What's new

Pakistan Should Produce More Nuclear Weapons If No F16's

You're right about that and Pakistani officials too are very duplicitous in that regard. There is a reason why we are sick and tired of both the duplicitous Americans and Pakistani officials/government etc.



Right on the money. You do need precision strike and drones/fighter jet air strikes are the way forward.
I think drones can accomplish the job....no need to use an advance jet for that purpose

Wow ... so many posts just because Pakistan cant pay for the jets it wants to buy ....!!!!! Instead, all members threatening heaven and earth on this topic without addressing the key issue - why is Pakistan unable to pay for what it wants???
Because it is not getting the things it wants for the price Americans want....eg AIM-9x and other sophisticated equipment....
 
Where did you see me concerning? ?? Lol.. do you know the cost of maintaining nukes. ... it's waste of time and resources and money... Pakistan and India have eno ugh nukes to deter each other...



Well good luck with that....

I know the cost. If they are required in such a hostile environment the security factor negates all other factors including the cost. Besides, what good are resources and money when you can become an Iraq/Afghanistan/Syria in today's world. Besides, it is not like Pakistan loves to have an expensive nuclear arsenal for fun. They are indeed a dire necessity.
 
To change the topic completely - To be honest the Congress is funnier; they've practically blocked everything that Obama tried to accomplish and for what ? 'Cause the Republicans can't stomach a Black Man as the President of the United States ! :tsk:
watch the supreme court justice saga unfold
 
Everyone knows that even the most advanced jets cannot counterattack guerrilla warfare tactics otherwise America and Russia won't have failed in Afghanistan...that was their mistake...

Well.... Pakistan is not fightin a sophisticated enemy from air.... these guys don't have any weapons to fight the Jets above skies like Talibans and Mujahideens did against Soviets.... last I heard ttp show'd a brokeass stinger that's it..
 
LOL so now we should also be giving out positive ratings at the behest of Indian approval on this forum. Know your place, Indian. You're just a guest on this forum. Nothing more nothing less.

You are too idiot to understand even the simplest of thing. You can discover you Indian and we pakistani out of anything.
 
With the US of A, it's always about placing them in no win situations......

Steps:

#1. Hang Dr. Afridi and send the photo of his corpse to Senator Corker and the rest of key members of Indian lobby..... LOL.....


Hundred more steps between their coffee cups and their lips.................... :D
 
To change the topic completely - To be honest the Congress is funnier; they've practically blocked everything that Obama tried to accomplish and for what ? 'Cause the Republicans can't stomach a Black Man as the President of the United States ! :tsk:

In Pakistan's case it is different. These neocon fvckers truly hate Pakistan from the bottom of their heart. They have been doing this for years now. Even when Obama wasn't around.
 
Well.... Pakistan is not fightin a sophisticated enemy from air.... these guys don't have any weapons to fight the Jets above skies like Talibans and Mujahideens did against Soviets.... last I heard ttp show'd a brokeass stinger that's it..
U misinterpreted my earlier post....what I was saying Pakistan does not require f16 for counterterrorism purposes only....it requires it for what other nations also require it for....
 
You are too idiot to understand even the simplest of thing. You can discover you Indian and we pakistani out of anything.

LOL Look who is talking. A guy who goes around in every thread complaining and whining that things aren't going according to his wishes. Just leave this thread if you are too weak to have the discussion, silly being.
 
I know the cost. If they are required in such a hostile environment the security factor negates all other factors including the cost. Besides, what good are resources and money when you can become an Iraq/Afghanistan/Syria in today's world. Besides, it is not like Pakistan loves to have an expensive nuclear arsenal for fun. They are indeed a dire necessity.

Like I said earlier....Pakistan has enough nukes to deter indian and keep Pakistan survive.... but what do you've when a swift conventional war happens... ??(leave Nasr.. using it is just a fantasy) you do need to bridge the gap that's where you need a potent fighter like F16
...
 
Well.... Pakistan is not fightin a sophisticated enemy from air.... these guys don't have any weapons to fight the Jets above skies like Talibans and Mujahideens did against Soviets.... last I heard ttp show'd a brokeass stinger that's it..

Tell that to the Americans who have been fighting the same militants for years now and couldn't defeat them even with their overwhelming air strikes... You don't have to convince us. We'll do as we wish and ain't nobody stopping us.
 
Like I said earlier....Pakistan has enough nukes to deter indian and keep Pakistan survive.... but what do you've when a swift conventional war happens... ??(leave Nasr.. using it is just a fantasy) you do need to bridge the gap that's where you need a potent fighter like F16
...

We'll use the Nasr and we're not leaving that out. That's our new effective method to fight Indian aggression. I know you don't like it particularly, but it is the truth.
 
Last edited:
Like I said earlier....Pakistan has enough nukes to deter indian and keep Pakistan survive.... but what do you've when a swift conventional war happens... ??(leave Nasr.. using it is just a fantasy) you do need to bridge the gap that's where you need a potent fighter like F16
...
Nope we require a 4++ Gen fighter fighter...in Pakistan quantity doesn't matter quality does...
 
Back
Top Bottom