Al Qaeda affiliated group that started off from South Waziristan. It gained most notoriety for its assassination attempt on the then Corps Commander Karachi Lt Gen Ahsan Saleem Hayat. The outfit has also targeted Shia Muslims and foreign tourists.
Not to be confused with Iran-based Jundullah.




Ghazi Force

A group formed after the Lal Masjid operation in Islamabad. It is named after Maulana Abdul Rasheed Ghazi, the former Lal Masjid cleric who was also killed in the operation. Most of its members are relatives and friends of the people killed in the 2007 operation.
This group has practically merged with the TTP. Some of its members and sympathisers in and around Islamabad are known to provide intelligence and a footprint in the capital.
Members of the group consider it a priority to target former president Pervez Musharraf.



The ‘Other’ Militants
Then there are those jihadi groups who, for one reason or another, have historically been classified as ‘good’ militants by the state.


Part of the reason for this is that these groups do not prioritise targeting the Pakistani state and instead turn their energies outwards. However, there is evidence that militants from their ranks can and at times do join other organisations, such as the TTP, AQ and LJ.

They also share ideological commonalities with those groups and in some cases even share resources and physical space.




Lashkar-e-Taiba

Formed in the early 90s in Afghanistan, the group has been primarily operating in Indian-held Kashmir. It seeks to “liberate” the people of Kashmir from “Indian oppression” and establish an Islamic state” in the region.
It sees India, the United States and Israel as eternal enemies of Islam and boasts about defeating them through armed struggle. Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the head of Jamat-ud-Dawa denies that his charity is simply a cover for the banned militant outfit. However the lower cadre not only acknowledges their connection with LeT but proudly boast about their operations in India.
In line with their particular brand of Salafism, the organisation is strongly opposed to rebellion against the Pakistani state.
Members of the group say they are bracing themselves for the Ghazwa-i-Hind — a grand war in which Muslims will regain control of India, they claim.



Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM)

Jaish-e-Muhammad was formed in 2000 by Maulana Masood Azhar. Shortly after its inception, it effectively swallowed a previously existing but now largely defunct Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HuM).
Its primary goal is to “liberate” Kashmir from Indian rule and it has carried out various attacks on Indian interests including the 2001 attack on Indian parliament.
The group was banned by then President Pervez Musharraf and rebranded itself as Khuddam-ul-Islam. It continues to engage in open fundraising outside many Pakistani mosques on Fridays.



Tehreek Ghalba-i-Islam

The group emerged as an offshoot of Jaish-e-Muhammad after serious differences emerged between various commanders. TGI is led by Commander Abdul Jabbar and operates primarily in Afghanistan.
Publicly, the organisation opposes rebellion against the Pakistani state. It stresses on its cadre to focus on Afghanistan.



Jaish al-Adal

The group has recently emerged in parts of Balochistan bordering Iran. It has targeted Shia Muslims and claims to be countering Iranian interference in Pakistan. The group also seeks to extend the theatre of war into Iran.



Hafiz Gul Bahadur group

He is one of the most influential figures in North Waziristan but at the same time, maintains a very low profile. Bahadur is politically affiliated with Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman’s Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam.
Hafiz Gul Bahadur have been very secretive about their plans. In public, they have always maintained focus on “liberating” Afghanistan and re-establishing Taliban rule. He is considered a pragmatic figure who knows how to consolidate his position. He has successfully managed his relations with both the military and the TTP.
He has never made his position on the Pakistani state public. However one of his most prominent commanders, who has since been killed in a US drone strike, gave an hour-long interview to Al Qaeda’s media wing As Sahab in 2009.
In the interview he made it clear that he did not have any differences with Al Qaeda or the TTP and that they were his “brothers”. He had also said that his men would fight against the Pakistan army if it sided with the Americans.



Haqqani Network

This setup operates primarily in the Eastern Afghan provinces of Khost and Paktika even though it has carried out “daring” attacks in Kabul. The network has also attempted to assassinate Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
The group is currently headed by Sirajuddin Haqqani, one of the sons of veteran Afghan jihadi commander Jalaluddin Haqqani. He is one of the most powerful commanders in the region and maintains good relations with Al Qaeda and the TTP.
The group has been silent on their view of the Pakistani state, however when questioned about the TTP, Sirajuddin Haqqani is on record as saying that he does not have differences with his “brothers”.
Their future plans focus on the reinstatement of the Taliban government in Afghanistan.




Sipah-i-Muhammad Pakistan

The group was formed in the 90s in response to the anti-Shia violence perpetuated by Sipah-i-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP). It maintains a very low profile and seeks to primarily target leaders of anti-Shia militant organisations such as SSP and LJ.
Its leader Syed Ghulam Raza Naqvi has been in prison since the mid-90s. Pakistani intelligence agencies claim the group is backed by Iran in a bid to extend its influence in the region.


5458c1d33d029.jpg
 
"The visit of the army chief, General Raheel Sharif accompanied DG ISI to Kabul on Wednesday said it all. He emphasised the need for Afghanistan to take action against fleeing terrorists from Pakistan’s tribal areas. The carnage in Peshawar had been conceived and planned by the TTP leader Mullah Fazlullah who was operating from the Haqqani Network-controlled areas of eastern Afghanistan."





http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9-291435-One-long-moment

One long moment


S Iftikhar Murshed
Sunday, December 21, 2014

It is only in this savage land that 132 innocent schoolchildren, along with nine of their teachers including the principal, can be ruthlessly massacred. This is precisely what happened on Tuesday when the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan stormed the Army Public School in Peshawar, the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa where the coalition government is led by Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf.

This is the man who so desperately wants to become prime minister that he paralysed the entire country for the past four months with continuous but failed sit-ins at Islamabad’s Constitution Avenue, mass rallies in the major cities, and, in the third phase the launch of the much touted ‘Plan C.’ This involved the one-day closure of the economic nerve centres of Pakistan starting with Faisalabad (December 8), Karachi (December 12) and Lahore (December 15). The process was to have culminated with a countrywide shutdown on December 18 when the gut-wrenching tragedy in Peshawar intervened.

Imran Khan was, therefore, constrained to put his prime ministerial ambitions on hold. He announced that his plans of bringing Pakistan to a grinding halt had been ‘postponed’ but not abandoned. The PTI chief also condemned the merciless slaughter of the schoolchildren but had cold feet about naming the TTP even though its spokesman, Muhammad Omar Khorasani boasted: “Our suicide bombers have entered the school.”

A few days back in one of his usual container-top diatribes, Imran Khan declared that had he been prime minister, he would never have allowed military action in North Waziristan. It was, therefore, not surprising that the PTI leader was nominated by the TTP as a member of their negotiating team for the talks with the government earlier this year.

But it is one-sided to blame Imran Khan alone. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has been no less weak-kneed insofar as the TTP is concerned. It is strangely ironic that the commonalities between Nawaz and Imran far outweigh their differences. The two political archrivals are men of limited vision whose lives revolve around their selfish ambitions. Both are sympathetic to the religious right and were hand-in-glove in pursuing the ill-advised talks with the TTP in the first half of the year.

The negotiations were not called off even though the Taliban released a video at the time which showed their fighters gleefully playing football with the severed heads of Pakistani soldiers who had been captured some months earlier and then pitilessly decapitated. There were several other similar outrages but all this did not even make one jot of a difference to the political leadership in their determination to appease the outlawed group.

The futile dialogue would have continued indefinitely under one pretext or the other had the TTP not carried out the stupidly dramatic attack on the Karachi airport on June 8-9. This took the initiative out of the hands of the spineless political leadership and triggered the long awaited military onslaught into North Waziristan a week later. The initiative to launch Operation Zarb-e-Azb was a correct one but it was that of the Pakistan Army and the prime minister had no option but to go along.

In the six months that the war has raged, the terrorist infrastructure in the tribal belt has been destroyed, militant outfits have been crippled and most of them have limped across the notoriously porous border into Afghanistan. As a result, in contrast to previous years, there have been only two major incidents of TTP outrages since June.

The first was the suicide bomb attack at the Wagah check post on November 2 which killed more than 60 people, the second was Tuesday’s astounding barbarity at the school in Peshawar. This is not the first time that the TTP has attacked educational institutions. A recent International Crisis Group report shows that in the three years between 2009 and 2012 more than 900 schools have been destroyed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

On each of these occasions the buildings were empty – never before have students been collectively targeted as they were earlier this week. This is a new trend and the first such attempt was on January 6 when a suicide bomber attempted to enter the Ibrahimzai School in the Hangu district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The consequences would have been disastrous had 15-year-old Aitzaz Hasan, not stopped him. In the ferocious struggle that ensued, the terrorist detonated his deadly load killing himself and the child hero. The teenager willingly rendered the ultimate sacrifice to save 2,000 of his fellow students, yet less than a year later, his heroism is not even a faint blip on the radar screen of public memory.

But in Peshawar on Tuesday there was no Aitzaz around and the enormity of the tragedy that unfolded will forever haunt this blighted land. The federal and the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments are equally to blame. This is established by the sequence of events in the last six months.

Two days after the launch of Operation Zarb-e-Azb, the Punjab police lived up to their reputation of unimaginable brutality and killed Tahirul Qadri’s Minhajul Quran workers in Lahore’s Model Town. This resulted in angry protests by Qadri’s supporters who soon teamed up with Imran Khan’s agitation against alleged rigging in last year’s elections. Since mid-summer a tidal wave of mass protests has ravaged the political landscape, and, in the process the war for Pakistan’s survival was all but forgotten.

It is a shame that it was the gruesome slaughter of more than 130 blameless children that compelled the politicians to stop playing their selfish games. At the All-Parties Conference convened by Nawaz Sharif in Peshawar on Wednesday, the participants unanimously pledged support for the ongoing military operations in the tribal regions. They also agreed that terrorism must be conclusively defeated without distinguishing between the ‘good and the bad Taliban’.

As if to reinvent the wheel, yet another parliamentary committee which includes representatives from the military and intelligence outfits was established and mandated to come forward with an anti-terrorism plan within a week. One wonders what happened to National Internal Security Policy which was unveiled by the government with such fanfare in February.

The visit of the army chief, General Raheel Sharif accompanied DG ISI to Kabul on Wednesday said it all. He emphasised the need for Afghanistan to take action against fleeing terrorists from Pakistan’s tribal areas. The carnage in Peshawar had been conceived and planned by the TTP leader Mullah Fazlullah who was operating from the Haqqani Network-controlled areas of eastern Afghanistan.

This has to be put in perspective. The ageing Jalaluddin Haqqani has been a legend in his lifetime. With his retirement, the network he had so painstakingly established is fracturing. In mid-October his son Anas Haqqani and a key commander, Hafiz Rashid, were arrested by the Afghan National Directorate of Security (NDS). The NDS spokesman, Haseeb Sediqi, said that the arrests would have “direct consequences on the network and their centre of command.” He was not far wrong.

The founder of the network has already lost three of his sons – Omar, Badruddin, and Naseeruddin – and control of the outfit has devolved on Sirjuddin Haqqani who is disliked and does not have the charisma of his ailing father. Sirjauddin has provided assistance to Mullah Fazlullah and is capable of targeting Pakistan. This is what the parliamentary committee needs to brainstorm.


Imran Khan participated in the APC during which he announced that he was ending the PTI sit-in at Islamabad. The same night he told his supporters: “We can win the heart of terrorists through dialogue. But anyway, we now fully support the government’s drive to eliminate terrorism.” This raises serious questions about the APC’s actual position on the military operation.

The excruciating agony that the men, women and children of Pakistan have undergone since 2007 is comparable to the anguish of one of the most brilliant minds of Victorian England who wrote in desperation: “Suffering is one long moment. We cannot divide it by seasons. We can only record its moods, and chronicle their return. With us time does not progress. It revolves. It seems to circle round one centre of pain.” In Pakistan the life of the ordinary citizen orbits around the hideous centre of fear.
The writer is the publisher of Criterion Quarterly.
 
2_82731.jpg


Even though I consider “Maulana” Abdul Aziz of Lal Masjid a hard-core terrorist who should have been hanged for the death of 10 elite army commandos who died during Lal Masjid operation sunrise.

But the scumbag is 100% right, in his December 20, 2014 sermon to the Friday congregation, he said “there were no differences between the Taliban of Afghanistan and those in Pakistan. They are like brothers.”

Now, I know many “experts” will disagree, but who knows more about who’s is who in the terrorist world, than this terrorist, after all, he and his family are very much part and parcel of the terrorist Frankenstein we are confronting today.

There links to the terrorist goes back to the 80s. His father Maulana Muhammad Abdullah Ghazi played a very important role during the war against Soviet Union in Afghanistan and was very close to Dictator Gen. Zai ul Haq.

The importance of the family can also be seen from the fact that after the Lal Mosque operation, numerous terrorist groups from FATA formed TTP to support them.

Although the Afghan-Taliban’s clandestinely have been supporting TTP from the very beginning but now it's just matter of time before they will start openly support them.


Sources:

http://www.dawn.com/news/1151981/suicide-attack-threats-again-ring-out-of-lal-masjid
In his sermon, he said there were no differences between the Taliban of Afghanistan and those in Pakistan. They are like brothers.

http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Mosque-siege-ends-and-grim-cleanup-begins-Al-2552675.php
But the operation still had a high cost: Of the 164 elite army commandos who laid siege to the mosque on July 3 and then stormed it a week later, 10 died and 33 were wounded, according to a military spokesman, Gen. Waheed Arshad.
 
Watch the interview from 2:15.

The self-appointed guardian of Pakistan, Gen. Hameed Gul in 2008 called Baitullah Mehsud and Faqir Muhammad “Mujahid” (freedom fighters)and Pakistan kay khair kha hai (well wishers of Pakistan).

He also out rightly rejected allegations that they were Indian agents.

Defended their brutal war against the state of Pakistan as badal (revenge), according to him we are the aggressors, since we attacked them, therefore, their war against us is justified.

So guys, what do you say?


 
"The role of the Haqqani Network in turning North Waziristan into a centre of international militancy was far greater than was realised. Having been protected for long by the security agencies, the network has effectively been the main patron of almost all militant groups, including the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) operating from the agency."



Zahid Hussain is an award-winning journalist and writer, a senior editor with Newsline and a correspondent for The Times of London, Newsweek and The Wall Street Journal. He has also covered Pakistan and Afghanistan for several other international publications, including the Associated Press (AP) and The Economist. His book Frontline Pakistan: The Struggle With Militant Islam has won widespread acclaim as a seminal text on the subject.

He's also the author of, The Scorpion's Tail, which is one of my favorite books on war on terror.




2014: The iron hand - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
Zahid Hussain
Published about 13 hours ago (01/04/2015)

It has been more than six months now since the army launched operation Zarb-i-Azb in North Waziristan, also described as terrorism’s centre of gravity. But the fight to regain control of the tribal region is far from over as the winter sets in. The militants are scattered in small bands, engaging the troops in hit-and-run encounters as Air Force jets continue to bomb suspected militant hideouts.

Intense air bombing and heavy artillery fires have reduced Miramshah, the Agency’s headquarters, and Mir Ali, another major town, to mere rubble. Although the towns and the surrounding villages are now under full control of the Army, small bands of militants are still lurking around in the hills. With almost the entire population having been evacuated, the region gives a deserted look; only the soldiers are seen guarding their posts on the hilltops.

Although administration appeared optimistic about the tribesmen returning to their homes soon in the districts cleared of the militants, but it will take years for complete rehabilitation of the region that has been devastated by the fighting. It is certainly going to be much longer for the military to take complete control of the region. It is indeed an extremely difficult battle the Pakistani security forces have been fighting in the strategically critical territory.

While immensely critical, the latest campaign is much more complex than any other undertaken by the security forces so far in its decade-long war in this treacherous mountainous territory. Despite the fact that the military is now much more experienced in fighting insurgency and battle-hardened, this asymmetric war was never easy. One thing is certain – it is going to be a long haul.

This is not the first time the Pakistan Army is carrying out an operation in North Waziristan. The earlier expedition, launched in 2004, ended in a peace deal with the tribal militants after two years of fierce fighting. The truce allowed the militants to not only regroup, but also strengthen their positions.

The battle for control over this lawless region has assumed much greater gravity with the approach of the endgame in Afghanistan. Al Qaeda-linked groups present a worrying, long-term security threat for not just Pakistan, but for the entire region.

The second largest of the seven tribal agencies North Waziristan had become a haven for a lethal mix of foreign and local militants presenting an existential threat to the country. Many of the terrorist attacks in other countries also have roots in the region The region had also been the home of Haqqani network, one of the most powerful and fierce faction of the Afghan Taliban movement.

The role of the Haqqani Network in turning North Waziristan into a centre of international militancy was far greater than was realised. Having been protected for long by the security agencies, the network has effectively been the main patron of almost all militant groups, including the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) operating from the agency.

The footprints of the Haqqanis are visible all over Miramshah. Though most of its fighters are said to have left the area, the troops have clear orders not to spare anyone coming in the way.

Apart from the Uzbeks, there were other foreign militant groups such as networks of isolated Chechens, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and Chinese Uighur militants of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement.

Reportedly, the majority of Arab militants have either been killed by US drone strikes or have left the region. Thousands of Punjabi militants also moved to North Waziristan over the years, and established training camps in the restive border region.One of the largest groups operating from the agency consisted of the militants belonging to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, which has been blamed for carrying out terrorist attacks in China’s Xinjiang province.


What happened to those thousands of local and foreign jihadi fighters?
Many of them have been killed, while others are still holding on in the mountains. Some of them are believed to have moved to Shawal valley that boasts one of most treacherous terrains. The thick forests and natural hideouts in the several caves that dot the mountains make tracking down the insurgents near impossible.
The Zarb-i-Azb operation is unique in many ways. The role of intelligence has contributed hugely to the targeting with precision of militant sanctuaries. The intelligence-based crackdown on the terrorist network across the country before the start of the Army operation in the agency has also helped contain the blowback in other parts of the country.

Surely a major objective of the offensive is to secure the control of the lawless territory. But military action alone does not offer a long-term solution to an extremely complex problem. The government needs to take urgent measures to end the alienation and backwardness of the tribal region as well. The ongoing military operation provides a great opportunity to push for the long-delayed integration of the region with the rest of the country in order to end its ambiguous semi-autonomous status.

The military operation in North Waziristan is only one dimension of the wider battle against militancy and violent extremism in the country. The militant groups have strong networks across the country. For a long-term solution, the government needs to develop a coherent and overarching counterterrorism strategy in order to strengthen the capacity of the civilian law-enforcement and intelligence agencies.There is also need for closer coordination among the various intelligence agencies and strict enforcement of rule of law.
One must learn from past military operations in other tribal regions. A major flaw in the approach was that after clearing the areas, no effort was made to establish a proper administrative system.

As a result, the state’s control over those areas remained tentative. The presence of the military does not provide permanent solutions. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a formal civilian system along with the military operation. Without that, the objectives of the operation will never be fully achieved.
 
Rah-e-Nijaat operation and Zaid Hamid’s usual lies and conspiracies.

“Sir” (andhon mem kana raja) Zaid Hamid as usual made many false claims on Rah-e-Nijaat’ operation, which Pakistan had launched against Baitullah Mehsud in 2009.

Since the man lies like hell he is not consistent. In the coming days, one by one, I will trash his false claims.
On a radio interview (which is posted on YouTube ). He had this to say:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG4pc_FWhe8
Zaid Hamid Operation Rah e Nijat 1 OF 5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffXD190SysQ
Zaid Hamid Operation Rah e Nijat 2 OF 5

“Since the start of Rah-e-Nijaat’ operation there has been not a single drone attack on Mehsud tribe dominated areas”.

And in another interview, which he gave to Pakistankakhudahafiz, e-newspaper.

He said:



http://pakistankakhudahafiz.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/us-betrayal-as-pak-launches-waziristan-offensive/
US Betrayal As Pakistan Army Launches Waziristan Offensive
October 19, 2009

PKKH BREAKING NEWS EXCLUSIVE
“The US drones which have struck with impunity in the past could have been effectively used to help Pakistan Army’s offensive in South Waziristan – however they also seem to have come to a halt as the offensive started.”



Okay, rather than coming to a halt (as claimed by Zaid) the drone attacks, in fact, increased in Mehsud dominated areas.

Zaid also (deliberately) forgot to mention that the leader of TTP Baitullah Mehsud was killed in a drone attack during that time period.


Now, let the facts speak for themselves:


Pakistan officially announces that it was ready to launch Rah-e-Nijaat operation against Baitullah Mehsud.

http://nation.com.pk/politics/17-Jun-2009/Army-ready-to-launch-RaheNijat-Operation

http://www.app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=79085&Itemid=2


Drone attacks start against Baitullah Mehsud and his terrorist gang:

http://www.dawn.com/news/858069/15-dead-in-waziristan-drone-attack-ambush
May 10, 2009
Sources claimed that those killed and injured in the attack belonged to the Baitullah Mehsud group.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8045106.stm
'Drone kills eight in Pakistan'
May 12 2009
The area is the stronghold of Pakistani Taleban leader Baitullah Mehsud.


http://www.dawn.com/news/963717/us-drone-attack-kills-29-in-north-waziristan
May 16, 2009
MIRAMSHAH Twenty-nine people were killed when a US drone fired two missiles at a residential compound in the Mirali tehsil of North Waziristan tribal region here on Saturday.
In another incident, helicopters gunship shelled houses of suspected militants in the Pir Kalli area, 10 kilometers east of Miramshah on Saturday.


http://nation.com.pk/Politics/15-Jun-2009/US-drone-strikes-after-a-lull-5-dead
June 15, 2009
The latest strike occurred in South Waziristan, hitting three vehicles in an area not far from Makeen, a village considered a stronghold of Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud.


http://www.nation.com.pk/Politics/19-Jun-2009/Drone-squadron-rains-missiles-on--SWA-10-killed
Drone squadron rains missiles on SWA; 10 killed
June 19, 2009 Mohammad Ashfaq


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/5616262/US-drone-attack-kills-45-militants-in-Pakistan-officials-say.html
Jun 23 2009
US ally Pakistan officially objects to the strikes by pilotless US aircraft, though the attack came as the Pakistani army was preparing an offensive against Baitullah Mehsud, the Pakistani Taliban leader, in South Waziristan on the Afghan border.

"Three missiles were fired by drones as people were dispersing after offering funeral prayers for Niaz Wali," one intelligence official said, referring to a Taliban commander who was one of six militants killed in an earlier drone attack.


http://www.dawn.com/news/964449/missile-kills-key-trainer-of-taliban-suicide-bombers
Jun 24 2009
Baitullah Mehsud, the chief of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, had a narrow escape on Tuesday when he left only moments before an attack by US drones on the funeral of a militant commander in South Waziristan.

Some officials believe that commander Sangeen had come from Afghanistan's Paktia province to attend the funeral of one of his key colleagues and the drones might have picked up his movement


http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-06/24/content_11594863.htm
June 24 2009
The attack targeted the hideouts of Baitullah Mehsud, the chief of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan,


http://nation.com.pk/Politics/04-Jul-2009/US-drones-target-Mehsud-hideouts
US drones target Mehsud hideouts
July 04, 2009
The site is situated at a distance of four kilometres from the village of Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud. The targeted compounds were also close to the camps run by Afghan militant commander Maulvi Sangeen. Maulvi Sangeen is stated to be a very close and confidential aide of Sirajuddin Haqqani, son of Jalaluddin Haqqani.


http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2009/07/20097784914231489.html
Training camp reportedly run by Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud targeted, killing 16 people.
Jul 08 2009
Tuesday's attack was the fourth in two weeks against Mehsud and his followers in his stronghold of South Waziristan.

One attack on the funeral of a dead fighter killed up to 80 people.
Pakistan's army is deploying troops in South Waziristan and launching regular air strikes of its own to try and kill or capture Mehsud,
who is blamed for organising many of the suicide attacks in Pakistan over the last few years.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8139739.stm
July 08 2009
Up to 50 suspected militants have been killed in two US attacks in north-west Pakistan, local officials told the BBC.

It has been one of the Taliban's deadliest days since the drone campaign began last August.
Wednesday's suspected drone strikes were targeting militants in a stronghold of Pakistan's top Taliban commander, Baitullah Mehsud.


The Pakistani army is now bracing itself for a major offensive against him.


http://www.dawn.com/news/965061/suspected-us-strike-kills-three-in-south-waziristan
Jul 11, 2009
A suspected US missile strike hit a Taliban communication centre in the countrys northwest late Friday, killing at least three people

The attack was the fifth in two weeks by attributed to American unmanned drone aircraft targeting Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud and his network of militants.


http://www.dawn.com/news/888114/us-drone-kills-five-in-north-waziristan
Jul 18, 2009
MIRAMSHAH, July 17 Two missiles fired by a US drone killed five suspected militants and injured four others in the village of Shamzai in North Waziristan on Friday.
According to sources, the missiles hit the compound of local tribesman Abdul Majeed, who reportedly belongs to the Taliban group of Baitullah Mehsud.

“It was the fourth drone strike in nine days, mostly targeting strongholds of Baitullah Mehsud.”


http://nation.com.pk/Politics/06-Aug-2009/Drone-kills-Mehsuds-wife-brother
August 06, 2009
PESHAWAR - At least three persons including wife and brother of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan chief Baitullah Mehsud were killed and several others injured when US drone missiles hit a house in Zangara, a village in Sara-rogha tehsil of Ladha, South Waziristan Agency. Four missiles fired by a US drone hit the house of Ikramuddin, father-in-law of Baitullah Mehsud.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=6&_r=2&hp
Mr. Obama, through Mr. Brennan, told the C.I.A. to take the shot, and Mr. Mehsud was killed, along with his wife and, by some reports, other family members as well,


http://www.dawn.com/news/964932/ttp-finally-admits-baitullah-killed-in-us-strike
TTP finally admits Baitullah killed in US strike

Aug 26, 2009
The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan acknowledged on Tuesday that its top leader Baitullah Mehsud was dead, ending weeks of claims and counter-claims over his fate following a US missile strike on his father-in-law's house earlier this month.


http://www.dawn.com/news/858432/10-taliban-killed-in-drone-attack
Aug 12, 2009
According to officials, this was the same area where another drone attack last week resulted in the reported death of Baitullah Mehsud.

An official said the house attacked on Tuesday was owned by Abdur Rahim Berki known to have links with the Baitullah Mehsud group and served as a training facility.



http://www.dawn.com/news/857293/21-militants-die-in-drone-attack-in-waziristan
Aug 22, 2009
According to sources, missiles fired by the suspected US pilotless plane hit a residential compound in Dandy Derpakhel village near Miramshah, frequented by militants mostly from Punjab.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8224289.stm
August 27 2009
A militant hideout was targeted in the South Waziristan tribal region, Pakistani intelligence officials said.
A similar attack in the same region in early August killed Pakistan's top Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud.


http://archives.dailytimes.com.pk/main/30-Sep-2009/drone-strikes-jets-kill-16-in-waziristan
Drone strikes, jets kill 16 in Waziristan
Sep 30 2009
PESHAWAR: Two suspected US drone attacks killed nine Taliban, while seven other militants were killed in air strikes and military action in different parts of Waziristan, officials said on Tuesday.


http://www.dawn.com/news/847141/us-drone-attack-kills-nine-militants
Oct 01, 2009
This was the third drone attack in Waziristan in two days. Two places in North and South Waziristan were attacked by the pilotless planes on Tuesday, killing at least 12 people.


http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/10/02/pakistan.uzbek.commander.killed/
October 2, 2009 – Updated
Uzbek commander Tahir Yuldashev was injured August 27 and died a month later from his injuries, according to the officials.

Yuldashev was the head of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and had joined forces with the former head of the Pakistani Taliban Baitullah Mehsud, who was killed in a U.S. drone strike in early August, Pakistani officials said.


http://www.geo.tv/12-10-2009/54461.htm
December 10, 2009
WANA: Six militants including four foreigners have been killed in US drone attack in South Waziristan.


http://www.dawn.com/news/857335/20-killed-as-drones-attack-shaktoi-again
Jan 18, 2010
Unmanned drone aircraft had attacked the same area on Thursday and 16 militants were reported to have been killed.

“The drones are apparently tracking and targeting Pakistani Taliban chief Hakimullah Mehsud whose presence is frequently reported in the area.”



http://www.dawn.com/news/854383/foreign-militants-among-10-dead-in-drone-attack
Assistant Political Agent Syed Abdul Ghafoor Shah said local people would face drone attacks as long as they continued to provide shelter to terrorists.

He said Ahmadzai Wazir tribesmen had been instructed to stop giving sanctuary to militants. He said the government would not allow miscreants to stay in the area



And that is the truth and the whole truth. :pakistan::usflag:





 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10206180
Death of Mustafa Abu al-Yazid 'setback' for al-Qaeda



Indeed Mustafa Abu al-Yazid was very important AQ leader. He eulogizes terrorist Baitullah Mehsud the so-called “CIA/Mossad/RAW/Afghan intelligence agent”.

Some of what he said is absolutely correct;

for example:

Baitullah Mehsud had fought along with the Afghan Taliban against the Northern Alliance.

He is also absolutely right about the Shakai battle that our Armed Forces fought against traitor Nek Mohammed. After Nek Mohammed was killed by the drone (ISI provided the intelligence), Baitullah started sheltering global terrorists.

The video is on You Tube, sorry I could not find it on Daily Motion.

The 8-minute 22-second video was produced by the Al-
Sahab Establishment for Media Production and disseminated by the Al-Fajr Media Center.

"Amir Baitullah was a student of Shari'ah (Islamic law), and began seeking Shari'ah knowledge
early in life. He accomplished a lot. However, when the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan was
created, it was in need of people to support it, strengthen it, and stand up to the enemies who
wanted to inflict harm on it in northern Afghanistan, so he joined the ranks of the mujahidin of
the Emirate early, under the leadership of the Commander of the Faithful Mullah Muhammad
Omar (may God preserve him.)

Amir Baitullah was a man with a great conscience and high aspirations.
He was concerned with raising and preparing the sons of his tribe in order to fight
the enemies of God in Afghanistan and Pakistan. He also aspired to send his mujahidin soldiers
to fight the nonbelievers in their own countries. I heard him say myself: 'I want to break the
pride and arrogance of the Americans, and hit them in their own country.'

"Amir Baitullah (may God have mercy on him) was a generous, strong, courageous, and noble
person when it came to making decisions, especially the decision to host, aid, and shelter his
migrating mujahidin brothers. It was he and the sons of his tribe (the generous heroes) who did
that.

Despite all the attacks, destruction, and killings by the hands of the apostate Pakistani
Army in the Wazir tribe in the Wana and Shikay areas, who were first to host their migrating
and mujahidin brothers (may God reward them), he did not stop hosting, aiding, and sheltering
his migrating brothers. After they left the Shikay and Wana areas, and with the approval of the
amir Baitullah, they headed to the Mehsud tribes.

The sons of this strong tribe were ordered to open up their homes and hearts to their brothers.
The apostate army did not give them time.
After this hosting, the army began its unjust and criminal campaign on the Mehsud tribe. It
began by shelling a Mehsud-run center for preparing the mujahidin, and 50 of the best men
from the tribe were killed (may God have mercy on them).

After these incidents, and after the
withdrawal of the defeated and vanquished Pakistanis at the hands of the Mehsud, amir
Baitullah (may God have mercy on him) and the sons of his tribe continued with their generosity
towards the migrant mujahidin brothers.”
 
:usflag::pakistan:


U.S. forces, Afghan troops arrest Taliban militants wanted for school massacre - The Washington Post

By Tim Craig February 12 2015

Less than two months ago, U.S. troops ended their combat mission in Afghanistan with great fanfare. On Thursday came fresh signs that at least some of the 12,500 coalition troops remaining in Afghanistan remain very much part of the fight.

At a news conference on the outskirts of the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, the chief spokesman for the Pakistani military announced that six Taliban militants were arrested recently during a joint mission by NATO and Afghan troops in eastern Afghanistan. The militants were wanted for organizing the
December massacre at a school in Peshawar in northwestern Pakistan.

The news of the arrests is the latest sign of the growing cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan in working to combat the threat posed by Islamist militants on both sides of the border. It also demonstrates that U.S. forces remain directly involved in risky missions in Afghanistan.

A coalition spokesman in Kabul confirmed that some foreign troops accompanied the Afghan army on a mission in Nangahar province in eastern Afghanistan on Feb. 3-4. The spokesman said the operation was part of the coalition’s continued “advise and assist role” in supporting the Afghan army.

“All coalition military operations are conducted in accordance with the law of war, rules of engagement and pertinent international agreements,” said the spokesman, referring all additional questions to the Afghan army.

It was not immediately clear whether Pakistani Taliban militants were killed or wounded during the raid. But the United States also considers the Pakistani Taliban to be a threat, one reason that the tempo of drone strikes in Pakistan increased in the weeks after the school massacre.

A security agreement between the United States and Afghanistan authorizes “U.S. military operations to defeat al-Qaeda and its affiliates,” as well as “combined military exercises” between coalition and Afghan troops. Whenever possible, however, Afghan troops are expected to lead those operations, the agreement states.

Such involvement may serve as a blueprint for future American military operations in Iraq.
On Wednesday, The Washington Post reported that President Obama will ask Congress for authorization for the use of military force to help Iraqi forces battle Islamic State militants. The authorization would prohibit offensive ground combat operations but allow ground deployments for rescue missions and assistance to local forces, The Post’s Karen DeYoung reported.
 
Here is some interesting information on how Pakistan got involved in the war on terror, how it started, and how closely United States and Pakistan have been working against our common enemy.


In The Line Of Fire (A Memoir) by Pervez Musharraf page 265, 266.

"In December 2001, when operation Tora Bora caused many Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters to flee to Pakistan, I establish the net for apprehending them. Our regular forces and the paramilitary Frontier Corps were dropped in by helicopter, as the area is quite inaccessible from the ground. We even gathered mules from all parts of the country and form them into animal transport Battalions to sustain our troops in this extremely inhospitable area, most of which has no communication infrastructure at all.

The Tora Bora net led to the capture of 240 Al Qaeda operatives belonging to 26 different nationalities, the majority from of Afghanistan and Arab countries. It remains the largest catch in a single antiterrorist operation conducted anywhere in the world since 9/11.

Since then, we have engaged in a number of operation of varying size. They have been recounted in the press only bare outlines. The full stories, and results, show that we have made far more progress than most people know.

The first big operation after Tora Bora was a real eye-opener. We called it operation Kazha Punga, after the name of the place. It was conducted in the South Waziristan agency on the night of June 25, 2002. We received information about the present of 30 to 35 Al Qaeda operatives and their families in Kazha Punga. A force of 500 comprising elements of the Special Service Group (SSG), the regular infantry, and the Frontier Corps traveled by road through the night, over the most rugged terrain. They stopped at a distance from Kazha Punga and then marched there using local guides. The SSG was dropped at dawn using some of our scarce helicopters. We learned later that the terrorists had deployed lookouts and knew that are force was approaching.

Once the cordon was established, the terrorists inside the compound started to plead innocence, saying that there were only two men and four women, one of whom was pregnant. It was a bluff. Still sounding innocent, they invited our troops to search the compound. Our troops fell for the pretense, thinking that our intelligence must have been faulty. They entered the compound without taking precautions and were met with a spray of bullets. Ten soldiers lost their lives, and to terrorists were killed. The remaining terrorists managed to escape.

This operation was a turning point, because it highlighted the magnitude and seriousness of the threat. It also confirmed the presence of foreign terrorists beyond the Tora Bora area; it confirmed, too, that they were receiving local assistance. Our men also learned, the hard way, just how this disarmingly “innocent” this vicious enemy could be.

Operation Kazha Punga made us realize that we needed a special, fast -reaching, hard-hitting force for the mountains. In coordination with the United States CENTCOM and intelligence agencies, a helicopter-borne Special Operations Task Force (SOTF) was created. It was composed of a battalion from SSG made helicopter-mobile, thanks to the assistance from the United States. We demanded and were assured of night-flying and firing capabilities. We also established technical intelligence centers in cooperation with U.S. Intelligence. Unmanned aerial vehicles (Drone) were to be made available to us on demand, flown by American handlers. This completed a triad of intelligence -- human, technical, and aerial. The human responsibility was ours; the other two were under the control of the United States."
 
Can you believe that Ayman al-Zawahri the leader of Al Qaeda praising Baitullah Mehsud “CIA/Mossad/RAW/Afghan intelligence” agent?

How can that happen?


Zawahiri praises Baitullah
Sep 29, 2009

CAIRO, Sept 28 Al Qaeda's second-in-command Ayman Al Zawahiri says the death of Pakistani Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud will only add fuel to the fighting against western forces in the region.

Zawahiri's 28-minute audio eulogy of Mehsud appeared on militant websites on Monday.

He praised Mehsud for establishing a jihadi movement against the US and allied forces and challenging the Pakistani army.

“You have killed Baitullah ... and he went to his God a martyr as we assume, but you have not killed Islam or jihad,” Zawahiri said in the message. “I warn you of a flood of death and wounds in Afghanistan and Pakistan with help from God, which will not end until you escape or until your demise.”

Zawahiri slammed US President Barack Obama as a criminal who turned a blind eye to the expansion of Israeli settlements. “Have we realised the truth of Obama the criminal, or do we still need more crimes to be carried out in Kabul, Baghdad, Mogadishu and Gaza to be sure of his criminality?” he asked.

“Have we realised the lowliness of America under the leadership of the smiling and wooing Obama?” he asked in the recording.

Zawahiri accused the US president of showing little interest in curbing the growth of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, while at the same time forcing Arab leaders to make further concessions to Israel.—Agencies





Ayman al-Zawahri, Al Qaida No. 2, Calls Obama A "Fraud"

By SARAH EL DEEB
11/28/2009

"Ayman al-Zawahri's 28-minute audio message was mainly a eulogy for slain Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud, but he also took the opportunity to slam NATO member states operating in Afghanistan, including Germany, which he criticized for keeping troops there."

About half of the recording was dedicated to the Pakistani Taliban chief Mehsud who was killed following a U.S. strike near the Afghan border on Aug. 5.

Al-Zawahri's eulogy was the terror group's first acknowledgment of the death of one of al-Qaida's main partners in Pakistan's tribal area where top leaders of the terror movement are believed hiding.

Al-Zawahri praised Mehsud for his role in mobilizing fighters in the region, and challenging "the new crusaders and their agents," in reference to the NATO forces and the Pakistani and Afghan security forces.

"To the Americans, their allies and their slaves in Afghanistan and Pakistan, I say you may have killed (Mehsud) ...but you did not kill Islam or holy war," al-Zawahri said, listing 10 of Mehsud's contributions to the jihad cause.

The August U.S. missile strike against Mehsud sparked speculation about his fate and put the group in disarray over a successor. The Pakistani Taliban later declared a former aide to Mehsud as the group's new leader.



 
"The sectarian forces at home received a shot in arm when they found a powerful ally in the form of the Taliban in Afghanistan from the mid-1990s onward. The Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani Taliban are tied to each other and the sanctuaries of the TTP led by Mullah Fazlullah in Afghanistan are also home to its ally, the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi."


The sectarian conglomerate


Adnan Adil
November 05, 2015

The recent sectarian killings of over 35 people in the Bolan district and Shikarpur display the resilience of terrorist groups despite the fact that the army has been conducting an operation against them in the tribal regions and the civil administration has taken a host of measures to check the activities of sectarian outfits.

The state has tackled sectarian terrorism largely by nabbing sectarian activists or, in some extreme cases, eliminating them in staged police encounters. Steps have been taken to ban hate literature and provocative speeches. These measures somewhat put a check on sectarian terrorists but could not wipe them out.

Shortcomings of the internal security system notwithstanding, a major reason behind sectarian terrorism’s endurance is that these organisations are spread far and wide, and the penetration of violent ideology in the name of religion is quite deep. The capacity of civilian security agencies does not match the size, resources and influence of sectarian forces.

There are two major sources from which sectarian terrorist organisations draw their cadres: (a) a huge mass of population that believes in sectarian, orthodox interpretations of Islam; and (b) the unemployed youth bulge belonging to the socio-economically marginalised section of society that sees little hope for upward mobility in the present system.

Those people who combine both features – the destitute indoctrinated with religious bigotry, though not necessarily schooled at seminaries, are the most lethal. Sectarian ideology and networking through militant organisations empower them and provide them upward mobility and they, in turn, give their energy and blood to the sectarian cause.

Sectarian terrorism is a product of sectarian culture. It thrives on a sectarian base that comprises sectarian ideology, clerics or proselytisers, religio-political parties and financial sponsors.

The sectarian base may not be directly involved in terrorism, but sustains it by other means. Without the sectarian base, terrorist groups cannot survive; they cannot recruit new killers and cannot pool funds for sustenance.

The seemingly non-violent component of the sectarian base is dedicated to proselytising a certain brand of sectarian Islam, running seminaries and churning out literature that breeds orthodoxy, bigotry and intolerance. Orthodox clerics, by fault or default, groom a sectarian mindset. It is inherent in an orthodox and conservative interpretation of the religion to produce a sectarian outlook.

The narrative formed by the clerics motivates the more energetic and aggressive amongst their students and followers to join militant organisations. Each year, the government has to bar hundreds of clerics from entering certain regions or speaking in public.

The terrorist infrastructure might be located in the country’s northwestern tribal areas or Afghanistan, but ideological hubs of the sectarian movement are located in the country’s big cities including Lahore and Karachi. The seminaries and clerics based in these cities provide ideology and literature to sectarian activists.

It is not without reason that when a group of clerics (ulema) issued a fatwa asking the Taliban to cease violence and start talks with the government, the TTP responded positively. A Taliban leader was quoted as saying that an edict by these clerics amounted to an order for them. The TTP could not defy the clerics as it is dependent on them for maintaining its popularity.

A variety of religio-political parties provide political cover to the sectarian base. The rank and file of seemingly non-violent religio-political organisations has an emotional and ideological attachment with the sectarian movement. The workers and leaders of these parties provide moral, political and legal support to sectarian activists when the need arises.

The agenda of terrorist organisations suit the ultimate objective of the religio-political parties. This spirit of camaraderie was publicly visible when the country’s religio-political parties mourned the killing of TTP chief Hakeemullah Mehsud in a drone attack in 2013. These parties have been quite steady in expressing either a soft corner or outright support for the Taliban.

The sectarian forces at home received a shot in arm when they found a powerful ally in the form of the Taliban in Afghanistan from the mid-1990s onward. The Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani Taliban are tied to each other and the sanctuaries of the TTP led by Mullah Fazlullah in Afghanistan are also home to its ally, the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.

This conglomerate of sectarian forces is too potent to be defeated by administrative measures alone. A comprehensive policy needs to be formulated, which should aim at: (a) preventing supply of new recruits to sectarian organisations by providing alternate means of affordable education and employment; (b) cutting linkages between different components of the sectarian base; and (c) countering the sectarian ideology with a non-sectarian, modern interpretation of the religion.
 
Back
Top Bottom