Pakistan Protests India's Move to 'Raise Wall' on LoC

[shaheenmissile]

use artillery shells to demolish the wall. Pakistan has claim on Kashmir and India shouldn't divide Kashmir by a wall.

 

[$@rJen]

use artillery shells to demolish the wall. Pakistan has claim on Kashmir and India shouldn't divide Kashmir by a wall.

And India will watch ideally??? The wall is coming one way or another... its the final answer to pakistan smuggling terrorists into kashmir. You fire artillery.. we'll reply with the same but with some extra kindness

 

[shaheenmissile]

And India will watch ideally??? The wall is coming one way or another... its the final answer to pakistan smuggling terrorists into kashmir. You fire artillery.. we'll reply with the same but with some extra kindness

then we may be looking at another war i guess

 

[$@rJen]

then we may be looking at another war i guess

Which you can't afford and will not do.. Attacking Kashmir again is only going to make Indian case stronger,

 

[JonAsad]

Lol, three stars always confuse anyone, i said kasmir held by pak in short and i guess u are assuming adult content here. Pdf dont let us write p..o..k.. Instead stars appears there. I wud have assumed the same if i were u. Lol

funny i actually knew exactly what you wrote- now read in that context again-

 

[Bang Galore]

use artillery shells to demolish the wall. Pakistan has claim on Kashmir and India shouldn't divide Kashmir by a wall.

It's a 135 feet wide embankment (not a conventional wall) probably separated by deep trenches on either side. Artillery won't cause much damage.

With raised walls, May be Pakistan has a chance in winning pole vault medal at the olympics.....It should be a welcome decision.

Except that being dastardly, the Indians are planning deep ditches on either side......

 

[Mustang06]

This wall/embankment would stop RAW terrorist to cross LoC and sabotage CPEC so Members from other side chill.
On topic though is there any proof of wall being constructed because construction of a wall would only obscure IA to see on other side of border?

 

[alpha q]

funny i actually knew exactly what you wrote- now read in that context again-

Duh, then maybe I need to keep in check my dirty mind and you need to be much less poetic...

It's a 135 feet wide embankment (not a conventional wall) probably separated by deep trenches on either side. Artillery won't cause much damage.



Except that being dastardly, the Indians are planning deep ditches on either side......

Need to fill in those ditches with spikes or some stuff like our old bollywood movies.

 

[Assange]

Which you can't afford and will not do.. Attacking Kashmir again is only going to make Indian case stronger,

A war?

Now wait and watch this entire thread will be speaking about tactical nuclear weapons of Pakistan....

 

[shaheenmissile]

Which you can't afford and will not do.. Attacking Kashmir again is only going to make Indian case stronger,

With India almost in Security council,Pakistan's case wont get any stronger,only weaker from now onwards. That's why i am guessing the military brass is looking at other options now.

 

[Secret Service]

would be a good target for artillery practice firing..

 

[$@rJen]

With India almost in Security council,Pakistan's case wont get any stronger,only weaker from now onwards. That's why i am guessing the military brass is looking at other options now.

Dude.. Pakistan case was already in a weaker position. even if india didn't get in.. it'll still remain the same

 

[karan.1970]

would be a good target for artillery practice firing..

Yet another Pakistani fanboy demonstrating that his knowledge of military is limited to what can be learnt by playing Command and Conquer.

 

[Mav3rick]

I don't know what you are getting by beating a dead horse ! Every one know including you and me that JK part of india and will be forever and there is no way you can take it by militarily or diplomatically.The sooner you forget the chapter the better.Your own intellectuals and retd military officers in ur media are telling that you keep you military big compared to your requirements. and now the military itself is eating your country.Neither india do not want to take P0K by force as we have several other prioritise for our country and people to get progress.

Why can't your country focus on education,building hospitals etc as top priority !

Practically, the only solution is to make the LoC a permanent IB because just as it may be true that Pakistan cannot take Jammu Kashmir by force the exact same is also applicable on India that she can never take back Azad Kashmir by force!

However, until a permanent solutions if found and implemented, this is neither a dead horse nor a bygone issue. As for you idiotic comments on the Military, I'd rather not engage.

Yup saw it in Indian dictionary but would need to see in pak dictionary if it had a different meaning.

So look it up in all the dictionaries that you want and be humble at your mistake.

Dont worry if u win kashmir somehow you can keep the wall too, now plz stop crying in UN.

UN is the forum where adults talk, not that you would know anything about it.

 

[MimophantSlayer]

Of course they object.
How will drugs and terrorists come into India otherwise.