What's new

Pakistani’s Iron Grip, Wielded in Opulent Exile, Begins to Slip

A.Rafay

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Messages
11,400
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
By DECLAN WALSH

September 12, 2013

LONDON — For two decades, Altaf Hussain has run his brutal Pakistani political empire by remote control, shrouded in luxurious exile in London and long beyond the reach of the law.He follows events through satellite televisions in his walled-off home, manages millions of dollars in assets and issues decrees in ranting teleconferences that last for hours — all to command a network of influence and intimidation that stretches from North America to South Africa.

This global system serves a very localized goal: perpetuating Mr. Hussain’s reign as the political king of Karachi, the brooding port city of 20 million people at the heart of Pakistan’s economy.“Distance does not matter,” reads the inscription on a monument near Mr. Hussain’s deserted former house in Karachi, where his name evokes both fear and favor.An image of Altaf Hussain at the headquarters of his political party in Karachi, Pakistan Now, though, his painstakingly constructed web is fraying.

A British murder investigation has been closing in on Mr. Hussain, 59, and his party, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement. His London home and offices have been raided, and the police have opened new investigations into accusations of money laundering and inciting violence in Pakistan.The scrutiny has visibly rattled Mr. Hussain, who recently warned supporters that his arrest may be imminent. And in Karachi, it has raised a previously unthinkable question: Is the end near for the untouchable political machine that has been the city’s linchpin for three decades?“This is a major crisis,” said Irfan Husain, the author of “Fatal Faultlines,” a book about Pakistan’s relationship with the United States.

“The party has been weakened, and Altaf Hussain is being criticized like never before.”Altaf Hussain's home in England.Mr. Hussain’s rise offers a striking illustration of the political melee in Pakistan.His support stems from the Mohajirs, Urdu-speaking Muslims whose families moved to Pakistan after the partition from India in 1947, and who make up about half of Karachi’s population. Since the 1980s, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement has fiercely defended Mohajir interests, and in turn it has been carried to victory in almost every election and to an enduring place in national coalition governments as well.

Mr. Hussain fled to London in 1992, when the movement was engaged in a vicious street battle with the central government for supremacy in Karachi. The British government granted him political asylum and, 10 years later, a British passport.London has long been the antechamber of Pakistani politics, where self-exiled leaders take refuge until they can return. The former military ruler Pervez Musharraf lived here until recently, and the current prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, lived here until 2007.Mr. Hussain, however, shows no sign of going back. The Muttahida Qaumi Movement has an office in Edgware, in northwest London. But these days Mr. Hussain is mostly at home, in a redbrick suburban house protected by raised walls, security cameras and a contingent of former British soldiers he has hired as bodyguards.

From there, he holds court, addressing his faraway followers in a vigorous, sometimes maniacal style, punctuated by jabbing gestures and hectoring outbursts. Occasionally he bursts into song, or tears. Yet, on the other end of the line, it is not unusual to find tens of thousands of people crowded into a Karachi street, listening raptly before an empty stage containing Mr. Hussain’s portrait, as his disembodied voice booms from speakers.“The cult of personality surrounding Altaf Hussain is quite extraordinary,” said Farzana Shaikh, an academic and the author of “Making Sense of Pakistan.” “He is immensely charismatic, in the way one thinks of the great fascist leaders of the 20th century.”In Karachi, his overwhelmingly middle-class party is fronted by sharply dressed, well-spoken men — and a good number of women — and it has won a reputation for efficient city administration.

But beneath the surface, its mandate is backed by armed gangs involved in racketeering, abduction and the targeted killings of ethnic and political rivals, the police and diplomats say.Other major Pakistani parties indulge in similar behavior, but the Muttahida Qaumi Movement frequently brings the most muscle to the fight. An American diplomatic cable from 2008 titled “Gangs of Karachi,” which was published by WikiLeaks, cited estimates that the party had an active militia of 10,000 gunmen, with an additional 25,000 in reserve — a larger force, the dispatch notes, than the city police.Many journalists who have criticized the party have been beaten, or worse, driving most of the news media in Karachi to tread lightly.

In June, the Committee to Protect Journalists, a lobbying group based in New York, accused the party of organizing the killing of Wali Khan Babar, a television reporter.In the West, the party has avoided critical attention partly because it has cast itself as an enemy of Islamist militancy. In 2001, Mr. Hussain wrote a letter to Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain, offering to help Britain set up a spy network against the Taliban.Critics of the party have frequently questioned the role of British officials in facilitating its unusual system of governance. Pakistani exiles from Baluchistan, also accused of fomenting violence, have faced criminal prosecution. But Britain is not the only node of Mr. Hussain’s international support network.Through the Pakistani diaspora, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement has active branches as far afield as the United States, Canada and even South Africa, which has become an important financial hub and a haven for the group’s enforcers, Pakistani investigators say.

Two police interrogation reports obtained by The New York Times cite militants from the movement who say they traveled to South Africa in between carrying out political assassinations in Karachi. One of those men, Teddy Qamar, confessed to 58 killings between 2006 and 2012, the police say. In an interview, Anis Hasan, the party’s joint organizer for South Africa, denied any link to organized violence.But if Mr. Hussain seemed immune to scrutiny at his London stronghold, his luck started to turn in September 2010 after Imran Farooq, a once-influential leader in the movement who had split from the party, was stabbed to death near his house in Edgware.Soon after, Mr. Hussain appeared on television, mourning Mr. Farooq with a flood of tears. But over the past year, the police investigation has turned sharply in his direction.In December, officers from Scotland Yard’s Counter Terrorism Command searched the movement’s London office.

Then in June they went to Mr. Hussain’s home and arrested Ishtiaq Hussain, his cousin and personal assistant, who is now out on bail. The police impounded $600,000 in cash and some jewelry under laws that target the proceeds of crime.Mr. Hussain was not available for an interview, his party said. But a senior party official, Nadeem Nusrat, speaking at the movement’s London office, denied any link to Mr. Farooq’s killing. “Our conscience is clear,” Mr. Nusrat said. “We have nothing to do with it.”Mr. Nusrat said the impounded money had come from political donations. And he rejected accusations, also the subject of a police inquiry, that Mr. Hussain has directly threatened political rivals, in some instances by warning that he would arrange for their “body bags.”“It’s all taken out of context,” Mr. Nusrat said.Mr. Hussain has receded from public view during the recent furor. There have been rumors about mounting health problems, which Mr. Hussain’s aides deny.

But he cannot return to Pakistan, they say, because the Taliban could kill him. “In Pakistan,” said Muhammad Anwar, a longtime aide, “nobody can guarantee your life.”Then there are the legal threats: over the years, dozens of murder charges have been lodged against Mr. Hussain in Pakistan, although some have been quashed in court. A more pressing question, perhaps, concerns the impact on the streets of Karachi if Mr. Hussain is forced to step down.Some fear that without his guiding hand, tensions within the movement could split it into hostile factions — a frightening prospect in a city where political violence already claims hundreds of lives a year.

“However viciously the party conducts itself, there is an order within the apparent disorder,” said Ms. Shaikh, the academic.Even if the British government wished to crack down on Mr. Hussain, she added, it might find itself subject to appeals from the Pakistani authorities. “The fear of Karachi going up in flames is so great,” Ms. Shaikh said, “that no government can take that risk, as long as Altaf Hussain is alive.”


http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/09/1...-grip-on-a-pakistani-city-faces-a-threat.html
 
its a crap article, in MQM's home ministry the crime rate drastically declined and karachi was very much peaceful, there was no concept of bhatta and target killing except mobile snatching
 
The Last Blog | An Agent’s Story – Declan Walsh on MQM

Finally the lord has spoken, the bible of journalism industry The New York times has taken its empirical attempt, slinging mud shots at Mr. Altaf Hussain. The story titled “Pakistani’s Iron Grip, Wielded in Opulent Exile, Begins to Slip” has been the topic of discussions in press clubs and news channels of Pakistan. The story is by Declan Walsh, yes, do the name rings a bell?

After reading the story early in the morning, I felt a wave of utmost disappointment and regret. I have been reading the Newyork times since six years but I never felt such despair.

I was thinking such baseless story on such credible paper, even a boy can rip this sheet of lies apart. So I start from the reporter, Mr, Declan Walsh. He was working in Pakistan since 2004, until recently he was expelled. Yes, in 2013, Mr. Walsh has been placed in list A of black list (BL) of government of Pakistan and was soon declared Persona non grata, on the request of security agencies of Pakistan. He was expelled from Pakistan with immediate effect of the notice.

The reasons given in the letter of interior ministry were … “Walsh has frequently been advised to refrain from violating procedures. Nevertheless, disregarding instructions he continued to visit various no-go areas without clearance” .

The report by the intelligence agencies about Mr. Declan Walsh stated that he was involved in “undesired activities” in Pakistan.

According to the contents of a report prepared by an intelligence agency, “Walsh was expelled due to false journalism against Pakistan and violating his terms of stay by visiting prohibited areas without a no objection certificate (NOC).”

The report further says that “ the journalist has, overtime, produced inaccurate and defamatory pieces about Pakistan with one creating the impression that the country’s nuclear weapons storage areas were being attacked.”

Now these are quotes from the report prepared by the intelligence agencies of Paksitan including ISI, and given to the interior ministry and based on these reports action against Mr. Walsh was taken.

This is I guess enough for the backgrounder of the reporter. Now some questions that I worry about.

Most of the information in this article is defamatory and I am sure Mr. Walsh cannot on any ground provide evidence of what is written. Walsh maintains that Mr. Altaf Hussien has an army of ten thousand soldiers which is active in Karachi, plus 25,000 reserved army is also present in Karachi that serves Mr. Altaf hussain. I don’t know who gave him the figure but one thing is for sure, If there was an army of 35,000 men in Karachi, that served Mr. Altaf Hussain and MQM, none in Pakistan than had the guts to kill a Muhajir in Karachi. Mr. Walsh has defined the term MUHAJIR well in his write up but , question is simple if a community has an army of 35000 active men, do u think they can be killed, bullied or ruled.

Secondly, it would have been much better, if Mr Walsh has asked this question from the British government that what Mr. Altaf Hussain is doing in Britain. Because he is accusing Mr. Altaf Hussain, of being a Criminal lord involved in serious and heinous crimes. But I guess he is too afraid to ask the British government that why they are supporting and international terrorist, according to him. In fact he is also accusing the British government of spreading terror in Pakistan.

Mr walsh also talks about intelligence reports about two alleged criminals of MQM, he mentions the police reports about some teddy and his 58 murders, so Mr Walsh , havent you read the reports of Pakistani intelligence about you. it says you are working against the country.

Rest is all those accusations that the world has been placing on MQM and Altaf hussian since ages and we the people of Karachi are sick and tired of listening and reading to them.

But I just wonder why there is this sudden wave of derogatory reports about MQM and Altaf Hussain on western media. When in Pakistan since 2004, did not Mr. walsh saw all the things that he mentioned in his report yesterday. What was he doing then. I think the sudden media out burst on Mr Altaf is due to the way the west want Pakistan to be or it is due to IMF program, can’t tell everything on a simple blog, just fruit for thought.

547310-declanwalshpakforeigneyesphotoatherkhan-1368220892-172-640x480.jpg
 
Declan

declan-walsh-with-bugti-t-007.jpg


Declan Walsh, New York Times’ Pakistan Bureau Chief who is currently barred from entering Pakistan, after his visa was revoked earlier this year, in a vague statement issued by Pakistani Authorities for cancelling his work visa and the reason given was “in view of your (his) undesirable activities”.

Previously, Walsh was noted as a credible figure reporting on US war in Pak-Afghan region. In a recent publicity stunt article Walsh adopted and voiced extreme views of his own on the largest political party of Karachi and Urban Sindh, Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM). It is no coincidence that MQM has been marred by controversies right from the get go, and till this date remains the most misunderstood phenomena in the entire nation. It supporters, workers and voters belong from large silent middle class majority who are amongst the most educated and law-abiding citizens of the nation.

Myself, being a Pakistani-American who grew up in the western society, have always looked at journalism as a noble profession and had a lot of respect for it. But Mr. Walsh’s article caused me to re-think my thoughts. The article start’s off by immediately in its very first line by taking a jab at character Mr. Altaf Hussain. As I went on to read the article somewhere in back of naive brain, I kept on questioning myself, that the negative imagery portrayed by Declan Walsh is that a complete truth? Could the last 35+ years of hard work and struggle of MQM and Mr. Altaf Hussain be summed in a 2 page article? Lastly, how could New York Times, a well-known newspaper regarded for its credibility publish such a one sided piece?

Needless to say my trust was shattered as I re-read the article to ensure that I haven’t missed anything. As a student of history, I recalled the praises of MQM and specifically Mr. Altaf Hussain by numerous humanitarians, politicians, journalists and well known-dignitaries. Another question that arose in my mind, was it a co-incidence or an indented cause that a dozen plus quotes were referenced within the article, but all were hand-picked fuelling negative propaganda. Could Mr. Walsh not have added a quote by prominent journalists or society members about development by MQM, exemplary social and charitable work conducted by the organization, along with standing up against feudalism, empowering the middle class and restoring their trust in democracy; or rather did he not try to, or perhaps ignored it on purpose.

Walsh, being ruthless to his profession sabotaged all basic principles of investigative journalism and went on point out so-called fact which holds no basis (see the image below – excerpt from the article). First and foremost, the house searched did not belong to Mr. Altaf Hussian, as he does not hold any material property of his own. Secondly, the cousin mentioned Ishtiaq Hussain does not exist; although a cousin by the name of Iftikhar Hussain does exist who holds no political or administrative post within the party nor serves as personal assistant anyone. Furthermore to this account, Iftikhar Hussain was detained, not arrested at London Airport while returning after attending a family wedding in Canada, and was will-fully released by Metropolitan police after a conclusive investigation and no charges were filed. Lastly, till this date, Scotland Yard nor Metropolitan Police has confirmed or stated what they impounded from Mr. Hussain’s residence. Although imagination has no bounds, but credible journalists do like to speculate and associate a dollar amount and desirable description to the items impounded.

_____________________________________________________________

article txt

_____________________________________________________________

The above syndicated four-line paragraph is merely an example of ongoing cliché’s and baseless arguments presented in Declan Walsh’s One Sided Story. If you are in for some gossip be sure to waste 10-15 minutes of you precious time to read complete story on Declan’s Decline at New Times website.
 
MQM to sue against NYT, declan walsh

MQM Terms US Paper Report About Altaf Hussain As Baseless :: CNBC Pakistan ::

Staff Report

KARACHI: MQM Rabita Committee has condemned US paper report about its chief Altaf Hussain, calling it malicious and baseless.

In a statement issued here on Saturday, Rabita Committee said it would send defamation notice to US paper and its journalist for publishing derogatory report about Altaf Hussain.

The Committee said the US journalist, according to some media reports, was declared persona non grata and expelled from Pakistan recently.

Reason Behind International Media Against MQM

[video]https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x14okla_reason-behind-international-media-against-mqm_news[/video]
 
Back
Top Bottom