Pakistan Has Over 100 Nuclear Weapons Pointed At India (And Millions Live At Risk)

[Tom M]

So what?

i hope u understand the impact hateful ideology and it doesnt matter whether it is elected or no elected. in fact elected is even worse. Such hatefull thinking is not like tap water that can be turned off

and yes it good for us we have a great leader at our helm and you have a rotten on at yours.

Well neither he nor his party will be there at the helm for too long. And that is the beauty of democracy.

 

[PradoTLC]

Well neither he nor his party will be there at the helm for too long. And that is the beauty of democracy.

Yes your beauty.... like this?.. seriously you guys are good at fooling your self.




'No Muslims': Why is India's Citizenship Act Amendment Bill so controversial

https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/ind...dment-bill-now-to-rajya-sabha-1.1575946814138


India: Lok Sabha passes citizenship amendment bill, now to Rajya Sabha
The bill is being accused of discrimination based on religion for Indian citizenship

Published: December 10, 2019 06:56ANI
'No Muslims': Why is India's Citizenship Act Amendment Bill so controversial

• Amit Shah sounds the whistle – Muslims to be targeted again in India with another NRC

• Indian Cabinet clears 6 bills, including Citizenship Amendment Bill

New Delhi: The Lok Sabha (India's lower parliament) a little past midnight on Monday passed the Citizenship Amendment Bill after a reply by Home Minister Amit Shah who said that the "historic legislation will liberate crores of refugees" who had come from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh from adversities they have faced for decades.

The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019 was passed after division with 311 members voting in favour and 80 against. The bill will now go to the Rajya Sabha - the upper house.

ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads
The bill was supported by Shiv Sena, which is no longer with BJP, though its other allies in Maharashtra government - Congress and NCP - strongly opposed the bill. The over seven-hour debate saw participation from 48 members. The bill was introduced Monday morning and was passed past midnight.

With Narendra Modi as Prime Minister, no citizen irrespective of religion needs to fear
- Amit Shah, during CAB debate in Lok Sabha
PM Modi
Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed his delight over the passage of the bill.

"Delighted that the Lok Sabha has passed the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019 after a rich and extensive debate. I thank the various MPs and parties that supported the Bill. This Bill is in line with India's centuries-old ethos of assimilation and belief in humanitarian values," PM Modi said in a tweet.


Narendra Modi

✔@narendramodi
https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1204107928233340932

Delighted that the Lok Sabha has passed the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2019 after a rich and extensive debate. I thank the various MPs and parties that supported the Bill. This Bill is in line with India’s centuries old ethos of assimilation and belief in humanitarian values.


35.6K
10:37 PM - Dec 9, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

10.7K people are talking about this



The Prime Minister also applauded Shah for "lucidly" explaining all aspects of the Bill.Shah said in his reply to the debate that there was no need to link the bill to National Register of Citizens. "We will bring NRC and bring it with clarity. There will be NRC. When NRC comes, all infiltrators will be identified," he said.

ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads
The debate
With opposition repeatedly talking to fear among Muslims, Shah said the government was committed to giving equal rights to all people.

"With Narendra Modi as Prime Minister, no citizen irrespective of religion needs to fear," he said.

Shah also took political digs at Congress and Trinamool Congress.

He said TMC member Abhishek Banerjee had referred to Rabindranath Tagore and Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and asked if they would have dreamt that it would require court intervention for immersion of Durga idols and "no Saraswati puja".

"Those who use infiltrators as their vote-bank, we will not let them succeed," he said.He said Nehru-Liaquat pact for proper treatment of minorities was not implemented by Pakistan.

"The mistake of Nehru-Liaquat agreement is being rectified by Modiji," he said.

Allaying apprehensions of opposition members, Shah said the bill was not related to Muslim citizens of the country.

He said the bill does not violate Article 14 of the constitution which provides for equality before the law as citizenship was being given to "a class" and not a religion.

"It is a reasonable classification," he said.

Shah said there was a need of bill because the country was divided on the basis of religion. "It is a reality. You have to accept it. Congress has t accept the historical fact," he said.

Referring to Congress as communal, Shah said he had not seen a party which allies with IUML in Kerala and with Shiv Sena in Maharashtra.

He said in 1947, 23 per cent of Pakistan population comprised of minorities but in 2011, the number came down to 3.7 per cent.

Shah said the number of the minority population and Bangladesh had also come down from 22 per cent to 7.8 per cent in 2011 and number of Hindus and Sikhs in Afghanistan had come down from about 2 lakh to 500.

"Where did these people go. Were they converted, came to India, were killed. What was the fault of these minorities? If they face atrocities, should India remain a mute spectator? We want they should live with respect," he said.

To opposition criticism that India was becoming a Hindu Rashtra under BJP, Shah said the proportion of the community's population had gone down from 84 per cent to 79 per cent and that of Muslims had gone up from 9.8 per cent in 1951 to 14.23 per cent.

"We have never discriminated on the basis of religion. It will not happen in future," he said.

He also said there was no need for refugee policy.

Answering a query posed to him during the debate, Shah said, "[Pakistan-administered Kashmir] is ours. The citizens are ours. We have kept 24 seats reserved," he said.

He said only "minorities" from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh who have faced religious prosecution have been covered in the bill and Muslims in these Islamic countries were not minorities.

What about the Rohingyas?
He said Rohingyas will not be accepted as citizens of the country.

The bill makes Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, Christians from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, eligible for citizenship. It seeks to amend the Citizenship Act.

Shah said only Constitution was the dharma of the Modi government.

He said an attempt was being made to create a fear among the refugees that they will not get citizenship without ration cards. "There is a document or not, the eligible have to be made citizens," he said, adding that there will remain a difference between refugee and infiltrator.

He said the BJP-led government will not change Article 371 pertaining to the North East. Shah said the bill has nothing to do with Muslims who were citizens of India.

Committed to secularism
Earlier, moving the bill for passage, Shah said it was not targeting anyone and won't promote any injustice as BJP-led government was committed to secularism enshrined in the constitution and believes that there should be no discrimination against any citizen on the basis of religion.

He said the bill was for giving citizenship to religiously prosecuted minorities from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.

He said unity in diversity was the strength of the country and tolerance was an attribute of the country.

"It is true that unity in diversity is a strong mantra to keep the country united. Tolerance is an attribute of the country. Never has this country invaded another country, it is 10,000 years old history. Our forces never went out. Tolerance is our quality.

He said the country has accepted change and it was a factor behind India being one of the oldest civilizations in the world.

"We accept change, make it part of our culture and move forward," he said.Shah said the constituent assembly had accepted India to a secular nation and "BJP and its allies respect it, accept it and are eager to take it forward".

"We all accept secularism. There should not be discrimination against anybody on the basis of religion, rights should not be curtailed. After the bill is passed, crores of people will be free from a difficult life and become Indian citizens with respect," he said.

Shah said the bill has not taken away rights of any Muslim and they can apply for citizenship under the relevant rules and due process will be followed.

He said there was a fear amongst minorities that they would be jailed if they even apply for citizenship.

"We have a provision that'll end all investigations against any minor as soon as that person gets citizenship of India. In this Bill, we're protecting the social and linguistic uniqueness of the North East people. Nobody needs to fear it," he said.

"Nagaland and Mizoram are protected by Inner Line Permit and it will continue to remain protected. Keeping in mind the feelings of Manipur, we're including them into the Inner Line Permit as well. Meghalaya is protected by the Sixth Schedule, and we're keeping the Sixth schedule of the ambit of the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill," Shah said.

The cut-off date for citizenship bill is December 31, 2014.

https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/ind...dment-bill-now-to-rajya-sabha-1.1575946814138

indians have more than 100 nukes and they r all pointed towards Pakistan and millions of lives r at risk

if those nukes are good as their pilots... we have nothing to worry about.

 

[God Parshuram]

and Pakistan has none

This made my day. I do not need to listen to Zaid Hamid today.

'No Muslims': Why is India's Citizenship Act Amendment Bill so controversial

There is nothing controversial. Muslims got Nations for Muslims and we all know that there is no place for minorities in those states. Now after getting two nation based on religion, they want citizenship of a country from which they parted on the basis of religion. You got whatever you wanted. If at all those who are crying has any dignity, they should not cry. If they are uncomfortable in those nations, they should go to one of the other muslim nation. There are more than 50 for them.

 

[Tom M]

There is nothing controversial. Muslims got Nations for Muslims and we all know that there is no place for minorities in those states. Now after getting two nation based on religion, they want citizenship of a country from which they parted on the basis of religion. You got whatever you wanted. If at all those who are crying has any dignity, they should not cry. If they are uncomfortable in those nations, they should go to one of the other muslim nation. There are more than 50 for them.

Agreed to some extend. But what I don't understand why the hell are we giving citizenship to illegal immigrants belonging to other faith ??? Ain't our 1.4 Billion poor more than enough strain on our already depleted resources, joblessness and poverty ??

 

[Ultima Thule]

This made my day. I do not need to listen to Zaid Hamid today.

TELL ME HOW MANY FREEDOM STRUGGLES IS GOING IN PAKISTAN,IF I KNOW NOTHING

 

[PradoTLC]

This made my day. I do not need to listen to Zaid Hamid today.



There is nothing controversial. Muslims got Nations for Muslims and we all know that there is no place for minorities in those states. Now after getting two nation based on religion, they want citizenship of a country from which they parted on the basis of religion. You got whatever you wanted. If at all those who are crying has any dignity, they should not cry. If they are uncomfortable in those nations, they should go to one of the other muslim nation. There are more than 50 for them.

spoken like a true cow piss drinking RSS turd...

well done!

you made our day!

 

[God Parshuram]

Agreed to some extend. But what I don't understand why the hell are we giving citizenship to illegal immigrants belonging to other faith ??? Ain't our 1.4 Billion poor more than enough strain on our already depleted resources, joblessness and poverty ??

Do you want to say that we should let Shikhs, Christians to leave them on their own fate. Don't you know that Teen girls are kidnapped, converted and married to the men of their grand father's age? Actually, they too would have similar rights what our minorities are enjoying but unfortunately that did not happen. We have given asylum to many communities for thousands of years and shall be left our own people to die? Infact, Islam came to India because we gave asylum to prophet Mohammad's family. What we are doing is fully correct. We must go ahead with what we are doing.

TELL ME HOW MANY FREEDOM STRUGGLES IS GOING IN PAKISTAN,IF I KNOW NOTHING

Baluch, Sindh, Pashtun, Azad Kashmir.

 

[macnurv]

Another article by know nothing expert on Pakistan, but this line gets me:

It is also dealing with internal security issues that could threaten the integrity of its nuclear arsenal

Already old and debunked talking point, guess paid to write stooges havent received updated talking points yet.

 

[SIPRA]

......... We have given asylum to many communities for thousands of years ......... In fact, Islam came to India because we gave asylum to prophet Mohammad's family.

Yes, of course. We are grateful to you for giving asylum to poor folks like Muhammad bin Qasim, Mehmood Ghaznavi, Shahabuddin Ghori, Qurbuddin Aibak, Zaheer uddin Babar, Amad Shah Abdali and likes.

 

[Adonis]

Pakistan Has Over 100 Nuclear Weapons Pointed At India (And Millions Live At Risk)

Lol...let them remain pointing. They slapped and took away Kashmir...and we are happy seeing weapons pointing at them.

Fact is, India doesn't care anymore about nuclear threat. It has all he world on it's side....and it knows, we cant' do anything of our own...without support we are helpless to initiate any adventures.

 

[Politico]

ok troll, you insist your crap that have no evidence by you links/clips, the only lame effeort to justify your illegal occupation of IOK, i read full your link and watch a whole video, where its say only princey states head dictate its peoples that we are going to join India without asking to its peoples

and what about UN resolutions on Kashmir and don't tell me these resolutions are for our part of Kashmir (AZAD KASHMIR), these resolutions are for whole Kashmir

You're missing the woods for the trees

 

[Tom M]

Do you want to say that we should let Shikhs, Christians to leave them on their own fate. Don't you know that Teen girls are kidnapped, converted and married to the men of their grand father's age? Actually, they too would have similar rights what our minorities are enjoying but unfortunately that did not happen. We have given asylum to many communities for thousands of years and shall be left our own people to die? Infact, Islam came to India because we gave asylum to prophet Mohammad's family. What we are doing is fully correct. We must go ahead with what we are doing.

Yes, what happens to a foreigner in my land is least of my concern as long as justice to my fellow countrymen (irrespective of their religion, cast or color) in the form of employment, improved food and shelter are not guaranteed. FYI, we are still holding the largest and poorest population in the world with lack of basic amenities. And here we have geniuses proposing to add a few thousands/millions to this already ailing economy, huh ??? What kind of logic is that ??

What we are doing is mad. Period.

And you are wrong. Islam came to India during Prophet Mohammad's lifetime that too peacefully. It came to my home state Kerala initially in 629 AD . Do some research and come after learning correct facts.

Yes, of course. We are grateful to you for giving asylum to poor folks like Muhammad bin Qasim, Mehmood Ghaznavi, Shahabuddin Ghori, Qurbuddin Aibak, Zaheer uddin Babar, Amad Shah Abdali and likes.

And some people are the living testament for the same long history of murder, rape and pillage but still doesn't shy away for using their Hindu/Sikh ancestral surnames from their names till date.

 

[God Parshuram]

And you are wrong. Islam came to India during Prophet Mohammad's lifetime that too peacefully.

Ohh are you sure? Even in recent time, thousands of temples are destroyed in Kashmir. Why talk even of India. There is no Muslim country in even 21st century where mosques and Islamic shrines are not destroyed in big numbers. Just do not give example of world's second mosque build in Kerala. That land was given voluntarily by Hindu king. Talk about Large scale invasion India by Mohammad bin Quasim who came to kill Prophet's family members.

 

[Secret Service]

Pakistan is more responsible nuclear armed state than more others.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Baluch, Sindh, Pashtun, Azad Kashmir.

Baluch you can say some how, and back by you, but where is freedom struggle in sindh don't troll yourself, can you give me any proofs/links/source from neutral sources, and PTM is running through Afghanistan with minimal elements in Pakistan and also back by you , what are you talking about there is no freedom struggle in our part of Kashmir, can you prove with links/sources from neutral sources instead of trolling