Pakistan First
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,437
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Pakistan summons India's Deputy High Commissioner over Assemanand's acquittal. Samjhauta train blast
- Thread starter BHarwana
- Start date
Jacob Martin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Qutb-ud-din Aybak
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 6,968
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
release hafiz saeed and all others waned byindia. Give indians weapons caught in fata to them. Few million bullets recently recovered in zrb e azb will do the job.
It will help us counte indian propaganda. Now our answer will always be samjhota express. Thank you modi. Made the work of our poor diplomats easy.
Bratva
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 13,832
- Reaction score
- 67
- Country
- Location
The witnesses turned hostile and refused to testify against Sawami. Hence he got acquitted. Not that Evidence was not there but witnesses refused to come forward fearing their lives.
For brain dead people like you, I'm going to post what happened.
Posted at: Sep 5, 2015, 12:42 AM; last updated: Sep 4, 2015, 11:34 PM (IST)SAMJHAUTA BLASTS CASE
4 witnesses turn hostile
In a setback to the National Investigating Agency (NIA), four of the five witnesses in the Samjhauta blasts case turned hostile here today.
The witness — Rajeshwar Singh from Agra (Uttar Pradesh), Ajay Chauhan and Shakti Singh from Haridwar (Uttarakhand), Lal Krishan Joshi from Rajasthan — retracted from their earlier statements.
Another witness Aruna Thakur, however, produced record before the special NIA court today.
“Rajeshwar failed to identify main accused Swami Aseemanand. He told the court he had gone to an RSS programme and he knew one Aseemanand of Daang area, but not this Aseemanand standing in the court,” said defense counsel Manbir Singh Rathi.
He further said, “Ajay and Shakti, villagers from Haridwar (from where the NIA had shown the arrest of Aseemanand), said no such person ever stayed with a saint there and they didn’t know who he was.”
It was told that Aseemanand had taken shelter at a village in Haridwar with a saint, but the two persons who were made witnesses backed out.
“Krishan, who works at a coaching centre, said he never had any link with Sadhvi Pragya,” Rathi added.
The Samjhauta Express, the only rail link between India and Pakistan, was bombed in February 2007 at Diwana village near Panipat. Four improvised explosive devices were planted on the Samjhauta Express, a twice-weekly train service connecting Delhi, India, and Lahore, Pakistan on February 18, 2007, in which 68 lives were lost.
In February 2014, the trial began. The NIA had framed charges against four accused — Aseemanand, Lokesh Sharma, Kamal Chauhan and Rajender Chaudhary. The charges included murder and sedition.
The NIA, in its charge-sheet, had said many Hindu activists had conspired to blow up the train following which four were arrested, including Aseemanand.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/haryana/courts/4-witnesses-turn-hostile/128729.html
2007 Samjhauta blasts case: Four more witnesses turn hostile
By: Express News Service | Chandigarh | Published December 24, 2016 4:18 am
FOUR MORE witnesses in the 2007 Samjhauta Express blasts case turned hostile before the special NIA court in Panchkula on Friday. The witnesses, associated with Gujarat-based Shabri Dham Ashram headed by prime accused Swami Aseemanand, are Kishore Bhai Gavit, Sunil Bhai, Mansu Bhai and Phool Chand. They were among five witnesses, who appeared in the NIA court on Friday, and resiled from their earlier statements given to the NIA.
The Samjhauta Express blasts occurred near Dewana railway station in Haryana’s Panipat district, killing 68 people, mostly from Pakistan, and injuring 12 on the night of February 18, 2007. The train was on its way to Lahore from Delhi.
A resident of Ahwa in Gujarat, Gavit, had told the NIA in August 2012 that he was given a construction contract at Aseemanand’s Shabri Dham Ashram in Dang. Gavit had also stated that Aseemanand was associated with Abhinav Bharat, Lt Col P S Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and that after Pragya’s arrest in a bomb blast case, Aseemanand had said that the time had come to surrender before police. Gavit had also stated that he had seen Sandeep Dange, another accused, at Shabri Dham Ashram. However, on Friday, he said he had not given any such statement to the NIA.
Sunil Bhai, from Dang district, had given a statement to the NIA in August 2012 that since 2002 he was staying at Shabri Dham Ashram and had seen accused Sunil Joshi (now dead) and Pragya coming to the ashram. He, too, resiled from his statement on Friday.
NIA counsel, Rajan Malhotra, said that the other two witnesses — Dang district resident Mansu Bhai and Amonia village resident Phool Chand — were to testify about one of the absconding accused, Sandeep Dange, but they resiled from their statements given to the NIA in August 2012.
Malhotra said the fifth witness, Jayanti Bhai, a resident of Navsari district, who used to take care of donations at Shabri Dham Ashram, stood by his earlier statement. He submitted that he had dissociated himself from the ashram after Aseemanand’s name appeared in the media.
Why Aseemanand’s acquittal points to meltdown in cases against militant Hindu nationalists
OPINION Updated: Mar 10, 2017 18:01 IST
Rajesh Ahuja
Hindustan Times, New Delhi
The acquittal of Swami Aseemanand and six others in the 2007 bombing at the Ajmer Sharif mausoleum in Rajasthan comes as no surprise.
More than three dozen witnesses out of 149 turned hostile or, in other words, refused to confirm to the court what they had earlier told the police and officers from the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
Perhaps, a similar fate awaits a spate of court cases involving militant Hindu nationalists, including the bombing of Samjhauta Express that killed about 70 people in 2007. Dozens of witnesses in that case have already turned hostile in court.
In all, the NIA is investigating seven cases in which Hindu right-wing groups are suspects. These cases – involving attacks where Muslims were targeted -- were handed to the federal agency by the previous UPA government. This is also when the NIA made most of the arrests, including that of Swami Aseemanand who faces charges in at least two other bomb attacks.
The other cases were the bombings in Maharashtra’s Muslim-dominated Malegaon town in 2006, blasts at Hyderabad’s Mecca Masjid the following year and bomb attacks in Gujarat’s Modasa and Malegaon in 2008. The seventh was the murder of former Hindu activist Sunil Joshi in Madhya Pradesh’s Dewas in 2007.
Joshi’s murder investigation was handed to the NIA as it was suspected that his killing was part of a larger Hindu right wing conspiracy against Muslims.
But over the past three years, the pace of investigation has slackened and witnesses have turned hostile in cases where the accused belonged to organisations close to the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
The collapse of cases involving right-wing Hindu groups coincide with the BJP’s rise to power. And such speculation has only been further fed by claims of the NIA’s former special public prosecutor, Rohini Salian, that she was asked to “go soft’’ on the investigations into the 2008 Malegaon blast. She was removed as the special public prosecutor after this.
Sample this.
The NIA has not been able to arrest any absconding accused in these cases since 2014, the year the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance came to power. The arrest of such absconders as Sandeep Dange, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Ashwini Chauhan is necessary to unravel any larger Hindu right-wing conspiracy.
The first indication of change in the course of investigations into these cases came when the Union home ministry under Rajnath Singh refused permission to the NIA to challenge a court order granting bail to two accused - Devender Gupta and Lokesh Sharma in the Mecca Masjid blast case.
In August, 2014, the NIA filed charges in Joshi’s murder against five accused, including Pragya Singh Thakur. But the agency said his murder was not linked to any wider militant Hindutva conspiracy.
The agency said Joshi, considered the ring leader of Hindu extremists blamed for half a dozen blasts in the country, was killed by his own men as he misbehaved with Pragya Singh Thakur.
The NIA termed Joshi’s killings as a simple murder and asked the Madhya Pradesh government to carry the case forward. In February, a court acquitted all the accused in the case.
Around the same time, the Punjab and Haryana high court granted bail to Aseemanand, who is also the prime accused in the Samjhauta train bombing. The next month, the government told Parliament that the NIA had decided not to challenge the bail order in the Supreme Court. Aseemanand is also an accused in the Hyderabad Mecca Masjid blast.
In May 2015, the NIA closed its probe into the Modasa blast, citing lack of evidence.
Last May, the NIA let off Pragya Singh Thakur in the 2008 Malegaon bombings even though she had been formally charged by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad seven years earlier.
The court is yet to approve the NIA’s decision to drop charges against Thakur.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...e-convicted/story-djXpxsy547RAVFTIphSTzN.html
2007 Ajmer blast case: Swami Aseemanand acquitted, three people convicted
INDIA Updated: Mar 08, 2017 22:28 IST
A Jaipur court on Wednesday convicted three persons but let off former RSS member Aseemanand and six others in the 2007 Ajmer Dargah blast case in which 26 witnesses turned hostile.
The quantum of punishment will be decided on March 16.
Three persons were killed and 15 injured in an explosion at the famous shrine of Sufi saint Khawaja Moinuddin Chisti in Rajasthan’s Ajmer on October 11, 2007.
NIA court judge Dinesh Gupta found Rashtriya Swayamsweak Sangh members Sunil Joshi and Devendra Gupta guilty of planning the blasts – one of the two bombs didn’t go off -- and Bhavesh Bhai Patel of planting the explosive.
The court acquitted Aseemanand, also an accused in the Samjhauta Express and Mecca Masjid blasts, and others, giving them the “benefit of doubt”.
The three blasts, within months of each other, came to be known as acts of Hindu terror -- a term that triggered a furious political debate --- because of the arrests of the members of the right-wing outfits.
“We will examine order of the court and take a call accordingly in due course. At the moment, it will be too premature to say anything,” NIA director-general Sharad Kumar said.
The National Investigation Agency took over the probe from the Rajasthan anti-terrorism squad. Initially, police blamed Islamic terror groups but later a confession by Aseemanand shifted the focus on Hindu groups.
A total of four charge sheets were filed.
Gupta and Joshi were members of the RSS and worked together in Madhya Pradesh’s Indore and Mhow from 1998 to 2003, one of the charge sheets said.
A native of Ajmer, Gupta moved to Jamtara in Jharkhand in 2003 and stayed there till 2008 but the two kept in touch and met several times till Joshi’s death in 2007, the court was told.
Joshi was shot dead on December 29, 2007.
The SIM cards and the mobile phones used for detonating the two bombs were bought from Jharkhand, where Gupta was working as an RSS zila pracharak, or district head of publicity. Public prosecutor Ashwini Kumar Sharma said 26 witnesses, crucial to the case, turned hostile.
“The court did not find Aseemanand’s confessional statement a basis enough for his conviction. Notably, Aseemanand retracted his statement three months after giving it,” Sharma said.
Aseemanand was a victim of political conspiracy, his lawyer Jagdish Rana said. “There was a conspiracy to frame a person from a particular community for a particular kind of crime,” he said.
Of the 13 accused, three are still absconding.
A member of right-wing Hindu group Abhinav Bharat, Assemanand has been in jail since December 2010 after his arrest in the Mecca Masjid blast. The explosion in the Hyderabad mosque on May 18, 2007 left 14 people dead.
He also faces charges in the 2007 Samjhauta case. Sixty-eight people were killed on February 18, 2007 when explosions ripped through the express train that runs between India and Pakistan
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...e-convicted/story-djXpxsy547RAVFTIphSTzN.html
JOEY TRIBIANI
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
- Messages
- 3,344
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Hence proved hindu criminal isnt a criminal in india .
.
.
Good to see that Two nation theory still alive
.
Jacob Martin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
The witnesses turned hostile and refused to testify against Sawami. Hence he got acquitted. Not that Evidence was not there but witnesses refused to come forward fearing their lives.
For brain dead people like you, I'm going to post what happened.
Posted at: Sep 5, 2015, 12:42 AM; last updated: Sep 4, 2015, 11:34 PM (IST)SAMJHAUTA BLASTS CASE
4 witnesses turn hostile
In a setback to the National Investigating Agency (NIA), four of the five witnesses in the Samjhauta blasts case turned hostile here today.
The witness — Rajeshwar Singh from Agra (Uttar Pradesh), Ajay Chauhan and Shakti Singh from Haridwar (Uttarakhand), Lal Krishan Joshi from Rajasthan — retracted from their earlier statements.
Another witness Aruna Thakur, however, produced record before the special NIA court today.
“Rajeshwar failed to identify main accused Swami Aseemanand. He told the court he had gone to an RSS programme and he knew one Aseemanand of Daang area, but not this Aseemanand standing in the court,” said defense counsel Manbir Singh Rathi.
He further said, “Ajay and Shakti, villagers from Haridwar (from where the NIA had shown the arrest of Aseemanand), said no such person ever stayed with a saint there and they didn’t know who he was.”
It was told that Aseemanand had taken shelter at a village in Haridwar with a saint, but the two persons who were made witnesses backed out.
“Krishan, who works at a coaching centre, said he never had any link with Sadhvi Pragya,” Rathi added.
The Samjhauta Express, the only rail link between India and Pakistan, was bombed in February 2007 at Diwana village near Panipat. Four improvised explosive devices were planted on the Samjhauta Express, a twice-weekly train service connecting Delhi, India, and Lahore, Pakistan on February 18, 2007, in which 68 lives were lost.
In February 2014, the trial began. The NIA had framed charges against four accused — Aseemanand, Lokesh Sharma, Kamal Chauhan and Rajender Chaudhary. The charges included murder and sedition.
The NIA, in its charge-sheet, had said many Hindu activists had conspired to blow up the train following which four were arrested, including Aseemanand.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/haryana/courts/4-witnesses-turn-hostile/128729.html
2007 Samjhauta blasts case: Four more witnesses turn hostile
By: Express News Service | Chandigarh | Published December 24, 2016 4:18 am
FOUR MORE witnesses in the 2007 Samjhauta Express blasts case turned hostile before the special NIA court in Panchkula on Friday. The witnesses, associated with Gujarat-based Shabri Dham Ashram headed by prime accused Swami Aseemanand, are Kishore Bhai Gavit, Sunil Bhai, Mansu Bhai and Phool Chand. They were among five witnesses, who appeared in the NIA court on Friday, and resiled from their earlier statements given to the NIA.
The Samjhauta Express blasts occurred near Dewana railway station in Haryana’s Panipat district, killing 68 people, mostly from Pakistan, and injuring 12 on the night of February 18, 2007. The train was on its way to Lahore from Delhi.
A resident of Ahwa in Gujarat, Gavit, had told the NIA in August 2012 that he was given a construction contract at Aseemanand’s Shabri Dham Ashram in Dang. Gavit had also stated that Aseemanand was associated with Abhinav Bharat, Lt Col P S Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and that after Pragya’s arrest in a bomb blast case, Aseemanand had said that the time had come to surrender before police. Gavit had also stated that he had seen Sandeep Dange, another accused, at Shabri Dham Ashram. However, on Friday, he said he had not given any such statement to the NIA.
Sunil Bhai, from Dang district, had given a statement to the NIA in August 2012 that since 2002 he was staying at Shabri Dham Ashram and had seen accused Sunil Joshi (now dead) and Pragya coming to the ashram. He, too, resiled from his statement on Friday.
NIA counsel, Rajan Malhotra, said that the other two witnesses — Dang district resident Mansu Bhai and Amonia village resident Phool Chand — were to testify about one of the absconding accused, Sandeep Dange, but they resiled from their statements given to the NIA in August 2012.
Malhotra said the fifth witness, Jayanti Bhai, a resident of Navsari district, who used to take care of donations at Shabri Dham Ashram, stood by his earlier statement. He submitted that he had dissociated himself from the ashram after Aseemanand’s name appeared in the media.
Why Aseemanand’s acquittal points to meltdown in cases against militant Hindu nationalists
OPINION Updated: Mar 10, 2017 18:01 IST
Rajesh Ahuja
Hindustan Times, New Delhi
The acquittal of Swami Aseemanand and six others in the 2007 bombing at the Ajmer Sharif mausoleum in Rajasthan comes as no surprise.
More than three dozen witnesses out of 149 turned hostile or, in other words, refused to confirm to the court what they had earlier told the police and officers from the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
Perhaps, a similar fate awaits a spate of court cases involving militant Hindu nationalists, including the bombing of Samjhauta Express that killed about 70 people in 2007. Dozens of witnesses in that case have already turned hostile in court.
In all, the NIA is investigating seven cases in which Hindu right-wing groups are suspects. These cases – involving attacks where Muslims were targeted -- were handed to the federal agency by the previous UPA government. This is also when the NIA made most of the arrests, including that of Swami Aseemanand who faces charges in at least two other bomb attacks.
The other cases were the bombings in Maharashtra’s Muslim-dominated Malegaon town in 2006, blasts at Hyderabad’s Mecca Masjid the following year and bomb attacks in Gujarat’s Modasa and Malegaon in 2008. The seventh was the murder of former Hindu activist Sunil Joshi in Madhya Pradesh’s Dewas in 2007.
Joshi’s murder investigation was handed to the NIA as it was suspected that his killing was part of a larger Hindu right wing conspiracy against Muslims.
But over the past three years, the pace of investigation has slackened and witnesses have turned hostile in cases where the accused belonged to organisations close to the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
The collapse of cases involving right-wing Hindu groups coincide with the BJP’s rise to power. And such speculation has only been further fed by claims of the NIA’s former special public prosecutor, Rohini Salian, that she was asked to “go soft’’ on the investigations into the 2008 Malegaon blast. She was removed as the special public prosecutor after this.
Sample this.
The NIA has not been able to arrest any absconding accused in these cases since 2014, the year the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance came to power. The arrest of such absconders as Sandeep Dange, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Ashwini Chauhan is necessary to unravel any larger Hindu right-wing conspiracy.
The first indication of change in the course of investigations into these cases came when the Union home ministry under Rajnath Singh refused permission to the NIA to challenge a court order granting bail to two accused - Devender Gupta and Lokesh Sharma in the Mecca Masjid blast case.
In August, 2014, the NIA filed charges in Joshi’s murder against five accused, including Pragya Singh Thakur. But the agency said his murder was not linked to any wider militant Hindutva conspiracy.
The agency said Joshi, considered the ring leader of Hindu extremists blamed for half a dozen blasts in the country, was killed by his own men as he misbehaved with Pragya Singh Thakur.
The NIA termed Joshi’s killings as a simple murder and asked the Madhya Pradesh government to carry the case forward. In February, a court acquitted all the accused in the case.
Around the same time, the Punjab and Haryana high court granted bail to Aseemanand, who is also the prime accused in the Samjhauta train bombing. The next month, the government told Parliament that the NIA had decided not to challenge the bail order in the Supreme Court. Aseemanand is also an accused in the Hyderabad Mecca Masjid blast.
In May 2015, the NIA closed its probe into the Modasa blast, citing lack of evidence.
Last May, the NIA let off Pragya Singh Thakur in the 2008 Malegaon bombings even though she had been formally charged by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad seven years earlier.
The court is yet to approve the NIA’s decision to drop charges against Thakur.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...e-convicted/story-djXpxsy547RAVFTIphSTzN.html
2007 Ajmer blast case: Swami Aseemanand acquitted, three people convicted
INDIA Updated: Mar 08, 2017 22:28 IST
A Jaipur court on Wednesday convicted three persons but let off former RSS member Aseemanand and six others in the 2007 Ajmer Dargah blast case in which 26 witnesses turned hostile.
The quantum of punishment will be decided on March 16.
Three persons were killed and 15 injured in an explosion at the famous shrine of Sufi saint Khawaja Moinuddin Chisti in Rajasthan’s Ajmer on October 11, 2007.
NIA court judge Dinesh Gupta found Rashtriya Swayamsweak Sangh members Sunil Joshi and Devendra Gupta guilty of planning the blasts – one of the two bombs didn’t go off -- and Bhavesh Bhai Patel of planting the explosive.
The court acquitted Aseemanand, also an accused in the Samjhauta Express and Mecca Masjid blasts, and others, giving them the “benefit of doubt”.
The three blasts, within months of each other, came to be known as acts of Hindu terror -- a term that triggered a furious political debate --- because of the arrests of the members of the right-wing outfits.
“We will examine order of the court and take a call accordingly in due course. At the moment, it will be too premature to say anything,” NIA director-general Sharad Kumar said.
The National Investigation Agency took over the probe from the Rajasthan anti-terrorism squad. Initially, police blamed Islamic terror groups but later a confession by Aseemanand shifted the focus on Hindu groups.
A total of four charge sheets were filed.
Gupta and Joshi were members of the RSS and worked together in Madhya Pradesh’s Indore and Mhow from 1998 to 2003, one of the charge sheets said.
A native of Ajmer, Gupta moved to Jamtara in Jharkhand in 2003 and stayed there till 2008 but the two kept in touch and met several times till Joshi’s death in 2007, the court was told.
Joshi was shot dead on December 29, 2007.
The SIM cards and the mobile phones used for detonating the two bombs were bought from Jharkhand, where Gupta was working as an RSS zila pracharak, or district head of publicity. Public prosecutor Ashwini Kumar Sharma said 26 witnesses, crucial to the case, turned hostile.
“The court did not find Aseemanand’s confessional statement a basis enough for his conviction. Notably, Aseemanand retracted his statement three months after giving it,” Sharma said.
Aseemanand was a victim of political conspiracy, his lawyer Jagdish Rana said. “There was a conspiracy to frame a person from a particular community for a particular kind of crime,” he said.
Of the 13 accused, three are still absconding.
A member of right-wing Hindu group Abhinav Bharat, Assemanand has been in jail since December 2010 after his arrest in the Mecca Masjid blast. The explosion in the Hyderabad mosque on May 18, 2007 left 14 people dead.
He also faces charges in the 2007 Samjhauta case. Sixty-eight people were killed on February 18, 2007 when explosions ripped through the express train that runs between India and Pakistan
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...e-convicted/story-djXpxsy547RAVFTIphSTzN.html
Don't bore us with these trivialities. Witnesses can turn hostile because the initial testimony was under duress or vice versa.
Pakistanis should stop poking their nose where it doesn't belong.
Bratva
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 13,832
- Reaction score
- 67
- Country
- Location
Jacob, if you had used your common sense, NIA wouldnot have had presented them in the courts if they doubted they would turn hostile. Its after making their identities public that they turned hostile.
Blaming Pakistan for LET is the lowest form of denial a retard could think of.
Verve
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,116
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
Well, then why are you bothered with trivialities without evidence against Hafaz Saeed?
And was Pakistan or some hidden power (ISI?) behind the 26 witnesses when they were being harassed to give first statement?
Jacob Martin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
If you are so concerned about glaring procedural lapses then kindly talk to the prosecutors. These lapses, witnesses turning hostile is a part of legal proceedings. Yu are biased so you assume that it means that the verdict is rigged. It also happens to be none of your business as it is our internal matter. He was not being tried at ICC.
Pakistan First
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,437
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
What is required is a "shootout at lokhandwala" style execution of these hindu terrorists.
Jacob Martin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
The US found the evidence against Saeed to be credible enough to offer a bounty in his head. His organization is banned by the UN, US, UK, EU, Russia and Australia. As opposed to your empty blather about Samjhauta which no one believes. Keep up the good work.
Verve
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,116
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
And Hafaz Saeed is still safe and sound and his organisation works in Pakistan for the public - that's all that matters. US is an enemy state so what they say is irrelevant.
Bounty on the head? Really? Official statements by these countries (not some news clip) stating this 'bounty on his head' as proof?
And we've got your monkey and will bring him out when it's time to. First video is just the tip of the iceberg. over 400 people have been caught after he spilled the beans and all that will come out in open eventually. Wait for it.
Jacob Martin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Hahahaha...So you want more proof? Just as you want more proof of -
- Dawood being in Pakistan,
- involvement in Kashmir insurgency,
- Osama being killed in Pakistan,
- incubation and sustenance of Taliban,
- use of Haqqani network in Afghanistan,
- LeT, JuD, and all the other NGOs in Pakistan,
- Quetta Shura,
- AQ Khan's nuclear racket,
- collaboration with North Korea and China on WMDs
- Masood Azhar...
....So when has any proof been enough?
boxer_B
BANNED
- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Messages
- 1,435
- Reaction score
- -15
Actually NIA wasn't even formed when aseemanand was charged. It was some local crime branch or ATS investigation.
Secondly, the term Hindu terrorism was coined by Congress in center as they saw Modi coming into mainstream politics.
Similar threads
