What's new

Pakistani Representative shows wrong pic at UN - Indian media erupts

when a pakistani army back lawyer was sent to ICJ to fight kulbhushan yadev case after taking billions of rupees from pakistani state got lost to a case fought by an indian lawyer who took token fees of 1 rupees even though pakistan had kulbushan tadev in its hands and could not have lost the case from here

i realized how pakistanis are being fooked by this deceiving establishment

in 1971 pakistan media headlines on 18th december wad that pakistan army was winning the war after pakistan had already surrendered on the 16th

they don't have any Basic Proof except Passport against kulbhushan

do you have any link or source for 1971 war which you mentioned, I don't have knowledge of that if you share any link i can read
 
.
so as per your mindset there are no rights for Human only Muslim First then Human Second
The Muslims of Kashmir do not want to live with the Hindus of India.

The Kashmiris have a right to secede.
 
.
There are and should be rights for everyone, Kashmir has wanted freedom for over 70 years forcing them under occupation has just created chaos

where you Muslim word Missing from your post i expected Muslim word,

If you respect human then give them freedom why you want them part of your country when they don't want part of you,
 
.
AWACS are still a fantasy for a few. So yeah, to you it would be no less than a fairy tale.

Pakistan operate more AWACS then you rats, with LINK-17 specifically designed for PAF. and our numbers are set to increase in near future. Which parallel world you live in rat-Indian?
 
. .
as well Balochistan has rights to secede where they don't want to be a part of
Balochistan is not disputed territory like Jammu and Kashmir is.

What about ULFA the Seven sister states and Khalistan.

Now don't be a hypocrite now ;)
 
.
The Muslims of Kashmir do not want to live with the Hindus of India. The Kashmiris have a right to secede.
Do they? I thought that under the old U.N. resolution Kashmiris only have the right to choose between Kashmir and India, not independence.
 
.
Do they? I thought that under the old U.N. resolution Kashmiris only have the right to choose between Kashmir and India, not independence.
You mean choose between Pakistan and India, I presume.
You could be correct. However the Kashmiris definitely want to be rid of Indian tyranny. That is for sure.
 
.
Do they? I thought that under the old U.N. resolution Kashmiris only have the right to choose between Kashmir and India, not independence.
they dont have any rights per se, that was only given territory administered by british. Kashmir was ruled by a king and he decides whom to join with. It was Indian PM who was gracious to give that choice but the greedy pakistanis scored a self goal by invading kashmir.
Which forced India to send troops.

Either way kashmir is Indian territory for ages which had hindu pandits population. In fact name of kashmir derives from a Indian sage named Kashyap. Islamic invaders invaded and destroyed our temples and killed our ppl. Now they claim the land as theirs. They are continuing centuries of violence against the natives of the land.

See our destroyed temples.
upload_2017-9-25_18-29-7.jpeg


Real historical truth.
upload_2017-9-25_18-29-44.jpeg
 
.
Balochistan is not disputed territory like Jammu and Kashmir is.

What about ULFA the Seven sister states and Khalistan.

Now don't be a hypocrite now ;)

Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha :-):-):-):-):-):-)

It's not a Disputed territory, I know

We are talking about People who don't want to be part of, not a Disputed territory
 
.
where you Muslim word Missing from your post i expected Muslim word,

If you respect human then give them freedom why you want them part of your country when they don't want part of you,

Balochistan is fine

Its a muslim majority state part of a muslim country, no martial law, no curfew virtually everyone acts, talks be's like every other Pakistani

Kashmiris a Muslim majority state occupied by a hindu country against its wishes snd partition
 
.
Pakistan operate more AWACS then you rats, with LINK-17 specifically designed for PAF. and our numbers are set to increase in near future. Which parallel world you live in rat-Indian?

Chinese !! Nuff Said !! You Pakistani's are in Rat trap!! Your economy is so fragile and weak that you have to buy the words cheapest low quality item in a soft loan and the funny part is you call us rats !! Whats the use operating good for nothing aircraft apart from exercising with the makers of those aircraft?
 
.
Do they? I thought that under the old U.N. resolution Kashmiris only have the right to choose between Kashmir and India, not independence.

Kashmir is a extension of Northern Pakistan in terms of culture, faith, language even look

They simply wanted to be part of the new state meant for Muslims in 1947

Rather then respect their wishes and the spirit of Partition the whole point of which was the seperation of hindu/muslim people's, they tried to force a muslim majority state into a indian union because the king was hindu

Azad Kashmir was freed the rest has caused 70 years of emnity
 
.
Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha Ha ha ha :-):-):-):-):-):-)

It's not a Disputed territory, I know

We are talking about People who don't want to be part of, not a Disputed territory
Is that the best argument you got? :lol:

The Baloch are not even a majority in Balochistan.
Most Baloch do not want to secede from Pakistan.
 
.
Balochistan is fine

Its a muslim majority state part of a muslim country, no martial law, no curfew virtually everyone acts, talks be's like every other Pakistani

Kashmiris a Muslim majority state occupied by a hindu country against its wishes snd partition

J&K fine and they are living Happily,

it doesn't Matter Muslim or Hindu or Chrestien, they are happy and will be happy with the part of us
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom