What's new

Pakistan's Provinces Share in GDP

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
103,045
Reaction score
106
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Pakistan's Provinces Share in GDP

Punjab......... 162 Billion US$
Sindh ...........88 Billion US$
KP............... 28 Billion US$
Baluchistan.. 11 Billion US$
AJK.............. 7 Billion US$
GB............... 4 Billion US$
ICT & FATA.... 4 Billion US$

Pakistan Total............... 304 Billion US$ Est


19894535_1223446031116426_1538333142822045545_n.jpg
 
.
Why is Sindh figures so low? I was expecting + - 10 Billion difference with Punjab.

If country like Bangladesh have an economy of 230 billions then it is quite a shame especially for Sindh and Punjab. I hope these 2 province will surpass Bangladesh.
 
. .
IMF Executive Board Concludes Article IV Consultation with Pakistan
June 16, 2017

On June 14, 2017, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation with Pakistan.

Pakistan’s outlook for economic growth is favorable, with real GDP estimated at 5.3 percent in FY 2016/17 and strengthening to 6 percent over the medium term on the back of stepped-up China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) investments, improved availability of energy, and growth-supporting structural reforms. Inflation has been gradually increasing but remains contained, and the financial sector has remained sound.

However, macroeconomic stability gains made under the 2013-16 EFF-supported program have begun to erode and could pose risks to the economic outlook. Fiscal consolidation has slowed, with the 2016/17 budget deficit target of 4.2percent of GDP (authorities’ latest projection) likely to be exceeded. The current account deficit has widened and is expected at 3 percent of GDP in 2016/17, driven by quickly rising imports of capital goods and energy. Foreign exchange reserves have declined in the context of a stable rupee/dollar exchange rate. On the structural front, while the successful implementation of business climate and financial inclusion reforms has continued, some renewed accumulation of arrears in the power sector has been observed, and financial losses of ailing public sector enterprises continue to weigh on scarce fiscal resources. Key external risks include lower trading partner growth, tighter international financial conditions, a faster rise in international oil prices, and over the medium term, failure to generate sufficient exports to meet rising external obligations from large-scale foreign-financed investments.

Directors commended the Pakistani authorities for strengthening macroeconomic resilience during their 2013–16 Fund‑supported program. Directors agreed that the growth outlook remains favorable, but noted that policy implementation weakened recently and macroeconomic vulnerabilities are reemerging. Against this backdrop, Directors called on the authorities to safeguard the macroeconomic gains of recent years through continued implementation of sound policies, and to continue with structural reforms to achieve higher and more inclusive growth.

Directors encouraged the authorities to strengthen fiscal consolidation. They noted that the FY 2017/18 budget aims at further gradual consolidation, albeit at a slower pace than targeted under the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation (FRDL) Act, and will likely require additional revenue measures in light of recent revenue underperformance. Directors emphasized that sustained fiscal consolidation over the medium term, in line with the FRDL Act, is critical to strengthen economic resilience, safeguard fiscal sustainability, and limit pressures on the current account and international reserves. To this end, Directors recommended mobilizing additional tax revenues by broadening the tax base and strengthening tax administration; and enhancing the composition of public spending by containing the wage bill’s growth, further reducing electricity subsidies, and increasing priority social spending. They also recommended strengthening the national fiscal federalism framework and public debt management.

Directors stressed the importance of maintaining a prudent monetary policy stance to preserve low inflation. They noted that monetary policy has been appropriately accommodative, and urged the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to remain vigilant and be ready to tighten it in case inflationary pressures emerge or foreign exchange market pressures intensify. Directors called on the authorities to allow for greater exchange rate flexibility—rather than relying on administrative measures—to help reduce external imbalances and bolster external buffers. In this regard, they welcomed the authorities’ commitment to remove, within one year, the cash margin requirement for imports of consumer goods, which constitutes an exchange restriction and multiple currency practice. Directors welcomed ongoing progress in strengthening central bank autonomy, and called for implementing the remaining recommendations from the 2013 Safeguards Assessment and to phase out government borrowing from SBP. Directors saw many of the abovementioned measures as preconditions for moving to an inflation targeting regime in the medium term.


Directors underscored the importance of further advancing financial sector reforms to continue strengthening resilience and support financial deepening. They welcomed efforts to bring undercapitalized banks into regulatory compliance, further strengthen the regulatory and supervisory frameworks, address non‑performing loans, and enhance the AML/CFT framework. Directors looked forward to the operationalization of the new deposit insurance.

Directors stressed that further progress in the structural reform agenda is needed to make growth more inclusive and reduce poverty. They welcomed the progress in fostering financial inclusion and implementing the business climate reform strategy, and encouraged the authorities to press ahead with these efforts. Directors also recommended further strengthening social safety nets. They called for maintaining a strong regulatory framework in the energy sector, swiftly addressing the renewed build‑up of arrears in the sector, and ensuring its financial soundness. Directors noted that restructuring and attracting private sector participation in public enterprises as well as improving their governance will ensure their financial viability and economic efficiency while reducing fiscal risks.


Pakistan: Selected Economic Indicators, 2012/13–2017/18 1/

Population: 195.4 million (2015/16)

Per capita GDP: US$1,454 (2015/16)

Poverty rate: 29.5 percent (2012/13)

Main exports: Textiles ($12.8 billion, 2015/16)

Unemployment: 5.9 percent (2014/15)

2012/13

2013/14

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

Proj.

Proj.

(Annual percentage change)

Output and prices

Real GDP at factor cost

3.7

4.1

4.1

4.5

5.3

5.5

GDP deflator at factor cost

7.1

7.4

4.3

0.6

3.5

5.0

Consumer prices (period average)

7.4

8.6

4.5

2.9

4.3

5.0

Consumer prices (end of period)

5.9

8.2

3.2

3.2

5.3

5.0

Pakistani rupees per U.S. dollar (period average)

8.4

6.4

-1.5

2.7



https://www.imf.org/en/News/Article...ncludes-article-iv-consultation-with-pakistan
 
.
.
These are not official numbers. Pakistan need to start releasing GDP and growth rate by provinces.

The same report shows Pakistans GDP at $279.4 Billion for 2015/16 and a projected growth of 5.3% for 2016/17. Simple maths tells us that the Pakistans GDP is $294.2 Billion, and NOT the fanciful and invented figure of $304 Billion.
Bangladesh is $243.5 Billion by the same organisation

Its not invented, Pakistan GDP crossed $300b this FY.
 
.
These are not official numbers. Pakistan need to start releasing GDP and growth rate by provinces.
Its not invented, Pakistan GDP crossed $300b this FY.

So the IMF who keeps a close eye on Pakistan ( It needs to and is allowed access to the REAL FIGURES because its part of the conditions for your government being endlessly bailed out. ) is to be ignored and the figures rejected, but one must believe the fictional figures invented for a domestic audience ?

Errr, No thanks. You live in your concocted reality and I will look at CREDIBLE figures from a reputable lender.
 
.
So the IMF who keeps a close eye on Pakistan ( It needs to and is allowed access to the REAL FIGURES because its part of the conditions for your government being endlessly bailed out. ) is to be ignored and the figures rejected, but one must believe the fictional figures invented for a domestic audience ?

Errr, No thanks. You live in your concocted reality and I will look at CREDIBLE figures from a reputable lender.

IMF will update with time, don't worry they are using estimated old numbers. SBP is yet to release full year report on GDP 2016-17 which comes out in September or October. No one is inventing anyone, this isn't India.
 
. .
Karachi is the financial capital of Pakistan. With an annual GDP estimated at $113 billion as of 2014, (projected to be $193 billion in 2025 at a growth rate of 5.5%). the city accounts about half of the total collections of the Federal Board of Revenue, out of which, approximately half are customs duty and sales tax on imports. Karachi produces about 30 percent of value added in large scale manufacturing,20% of the GDP, the World Bank identified Karachi as the most business-friendly city in Pakistan. In 2010, research by the global human resources company Mercer found Karachi to be the most inexpensive city in the world.
 
.
Karachi is the financial capital of Pakistan. With an annual GDP estimated at $113 billion as of 2014, (projected to be $193 billion in 2025 at a growth rate of 5.5%). the city accounts about half of the total collections of the Federal Board of Revenue, out of which, approximately half are customs duty and sales tax on imports. Karachi produces about 30 percent of value added in large scale manufacturing,20% of the GDP, the World Bank identified Karachi as the most business-friendly city in Pakistan. In 2010, research by the global human resources company Mercer found Karachi to be the most inexpensive city in the world.
if karachi alone has gdp of 113 bil, than how come sindh has a collective gdp of just 88 bil.
 
.
if karachi alone has gdp of 113 bil, than how come sindh has a collective gdp of just 88 bil.
Because of shitty systems and lots of interest to show others low eventually it hurts Pakistan because of few idiots, we need full survey and army can do excellent job like it did in Census. We need Census for our industries and trades and only we can find out real GDP of Pakistan
 
. .
Because of shitty systems and lots of interest to show others low eventually it hurts Pakistan because of few idiots, we need full survey and army can do excellent job like it did in Census. We need Census for our industries and trades and only we can find out real GDP of Pakistan
Yes, the black economy is known to be huge.
 
.
Why is Sindh figures so low? I was expecting + - 10 Billion difference with Punjab.

If country like Bangladesh have an economy of 230 billions then it is quite a shame especially for Sindh and Punjab. I hope these 2 province will surpass Bangladesh.


Sindh has zero chance this century. Punjab may due to higher population growth but we are talking about in the latter half of this century and it is a may.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom