Pakistans 30 plus 2 questions for India

[HAIDER]

Pakistans 30 plus 2 questions for India
Tuesday, 24 Feb, 2009 | 06:01 AM PST | Pakistan's Interior Minister Rehman Malik shows Mumbai attacks investigation report to the media during his news conference in Islamabad.AP Annexure-A



Material / evidence required from the government of India:

1. Authenticated copy of confessional statement of Ajmal Qasab recorded by the judicial authorities
2. National Identity Card number of Ajmal and other documentation/ diaries recovered from his possession.
3. Cell phone numbers used by Ajmal in the past, if disclosed during interrogation.
4. Detailed description and further particulars / maximum information of reportedly killed terrorists deposed by Ajmal during interrogation with Indian Police.
5. The digital note books/ diaries recovered from killed terrorists.
6. Authenticated copies of seizure memos of all the articles recovered from or belonging to accused terrorists along with their photographs.
7. Authentic forensic analysis reports of mobile / satellite phones and or any other evidence establishing connectivity and communication of the terrorists with militants based abroad along with identifying particulars.
8. Logs of cell phone interceptions.
9. Detailed transcripts of conversation amongst the terrorists during the terror activity from 26 to 28 Nov as well as with their handlers.
10. Cell-phone numbers targeted for transcripts immediately after the terror strike.
11. Intercepted voice recording identified by Ajmal Qasab as of Abu Hamza and Kahfa etc for voice analysis, as well as further details about alleged handlers Abu Hamza and Kahfa.
12. Thuraya telephone forensic analysis including:
a) Numbers in stored memory.
b) Called numbers /log
c) SMS messages
d) Any other information
13. Forensic analysis of cell phones, recovered from the possession of accused including:
a. Dialled numbers
b. Missed and received calls.
c. Last location
d. Photographs / movies
e. Audio recording
f. IMEI no. & SIM IMSI no
g. Screen shots etc
14. Fingerprints of all the ten accused for comparison with available database.
15. Fingerprints lifted from recovered weapons, personal articles and navigation devices etc. of the accused required for comparison.
16. Clear photographs of the accused for identification and matching with the national database.
17. DNA profiles of all the terrorists arrested / killed.
18. Post mortem reports of all the killed terrorists.
19. Forensic analysis and photograph of engravings on Yamaha engine including the tampering of letters on the engine. Two letters are missing. Complete engine number must be provided.
20. Photographs of engravings on pistols /SMGs recovered from the accused for identification.
21. Confirmation as to whether the pistols used by the terrorists were 9 mm! The picture of pistol shows a TT 7.62 MM (30 Bore) and CAL-30 is clearly visible.
22. Headers of the email received from deccanmujahideen@gmail.com claiming responsibility and clarification as to which specific media received the same.
23. Complete and date wise CCTV footage of all the incidents.
24. GPS data regarding travelling log, location to check log and coordinates, etc. for identifying the launching area. This is important because certain ambiguities have been noticed in the information already provided. For instance, if the terrorists started in a small boat from Karachi at approximately 0800 hours on 22nd Nov, then how come MOB waypoint is showing the boats position near Keti Bandar nearly one hour before this time? Out of 17 waypoints, only three have date stamps and remaining is without the same, creating doubt whether these points are authentic or created through GPS.
25. GPS operation is dependent on internal or external batteries, thus following points need elaboration:
a. If internal batteries were used, a large cache of batteries were required to keep them operative for more than six days.
b. If external batteries were used on boat then picture / evidence of the same should have been included in the list of items recovered from Kuber.
c. Picture labelled Thuraya satellite phone found in Kuber is of GPS of Garmin Company as GPS navigation buttons, waypoint names on screen and company name are clearly visible.
26. Photograph identified by Ajmal as Zaki ur Rehman Lakhvi.
27. Relevant information pertaining to tailor / company marks, brand names as well as dry cleaning or laundry stamps on clothes seized.
28. Google earth does not carry details of security systems, various entries / exit points, inner details. Such like information requires extensive physical reconnaissance and establishment of control centre within targets. Further details are required.
29. Why did the terrorists not come to the notice of Gujrat and Maharashtra Governments after having travelled by sea in their territory including reported refuelling enroute? Besides, how did they manage to evade so many coastal radars?
30. Details of interrogation reports of Mukhtar Ahmed (Counter-insurgency Officer) and Tausif Rehman, both Indian nationals, arrested after Mumbai attacks on charge of providing SIMs to the terrorists.


Annexure-B


Additional Information Required.



The eye witness account of Jugdev, the only survivor boarding the vehicle of ATS Chief Mr Hemant Karkare, accompanied by two other senior police officers in the same vehicle namely Mr Salasker and Mr Kamteis required to be examined by investigators in Pakistan. It is necessary as Mr Karkare was investigating the cases against militants in mass scale killings of Muslims in India including Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit, reportedly involved in Samjhota Express incident.




Linkages between diamond merchant firm Surat, Gujrat and some Hindus in Pakistan need to be clarified as the diamond merchant was alleged to sponsor Malegoen blasts through Col Purohit.

 

[metalfalcon]

Now lets see How India Responds to these Questions.

 

[Captain03]

Now lets see How India Responds to these Questions.

they're gonna have to get some bollywood script writers [or hollywood dvds lol] to get the answers for most of these questions

 

[jeypore]

Mumbai attacks: India says action first, talks later
New Delhi/Islamabad (IANS): India on Tuesday said it will respond to Pakistan's queries seeking more details, including audio recordings of conversations between the Mumbai terrorists and their handlers, but asked Islamabad to "do more" to dismantle terror infrastructure on its soil if it wants to resume the peace process.

"So far the composite dialogue is concerned, it is paused and we expect Pakistan to do more in respect of dismantling the terror infrastructure," External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee told reporters here when asked about the likelihood of restarting the dialogue with the neighbouring country.

When Pakistan High Commissioner Shahid Malik met Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon on Monday, he raised the issue of reviving the composite dialogue that went into a limbo after the Mumbai terror attacks in November last year.

Menon is likely to meet his Pakistani counterpart Salman Bashir in Colombo next week for the SAARC ministerial conference. But it's not clear whether the two officials will hold talks on the sidelines of the meet. If the talks are held, it will mark the first high-level contact between the two countries after the Mumbai attacks.

External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee was scheduled to go for the 31st meeting of the SAARC council of ministers, but he is unable to go due to his domestic responsibilities, official sources said.

After Islamabad admitted nearly a fortnight ago that a part of the Mumbai conspiracy was hatched and executed by its citizens from Pakistani territory, Pakistani leaders have been asking India to restart the fifth round of composite dialogue in media interviews, saying only talks can resolve issues related between the two countries.

New Delhi has, however, made it clear that the resumption of the dialogue process can only happen after "credible and verifiable action" by Islamabad against the Mumbai terrorists and the larger terror infrastructure that is deployed to target the Indian territory.

With Pakistani leaders raising the pitch for more information relating to the Mumbai atrocity, Mukherjee again reminded Pakistan to bring the perpetrators of the carnage to justice. "The process is on. We have received their response. We are going to send the response to them," he said.

In its response to the 26/11 dossier presented by India, Pakistan Feb 12 raised 30 questions, saying this information was needed to prosecute Pakistani militants detained by their authorities in connection with the Mumbai blasts.

Pakistan has asked for an "authenticated copy" of the confessional statement of Ajmal Kasab, the lone Mumbai attacker arrested during the Mumbai attacks, as recorded by judicial authorities and "other documentation/diaries recovered from his possession".


It has also sought mobile phone numbers "used by Ajmal in the past, if disclosed during interrogation".

In its note verbale to India, Islamabad has also asked for the digital notebooks/ diaries recovered from killed terrorists and authenticated copies of seizure memos of all the articles recovered from or belonging to accused terrorists along with their photographs.

Islamabad also wants authentic forensic analysis reports of mobile/satellite phones and or any other evidence establishing connectivity and communication of the terrorists with militants based abroad along with identifying particulars.

It wants logs of cell phone interceptions and detailed transcripts of conversation amongst the terrorists during the terror activity from 26 to 28 Nov as well as with their handlers and sought the fingerprints and DNA profiles of all 10 terrorists involved in the attacks so that they can be compared with its available database.

They have requested for the post-mortem reports of all the killed terrorists.

Pakistan also suspects that some Indians were also involved in the attacks and hinted at the connivance of Indians in helping terrorists organize the attacks.

"Why did the terrorists not come to the notice of the Gujarat and Maharashtra governments after having travelled by sea in their territory, including reported refuelling enroute? Besides, how did they manage to evade so many coastal radars?" asks Islamabad in its response to the Indian dossier.

It has asked details of interrogation reports of Mukhtar Ahmed (Counter-insurgency Officer) and Tausif Rehman, both Indian nationals, arrested after the Mumbai attacks on charge of providing SIMs to the terrorists and sought the eyewitness account of constable Arun Jadhav - the only policeman to survive a terrorist attack which killed ATS chief Hemant Karkare and two other senior officials Ashok Kamte and Vijay Salaskar.

"It is necessary as Karkare was investigating the cases against militants in mass scale killings of Muslims in India, including Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit, reportedly involved in the Samjhauta Express incident," a report in the Dawn daily said Tuesday.

"Linkages between a diamond merchant from Surat, Gujarat, and some Hindus in Pakistan need to be clarified as the diamond merchant was alleged to have sponsored the Malegaon blasts through Col. Purohit," the report added.

Pakistan has also asked Indian authorities for the photograph that was used by Kasab to identify Lashker-e-Taiba operative Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi. Kasab has named Lakhvi as the mastermind behind the Mumbai attacks.

The Pakistani response also sought to raise questions over some of the data provided by India in its dossier. While seeking GPS data to identify the "launching area" of the terrorist, it said "certain ambiguities have been noticed in the information already provided".

India is ready to provide some of this information and has launched inter-agency consultation process for the same, but it is not comfortable with some of the questions that it sees as "diversionary tactics" aimed at giving a domestic angle to the Mumbai attacks.

The demand for tapes of recordings of the conversation of the Mumbai attackers and those of the conversations they had with their Pakistan-based handlers could also run into problems as some of these tapes run into 60 hours.

Indian authorities see Pakistan's posers as a time-buying tactic to divert attention from its primary responsibility of bringing the perpetrators of the Mumbai carnage to justice. "There is no guarantee that they will not ask for still more questions after the present lot. For India, the key issue is prosecuting and punishing the terrorists involved in the Mumbai attacks," said government sources.

The Hindu News Update Service

 

[Bane Blade]

Sounds like India has something to hide or is it simply taking time to make up the stories that are required to complete the answers because this is too long uptill now they have only successfully concluded that the terrorists are Pakistanis which is very odd because that is something the RSS concluded within fifteen minutes of the first report on the incedent shouldn't RSS be in power they seem to know more than the present government?

And can conlude faster?

 

[dabong1]

Have any these questions been answered yet?

 

[Dosti]

Can any of my brother tell me as to why do we need India to answer all these questions when we know that the terrorist had gone from pakistan and they were trained and fuded by ISI.Now is the time for all of us to decide weather we want talabani pak or a much more rational and free nation.....