Do i look like a gay to you
Awkward question, more awkward answer.
Now coming to the serious tone , i think Jinnah sahab was not man of deep vision and philosophical mind, he was just a sharp lawyer who was doing politics for time pass for first two or three decades. Jab congress may Dal nahi gali then he resigned and gave some attention to Muslim League. I think some one gave him idea or he himself realized that that talk more about muslims and islam in speeches, it would work. And it worked. I doubt that he was even remotely interested in religion but he was sharp enough to know that it is necessary tool for his politics and achieving goals. He promised Pir of manki Sharif that there would be sharia in pakistan and to secular person like Sikander Mirza, he said 'no such non-sense will be imposed in Pakistan.The British facilitated Jinnah's and Nehru's dreams , both of whom desired partition. Going with partition, was good decision by Jinnah, no one would dispute that.
Since you've admitted that these are conclusions that you came to through exercising your own mental faculties, one could just give you a pass for reaching laughable claims by fault of possessing sub-par cognitive capacities. But that's no fun. So,
The man had a vision deep enough to realize the need for a separate homeland for his people (which the people themselves never did) and then deeper still to get it against all odds, all on his own, manoeuvring against everything that was thrown at him. It was deep enough to realize that he must do it 'legally' and constitutionally making it clear for every generation of Pakistani to come that no matter how difficult the task you need not stoop to committing wrong to achieve it. He alone showed how the means justify the end as much as the later justifies the former.
He wasn't a philosopher, and thank God for that. Indian Muslims had been churning out "philosophers" like rabbits. From as great as Iqbal to as impotent as Bahadur Shah Zafar, sitting at their desks trying to change their people through the power of the pen. Their people who weren't only stubborn in their unwholesome ways but ones who had little clue of their workings or what was being said. What change have these philosophers brought about, even till today? Zilch.
Philosophers aren't leaders, men of action are. Praised be our lucky stars that Mr. Jinnah was
the man of action and what a man he was. The one man of action that these people have ever produced and the one man that they needed. He didn't sit at his desk he went out and changed the destiny of his people, how many men in the world can be accredited with that? The only one in our history who could have done it and it is indeed what he did.
You know it's one thing to come up with ludicrous conspiracies and then there's making up sentences out of one's rear end. There is no confusion as to why Mr. Jinnah left congress, read if you haven't yet. His daal was more than gali hui.
The only claim that he ever made about Pakistan was that it would be a land free for the Muslims of the subcontinent to live in peace, without prejudice and according to their religion (I have wrote alot on this in my previous posts, for heaven's sake learn to read). Not
ONCE did he ever promise an Islamic theocratic state. In fact the man is on record (in a public speech) that Pakistan would in no case be a theocracy. His stance on this was so well known and absolute that the religious Mulahs and parties of the time (e.g. Maulana Maudoodi and jamat-e-Islami) termed him Kafir-e-Azam and Pakistan as Kafiristan. Anyone who claims otherwise is a liar and should present proof.
ps: Oh yea, he was in politics to pass his time until he had passed all of it just for politics.
Apart from the clear fissures in your below arguments resulting from the falacy of first claiming that Mr. Jinnah did nothing except for having drawing room talks to holding him responsible for all the following, I'll explain how your claims are absolutely nonsensical:
My some criticism on post-Independence Jinnah
1- Jinnah stirred Urdu-bengali conflict
LoL, how?
2- He acted like a civilian dedicator
LoL, how?
3- For petty reason like seat of Governor General, he antagonized Lord Mount Baitan. Mr. Introvert coldly rejected the friendly gestures from Viceroy who then approached Nehru , who was then favored in partition plan.
Now I'm sure that you don't ever read anything, not even my previous posts.
The man was offered the Prime-minister's seat of the whole united India if he let go of the claim for Pakistan, he refused. Read my previous posts for the details. This example is pretty much it for any uneducated opinion peddler who thinks that Mr. Jinnah was out for power. In the words of Mountbatten himself Mr. Jinnah, unlike the congress, was cold and all business which let him know that this man was not only a formidable adversary but that he would not ever compromise on his cause or be intimidated. Instead he intimidated the crap out of Mountbatten. I don't know how you do things but I'd rather not have my leader licking the colonial power's boots. Nehru was favoured because Mountbatten's wife (himself a poof and a spineless one at that) had a really personal relationship with Nehru.
Kashmir and Gurdaspur went into hands of India due to poor judgment and decisions by Jinanh. The man signed Radcliffe award without even knowing the exact details of drawing of border.
What judgement? What decisions? Explain. The Radcliffe award defined the principles on which the border was to be drawn. The award did not give those areas to India. Why should he have not signed it? If the British went against the signed treaty and ran before anything could be done about it then it was their treachery, the great Quaid could not have done anything about it. Furthermore, the precarious position of East Punjab in the division was well known throughout the region; the local Lahoris were afraid that even Lahore might go to India. The British for fears of a full blown civil war erupting packed their bags and left running a full year earlier than was planned, leaving a bucket full of issues unresolved; Pakistan's share not being given to it, border disputes, asset disputes and the millions of deaths that were incurred on both sides of the border. Pakistan was made and left in such a situation that no one in the world expected it to last, except for one man and that man made it last through it and beyond.
Kashmir was a completely different issue. It was as clear as the light of day to whom Kashmir belonged. Mr. Jinnah could not have done jack about the treachery of the Dogra ruler, except order the Pakistani forces into Kashmir, which he did. Had the militias not resorted to looting the Dogra establishments on their way they would have easily reached Srinagar before the Indian troops and denied them any chance of establishing a foothold in the valley. What could have the man done?
At least read a little before you post, it will enable you to come up with more believable lies.
