jarnee
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 438
- Reaction score
- 0
Title may be wierd , however this is what i have started to believe in watching the so called "geopolitical games" been played in subcontinent. here it goes: (considering all gossips to be true from all sides)
We will have to go back 3 years to understand this, major infitration in Indian Kashmir, very high terrorism in India, 2007-8 were considered to be bloody in terms of terrorism. India was helpless, only thing it could do was seal borders , increase vigilance , increase security in Kashmir , Delhi, Mumbai, bith Delhi and Mumbai were having regular attacks with support from groups in Pak / Bdesh with support of ISI.
Then entered US (after fighting a loosing battle in Afganistan). Allowed India to set up intelligence and support centers in Afghanistan.
India had Money and political necessity to end violence in its cities, so needed ally's in subcontinent.
Mounting pressure from America to attack SWAT and other Taliban breeding grounds, Some sections of ISI (who had interest in ensuring safe haven of taliban stays ..to protect their interst in Afganistan and the drug money keep flowing). attacked Mumbai (26/11), to invite India and Pakistan stand off , similar to one in 2002. However this time India could (with help of FBI) figure out intent of the attack. hence took the diplomatic route instead of an more likely direct action against terror camps.
I remember when there was a virtual Media war , the Taliban said they will fight along with Pak army if India dare attack same Baitullah said. you can watch videos on You tube from 2008.
India there after adopted and what is still its stand that you punish Hafiz sayed forget the rest, but he is key. but justice system even if they know he is involved cannt punish , Pakistan cannot punish him w/o direct evidence valid in court to punish him (Justice system is same in Ind/Pak ..same old colonial legacy) we all know.
What is India to gain out of not talking.
1. No talks on any issues including Kashmir
2. Talks on water sharing etc all on hold.
3. Dont blame india on Baluchistan or consulates in Afganistan
4. Pakistan's image stays as one with protecting terrorists.
5. There can be no attacks on India at least with Pak approval, bec that will further question its intent. On the contrary Pakistan has to proactively ensure that some one else does not use its soil to attack India.
6. Worst case if India is attacked , US and NATO will be at Paksitans throat.
7. After ISI / Pak influence diminished, India got its eastern neighbour Bangladesh acting proactively to arrest and hand over north eastern terror groups and cracked down on Huji.(India managed to get a friendly govt in B'desh).
Bottom line... Thanks to British lousy colonial justice system , India has stumped Paksitan.
Pakistan needs to play another game now with another batsman.
Pls see these are my personal views they may not be true.
We will have to go back 3 years to understand this, major infitration in Indian Kashmir, very high terrorism in India, 2007-8 were considered to be bloody in terms of terrorism. India was helpless, only thing it could do was seal borders , increase vigilance , increase security in Kashmir , Delhi, Mumbai, bith Delhi and Mumbai were having regular attacks with support from groups in Pak / Bdesh with support of ISI.
Then entered US (after fighting a loosing battle in Afganistan). Allowed India to set up intelligence and support centers in Afghanistan.
India had Money and political necessity to end violence in its cities, so needed ally's in subcontinent.
Mounting pressure from America to attack SWAT and other Taliban breeding grounds, Some sections of ISI (who had interest in ensuring safe haven of taliban stays ..to protect their interst in Afganistan and the drug money keep flowing). attacked Mumbai (26/11), to invite India and Pakistan stand off , similar to one in 2002. However this time India could (with help of FBI) figure out intent of the attack. hence took the diplomatic route instead of an more likely direct action against terror camps.
I remember when there was a virtual Media war , the Taliban said they will fight along with Pak army if India dare attack same Baitullah said. you can watch videos on You tube from 2008.
India there after adopted and what is still its stand that you punish Hafiz sayed forget the rest, but he is key. but justice system even if they know he is involved cannt punish , Pakistan cannot punish him w/o direct evidence valid in court to punish him (Justice system is same in Ind/Pak ..same old colonial legacy) we all know.
What is India to gain out of not talking.
1. No talks on any issues including Kashmir
2. Talks on water sharing etc all on hold.
3. Dont blame india on Baluchistan or consulates in Afganistan
4. Pakistan's image stays as one with protecting terrorists.
5. There can be no attacks on India at least with Pak approval, bec that will further question its intent. On the contrary Pakistan has to proactively ensure that some one else does not use its soil to attack India.
6. Worst case if India is attacked , US and NATO will be at Paksitans throat.
7. After ISI / Pak influence diminished, India got its eastern neighbour Bangladesh acting proactively to arrest and hand over north eastern terror groups and cracked down on Huji.(India managed to get a friendly govt in B'desh).
Bottom line... Thanks to British lousy colonial justice system , India has stumped Paksitan.
Pakistan needs to play another game now with another batsman.
Pls see these are my personal views they may not be true.
