BATMAN
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 29,895
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
It proves what Dr. Lodhi has stated and showed in her speech has a background.This is a picture of a Hindu Temple. What does it prove?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It proves what Dr. Lodhi has stated and showed in her speech has a background.This is a picture of a Hindu Temple. What does it prove?
ok ...so Mumbai attack is beating around bush..goodNo we are talking about India's brutal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir.
Don't try to obfuscate and beat around the bush here.
If he would have been in Pakistan, he would have been killed by now for thinking against defence establishment.
If he would have been in China, his entire family have been killed by now for thinking against communist party!!!
The same guy who after becoming politicians said the distance between Karachi to Bangladesh was same as the distance between Karachi and Southern France? Lol
Keep on dreaming. Koi tax nahi laga hai.
Kashmir is indian occupied territory and a disputed region no matter what indian propagandists says.
Isn't it wonderful how every figure of authority becomes an advocate of the Indian side after retirement? Does that say anything to you?
They are politicians now and they know how to do u turn if you see some facts after intersection.
Isn't it wonderful how everyone who acknowledges the Indian case turns out to be a U turning politician? Perhaps they should put patriotic Pakistani perseverance in the endangered species list.
Yeah we know Pakistani track record of official statements. "No Pakistani regular at Kargil" "No Osama in Pakistan" "This photo of kasmiri innocent injured with pellets" "Only 2 people died in Zarb-e-Azb". Plus we don't know who you classify as civilians. In case that "Everyone who held a weapon or aided and terrorist is considered as Enemy Combatants" then we have harmed not a single "Civilian" ( we may also argue that the wounded where not "civil" at that time, hence where fired upon)
What background? That picture was of a palestinian girl this is of a Hindu temple. No connection between the twoIt proves what Dr. Lodhi has stated and showed in her speech has a background.
Just like katju, arundhati, boss, zakir naek, etc became controversial figures.
Get your facts right. It was not a Muslim majority state; those were the Punjab, NWFP, and Sindh, and British administered Balochistan, and Bengal in the east. Kashmir was a princely state.
Ever figured out the difference?
Does it matter? what is the difference between you and israel anyway? both are ditto copy of each other when it comes to committing atrocities on Kashmir/Palestine.
There are so many pics like that on internet that now it's becoming hard to id whether it's Kashmir or Palestine.
View attachment 427440
No wonder you two are besties of each other both learn from each other how to commit genocide.
@Burhan Wani @Arsalan @django @saiyan0321 @Zibago
it had a big Muslim majority
it was thus a muslim majority state that wanted the simple rights the rest of us got during Partition and that was to separate from india and be part of Pakistan
simply accepting the will of the people would have allowed peace in the sub continent to establish itself
India playing idiot's trying to force a muslim majority state under its occupation has created generations of war and emnity