What's new

Pakistan's 26/11 trial

Awesome

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
22,023
Reaction score
5
I think as we demand justice for ourselves we must demand justice for all those that have been aggrieved by Pakistani nationals as well. Our prosecution should not be complacent against all those that have wronged India in this matter.

The case is ongoing and we must keep the pressure on the government to take it to some logical end.
 
Everyone responsible for killings must be taken to court of law irrespective of nationality. But in our current judicial system is this mreally possible? The way the chief justice fingers govt., if 10% of the same is pointed towards our judiciary, it will be a real bless.
 
To add to it. Its in favor of Pakistan to do it.

If a kid hits or abuses others or his siblings it should be same for parents. If you dont stop them in time it will hurt you soon.
 
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

Prosecutors given 7 days to provide copies of witnesses’ statements

RAWALPINDI: An ATC conducting the trial of the accused charged with involvement in Mumbai attacks, gave prosecutors seven days to provide copies of statements of key Indian witnesses and other relevant documents to defence lawyers.

After the prosecutors sought more time to produce the documents, the judge gave them time until June 18 and adjourned the proceedings. The court was also informed that India had provided the medical reports of those killed in Mumbai attacks, but these reports were not authentic and the Indian authorities had been requested to provide authentic reports. On the last hearing, the prosecutors had told the court that the Indian government had said that it would cooperate with a Pakistani judicial commission that will interview doctors who conducted the autopsies on the Mumbai attacks’ victims, police officials who investigated the incident and the magistrate who recorded the statement of Ajmal Kasab. staff report
 
26/11 trial put off for judge unavailability | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online

RAWALPINDI - The hearing in the trial of the seven accused arrested in Pakistan in connection with Mumbai attacks was postponed for a week.

A duty judge adjourned the hearing owing to non-appointment of any new judge in ATC No 3 after the transfer of Justice Rana Nisar Ahmed Khan. ATC No 1 Judge Malik Akram Awan adjourned the proceeding till 25 June. In the last hearing, FIA prosecutors were unable to present the attested statements of eyewitnesses against Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and others.

For once can these type of screw ups not happen when the whole world is watching the status of this case...
 
2008 Mumbai attacks case: Defence lawyers blame India for delay in trial – The Express Tribune

RAWALPINDI: The lawyers of the seven accused arrested in connection with the 2008 terrorists attacks in Mumbai have blamed the Indian government for causing a delay in the trial against their clients.

Addressing a press conference at a local hotel on Saturday, Advocate Malik Muhammad Rafique said that if the Indian government accepted the demand by Pakistan to send 20 prosecution witnesses to a Pakistani court, the trial could be wrapped up in no time.

Speaking on behalf of the other defence lawyers, Advocate Rafique said that the lawyers unanimously agreed that India should stop piling pressure on Pakistani authorities for a speedy trial of the seven accused, who were arrested in January 2009.

He further said that the reason for the press conference was that as defence lawyers it was necessary for them to present the current status of the trial.
The lawyer added that the trial court had been waiting for the prosecution witnesses in the case, as India had turned down a request of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to send the witnesses to appear before the trial court.

Advocate Rafique further said that a request of the FIA to form a judicial commission that would go to India to record statements of the prosecution witnesses for the trial would not be suitable under Pakistani laws, which requires the judge to be present while witnesses record their statements.
He explained that only the competent court of law could determine the ‘demeanour ‘of the prosecution witnesses while recording their statements.
If the commission goes to India to record the statements of the witnesses, their value to the defence would be minimal and could create another legal lacuna in the case.

Similarly, the criminal evidence and statements of the witnesses obtained in India against Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist involved in the attack, could not be helpful for the FIA against the seven arrested men who belong to the banned Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, the lawyer said.

Denouncing the pressure by India for a speedy trial of the accused, the lawyer said that India should first produce the culprits in the case of the Samjotha Express incident which killed hundreds of innocent Pakistanis.

In response to a question, Advocate Rafique said they would seek the post-arrest bail of the seven accused in a stable condition as many trial judges who had been appointed to hear the case were transferred.

The hearing against the arrested accused Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, the alleged mastermind of the attacks, Hammad Amin Sadiq, Shahid Jamil Riaz, Younas Anjum, Jamil Ahmed, Mazhar Iqbal and Abdul Majid was adjourned till June 25 in the absence of the trial judge who was transferred last Saturday.

Cooperation from the Indian side is required too, only calling for speedy trial and not providing the witnesses, is also causing delays. Pakistanis want a logical end to this case too, but with the due process followed.
 
26/11 trial Prosecutors asked to provide statements by key Indian witnesses

Islamabad—An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) conducting the trial of Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and six other accused charged with involvement in the Mumbai attacks Saturday gave prosecutors a week’s time to provide copies of statements of key Indian witnesses and other relevant documents to defence lawyers.

The prosecutors were unable to produce the documents during proceedings conducted by Judge Rana Nisar Ahmed behind closed doors at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi. The judge had earlier directed the prosecution to provide the documents at Saturday’s hearing. After the prosecutors sought more time to produce the documents, the judge gave them time till June 18 and adjourned the proceedings, the PTI reported while quoting sources.

At the last hearing on May 28, the prosecutors had told the judge that the Indian government had said it will cooperate with a Pakistani judicial commission and allow it to question witnesses and officials.

The judge had asked them to substantiate their contention with any written communication sent by Indian authorities. This matter is also expected to be taken up at the next hearing. —INP
 
For fourth time, Pak transfers 26/11 judge - Times Of India

NEW DELHI: In what is seen here as a tactic to delay the trial of the Mumbai terror attack's perpetrators, Pakistan has once against transferred the judge hearing the 26/11 case against seven jailed Lashkar terrorists. This is the fourth time that the trial judge of the concerned Rawalpindi court has been transferred in the past two years.

The judge, Rana Nisar Ahmed, hearing the case since November 2010, was transferred from the Rawalpindi court to the Shankargarh court in Punjab province of Pakistan on Saturday.

The Rawalpindi court has been hearing the Mumbai terror attack case against seven accused – Lashkar commanders Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, Zarar Shah, Abu-al-Qama and others – since 2009. Before Ahmed, three other judges of the same court had been transferred forcing the case to drag on without any conclusion in sight.

Question to ask is who is doing the transferring? Chief Justice should take a bold step and try the case himself. Its already happening in the same city, so why not just elevate such an important case to the SC?
 
26/11: Pak submits Kasab statement

Rawalpindi, July 9 (IBNS) Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) prosecutors on Saturday submitted documentary evidences, including statement of lone surviving terrorist of 26/11 Ajmal Kasab, provided by India, in an anti-terrorism court.



According to reports, the FIA prosecutors submitted three files containing autopsy reports of those killed in the attacks, medico-legal reports of the injured and Kasab’s confessional statement in English, Hindi and Marathi, to new judge Shahid Rafique during in-camera proceedings at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi.

The Pakistani anti-terrorism court is holding trials of seven 26/11 suspects, including Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi.

On May 27 last year, the Supreme Court of Pakistan dismissed the acquittal petition filed by Lakhvi in the 26/11 case.

Lakhvi, who is being tried with six others at the Pakistani anti-terrorism court for allegedly planning the Mumbai Terror Attack, had filed a petition for his acquittal saying the charges against him were solely based on the confession of Kasab.

Meanwhile, Indian investigators have been seeking voice samples of the Pakistani nationals accused of planning and executing the devastating 72-hour strike on India’s financial capital on November 26, 2008, that left 166 dead and over 300 wounded.

26/11: Pak submits Kasab statement
 
Judicial commission on 26/11 to visit India: Malik

Pakistan has confirmed to India that it will soon send a judicial commission to pursue the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case. Sources said this was conveyed by Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik to Home Minister P Chidambaram when they met on the sidelines of the SAARC Interior/Home Ministers meeting here on Saturday. Sources said a team from India is also likely to visit Pakistan in connection with the 26/11 probe. During the Home Secretary-level talks in March, India had agreed to host Pakistan's judicial commission to take statements of the magistrate, investigating officer and the doctor who had conducted the post-mortem of the terrorists who attacked Mumbai on November 26, 2008. The commission also wants to interview the Indian officials in connection with the trial of seven Pakistani suspects currently in prison in that country in connection with the case.

Judicial commission on 26/11 to visit India: Malik | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online

It is not clear, whether Kasab will be interrogated or not.
I think we should send Virk Sb. (of Lahore) to interrogate Kasab. Sabh doodh ka doodh, pani ka pani ho jaye ga.
 
^^ Umar virk is a good choice :P

bata haan zara....kitho da aye tu.... oye kassab naa rakhiya aye teri maa ne.... waikh mein hun tere naal ki karna.... panjwi da nasab yaad aa jay ga tenu @ Virk
 
Well at least a move in the +ve direction.
In this time of such a huge trust deficit , every step, no matter how big or small from either side counts, i guess.
 
I think as we demand justice for ourselves we must demand justice for all those that have been aggrieved by Pakistani nationals as well. Our prosecution should not be complacent against all those that have wronged India in this matter.

The case is ongoing and we must keep the pressure on the government to take it to some logical end.

Better late than never. Justice delayed I guess is not justice denied. Lets see what their investigative team will come to their logical conclusion. After two years they asked for permission to interrogate Ajmal Kasab and others. Maybe we should start demanding monetary compensation to all the victims who perished.
 
Back
Top Bottom