Pakistan's Remittances rise to all-time high of $2.8bn in April, up 56% YoY

[TheDarkKnight]

LOL. Let me show the false equivalence here. You are dishonest enough to first attribute a falsehood to me - which was never said - and then attempt to ridicule it.

Please show me where I have stated that "remittances can cause more to be imported than whats being injected" or even "how $10 remmited to Pakistan causes $20 imports"? Go ahead and read all my posts in this topic again and understand them properly before proceeding.

If you still waiting for an explanation of the above falsehoods, I think you may need to wait for a very long time for your lying to be explained, but not by me.

Or may be, being charitable, you simply do not have the intellectual capacity to discuss such an evolved topic.

Either way, ignoring a pathetic liar at worst, or an intellectual pygmy at best, would be the better way forward.



(PS: Interesting that you claim that Double Shah was an ISI agent. )

I see after a wrong use of analogy now you have resorted to personal attacks which are uncalled for. If having a civil and respectful discourse is too much for you, then we can leave it here. I will only reply to some of the wrong things attributed to me and leave the rest readers to decide:
I never said the $10 and $20 example was your statement, it was provided by me to show how remittances at worst can only cause imports upto whats being injected - ie $10 should ideally cause $10 of imports at most. Realistically a portion is always consumed internally. Your view in previous posts was that it causes an increase in imports etc. Now I dont know how to make this logically more simple for you to understand, that definitely is beyond my intellectual capacity. I had merely requested you to back up your critical view with sources and numbers. And as an intellectually deficient person you assume me to be at best, I still fail to grasp the wisdom and science of how mysteriousness of Pakistani Army operating in politics explains negative and/or other aspects of remittances or economics. As I had said economics and finance are separate domains and need to be discussed in its own.

PS: No i did not mean Double shah was an ISI agent. As an intellectually superior person you seemed to have missed the sarcasm and the ridiculousness. If he actually had anything to do with ISI then it was pure coincidence.

 

[VCheng]

Your view in previous posts was that it causes an increase in imports etc.

Incorrect. What I said was this:

they create their own patterns of demand that perversely cause imports to rise far above what they would be otherwise.

Please note the underlined part.

I also explained it thusly:

the percentage of their revenues in the overall economic pie. It is certainly enough to cause adverse distortions.

Now if you can comprehend the implication of what I actually stated instead of what you wished to see, we can proceed at a level more suitable to the levels being demonstrated.