What's new

Pakistani Representative shows wrong pic at UN - Indian media erupts

I think someone from Obama's foreign Ofc said a wonderful thing. They said while they meet Indian counterpart for 123 agreement (nuclear deal) they where very thoroughly prepared. They had every single copy of previous 123 agreement with sections marked and tagged which they liked. Indian diplomats did a lot of background before they came to table, that made US diplomat very dicy as they too would have to match them.

Compare that to this fiasco.
 
. .
yeah pellet guns were never used in Kashmir...Shameless Indians, instead of debating on real point, hiding behind this!
 
.
lol you are literally firing into crowds of innocent civilians, we are using heavy ordinance only in areas where civilians have been evacuated.

Can you seriously not tell the difference?
If harming the local populas was the main motive, they could have easily turned to their standard firearm. That would have definitely stopped the riot but instead they choose to use a non leathal force. But you guys chose to bomb the local populas ..! You literally took out peoples homes.
 
. .
70 years of occupation and brutality causes more harm then any shell

You can provide any information you like we will state as always Kashmir must be given a referendum and democratic choice to determine their future

one man, one woman, one vote
two choice Pakistan or India

if you want to vote then do it in Azad Kashmir, J&K is an Integral part of India,
 
. .
this is the second thread on this.........
This just shows that their pichwara is on fire after her speech. It is not business as usual for India. They thought they could just rant and rant and nobody is going to challenge them on this. As for the picture, the whole world community knows that Indian occupied forces used pallet guns to blind Kashmiries. So it does not matter which picture was shared as long as the world got to see the real face of the world's largest hypocrisy.
 
.
If harming the local populas was the main motive, they could have easily turned to their standard firearm. That would have definitely stopped the riot but instead they choose to use a non leathal force. But you guys chose to bomb the local populas ..! You literally took out peoples homes.

1 million people were evacuated from the region and compensated 35,000 Rs for travel and food. No structures were destroyed unless it was absolutely necessary, and even then they were rebuilt, there are many pictures across this forum of marketplaces and houses being rebuilt or restored by Army engineers.

In Zarb-E-Azb over a 2 and a half year period only 2 civillians were killed by the military, do I even need to tell you how many were killed in Kashmir in the same period?
 
.
Kashmir must be given a referendum and democratic choice to determine their future
Sure be my guest.Refer to the draft of UN resolution which show that -

  • The UN resolution of 1948 applies to the full “State of Jammu & Kashmir”. As shown in the map below, this includes Gilgit-Baltistan, AZK, Shaksgam Valley, Jammu, Ladakh and Kashmir valley – not just Kashmir
  • For UN plebiscite to be conducted, the first condition is that Government of Pakistan should withdraw it’s forces and non-residents from the area
  • When the above has been established, then Government of India needs to reduce forces to the minimum strength, as required to maintain law & order
The first step to be taken by Pakistan has never been done, due to obvious reasons.
 
.
Should have used this instead;
IMG_6838.JPG


IMG_6839.JPG


Sure be my guest.Refer to the draft of UN resolution which show that -

  • The UN resolution of 1948 applies to the full “State of Jammu & Kashmir”. As shown in the map below, this includes Gilgit-Baltistan, AZK, Shaksgam Valley, Jammu, Ladakh and Kashmir valley – not just Kashmir
  • For UN plebiscite to be conducted, the first condition is that Government of Pakistan should withdraw it’s forces and non-residents from the area
  • When the above has been established, then Government of India needs to reduce forces to the minimum strength, as required to maintain law & order
The first step to be taken by Pakistan has never been done, due to obvious reasons.
First steps by Pak?:lol:


Pakistan took the initiative in the 50s... india backed out.

Also your propoganda has been busted several times...

@Azlan Haider
 
. . . .
You really won't like us challenging the picture. Bcoz we won't challenge it head on, we will just show how Pakistan managed it's house, ie with AF and heavy artillery. I am a lay man, but pray please tell me what takes more lives? An artillery shell packed with HE or non lethal pellets that where fired in self defence at a large unruly/violent, paid, crowd after sevral warnings?
You are too fukin retarded to know that Pak evacuated millions of people from operational areas.. triggering an IPD issue...
and forget the indian airforce bombing entire northeast towns and triggering Insurgencies in 7 sister states.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom