What's new

Pakistan rubbishes Indian claims of Surgical Strike inside Pakistan.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/consequences-of-pakistani-terrorism-1475189497

India’s doctrine of “strategic restraint” toward Pakistan was tested again Wednesday, after the Indian Army responded to a Sept. 18 attack against an Indian base that killed 19 soldiers by conducting raids against terrorist facilities just inside Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. Islamabad has addressed the incidents with its usual mix of bluster and denial, but if it means to prevent an escalation of violence it needs to shut down the terrorist groups it continues to support.

That should start with Jaish-e-Mohammad (Army of Mohammed) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (Army of the Pure), two major jihadist groups that operate openly in Pakistan and are prime suspects in these attacks. Both groups are supported by its military despite being on United Nations lists of terrorist organizations. Last month the U.S. Defense Department blocked $300 million in reimbursements to Pakistan because of its continuing tolerance of the Haqqani Network that operates in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The Pakistani government insists it had nothing to do with the attack on Uri, as well as with a similar attack in Pathankot in January that killed another seven Indian soldiers. Pakistan’s military goes so far as to deny the raids took place and blamed India for an unprovoked artillery attack across the Line of Control that killed two Pakistani soldiers. Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif even accused India of staging the Uri attack and repeated past threats to use tactical nuclear weapons.


But as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi noted in a speech on Sunday, so far this year the Indian Army has thwarted 17 attempts by terrorists to cross the border from Pakistan, killing 110 of them. These incursions often occur under the cover of Pakistani artillery fire. New Delhi also presented evidence Tuesday that the Uri attackers crossed the border from the Pakistani city of Muzaffarabad. Two guides who assisted the infiltrators have been detained.

Mr. Modi has consistently offered closer economic and diplomatic ties to Pakistan as long as it stops supporting terrorism. Pakistan’s democratic government has also long been threatened by the very jihadist groups it helped unleash, particularly the Taliban. And Pakistan increasingly risks becoming a pariah state. Even China, Pakistan’s “all-weather friend” as both countries put it, will have limited patience if Islamic extremism spreads into its Muslim-majority northwest.

Pakistan remains trapped by a national identity based on fomenting religious-based insurgencies in Kashmir. The country needs a new vision centered on improving the lives of its people, and there is no shortage of potentially willing hands, including Mr. Modi’s, to help it move in that direction. What’s needed is political courage in Islamabad, before the crisis in Kashmir escalates.
 
.
After years of terror strikes supported by Pakistan, the Indian Army has hit back with a textbook surgical strike that killed 38 terrorists, 2 Pakistani soldiers, and destroyed five terror camps.

India Today has got exclusive details of the inside story behind the surgical strikes.It was around midnight, when the Army’s Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopters with 25 commandos from 4-Para and 9-para crossed the LoC into Azad Kashmir. The helicopters dropped the commandos at earmarked spots and returned. They were now in enemy territory.

HOW THEY REACHED THE TARGET

The Army commandos crawled through mud, rocks and even landmines for about 3 kilometres with the threat of being caught in the Pakistan army’s crosshairs. Their destinations included five launch pads where large number of terrorists had gathered.

The launch pads were for terrorists waiting to infiltrate into the Indian side of the LoC to carry out terror attacks in the country. The terror launch pads were located in Bhimbar, Kel, Tattapani and Leepa areas.

The launch pads were under close surveillance of the Indian intelligence agencies. RAW and Military Intelligence had kept an eye on every single movement of terrorists in the target zone.

THE SURGICAL STRIKE

The surgical strike team had six targets on mind, three of which were completely destroyed during the operation. Commandos were equipped with Tavor and M-4 guns, grenades and smoke grenades. They also carried under barrel grenade launchers (UBGL) and night-vision devices. They wore camera-mounted helmets.

After reaching the target spot, the commandos used the element of surprise to mount rapid and deadly attacks on the enemy. With the terrorists taken by surprise, the crack troops added to the chaos by firing a flurry of smoke grenades into the terror camps.

Their actions were so precise and quick that by the time terrorists and Pakistani army personnel realized what was happening, 38 terrorists had been killed. Two Pakistani army personnel were also killed in the action.

Two para commandos of the strike team received injuries during the mission from landmines.

REAL-TIME MONITORING

Meanwhile in Delhi, in a scene similar to the US mission to take out Osama bin Laden, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Army Chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag monitored the entire operation in real time, receiving footage from the helmet cameras as well as a drone.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi was being regularly briefed about the progress of the operation.

Parrikar congratulated the Army for its successful operation. He said that Army had “credible information about the presence of terrorists in the area and we carried out surgical attacks on those camps.” Pak Occupied Kashmir is part of India, Parrikar added.

In an important diplomatic move, Doval spoke to his American counterpart Susan Rice and took her into confidence about the cross-border operation.

A DINNER SKIPPED AND A WAR ROOM MEETING

The operation that began at 12.30 am past midnight ended at around 4.30 am on Thursday. Army headquarters in Delhi had finished its preparation for the operation by 8 pm on Wednesday night.

On Wednesday, in fact, there was a dinner at the Coastguard Commander Conference in New Delhi. Besides Parrikar, Doval and General Suhag were expected to attend the dinner party.

However, the three skipped the dinner and held a war-room meeting at Army headquarters, where they reviewed the plan for the surgical operation and gave their final approval.

Army chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag said that the army had done what it said by “giving a befitting reply at the place and time of its own choice”.

VIGILANT AFTER STRIKE

After paying back Pakistan in the same coin, the Indian Army’s morale is high but it has also stepped up vigil along the LoC and the border in Jammu and Kashmir as well as Punjab.

All the three armed forces and paramilitary forces have been put on the highest alert. The leaves of Army and BSF personnel have been cancelled.

Areas adjacent to border and LoC in Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir are being evacuated. Additional deployment of BSF personnel is also being made. There is a high alert from Gujarat to Kashmir along the border and LoC. Coast Guard has been asked to be extra vigilant.

How you can Crowle through mine field layed by Pakistan without knowing precise location. It's seems bolywood cinema then real event. Secondly in alert situation it's impossible to dodge Pakistani gurd on duty.
 
.
Lights, Camera, Action!

Transformation of Bollywood into Hollywood. Very Bad Written Fiction. We are not on a movie set, Everyone understands the sensitivity of the situation on both sides of boarder except the people who wrote that story. commandos were dropped by air... the played and vanished... and came back home safe.

Is it possible to violate the LoC when the other side is ready to response accordingly.
 
.
4357548.jpg
1004212
 
.
Naik Imtiaz Shaheed.jpg
L.Hav Jumma Khan Shaheed.jpg


Nation bestows their precious regards to the fallen comrades of yesterday's battle along LOC.

May ALLAH reward them with the highest places in Jannah, Ameen!

Pakistan Zindabad! :pakistan:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8killed.png


At least 8 Indian soldiers Killed, 1 captured.
 
.
Good script for next Bollywood movie, thats all they are good for these actors.
 
.
India’s “surgical strikes” aren’t a brave new idea, and they won’t stop Pakistan from backing terrorism

India’s admission and celebration of an alleged “surgical strike” against “terrorist launchpads” across the Line of Control (LoC) in Pakistan-administered Kashmir is a serious cause for worry.
Let’s first contextualise this strike from a historical perspective.

Ever since the 1949 ceasefire, the deployment of militaries along the LoC, which is not a legally recognised border, has increased with regular spikes after the 1971 war, the 1984 Siachen conflict, the advent of insurgency in Kashmir after 1988, and most prominently after the 1999 Kargil conflict.

For instance, the 80-kilometre stretch along which the Kargil conflict was fought was traditionally defended by one brigade i.e. approximately 3,000 troops. Today, it is manned by nearly a division i.e. approximately 10,000 troops. Not just that, after the 1971 war, the Indian army added a new term to its training curriculum—Line of Control Warfare. And after 1989, counter-infiltration operations were added to the list.

Given the complementary increase in force-levels at the LoC, where Indian and Pakistani posts are in close proximity for tactical reasons, local duels by specially trained and motivated troops have been a common feature (a local revenge cycle is created). Such engagements, historically, have involved not just small arms fire, but also artillery shelling and regular (at times on a daily basis) cross-border raids on small and isolated posts that are within operational reach of infantry battalions. Not surprisingly, LoC deployments are termed “no war, no peace” postings, according to Indian army manuals.

How does this game of tactical one-upmanship at the LoC work?

Since 1989, the Pakistani posts have been used as launch pads for militants aimed at targeting Kashmir and other parts of India. It is common for Indian intelligence agencies to collect information about these groups (often between 20 and 100 militants) and alert the military in advance. In fact, the first, most basic training of officers from the Research and Analysis Wing, India’s primary foreign intelligence agency, is undertaken in border areas. Depending on local military context, and the national political climate, these units take pre-emptive or curative measures to halt infiltration, including setting up ambushes or undertaking cross-border raids. Such engagements across the LoC have been taking place since (at least) the 1990s.




Since 2003, after months of a near-war scenario, India and Pakistan decided to enter a ceasefire at the LoC. The following reduction in cross-border attacks was a result of this political settlement.




This latest “surgical strike”, then, is actually an old phenomenon being heavily reported by the media as something new. That such cross-border firing happened in early 2015 (leave aside pre-2003) and did not reduce the actual threat of cross-border infiltration, which has generally been on a downward trend over the past few years, is also being missed.

Nonetheless, terming these old-style tactics “surgical strikes” is surely new, and mostly is in response to the demand for such strikes by those seeking revenge.

So, what exactly is a surgical strike?


Not because there is something wrong with taking responsibility of your actions, especially when they involve violence. For, that reflects maturity and control over the situation. Even enjoying the sense of security that sensible use of force instils among the people of a nation, which is frustrated with a neighbour unwilling to stop supporting militants, is also understandable.

The problem begins when the political and military leadership confuses its ways and means with strategic ends.

A surgical strike, according to a widely accepted definition, is “a military attack which results in, was intended to result in, or is claimed to have resulted in only damage to the intended legitimate military target, and no or minimal collateral damage to surrounding structures, vehicles, buildings, or the general public infrastructure and utilities”.

On the face of it, India got the “surgical” element of the strike right. After all, what collateral damage is one to expect at a border post along the LoC?

Capability crunch
But if the aim of this highly-celebrated “surgical strike” was to convince Pakistan to abort the use of cross-border terrorism, then this operation did nothing to alter that calculus. And Pakistan’s response is a clear testament to that. The Pakistani media is now claiming that it has killed eight Indian soldiers in return, and captured one alive.

It also signifies that India finds it difficult to change its military doctrines and operational practices despite knowing its regional security environment well. This is an issue that goes to the heart of India’s tormented defence planning processes.

Even more worrying is the prospect that these strikes were conducted for domestic political consumption—similar to the June 2015 cross-border strikes against Naga rebels operating from Myanmar’s territory.

Although one can understand why it was politically expedient for the Indian government to declare its actions, the fact is that publicising such operations is tricky. It confuses who the target audience really is, and sets unwieldy expectations of the public, i.e. a desire for “revenge” risks becoming an end unto itself.

If the message was meant for Islamabad—as it should have been—then it is futile to make it public without clear long-term strategic benefits. Pakistan has been not been deterred in the past, and is unlikely to change its approach based on such strikes, which its army is used to. This, by corollary, means that people of India are no safer today than they were yesterday.

Yes, it can credibly be argued that this surgical strike came in combination with India’s proactive diplomatic activism to isolate Pakistan, regionally and globally. But then, does such a combination of diplomatic and military pressure, despite being potentially promising, translate into strategic benefits?

The simple answer is, no.

Interface state
From a regional perspective, India succeeded in garnering support from Bangladesh, Bhutan, and Afghanistan for boycotting the 2016 SAARC Summit, which was to be hosted in Islamabad. This is an important development that signals Pakistan’s capability of simultaneously making enemies with most of its neighbours; it is something for Islamabad to worry about if it really wants a way out of its current morass.

No amount of Chinese money and infrastructural development under the rubric of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) can buy Pakistan peace

Yet, regional diplomatic isolation, though necessary, is not a sufficient condition to mend fences with Pakistan. At least not in the short run.

From an international perspective, despite calling it a state-sponsor of terrorism, India has largely been unable to isolate Pakistan. True, Pakistan’s credibility among the comity of nations is in tatters, and its exhortations of Indian perversion sounds hollow. But it is not isolated.

Pakistan’s geopolitical positioning, military culture, domestic socio-political tensions, and advanced nuclear capabilities, has made it internationally unavoidable (unlike, lets say, Myanmar before 2012). No big power, be it the US, UK, Germany, France, Russia, or China, would easily bestow the title of a pariah or terrorist state on Pakistan. The latest joint Russia-Pakistan military exercise is an indicator, whatever Moscow’s intent might be behind such defence engagement with Islamabad.

Pakistan is an “Interface State”, as Christophe Jaffrelot prescientlyexplained, that is comfortable in building strong patron-client relations with world powers (first the US, and now China). This ensures Pakistan’s enduring strategic relevance despite domestic and external tensions.

There is no guarantee that Pakistan would halt using non-state actors to execute Uri, Pathankot, and Gurdaspur-style attacks. Then, the best such strikes do is to heat up the LoC, where both countries have concentrated their military infrastructure over the decades. And the sad truth is that firing bullets and shells at each other on a contested border, as history shows, is a road to nowhere, and least of all a way to deter Pakistan from engaging in asymmetric warfare.

The return to a violent status quo at the LoC simply underlines that, despite its increasing material capacities, India is unable to address its “capability” crunch. That is, it is either incapable of accepting that Pakistan is proactively shaping its strategic environment and pushing New Delhi into making mistakes in dealing with dissent in Jammu and Kashmir; or that Islamabad cares little about international diplomatic isolation.


Even though US financial aid to Islamabad fell from $3.5 billion in 2011 to less than $1 billion in 2016—a sizeable drop that signals Washington’s reorientation of strategic priorities in South Asia—it does not imply a breakdown in relations with Pakistan. Instead, such an action could very well be a transitory financial punishment. All it does is push Pakistan further into China’s embrace financially and strategically.

In this context, what seems like a great synthesis of diplomatic isolation and punitive military action by New Delhi is essentially an exercise in extending the due date of either all-out war (even if under the nuclear umbrella), or a policy compromise—where both neighbours reach uneasy ceasefires without sustainable long-term settlements.

But the simple fact is this: While unabashed celebration of such attacks without worrying about retaliation (which is possible given Pakistan’s diplomatic isolation) do give a sense of “new norm” and “fresh precedents”, it is nothing more than old wine in, well, old bottles.

If there was any doubt about India’s incapability to formulate a credible response to Pakistan’s provocations, and move towards a political settlement of bilateral disputes, this “surgical strike” and the way it has been presented at home (and abroad) puts an end to that debate.


http://qz.com/796996/narendra-modis...-they-wont-stop-pakistan-from-backing-terror/
 
.
After years of terror strikes supported by Pakistan, the Indian Army has hit back with a textbook surgical strike that killed 38 terrorists, 2 Pakistani soldiers, and destroyed five terror camps.

India Today has got exclusive details of the inside story behind the surgical strikes.It was around midnight, when the Army’s Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopters with 25 commandos from 4-Para and 9-para crossed the LoC into Azad Kashmir. The helicopters dropped the commandos at earmarked spots and returned. They were now in enemy territory.

HOW THEY REACHED THE TARGET

The Army commandos crawled through mud, rocks and even landmines for about 3 kilometres with the threat of being caught in the Pakistan army’s crosshairs. Their destinations included five launch pads where large number of terrorists had gathered.

The launch pads were for terrorists waiting to infiltrate into the Indian side of the LoC to carry out terror attacks in the country. The terror launch pads were located in Bhimbar, Kel, Tattapani and Leepa areas.

The launch pads were under close surveillance of the Indian intelligence agencies. RAW and Military Intelligence had kept an eye on every single movement of terrorists in the target zone.

THE SURGICAL STRIKE

The surgical strike team had six targets on mind, three of which were completely destroyed during the operation. Commandos were equipped with Tavor and M-4 guns, grenades and smoke grenades. They also carried under barrel grenade launchers (UBGL) and night-vision devices. They wore camera-mounted helmets.

After reaching the target spot, the commandos used the element of surprise to mount rapid and deadly attacks on the enemy. With the terrorists taken by surprise, the crack troops added to the chaos by firing a flurry of smoke grenades into the terror camps.

Their actions were so precise and quick that by the time terrorists and Pakistani army personnel realized what was happening, 38 terrorists had been killed. Two Pakistani army personnel were also killed in the action.

Two para commandos of the strike team received injuries during the mission from landmines.

REAL-TIME MONITORING

Meanwhile in Delhi, in a scene similar to the US mission to take out Osama bin Laden, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Army Chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag monitored the entire operation in real time, receiving footage from the helmet cameras as well as a drone.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi was being regularly briefed about the progress of the operation.

Parrikar congratulated the Army for its successful operation. He said that Army had “credible information about the presence of terrorists in the area and we carried out surgical attacks on those camps.” Pak Occupied Kashmir is part of India, Parrikar added.

In an important diplomatic move, Doval spoke to his American counterpart Susan Rice and took her into confidence about the cross-border operation.

A DINNER SKIPPED AND A WAR ROOM MEETING

The operation that began at 12.30 am past midnight ended at around 4.30 am on Thursday. Army headquarters in Delhi had finished its preparation for the operation by 8 pm on Wednesday night.

On Wednesday, in fact, there was a dinner at the Coastguard Commander Conference in New Delhi. Besides Parrikar, Doval and General Suhag were expected to attend the dinner party.

However, the three skipped the dinner and held a war-room meeting at Army headquarters, where they reviewed the plan for the surgical operation and gave their final approval.

Army chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag said that the army had done what it said by “giving a befitting reply at the place and time of its own choice”.

VIGILANT AFTER STRIKE

After paying back Pakistan in the same coin, the Indian Army’s morale is high but it has also stepped up vigil along the LoC and the border in Jammu and Kashmir as well as Punjab.

All the three armed forces and paramilitary forces have been put on the highest alert. The leaves of Army and BSF personnel have been cancelled.

Areas adjacent to border and LoC in Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir are being evacuated. Additional deployment of BSF personnel is also being made. There is a high alert from Gujarat to Kashmir along the border and LoC. Coast Guard has been asked to be extra vigilant.

The technical term is horse shit. The border you are talking about is heavily militarized on both sides. Where are the videos and where is the evidence? Fairy tales, conjecture and fiction to appease the right wing masses. From the inflicted death toll on Indian soldiers, it is evident that there was infiltration from Indian Administered Kashmir, which left in a hurry leaving their bodies behind. Keep using your imagination for mental masturbation. Pakistan Forces are alert and awake and waiting for you, whichever border you decide to violate.

India is looking for reasons to escalate, as it takes attention away from your colossal intelligence failure in URI and Pathankot, and to undermine the rightful struggle of self determination by Kashmiri people in Indian Administered Kashmir. Shame on you the State of India. It seems that in war Hysteria, all voices of reason and rational thinkers are either shut up or have been sent packing.
 
.
Which is area, where they attacked the so called terrorists ?
Where is proof of their activity ?
Where is proof of death of 38 people ?
 
.
Most valued targets killed ......TERRORIST.....who blow themselves with no remorse of innocent life. These terrorists can only be termed as cowards who can not do any thing in his life except blew up but out of hate and in competence he becomes suicide bomber. Even hell will not allow them.


If nothing happened then why are you so nervous and for your information this is not the first time when Indian troops walked in Pak.
How did u determin that im nervous, probably by the same intelluctual compass that leads u to believe that strikes happened, grow up , not the first time indian troop walked in pak????, do u even know what a surgical strike is u goon???, a targeted highly accurate strike on a target by a jet, for hell's sake idiot grow out of this bollywood dilemna, if ur airforce musters up the courage to conduct a strike and in a very rare scenario where they are succesful, paf will wreak havoc on ur side of loc...
 
. . .
Given CARTOSAT and general observation intel was probably gathered over a long time (regarding routes used by forces on the other side), this should not have posed any issue.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...sat-images-for-Army/articleshow/54596113.cms?

It is also important to understand from Indian side, such strikes (although smaller) have occured before, they just were not made official.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ealing-with-pakistan/articleshow/54597079.cms

It was the official declaration of this one that breaks previous precedent.

.jpg


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...er-uri-terror-attack/articleshow/54594097.cms

This is from Indian perspective, so you will probably personally feel you need some salt to go with it.

Some hollywood movies seem to be the source of inspiration, and also the source of content.
BR
 
.
India Strikes Pakistan: Why It's 'Very, Very Significant'

India's announcement of "surgical strikes" in Pakistan on Thursday marked a sharp worsening of tensions between the nuclear-armed nations, signalling Delhi has lost patience with its neighbor for allegedly sheltering militants.

The Indian army said it was trying to take out terrorists who'd "positioned themselves ... with an aim to carry out infiltration and terrorist strikes.

The military moves — that Pakistan denied took place — were a serious departure from India's previous policies of "strategic restraint," according to Charu Lata Hogg, a regional expert and associate fellow with the Chatham House think tank.


Map showing location of one of the strikes India said it carried out in Kashmir. Google Maps
Pakistan has long been accused of housing and supporting militant groups that target India — including Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, which was behind the devastating 2008 Mumbai attacks that left over 160 dead.

India has retaliated with similar strikes in the past but never admitted it openly, said Shanshank Joshi, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute think tank.

That it came out so publicly with Wednesday's action was "very very significant," he said, adding that India under Prime Minister Narendra Modi was "trying to show the rules of the game are changing."

The "most important background is that Pakistan has created, assisted and sheltered a variety of jihadist groups on its soil," Joshi explained. "India has grown increasingly frustrated that it has not been able to react without it escalating into nuclear war."


India's strikes Thursday appeared to be retaliation for a militant attack that killed 19 Indian soldiers in Uri, near the frontier, on Sept. 18. The incident— the latest in a long string that Delhi has pinned on militants protected by Pakistan — provoked widespread outrage and anger in India.

At the heart of the tensions between the two countries is Kashmir, one of the most militarized regions in the world which straddles the India-Pakistan border.

Both India and Pakistan claim all of Kashmir, but govern separate parts.


Smoke billows out from inside an Indian army base which was attacked by suspected militants in Uri on Sept. 18. EPA / EPA
India and Pakistan have fought three wars since independence from Britain in 1947 — two over Kashmir. The two countries often exchange small arms fire across the so-called Line of Control that separates the two.

India has the world's second-largest army and Pakistan, the world's sixth largest.

The more than 700,000 Indian troops stationed in the disputed Kashmir Valley are grappling with a separatist movement in the Muslim-majority area. They are staring down almost 200,000 Pakistani troops on the other side of the border.


Tensions between the South Asian rivals has been particularly high since an Indian crackdown on dissent in Kashmir in wake of the killing by security forces of Burhan Wani, a young separatist leader, in July.

The U.S. is allied with both India and Pakistan — but there have been signs it might be putting its support behind India when it comes to the issue of militants in Pakistan.

National Security Adviser Susan Rice spoke to her Indian counterpart to offer "condolences to the victims and their families" of the Uri attack, according to a statement released by the White House on Wednesday.



The conversation highlighted "the danger that cross-border terrorism poses to the region," it added.

"Rice reiterated our expectation that Pakistan take effective action to combat and de-legitimize United Nations-designated terrorist individuals and entities," the statement said.


Indian army soldiers take position during a gun battle at the Taj Mahal hotel in Mumbai on Nov. 29, 2008. Desmond Boylan / REUTERS
While Pakistan rejected India's account of the latest cross-border activity, officials hinted they might retaliate.

"India is doing this only to please their media and public," Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said Thursday, according to Reuters. "If India tries to do this again we will respond forcefully."

Pakistan's prime minister called an emergency Cabinet meeting for Friday.

Meanwhile, experts expect the situation on the ground in Kashmir to worse.

"[It] is likely to escalate further before sense prevails on both sides," Chatham House's Hogg warned. "Media jingoism and public support for the strikes in India is high, the weaponry being used is high caliber."

"Despite spontaneous protests, ordinary people in Kashmir are tired of violence. The core grievance remains the failure of authorities to protect their basic rights," she added.


Indian Border Security Force soldiers patrol along a border fence at an outpost along the Line of Control between India and Pakistan in Jan. 2013. TAUSEEF MUSTAFA / AFP - Getty Images
Adding a dangerous element to the mix is Pakistan's consistent assertion that it reserves the right to use nuclear weapons preemptively. India has a no-strike-first policy. Pakistan's defense minister repeated that claim last week after the attack on Indian soldiers in Uri.

India's strike also comes at a difficult time for Pakistan, with powerful Army Chief of Staff General Raheel Sharif due to retire shortly and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif still to decide on a successor.

The Indian stock market fell after India's announcement, with the benchmark NSE Index falling by up to 2 percent in Mumbai and a key "fear index," which measures volatility rising to a three-month high.



http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/india-strikes-pakistan-why-it-s-very-very-significant-n656656
 
.
Some hollywood movies seem to be the source of inspiration, and also the source of content.
BR

You are welcome to believe that. Evidence will be disseminated from our side once the situation has stabilised and it is appropriate or prudent to release such.

It will not be forthcoming from Pakistan side of course, since you have already constructed your denial matrix just like in those days in December of that fateful year some 45 years ago or so.

I will sit back and watch.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom