Pakistan vs India : A quantitative comparision

[JustAnotherWomen]

Pakitanis are so naive to believe that whole world will be sitting on a$$ and watch pakistan bring out missiles from silos and while they continue to sing the "N" song.

 

[pumkinduke]

When has India ever won?,

India lost in 1947 to Pakistan, broken in many pieces, lost most of Kashmir, India again Lost in 1962 against China, India lost in the Soviet-Afghan Jihad when it was supporting Soviet Russia, India lost badly in 1965 against Pakistan, India lost again to rejoin Bangladesh in 1971, India lost in 1999 kargil war, India was sorely defeated in Srilanka against Pakistan, when it was supporting tamil tigers, India lost hope in 2003 and even in 2008 stand off...India loosing is something a normal case now !!

This is called "HEIGHT OF BRAINWASH"...hahaha
"soye hue toh jagha sakte hai but jo sone ka natak karta hai usse kabhi nahi jagaya ja sakta hai"

 

[Established_1965]

I still don't get but yhy does Pakistan needs such an massive army!!
may be they are more into offensive than defensive!

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Pakitanis are so naive to believe that whole world will be sitting on a$$ and watch pakistan bring out missiles from silos and while they continue to sing the "N" song.

Who said we will be bringing out the missiles , we might already have few gifts planted in India right under Modi's chair

 

[ares]

The Indians seems to not understand the dynamics


Pakistan of 2014 is not Pakistan of 1971, and the talks of unnecessary provocation have gone

• We employ a fleet of 80+ F16 Jets , armed with almost 500+ BVR missiles and almost 1200 Close range missiles
• JF17 Thunder gives us another 50+ option and again armed with 600+ SD10 units BVR missiles
• All our Mirages and F7 have upgraded radars and avionics and they all can carry Air to Air Ammunition

Pakistan's Missile program is of that quality that we can accurately pint point a PEPSI can sitting in any part of our adversary , head

You can amass 10 Million soldiers and we can go right over their heads to Modi's Tea party

• Hataf
• Gauri
  
• Shaheen
  
• Abdali

View attachment 128151

More then enough for Tactical Use in battle

Serial Production
> Jets
(JF17 Thunder , K8 )
> Tanks
(Al Khalid 1 , Al Khalid 2 , Zarar)
> Artillery


Anti Air defences:
Shoulder Fired Weaponry (Abundant) , simple means to take out 4th Generation craft
Spada 2000
Crotale SAM (100+)
Anti Aircraft Gun program with Europe

Anti Armor
Anti Tank /Armor weaponry (Self Sufficient)


For Pakistan , we need only 1-2 hours to sustain any aggression , because any misadventure would be answered in Full Force

You can not compete with quantitatively or qualitatively..we are a much bigger nation ..have an economy which is 9 times bigger than yours and growing faster than yours.... that reflects in our respective defense budgets...What ever you have...we have better and more in number.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Look Mr, you have Y number of cities

We have (Y) X 100 nuclear war heads

The numerical game of 2 soldier vs 4 soldiers don't work when you have nuclear arsenal

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Every battle and war has its own requirements of handling things

 

[ares]

Look Mr, you have Y number of cities

We have (Y) X 100 nuclear war heads

The numerical game of 2 soldier vs 4 soldiers don't work when you have nuclear arsenal

If we have Y number of cities, you have Y/ 4 number of cities.

If you have X number of nuclear warheads ..we too have X number of nuclear warheads of higher yields including thermo nuclear warheads.

If you have Z amount fissile material..which can be converted in nuclear warheads at short notice, we have 20*Z amount fissile material available to us.

If we have a nuclear triad..giving us a assured second strike capability and ability to launch a first strike, without any warning, then you have none.

If we have missile defense capability, which will give us a capability to neutralize a significant portion of you nuclear missile targeted at us, then you have none.

And most importantly we have population that is 6 times larger than yours...i.e you will need to more than 6 times the warheads(probably more, considering we have missile defenses too) to cause a same amount of damage to India..in percentage terms.

So as much you might not like it numbers and resources are still very much play despite nuclear capability.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Well lets put it this way , we are not sweating over minor artillery clash at border, Mr Modi should focus on his economy and let us handle ours. People get excited why international tours and sometimes its best to focus on economy

As for Bilawal , well no one really focuses on his statements anyways

 

[Joeblow]

Look Mr, you have Y number of cities

We have (Y) X 100 nuclear war heads

The numerical game of 2 soldier vs 4 soldiers don't work when you have nuclear arsenal

You do know India has nukes too, right? They have a no first strike policy. But the moment you launch a nuke, they're gonna wipe you out. Nukes are way over-rated. Unless you can single-handed hold off the world like the US or are using it like Israel's Samson option, nukes aren't going to protect you 'cause once you use them, the whole world is going to be all over your ***

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Actually the only gazwa-e hind happening was the movement to get rid of Nawaz sharif

General Pakistani public was focused on that element , the border item was not really a priority but it seems Modi made some promises to get in power he had to show off some of his stuff , unfortunately bad timing

Baby Bilawal is also a bit out of control

 

[Chakram Indian]

You may be talking of GDP PPP. But note that the PPP of a nation changes as it grows richer. Going by absolute terms, it is unlikely that we would make it to top 2 or even 3 any time soon.

Anyway it doesn't matter, comparisons are not what matter. We do what is good for us, and leave losers behind. Not naming any names.

no the thing is since 2007 there is change in methodology of calculating GDP

earlier GDP used to be calculated and then the countryspecific multiplier for Balck economy used to be added

now that black economy component is not being added to the white component

anyways

if tax rates rationalise then the black component will automatically go down and white will increase which will increase the GDP / Size of the economy

also all @Indians why are you interested in comparision with pakistan

do we want to go backwards to reach pakistan levels ?

compare ourselves to someone who is ahead of us ............