Pakistan proposes Muslim Blue Berets for Afghanistan

[Spring Onion]

even if u want to, u cant control natural natural resources of Afghanistan. Coz citizens of Afghanistan would not even let u lay ure hands on their natural resources.
but the concern is legitimate, looking at the past experiences, when Pakistan tried to manipulate the situation in its own favour creating a havoc for poor afghan-is.

Thank you we dont need to control their resources in the first place.


secondly Pakistan has suggested countries which are not directly having any stake in Afghanistan neither Pakistan is included in this force so jumping of bhartis here just manifestation of your inborn fear.

 

[Spring Onion]

it will still needed to invest huge money to tap these deposits....surly US would be eyeing it...

but does pakistan has the money........then why they are so vocal about influence in afganistan....or their voic is backed by chinese money...

Dear we are not eyeing it in the first place. It was silly weakest claim by an Indian that this keeping force is meant to control the untapped lolz resources.

 

[luckyyy]

Thank you we dont need to control their resources in the first place.


secondly Pakistan has suggested countries which are not directly having any stake in Afghanistan neither Pakistan is included in this force so jumping of bhartis here just manifestation of your inborn fear.

stake in Afghanistan when did afganistan became a public property...

 

[Spring Onion]

stake in Afghanistan when did afganistan became a public property...

so you are now trying to hide behind twisting words??

come on come up with some logical point.

Neutral countries are suggested by Pakistan for this force so if you can find some fault with these countries then come up and justify your view.

 

[IndianArmy]

Let the Afghan army take up the job if it can. so far the Karzai Govt has aired concern and had been asking US/NATO to stay adding that ANA is not in a position to take up the job.

ANA is Being trained By one of the Finest Armies and USA would Not End Up Just Like that, Its Being aired most of the time By the Obama Administration that US troops would Leave after making ANA Capable enough to defend There land.... And I do not have any Concern If the UNPKF is Helping out, But not Selective nations who have prioritised There Agenda in Afghanistan, It would End up in the creation of another Monster....

your BS blame that Muslim Peace Keeping force is meant for controlling resources of Afghanistan is just the weakest and lamest excuse. that too when there any tapped resources so far

Your BS Claim of Countering my Argument is the Weakest and probably The Meanest Way to End Up showing Your helplessness in proving you are right Jana....

The world doesnt move on emotional bouts. check your facts and see out of all UN members how many countries contribute to UN peace keeping. does it mean all others who dont are being punned around ?

Of course the world dosent move on Emotional Bouts, thats the Reason behind the Very Creation of UNPKF to Move the world on Emotions, Why would a Nation show its meanest tactics in Mixing there Interest in a Force Assigned for Peace missions?? This is my only Question?? We too are one among the Top contributors to UNPKF, and We have every reason to be a Part of it no matter where when and How...

 

[mjnaushad]

...

Thanks for the advise and stop giving your fatwas about who is troll and who is not....

Its not a fatwa... Its something which if you follow will help improve this site standard....which is already fall many level because of indian multiple ids.

Is Mukti Bahini a banned terrorist organization?

Only those organizations are banned which attack west or doesn't meet west interest... So choosing organization on BAN is totally biased.... Neither there was much terrorphobia in 71 so no one cared about it.... But accept it or not Indian army supported terrorism inside Pakistan.....

Well technically you guys are the one who support them not us. we just do construction over there
.

We guys..... Where your ban category is now?? if you are talking about TTP .... Pakistan is fighting TTP

Aint Pakistan wants Afghanistan back to Taliban rule because of its own interest of gaining influence viz a viz India. So you guys should be the first guys to kept out of equation by your own logic.

Maybe ...maybe not.... Pakistan want a stable afghan govt which is not under influence of foreign anti pakistan elements.....

And how come. Blue berets are super humans or what? As far as blue berets are concerned there is already Indians present who have the third largest muslim population. Irony aint it

Again you just bring india and largest papulation blah blah blah stuff.... Will the parties in Afghanistan accept this... Forget northren alliance.... talk about whole afghanistan....

that largest papulation is just 20% of papulation and 80% non muslim and anti pakistan which again supported terrorsim inside pakistan......and will again support terrorism inside pakistan plus will support anti pakistan sentiments in Afghanistan.....

 

[luckyyy]

so you are now trying to hide behind twisting words??

come on come up with some logical point.

Neutral countries are suggested by Pakistan for this force so if you can find some fault with these countries then come up and justify your view.

it's only the pakistan and pakistanis claming they are stake holders in afganistan such that afganistan is a public property....
the word has been used more then once in the article as well as by you...

 

[Spring Onion]

ANA is Being trained By one of the Finest Armies and USA would Not End Up Just Like that, Its Being aired most of the time By the Obama Administration that US troops would Leave after making ANA Capable enough to defend There land.... And I do not have any Concern If the UNPKF is Helping out, But not Selective nations who have prioritised There Agenda in Afghanistan, It would End up in the creation of another Monster....

Its not about training by finest powers that so far failed in Afghanistan. Its about acceptance by all sides in Afghanistan. So lets consider that. which force they would agree to. its surely isnt ANA so far.

Your BS Claim of Countering my Argument is the Weakest and probably The Meanest Way to End Up showing Your helplessness in proving you are right Jana....

Prove your BS claim that Peace Keeping force from Muslim countries will control resources which are not even yet tapped in Afghanistan.


This shows your Indian helplessness with regard to failure seeing any logical fault with this force.

Of course the world dosent move on Emotional Bouts, thats the Reason behind the Very Creation of UNPKF to Move the world on Emotions, Why would a Nation show its meanest tactics in Mixing there Interest in a Force Assigned for Peace missions?? This is my only Question?? We too are one among the Top contributors to UNPKF, and We have every reason to be a Part of it no matter where when and How...

ahhh a reply based on utter frustration.

this UN PKF is one of the neutral ones which has been suggested by anyone so far.

We have not included our country into it to further end chances of any prospect of influencing .

and ahhh now you came up open with your hidden wish of Including Bharat aka India into it.

i would say this is the meanest insecurity by India because when a country like Pakistan that is directly linked to this entire issue is ready to stay out of this force then why India is so much insecure and wana jump in ??


so who is resorting to meanest tactics here you or us? indeed its you not us.

 

[twoplustwoisfour]

so you are now trying to hide behind twisting words??

come on come up with some logical point.

Neutral countries are suggested by Pakistan for this force so if you can find some fault with these countries then come up and justify your view.

India has NO PROBLEM with neutral countries. But we have a problem with the precondition that the peacekeeping forces should be MUSLIM. Clearly if you are only going to have forces of ONE religion/ideology having so much power in a country, it is going to flare up prejudices.

Your point stating that Muslim countries will be able to understand the cultural and religious sensitivities is a cop out, simply because those same sensitivities landed us in this trouble. We have to help the Afghans come OUT of those prejudices, and help them treat everyone equally, be it muslim or non-muslim.

If on the other hand you want Afghanistan to return back to being an Islamic pariah state with no regards to other religions, then I don't think we'll ever agree.

 

[mjnaushad]

India has NO PROBLEM with neutral countries. But we have a problem with the precondition that the peacekeeping forces should be MUSLIM. Clearly if you are only going to have forces of ONE religion/ideology having so much power in a country, it is going to flare up prejudices.

Your point stating that Muslim countries will be able to understand the cultural and religious sensitivities is a cop out, simply because those same sensitivities landed us in this trouble. We have to help the Afghans come OUT of those prejudices, and help them treat everyone equally, be it muslim or non-muslim.

If on the other hand you want Afghanistan to return back to being an Islamic pariah state with no regards to other religions, then I don't think we'll ever agree.

^^ name the neutral non-muslim countries...... If they can help then most welcome...

 

[Spring Onion]

^^ name the neutral non-muslim countries...... If they can help then most welcome...

)))))) lets see what they name and how much prospect of its acceptance by local folks in Afghanistan.


as far as this one suggested by us have neutral Muslim countries

 

[metro]

)))))) lets see what they name and how much prospect of its acceptance by local folks in Afghanistan.


as far as this one suggested by us have neutral Muslim countries

))))))) India, China, Australia, Japan etc.

 

[mjnaushad]

))))))) India, China, Australia, Japan etc.

INDIA>.... NEUTRAL
CHINA.... US WILL NEVER ALLOW
AUSTRALIA.......Is already in afghanistan under ISAF and seen as invader
Japan... Cant say anything about them... I don't know if they know anything about regional culture and islamic values...

 

[Spring Onion]

India has NO PROBLEM with neutral countries. But we have a problem with the precondition that the peacekeeping forces should be MUSLIM. Clearly if you are only going to have forces of ONE religion/ideology having so much power in a country, it is going to flare up prejudices.

But why INDIA should have any problem with it ? its not suggested for deployment in India in the first place.

Lets the Afghan players give their suggestions for this if they reject it its gone if they consider it, it stays no matter what India want or what Pakistan want.

Its merely a suggestion you can come up with your suggestion and then let the players decide

Your point stating that Muslim countries will be able to understand the cultural and religious sensitivities is a cop out, simply because those same sensitivities landed us in this trouble. We have to help the Afghans come OUT of those prejudices, and help them treat everyone equally, be it muslim or non-muslim.

1. This prejudice is prevalent in India so your concern about Afghanistan is misplaced .

2. when a broad based govt is installed in Afghanistan composed of all sides according to wishes of all Afghans then they will take care of their internal matters themselves. The peace keeping force is not supposed to do that

If on the other hand you want Afghanistan to return back to being an Islamic pariah state with no regards to other religions, then I don't think we'll ever agree.

That is up to people of Afghanistan what, which system they want YOU Me and Other outsiders have NO say NO right in it.

Lets keep our wishes to ourselves.


The peacekeeping force is merely a force that is considered NON Hostile compared to gora force by locals

 

[metro]

INDIA>.... NEUTRAL
CHINA.... US WILL NEVER ALLOW
AUSTRALIA.......Is already in afghanistan under ISAF and seen as invader
Japan... Cant say anything about them... I don't know if they know anything about regional culture and islamic values...

India is a neutral country, and would be accepted by majority of the countries including Afghanistan.
so it has to be there.
there is no shortage of countries who can work for genuine peacekeeping in Afghanistan, Australia, newzealand, south Africa, Brazil, Indonesia etc etc...