What's new

Pakistan to learn from Chinese model of poverty alleviation:

How can Pakistan adopt the Chinese model of poverty elimination? Pakistan has a democracy while China is a dictatorial regime with unlimited power to deal with the people the way they like without bothering at all about the concern of people. Pakistan can not do that. Pakistan has to find a suitable model from any democratic country if it is willing to adopt some model only. The best model for the Pakistan will the one tailored model according to the requirement of Pakistan. It will be e a bit difficult but it will provide excellent results in my opinion. Pakistan should focus on the model which generates maximum employment and lift the people above poverty line. Pakistan has already lost the race of being one of the leading country in science ,technology economy etc.
Poverty is often function of culture, politics and wider social milieu. For instance if you want to address poverty in India you will have to change the cultural mores around Dalits. Poverty is in fact poverty of culture and ideas which informs it.
Indonesia, Malaysia, Phillipine and other south-east asian countries and south asian
I would suggest that the cultures of these societies are not reformed. For instance in Pakistan feudalism, religious obscurantism have all tied up to scuttle the ability to really benefit from modern western capitalism. And if you are suggesting that Confusious culture is the engine please explain why you ggot fcuked up royally by the European from 1800s onwards. Was Confusious asleep?

All these saocieties only made progress after they carried radical root and branch reform of society. Japan did this first in the Meiji Reformation when the old order was WIPED out.
 
Last edited:
.
White European guys has one tendency, they tend to be one sided thinking. This is why we have liberal economy like USA, British, and others who rely on private enterprise so much and the other hand there is USSR and other Eastern European with communist idea rely on state owned enterprises and killed market competition.

On the other hand, Eastern civilization like Islam and China have middle way thingking. This is why many Muslim countries like Indonesia and also China has strong state owned enterprises while market capitalism is still running as well.

China companies that are included in Forbes 500 is around 100 companies and almost all of them are state owned companies

Some reminding on state owned companies potency:

For the first time, China has more companies on Fortune Global 500 list than the US

  • The number of US companies on the list has declined to 121 from 126 last year
  • The contribution of state-owned enterprises has risen to 80.2 per cent of Chinese companies on the list from 76.3 per cent last year

https://www.scmp.com/business/compa...has-more-companies-fortune-global-500-list-us
 
.
Have you ever lived with Chinese? When you get to hang around John Ho or Viki Wang you will know. The average Chinese worship western culture.

Not completey true. Its depends on the situation.
Poverty is often function of culture, politics and wider social milieu. For instance if you want to address poverty in India you will have to change the cultural mores around Dalits. Poverty is in fact poverty of culture and ideas which informs it.
I would suggest that the cultures of these societies are not reformed. For instance in Pakistan feudalism, religious obscurantism have all tied up to scuttle the ability to really benefit from modern western capitalism. And if you are suggesting that Confusious culture is the engine please explain why you ggot fcuked up royally by the European from 1800s onwards. Was Confusious asleep?

All these saocieties only made progress after they carried radical root and branch reform of society. Japan did this first in the Meiji Reformation when the old order was WIPED out.

Confucius wasnt sleeeping but the emperor and the corrupt officials did. But its ok. We learnt from our mistake and moved on. Confucius is only part of the oriental traits, there are many oriental traits that proved to be beneficials because we dont focus on 1 system or idea for eternal. Oriental takes whatever suited system currently avaible and will discared it in the future once there is better new system or ideology available. BUT the Cultural aspects will stay and that is what make oriental different than the whites or blacks culture.

For instance: everyone who has driving licence are suppose to be able to drive car but it does not mean the driver is as good as F1 Hamilton or Max Verstappen!

Culture= the person who drives the car
Car= The county model (capitalism or communism)

The one who has superior culture will wins no matter what the system is.

And yet the nippons still have the ancient oriental cultural traits until today despite the old order being wiped out.



Dont mix cultural traits with the system=the game which everyone is playing!


I would suggest that the cultures of these societies are not reformed. For instance in Pakistan feudalism, religious obscurantism have all tied up to scuttle the ability to really benefit from modern western capitalism. And if you are suggesting that Confusious culture is the engine please explain why you ggot fcuked up royally by the European from 1800s onwards. Was Confusious asleep?

Interesting and yet confusing statement about culture that are not reformed. Culture is something that belongs to people/race that survived countless time. It is a traits that right or wrong belongs to certain people/race. When is something like culture be perfect/reformed? I suggest you pay attention to anthropology. It makes it clear for you to understand what culture is.
 
Last edited:
.
After having lived in China he still has not figured out the Chinese success medl. They just copied western culture. Then improved on it. It's that simple.

There is nothing 5,000 about the CCP.
You have a serious infiority complex. Get help.
 
.
I hope I will live to see that Pakistan invented it learnt something g on its own
 
.
Sounds like the good ambassador is saying that Pakistan should abandon Islam and adopt communism. Get rid of democratic institutions and have a one-party system with a top-down approach. Led not by elected politicians but trained technocrats.

After having lived in China he still has not figured out the Chinese success medl. They just copied western culture. Then improved on it. It's that simple.

There is nothing 5,000 about the CCP.

Well, China's 5,000-year history is filled with ups and downs, with periods of great prosperity and periods of great poverty. It's now in a period of great prosperity, and it all began after the end of the Cultural Revolution and the death of Mao.

China calls it "socialism with Chinese characteristics" but for all intents and purposes China adopted market capitalism, but a top-down variety that doesn't undermine CPC iron-grip political control. China has managed to unleash China's entrepreneurial animal spirits and the results are clear to see.

The question to ask: what does Pakistan have to do to release its animal spirits?
 
.
The question to ask: what does Pakistan have to do to release its animal spirits?
Feudal order wiped out. Aristoctatic landed gentry wiped out. Traditional power structures - clan/tribal based leaders wiped out.Traditional trading class wiped out. Islam wiped out. Entire mullah class wiped out.

Then from clean sheet reforming of society based on science. Equality of gender etc. Only one goal. Total obediance to the state which replaces idea of god. Islamabad becomes the Mecca and Kaaba rolled into one. The only scripture is new constitution that is of the people, by the people and equality of the people to a prosperous and healthy life.

The new madaris that produce millions of brainwashed science graduates produce a high technology human pool that can sustain industries and economy to reach the stars.

The animus is released on the Indus basin to conquer the world ...


Ps. Will this happen? No, we are not China, Vietnam or Japan. Thus what you of last 70 years you see the next 70 years. More retardness ....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom