What's new

Pakistan Will Add 60,000 Troops to Patrol Afghan Border

That’s a beautiful fresh steel fence.

Since Afghanistan voted against Kashmiris at the UN, Afghan refugees need to be sent home to Afghanistan.

Why are we helping this Afghan government avoid bankruptcy while they are doing everything to try to destabilize us?

After voting against the Kashmiri people any shred of brotherhood we feel to these scum should be removed

We need to actively look to hurt the Afghan people

Since the inception of Pakistan they have been our enemy and now we need to treat every one of them man, women or child as the enemies they are


They deserve the hell they are going through, may their lives be haunted by mines, death, misery and unfortune
 
After voting against the Kashmiri people any shred of brotherhood we feel to these scum should be removed

We need to actively look to hurt the Afghan people

Since the inception of Pakistan they have been our enemy and now we need to treat every one of them man, women or child as the enemies they are


They deserve the hell they are going through, may their lives be haunted by mines, death, misery and unfortune

But the million dollar question is when will our leaders going to wake up and smell the coffee? It is time to send these Refugees packing home, we are done with this hospitality. We don't want to feed these snakes anymore.
 
Last edited:
Pakistan should have special border patrol security (BPS) agency that is trained by Pakistani Army. BPS should be given security and surveillance tools and gadgets. IMHO, Army should focus on Eastern border but if there is a need they can support BPS on western border.
 
Pakistan Will Add 60,000 Troops to Patrol Afghan Border
By
Faseeh Mangi
August 8, 2018, 4:04 PM GMT+5 Updated on August 8, 2018, 5:57 PM GMT+5

  • Military has fenced about 13 percent of the disputed border

  • U.S. has accused Pakistan of allowing safe haven for militants

Facebook


Twitter


LinkedIn


Email
Pakistan will add as many as 60,000 troops to boost its patrols along its disputed border with Afghanistan in an effort to curb the flow of insurgents passing between the two nations, according to military officials familiar with the matter.



Forty percent of the troops have already been recruited in the exercise, which is expected to take two years, the officials said, asking not to be identified so they could discuss sensitive troop movements. About 13 percent of a fence planned along the 1,456 mile-long disputed border has also been completed, they said. The armed force’s media department didn’t respond to a request for comment.



800x-1.jpg

Pakistani military patrol border fence.

Photographer: Banaras Khan/AFP/Getty Images
The move will consolidate Pakistan’s border operations, which have been beefed-up in recent years after widespread insecurity wracked the country following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Domestic terror-related violence is now at its lowest in more than a decade. The army, which has 661,000 regular and paramilitary troops, have previously been more focused on the country’s eastern border with arch-rival neighbor India, with which it’s fought three wars against since British India’s partition in 1947. The two continue to contest the disputed region of Kashmir.



Read more: Pushing Pakistan Seems Obvious But Isn’t Simple: QuickTake Q&A



Pakistan has come under increasing pressure to act against the Afghan Taliban and the affiliated Haqqani network since President Donald Trump accused Islamabad of allowing them safe haven. In January, Trump suspended military aid to the nuclear-armed nation and accused Pakistan of giving “lies and deceit” in return for years of U.S. funding.

Fatalities
Pakistan's terrorist violence has dropped to lowest in more than a decade



Source: South Asia Terrorism Portal

Both Pakistan and Afghanistan have denounced the other for harboring insurgents, prompting relations to drastically sour in the past year. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has said Pakistan is waging an “undeclared war of aggression” against his nation and has threatened armed confrontation over the fence construction across the disputed Durand Line, which divided the largely ethnic Pashtun communities in the region during British colonial rule.

Pakistani officials have said the fence across the mountainous border is needed to stop the flow of militants crossing into both countries. Islamabad has often blamed Afghan nationals and refugees for bombings and attacks in Pakistan. More than 2 million refugees live in Pakistan and the government has said those camps are breeding grounds for insurgency.

The border is porous and has 235 crossing points, some frequently used by militants and drug traffickers, of which 18 can be accessed by vehicles, according to a report by the Afghanistan Analysts Network research group in October.

“It may not stop every terrorist, but it will deter them,” said Ikram Sehgal, a former military officer and chairman of Pathfinder Group, Pakistan’s largest private security company. “If you are serious about no encroachment, this is necessary.”

However, the AAN report said the Taliban can move with ease between the two countries in the often lawless border lands and are usually waved through by Pakistan security forces. Pakistan’s military has long denied supporting militant groups.

Khan Pledge
After winning last month’s national election, incoming Prime Minister Imran Khan promised to work for peace in Afghanistan and told Ghani in a call after his victory that he would visit Kabul at an unspecified time.

“If there is peace in Afghanistan, there will be peace in Pakistan,” said Khanin a televised victory speech from Islamabad last month.

However, there are questions as to how much influence he will have over foreign policy, which has long been the domain of the military. Pakistan’s generals are accused of supporting the Afghan Taliban to counter its fears of Indian encirclement and influence in Afghanistan.

Pakistan’s forces have directly ruled the nation for almost half of its 71-year history and has defined the nation’s role in world affairs for decades. It continues to assert its authority on the civilian government and the run-up to the election this year was tarred by widespread allegations of military manipulation.

Analysts also see Khan as a pliant prime minister who won’t challenge the army’s hold over foreign and national security policies. Both Khan and the army have denied the allegations.

@Zibago @tps77 how will @Sarah Ahmadzai cross durand line now?
Would be better to cut the troop numbers down and deploy some to baluchistan.
Use mobile regiments to patrol the border and deploy surveillance drones in the remoter areas.
Might enable quicker response times to trouble spots on the border, while making it safer for troops.
 
Would be better to cut the troop numbers down and deploy some to baluchistan.
Use mobile regiments to patrol the border and deploy surveillance drones in the remoter areas.
Might enable quicker response times to trouble spots on the border, while making it safer for troops.

Baluchistan also has border with Afghanistan. ??
 
I think there is a bit of a misunderstanding here, the FC will not just be deployed on the border but will secure the whole area. Some will also be deployed in urban areas, like the Rangers.
 
Yes if economics agree ..
do you think who are recruiting didnt took economics into account while devising this new plan?those who make these decisions know much more than you and me
its not like if on one fine morning one of them came to CCC and said hey yo bro i am saying why not raise 60K more troops it would be fun and other said yeah totally bro gotta give it a shot
 
do you think who are recruiting didnt took economics into account while devising this new plan?those who make these decisions know much more than you and me
its not like if on one fine morning one of them came to CCC and said hey yo bro i am saying why not raise 60K more troops it would be fun and other said yeah totally bro gotta give it a shot
Believe me when I say in Democracy it's votes that matters for politicians .They will think hundred times for investing their own money but if it's govt money then rarely any sort of thinking takes place ..In this matter its a law and order situation so one can't argue about any returns on investment in monetary terms ..So its certainly an added burden on national exchequer.
 
Baluchistan also has border with Afghanistan. ??
Troops should deal with terrorists on our side of the fence, before patrolling the entire length and breadth of it.
No reason to get shot at by khunzhairs on both sides of the fence.
 
Can this 60K FC troops be used in a war like eastern sector?
 
that's a massive number, how this will end up as IK's ponders on open borders!!!

IK will soon find out what it means to do business with treacherous Afghans. He is showing a lot of goodwill to all parties at the moment which isn't a bad thing necessarily. Let the euphoria settle and reality sink in after a while. The US, India and Afghanistan will reveal their true colors and things will get back to normal. Just a matter of time. These three countries are for the time being releasing some statements and observing. We know how it works, but so are we.

yep defense and war is expensive.

Let me tell you that territorial integrity and security has no price tag. Our economy and security shall improve as a result of fencing and more troops. We should have done this ages ago. You know how much pain and agony our enemies have caused with open porous borders with Afghanistan? When you put this in figures it puts the cost to shame.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom