Pakistan Expresses Concern over Passage of 9/11 Bill

[Indus Pakistan]

If you read

I actually think Saudia is liable but in a more indirect way - vicarously. By nurturing certain type of very political Islamism minus any self correcting reasoning Saudia has done much to wreak havoc in many Muslim countries with some of the effects hitting the West as well. However because of convergence of international politics the issue of accountability is not just plain legal matter.

The real issue is political. If USA decides to turn on any country and the dogs of hell are unleashed then even if there is no legal case a case will be made and on the contrary where there is a case convenience will see to it that it is overlooked.

Going to specifically Pakistan there is no way on earth USA would do what your suggesting unless Pakistani state was directly implicated in some mass terrorist attack on American soil like 9/11. The reasons are simple:-

(i) Pakistan is a major nuclear power and the results of any clash with USA would extract huge price for any external party - granted Pakistan would also suffer. However a clash with Pakistan would not be like Iraq or Syria. The consequences of giving grief to Pakistan would send ripples across the world. That is why President Obama said that Pakistan gives him nightmares.

(ii) Despite what you might hear the Pakistan elite and ruling class is product of British imperialism and that includes all major pillars of the state like the military. This class has very strong connections with the Anglo-Saxon world that includes US. It is because of this historical connection and relations with this class Pakistan was able to develop nuclear weapons where others dare not even buy a nuclear X-Ray machine.

This historical images say it all

President Ayub Khan and President Lyndon B Johnson.

Generations of Pakistan elite go to American or British universities. The military sends it's top officers to Sandhurst or West Point. Every new entrant to the elite class including even Mullah's send their childremn (including daughters) to UK or US. This builds up connections at the top between these two worlds that create pathways of influence out of sight of the general public.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

How Bahtiyar Pak is!! Hasn't it always been Pak establishment's wish to be the "last resort" friend of the KSA? The US Congress is offering that moment on a golden platter!!! The China-Russia Alliance must be preparing itself to go for the overdrive. And, as usual, it'll all be modulated by Pak. What concern, they must be having the best Biryani party ever...

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

I actually think Saudia is liable but in a more indirect way - vicarous liability. By nurturing certain type of very political Islamism minus any self correcting reasoning Saudia has done much to werak havoc in many Muslim countries with some of the effects hitting the West as well. However because of convergence of international politics the issue of accountability is not just plain legal matter.

The real issue is political. If USA decides to turn on any country and the dogs of hell are unleashed then even if there is no legal case a case will be made and on the contrary where there is a case convenience will see to it that it is overlooked.

Going to specifically Pakistan there is no way on earth USA would do what your suggesting unless Pakistani state was directly implicated in some mass terrorist attack on American soil like 9/11. The reasons are simple:-

(i) Pakistan is a major nuclear power and the results of any clash with USA would extract huge price for any external party - granted Pakistan would also suffer. However a clash with Pakistan would not be like Iraq or Syria. The consequences of giving grief to Pakistan would send ripples across the world. That is why President Obama said that Pakistan gives him nightmares.

(ii) Despite what you might hear the Pakistan elite and ruling class is product of British imperialism and that includes all major pillars of the state like the military. This class has very strong connections with the Anglo-Saxon world that includes US. It is because of this historical connection and relations with this class Pakistan was able to develop nuclear weapons where others dare not even buy a nuclear X-Ray machine.

Trust me bro you would be surprised at both the stupidity,hypocrisy, and lengths people will go in the U.S to make a lot of money hence why Obama is threatening with his veto and why the Supreme court refused to hear the Law suit in the first place. If the U.S allowed it's citizens to sue any country it would be diplomatic suicide and all because some greedy assholes decided to play the guilt card in congress because it was the anniversary for 9/11.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

both the stupidity,hypocrisy, and lengths people will go in the U.S to make a lot of money hence why Obama is threatening with his veto and why the Supreme court refused to hear the Law suit in the first place

I believe it - However I don't think US is only country that suffers from this condition. This appears to a human affliction that at some level all societies grapple with.

And I don't want to sound like a US apologist. Just being realist.

 

[illusion8]

The bill allows citizens to sue foreign countries over acts of domestic terrorism that means if someone lost a family member to 9/11 they would be able to sue Pakistan too considering that Pakistan had Osama bin Laden hiding in the country.

Exactly what I said in my earlier posts, wanted to know if its exclusive for 9/11 victims (it's called the 9/11 bill) or its for any terrorist attack?

 

[X-2.]

The world has always been divided between good and evil. The good and intellectually alive people have already realised it but the people who ignorant, or their hearts and minds are sealed with hatred of Islam and Muslims will always believe these lies...remember that they are the descendants of the people who fought crusades and Bush used that word a few times in his speeches and statements.

Few days back I commented 9/11 was inside job on a thread and number of activist came up to bash me lol
I has done alot in last few years about this matter but ppl don't believe they are sheeple.... any intellectual who knows this rapid hole knows hundreds of un answered questions and it's proof of inside job

Exactly what I'm saying, US don't have to do a false flag and sacrifice their 3000 citizens and twin towers to attack any country.

Iraq and syria are good examples, they never did any false flag back in USA before interfering there.

Yea u r bit right but 9/11 was false flag do u know why because to justify American tax payers into confidence and bring nato into money game !
Governments of most stronger Nations are gangsters sir they do terror attacks to keep the fear of terrorism in there people hearts so they can keep using people taxes
They need to do big false flag but there need to justify to coming in graveyard (Afghanistan) and this graveyard sides with Pakistan china iran lol
In Afghanistan they need other country route to pop in
There are many other reasons sir that America planned earlier
Even u wud hv heard of illuminati cards published back in 1995

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

Exactly what I said in my earlier posts, wanted to know if its exclusive for 9/11 victims (it's called the 9/11 bill) or its for any terrorist attack?

The law specifically states its for any act of terror,not just 9/11 or the victims of 9/11.

 

[illusion8]

The law specifically states its for any act of terror,not just 9/11 or the victims of 9/11.

Do you have the text of the bill?. With the link.

EDIT: you are right.

Supporters claim that only governments that have supported terrorists have reason to fear the proposed law.

http://www.good4utah.com/news/local...l-and-what-does-it-mean-for-national-security

No wonder Pakistan is rightfully concerned.

 

[Indika]

If I read it right, it's exclusive for 9/11 victim families. 6 Americans were killed in 26/11, but I doubt this bill has a wider angle to it.

it will set a precedent, then soldiers killed in afghanistan...etc

 

[T-Rex]

Exactly what I'm saying, US don't have to do a false flag and sacrifice their 3000 citizens and twin towers to attack any country.

Iraq and syria are good examples, they never did any false flag back in USA before interfering there.

That's your opinion but I would rather go with most of the experts who contradict what you're saying. If what you say was true bush and blair wouldn't come with their infamous evidence of Saddam possessing WMDs.

 

[Khanate]

I don't know what truly happened on 9/11 but my sympathies are with all the families of the victims. May Allah give you patience.

Why would any nation in the world other than Saudi or by way of OBL association - Pakistan be concerned?

This bill is exclusively pertaining to 9/11 victims.

Because by going to the courts, you set a precedence which gives Pakistan the right to ask for compensation from US courts for the innocent people it has killed with its drone program. Likewise, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia can ask US to pay for the millions of innocent people that died in Vietnam war. Same goes for Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and a good portion of countries in South America.

 

[coffee_cup]

What would happen if families of victims of countless American wars around the world started to sue US?

 

[iby32]

All this bullshit is created by US herself last 3000 citizens in drama and now killing people all over the world. Whole world should sue US for killing inocent people in name of terrorism once same OBL was their beloved agent. No one should belive in us as they are back stabbers