muse
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Messages
- 13,006
- Reaction score
- 0
A timely post - While Pakistan is literally bombed into pieces, who is it that cannot get it's act togother? Who is it that cares more about their piece of the pie than the good of Pakistan? Who wants to pin Musharraf instead of deal with the problem of terrorists?
Many Pakistanis have been congratulatory about the religion of so called "democracy" in Pakistan -- but exactly what is the substance to congratulate ourselves over this vicious, vile, petty, form of governance?
If Pakistan have a problem, it is the lack of a Pakistani political system.
All forms of governance are basically kleptocracies - a small group, which itself produces little to nothing, in Pakistan's case, not even laws, devises the transfer of wealth within segments of society, with particular attention to ensure that control over significant amounts of that wealth accrues to and remains in the control of a small group.
Through out history, societies have seen in this arrangement merit, on the condition, that this small group is efficient and effective with regard to it's mission in the public interests.
Have Pakistani politicians ever, through out it's entire history, been effective or efficient, when it comes to the public interest?
When we assert that this "democracy" is a kind of a religion, we point to the defence of it that some in society mount on it's behalf - while these same will lay open to critical review every other construct, but not this idea - this idea is beyond of critical review and even when they are open to examine it critically, it is on the condition that whatever it's faults, it's inefficiencies, it's ineffectivesness, it is not irredeemable.
Is the only option available to Pakistan, this religion of democracy or martial law? can Pakistan not devise a system free of the Westminster style, free of politicals built on victimization and patronage, free of politicians who not only authorize expenditure but also determine where and whom will be the benficiaries of this expenditure?
If these misrepresentatives cannot even agree as to who and what are the enemies of Pakistan, why should we have any confidence that they would care about our well being?
Many Pakistanis have been congratulatory about the religion of so called "democracy" in Pakistan -- but exactly what is the substance to congratulate ourselves over this vicious, vile, petty, form of governance?
If Pakistan have a problem, it is the lack of a Pakistani political system.
All forms of governance are basically kleptocracies - a small group, which itself produces little to nothing, in Pakistan's case, not even laws, devises the transfer of wealth within segments of society, with particular attention to ensure that control over significant amounts of that wealth accrues to and remains in the control of a small group.
Through out history, societies have seen in this arrangement merit, on the condition, that this small group is efficient and effective with regard to it's mission in the public interests.
Have Pakistani politicians ever, through out it's entire history, been effective or efficient, when it comes to the public interest?
When we assert that this "democracy" is a kind of a religion, we point to the defence of it that some in society mount on it's behalf - while these same will lay open to critical review every other construct, but not this idea - this idea is beyond of critical review and even when they are open to examine it critically, it is on the condition that whatever it's faults, it's inefficiencies, it's ineffectivesness, it is not irredeemable.
Is the only option available to Pakistan, this religion of democracy or martial law? can Pakistan not devise a system free of the Westminster style, free of politicals built on victimization and patronage, free of politicians who not only authorize expenditure but also determine where and whom will be the benficiaries of this expenditure?
If these misrepresentatives cannot even agree as to who and what are the enemies of Pakistan, why should we have any confidence that they would care about our well being?