the article is an exaggeration of facts..
its claims we have a capacity of 12 since 1998 ..that means we would have 200 plotonium nukes?
we should equip our subs for nuclear deterrence, as they are much safer
True More important than land based Taimur is a SLBM 6-8 MIRVed ICBM !!!
So when the US built 10,000 warheads did they seek Pakistan's permision ?
Pakistan needs to have at least 5000 + warheads to be taken seriously as a nuclear power. Period.
Pakistan also need to build another 20 Reactors to amply provide the Energy needed by this growing country.
I think its more about the missiles If you have 100 great missiles each missile can have depending on the payload 10-15 MIRV warheads so thats 100 nuclear missiles with total 1000-1500 warheads!!! As for 20 Nuclear power plants even that is not enough!!! 20,000MW more elecrtricty is still way too low....
Sir America is always against us so we need a lot more Nuclear Weapons and Fastest ICBM
True this is a great post Zarwan my idea is that we need
+ at least 50 Land Based ICBMs Missies range 12000kms in ballistic as well as cruise missiles --- As for the Sub Based we need 70-to 80 Missiles
Pakistan messed up big time with Shaheen III range..... Shaheen ii or Gauri II was said to be 2500KM range max I was expecting Shaheen to have somewhere between 4000-5000KM range but like usual I am disappointed...
RSD-10/SS-20
View attachment 346048
Long Range 3 MIRV capable 2 stage Solid fuel Ballistic Missile
Shaheen 4 will be something similar(probably)
Pakistan need 3 stage Solid ICBM not 2 stage..... Is Pakistan capable of Three 150 kt Mirvs? We only have small tiny bomb yeilds, fusion bombs have low yeild we need fission bombs.....
If india have ICBM why can't we we should have a full range of toys
We should have a full range of toys and given more hostilty from USA and Israel testing Jericho III and every other nuclear state apart from us has ICBM .... we should not be the odd one left out. It's not in our interest .
I think it is compulsion for Pakistan to develop ICBM keeping in view US and Israel inclination towards india. Recent defence pact between US and India adversely affected balance of power in this region. So there is no other solution but to develop ICBM for balance of power in this region.
Your reasoning carries weight ... Pakistan will always find a way to disappoint with their missiles shaheen II Max range 2500 km and Shaheen III Max range 2750km lol Shaheen IIII will be around 4000km we are behind in every regard when it comes missile and rocket tecnology...
Yeah , a Sub with AIP Tech with 8 CM with Range of 1000 KM is more than enough to tackle your enemy .. you don't have any enemy besides India .. US , NATO , Russia is out of our league to Fight
Still we should not be limited like this....
So what we need now are better delivery systems, ICBMs, higher yield. H-bombs, nuke subs and SLMBs for second strike. 200-300 nuclear missiles, high and low yield with a ICBMs and cruise missile + target directing sattelites+ 2nd and 3rd Nuklear strike capability through stealthy subs, deep burried seilos and aircrafts etc etc....+ get ready to use them against any kinda threat to our country......Insha-Allah...... is more then enough to act as a detterent, having a few hundred nuclear missiles is a scary thought, and it will deter any aggressor. Currently we have tiny yield tactical nukes which are not good enought to cause major damage to India the way India can do to us so we must hurry!!