Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
shaheen3 should be last missile in range for us ?
Pakistan missiles worry U.S.; 47 entities under strict watch
- Thread starter ZedZeeshan
- Start date
Taimoor Khan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2016
- Messages
- 13,811
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
If they are so concerned about Shaheen 3, why these morons in West are hell bend to prop India against Pakistan? Pakistan strategic developments will keep equilibrium with India, if west is concerned, they must pull the rug under India's feet, which in turn will stop Pakistani advancements.
This is the only way, there are no other solutions.
This is the only way, there are no other solutions.
Naara-e-Mastana
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2016
- Messages
- 611
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Old news + in case of any dialogue we should put our case and blame agni 5 test as the main reason to lest long range missile 
. i hope china will support us on ghis 
.
. i hope china will support us on ghis .
Star Expedition
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2016
- Messages
- 522
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
World police is really a hard job
CriticalThinker02
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2015
- Messages
- 1,675
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
The hypocrisy of the west plain in sight, on one hand they give the gun to India on a silver platter while from the other they try their level best to take away ours.
The greatest threat to world peace is the United States of America.
The greatest threat to world peace is the United States of America.
SHAHEEN EYE
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Yes...because india is the BIGGEST BLOOD THIRSTY ENEMY OF PAKISTAN...
TO DATE: 32000 CIVILIANS INCLUDING TH 144 CHILDREN OF THE ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL HAVE BEEN MASSACRED BY INDIAN RAW BACKED TERRORISTS
THIS IS A PAKISTANI FORUM WHY ARE INDIAN ON HERE
Dalit
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 23,669
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
Why they are here? Obsession.
IceCold
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Messages
- 19,236
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
Shaheen 3 is a joke when it comes to its range, If americans are worried over that, than we should give them something else to worry about, An ICBM but the government of NS does not have guts to do it, after all if it wasn't for the US assurances, these filthy creatures wouldnt be in Pakistan to being with. Hence they cannot go against their masters. A nationalist leader is required to fill the gap.
AUz
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2010
- Messages
- 8,595
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
So Shaheen 3 range is indeed greater than 2750km 
I remember back in 2008, yes 2008, American vice Presidential candidate and governor of Alaska--Sara Palin--said that she knows that Pakistan possesses missiles that can reach shores of Greece.
That was back in 2008. Almost a decade ago
I remember back in 2008, yes 2008, American vice Presidential candidate and governor of Alaska--Sara Palin--said that she knows that Pakistan possesses missiles that can reach shores of Greece.
That was back in 2008. Almost a decade ago
NirmalKrish
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,686
- Reaction score
- -30
- Country
- Location
Point that question to the mods not me
SecularNationalist
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 8,046
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Shaheen-III of particular concern; Trump to follow Obama defence policy on India
The United States government is increasingly worried over the rising range and variety of Islamabad’s missile capability and the recent decision of the Obama administration to impose trade restrictions on seven Pakistani entities came out of this concern, a source familiar with the developments told The Hindu.
The official announcement of the decision did not detail the reasons, but said there was “reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts,” that these entities “have been involved in actions contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States”. All the entities are linked to Pakistan’s missile programme. With the addition of these seven, there are 47 Pakistani entities that are under strict watch of the U.S agencies.
Shaheen-III the reason
What has triggered the alarm bells in Washington is Shaheen-III, which has a range of 2,750 km. Pakistan has officially explained its longest-range missile to date, tested for the first time in 2015, as a capability to strike the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, the farthest Indian territory from its shores. But the missile also has Israel in its range, along with several European countries – something that the U.S. strategic community finds unnerving. The entities put under trade restrictions by the U.S include the Islamabad-based National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM), and its subsidiaries, Air Weapons Complex (AWC), Maritime Technology Complex (MTC) and New Auto Engineering (NAE).
Speaking at an event on nuclear security, Vice-President Joe Biden alluded to this concern on Wednesday. “Not just North Korea, but Russia, Pakistan, and others have made counterproductive moves that only increase the risk that nuclear weapons could be used in a regional conflict in Europe, South Asia, or East Asia. Working with Congress, the next administration will have to navigate these dangers and — I hope — continue leading the global consensus to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our world.”
It will be ditto Obama here
The incoming administration will continue with the existing U.S. policies towards India, Pakistan and Asia in general, Defence Secretary-designate James Mattis indicated during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Forces Committee. He complemented Pakistan for its action against terror groups that operate within the country, adding that he would push for more effective targeting of groups that were aimed at neighbouring countries. This is in line with the Obama administration’s efforts in the region.
Mr. Mattis said he would “hesitate to use phrases such as “rebalance” or “pivot” as they imply that we are turning away from our commitments elsewhere,” but added that “China’s behavior has led countries in the region to look for stronger U.S. leadership. “If confirmed, I will examine ways to strengthen our allies and partners, while taking a careful look at our own military capabilities in the region,” he said.
Mr. Mattis also pledged to continue with the Obama policy of enhancing a long-term strategic relationship with India “based on the convergence of our interests and our shared democratic values.” “I note that the United States and India recently cemented India’s status as a Major Defence Partner. If confirmed, I would assess what particular areas in the bilateral security relationship I should focus on, and what steps can be taken to bolster the overall defence relationship.”
‘We will work with Pakistan’
Naming sanctuary and freedom of movement for the Afghan Taliban and associated militant networks inside Pakistani territory as “a key operational issue faced by the Afghan security force,” Mr. Mattis, who has commanded the U.S forces in Afghanistan, said he would work with Pakistan to improve the situation.
“Our relationship with Pakistan, including our military-to-military relationship, has had highs and lows. We have long faced a lack of trust within the Pakistani military and government about our goals in the region. If confirmed, I will work to build the trust that we need for an effective partnership,” he told the Senate Committee.
The United States government is increasingly worried over the rising range and variety of Islamabad’s missile capability and the recent decision of the Obama administration to impose trade restrictions on seven Pakistani entities came out of this concern, a source familiar with the developments told The Hindu.
The official announcement of the decision did not detail the reasons, but said there was “reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts,” that these entities “have been involved in actions contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States”. All the entities are linked to Pakistan’s missile programme. With the addition of these seven, there are 47 Pakistani entities that are under strict watch of the U.S agencies.
Shaheen-III the reason
What has triggered the alarm bells in Washington is Shaheen-III, which has a range of 2,750 km. Pakistan has officially explained its longest-range missile to date, tested for the first time in 2015, as a capability to strike the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, the farthest Indian territory from its shores. But the missile also has Israel in its range, along with several European countries – something that the U.S. strategic community finds unnerving. The entities put under trade restrictions by the U.S include the Islamabad-based National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM), and its subsidiaries, Air Weapons Complex (AWC), Maritime Technology Complex (MTC) and New Auto Engineering (NAE).
Speaking at an event on nuclear security, Vice-President Joe Biden alluded to this concern on Wednesday. “Not just North Korea, but Russia, Pakistan, and others have made counterproductive moves that only increase the risk that nuclear weapons could be used in a regional conflict in Europe, South Asia, or East Asia. Working with Congress, the next administration will have to navigate these dangers and — I hope — continue leading the global consensus to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our world.”
It will be ditto Obama here
The incoming administration will continue with the existing U.S. policies towards India, Pakistan and Asia in general, Defence Secretary-designate James Mattis indicated during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Forces Committee. He complemented Pakistan for its action against terror groups that operate within the country, adding that he would push for more effective targeting of groups that were aimed at neighbouring countries. This is in line with the Obama administration’s efforts in the region.
Mr. Mattis said he would “hesitate to use phrases such as “rebalance” or “pivot” as they imply that we are turning away from our commitments elsewhere,” but added that “China’s behavior has led countries in the region to look for stronger U.S. leadership. “If confirmed, I will examine ways to strengthen our allies and partners, while taking a careful look at our own military capabilities in the region,” he said.
Mr. Mattis also pledged to continue with the Obama policy of enhancing a long-term strategic relationship with India “based on the convergence of our interests and our shared democratic values.” “I note that the United States and India recently cemented India’s status as a Major Defence Partner. If confirmed, I would assess what particular areas in the bilateral security relationship I should focus on, and what steps can be taken to bolster the overall defence relationship.”
‘We will work with Pakistan’
Naming sanctuary and freedom of movement for the Afghan Taliban and associated militant networks inside Pakistani territory as “a key operational issue faced by the Afghan security force,” Mr. Mattis, who has commanded the U.S forces in Afghanistan, said he would work with Pakistan to improve the situation.
“Our relationship with Pakistan, including our military-to-military relationship, has had highs and lows. We have long faced a lack of trust within the Pakistani military and government about our goals in the region. If confirmed, I will work to build the trust that we need for an effective partnership,” he told the Senate Committee.
Similar threads
