What's new

Pakistan endures historic high import bill of $5.6b in January

SunilM

BANNED
Joined
Oct 26, 2017
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
-14
Country
India
Location
India


Saturday, 10 Feb 2018

Pakistan endures historic high import bill of $5.6b in January
By Shahbaz Rana
Published: February 10, 2018

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan seems to have its work cut on the external trade front, as its monthly import bill for January jumped to a record $5.6 billion – highest in history – with the trade deficit widening to $21.5 billion for the seven months of the ongoing fiscal year.

Despite imposition of regulatory duty on hundreds of tariff lines and putting in place non-tariff barriers for half the seven-month period, which the court has now overruled, Pakistan saw its January import bill surge 14.2% month-on-month. Exports during January also dipped 0.3%, amounting to $1.97 billion compared with December’s figure, widening the month-on-month trade deficit by 24% to $703 million.

China imports seafood directly from Pakistan for first time

The development is alarming for Pakistan’s policymakers as the import bill surged after the central bank allowed the rupee to depreciate by over 5% during December. It also comes at a time of declining foreign exchange reserves that have come under pressure due to external debt servicing and repayments.

On a cumulative basis, the trade deficit – gap between exports and imports – during July-January was equal to 84% of the government’s annual target of $25.7 billion, destroying official projections of current account deficit and foreign currency reserves.

The value of goods imported exceeded the value of those exported by $21.55 billion in the July-January period, reported the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) on Friday.

Court removes regulatory duty from over 350 goods

Exports in July-January period increased by 11.11% to almost $13 billion but these are only equal to 56% of the annual export target of $23.1 billion. In absolute terms, export receipts were up by $1.3 billion during the first seven months.

The value of imports stood at $34.5 billon, which was 18.9% or $5.5 billion higher than the import bill booked during the first seven months of the last fiscal year. The seven-month import bill was equal to 70% of the annual target.

2-1518200637.jpg


The current trade deficit is already placed on a higher base, as Pakistan closed the last fiscal year at a record $32.4-billion deficit. The level also indicates that this year the current account deficit would remain far higher than official projections of $9 billion.

The government had made macroeconomic projections on the basis of conservative growth in imports and higher growth in exports, which showed external financing requirements at the lower end.

Import of used cars only discouraged, not stopped: Dagha

However, the country’s external account started depicting a negative picture immediately after the start of the new fiscal year. The country booked a record six-month current account deficit of $7.5 billion during the first half of the fiscal year, which was largely financed by using official foreign currency reserves.

The official gross foreign currency reserves held by the State Bank of Pakistan have already slipped to $13.1 billion despite $5.5 billion in loans during the first six months of the fiscal year. By excluding domestic commercial bank borrowings, the net SBP reserves are not more than $7 billion.

3-1518200787.jpg


CREATIVE COMMONS

Annual-basis

On a year-on-year basis, Pakistan’s exports grew to $1.97 billion in January over the same month of the previous fiscal year, according to the PBS. Exports were higher by 11.04% or $196 million over the receipts of January 2017.

Imports grew at almost double the pace, increasing 18.9% in January. The import bill was $910 million more than that of January 2017. Consequently, the trade deficit widened 24.44% or $3.63 billion in January over the same month of the previous year. In absolute terms, the deficit was higher by $714 million.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 10th, 2018.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1630951/2-pakistan-endures-historic-high-import-bill-5-6b-january/
 
.
One reason I guess is CPEC as we are importing machinery.
Also its showing Pakistanis has much money to spend outside. We should come up with ideas to produce same things in Pakistan.

I guess we should not be worry on import but keep the balance on exports as well.
 
. .


Saturday, 10 Feb 2018

Pakistan endures historic high import bill of $5.6b in January
By Shahbaz Rana
Published: February 10, 2018

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan seems to have its work cut on the external trade front, as its monthly import bill for January jumped to a record $5.6 billion – highest in history – with the trade deficit widening to $21.5 billion for the seven months of the ongoing fiscal year.

Despite imposition of regulatory duty on hundreds of tariff lines and putting in place non-tariff barriers for half the seven-month period, which the court has now overruled, Pakistan saw its January import bill surge 14.2% month-on-month. Exports during January also dipped 0.3%, amounting to $1.97 billion compared with December’s figure, widening the month-on-month trade deficit by 24% to $703 million.

China imports seafood directly from Pakistan for first time

The development is alarming for Pakistan’s policymakers as the import bill surged after the central bank allowed the rupee to depreciate by over 5% during December. It also comes at a time of declining foreign exchange reserves that have come under pressure due to external debt servicing and repayments.

On a cumulative basis, the trade deficit – gap between exports and imports – during July-January was equal to 84% of the government’s annual target of $25.7 billion, destroying official projections of current account deficit and foreign currency reserves.

The value of goods imported exceeded the value of those exported by $21.55 billion in the July-January period, reported the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) on Friday.

Court removes regulatory duty from over 350 goods

Exports in July-January period increased by 11.11% to almost $13 billion but these are only equal to 56% of the annual export target of $23.1 billion. In absolute terms, export receipts were up by $1.3 billion during the first seven months.

The value of imports stood at $34.5 billon, which was 18.9% or $5.5 billion higher than the import bill booked during the first seven months of the last fiscal year. The seven-month import bill was equal to 70% of the annual target.

2-1518200637.jpg


The current trade deficit is already placed on a higher base, as Pakistan closed the last fiscal year at a record $32.4-billion deficit. The level also indicates that this year the current account deficit would remain far higher than official projections of $9 billion.

The government had made macroeconomic projections on the basis of conservative growth in imports and higher growth in exports, which showed external financing requirements at the lower end.

Import of used cars only discouraged, not stopped: Dagha

However, the country’s external account started depicting a negative picture immediately after the start of the new fiscal year. The country booked a record six-month current account deficit of $7.5 billion during the first half of the fiscal year, which was largely financed by using official foreign currency reserves.

The official gross foreign currency reserves held by the State Bank of Pakistan have already slipped to $13.1 billion despite $5.5 billion in loans during the first six months of the fiscal year. By excluding domestic commercial bank borrowings, the net SBP reserves are not more than $7 billion.

3-1518200787.jpg


CREATIVE COMMONS

Annual-basis

On a year-on-year basis, Pakistan’s exports grew to $1.97 billion in January over the same month of the previous fiscal year, according to the PBS. Exports were higher by 11.04% or $196 million over the receipts of January 2017.

Imports grew at almost double the pace, increasing 18.9% in January. The import bill was $910 million more than that of January 2017. Consequently, the trade deficit widened 24.44% or $3.63 billion in January over the same month of the previous year. In absolute terms, the deficit was higher by $714 million.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 10th, 2018.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1630951/2-pakistan-endures-historic-high-import-bill-5-6b-january/
I am not really concerned about this trade imbalance (for last few years) at all because it's all due to the imports related to equipment for CPEC project - it is the largest development project in Pakistan's history. We cannot slow its pace just to control our trade imbalance. We can easily survive having it now and enjoy much more growth/progress/development after these projects are completed.
 
.
Court removes regulatory duty from over 350 goods
By Shahbaz Rana
Published: February 8, 2018
63SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1628902-image-1518026989-479-640x480.jpg

The court decision will cause a dent in the FBR’s revenues for this fiscal year as it had estimated receipt of a minimum Rs25 billion from the regulatory duty. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Wednesday declared a legal amendment, which had given the finance minister powers of imposing regulatory duty, unconstitutional and scrapped the duty levied on more than 356 items, putting the federal government in a tight spot.

The decision carries far-reaching implications for the federal government and reinforces the principle of ‘trichotomy of power’ that the Supreme Court of Pakistan had enshrined in its historic August 2016 judgment.

The SHC made the Supreme Court’s judgment the base for declaring the amendment to the Customs Act 1969 through the Finance Act 2017 unconstitutional.

In the August 2016 judgment, the Supreme Court had defined the federal government as the federal cabinet plus the prime minister and barred the premier or any minister from unilaterally taking decisions in fiscal matters.

Import duty on eatables, luxury items raised by up to 350pc

“Section 18(3) of the Customs Act 1969 as to the extent as amended by the Finance Act 2017 is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution and of no legal effect,” read the SHC judgment.

In order to defeat the Supreme Court ruling, then finance minister Ishaq Dar had obtained these powers by inserting a clause in all the four fiscal laws. The clause stated that the board (Federal Board of Revenue), with approval of the federal minister in charge, may by notification make changes in the tax rates.

However, the SHC struck down the amendment to the Customs Act that had been challenged by the affected parties after the FBR imposed regulatory duty on more than 356 goods in order to curb growing imports.

The ruling also declared SRO 1,035 of 2017, issued in October 2017 in exercise of powers conferred by the amended Section 18(3) of the Customs Act, “ultra vires, of no legal effect and is hereby quashed”.

The decision will cause a dent in the FBR’s revenues for this fiscal year as it had estimated receipt of a minimum Rs25 billion from the regulatory duty. However, the decision will help ease inflationary expectations as the government had even targeted essential and food items to raise additional revenues.

Imported food items, tyres, vehicles, garments, etc will get cheaper as a result of the court ruling.

The SHC directed the FBR to refund the duty that the petitioners paid after the issuance of the SRO.

But the court suspended its judgment for 30 days in order to enable any aggrieved person or party to appeal against the verdict.

The court has upheld the principle of taxes and duties to be imposed only by parliament. “Those functions of the federal government that relate to the exercise of legislative powers cannot be conferred at all, ie, cannot be regarded as part of the designated functions,” said the judgment.

Auto industry demands exemption from regulatory duty on steel

The petitioners had prayed that the regulatory duty could not survive constitutional scrutiny keeping in view the Supreme Court’s judgment.

In terms of Article 90, the executive authority was to be exercised by the federal government comprising the prime minister and federal ministers, and the counsel referred to Article 92 in terms of appointment of federal ministers, according to the petitioners.

They submitted that a minister, acting individually, could not take those decisions that were required to be taken by the federal government or the cabinet.

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the power to impose regulatory duty as conferred by Section 18(3) was not a mere ministerial act or function. It was, in fact, a quasi-legislative power and could only be conferred on the federal government (meaning always the cabinet) and not otherwise.

However, FBR’s Member Legal Tariq Masood submitted that on a year-to-year basis, imports had registered a consistent upsurge in the months leading up to the issuance of SRO 1,035, which were unsustainable.

He emphasised that the Supreme Court had recognised a large margin of discretion with regard to the imposition of regulatory duty and thus, in the light of alarming macroeconomic trends and figures and also the balance of payments situation, a decision was taken by the board to propose the imposition of regulatory duty in terms of the power conferred on it by the amendment made in Section 18(3).

Published in The Express Tribune, February 8th, 2018.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1628902/2-court-removes-regulatory-duty-350-goods/
 
. .
@SunilM is back with his trash threads.

However this time your stay would be very short lived. Other than that multiple ID rat you are my next target for bans.
 
.
It is about Pakistan economy. Not Cpec..:coffee:

Not only that, the early harvest projects i.e the power plants are over and done with just some left. Which means this is not because of CPEC, but on high import dependence.
 
.
Not only that, the early harvest projects i.e the power plants are over and done with just some left. Which means this is not because of CPEC, but on high import dependence.
Fine. So, are you happy now? I still see you butthurt! Get some help.
 
. . . .
No its a question.

Since the baniya is good with figures. So i asked.

Diwaalia 70 saal se nikal raha hai
Well, since the gross reserves are in the negative, you know the answer to that question already.
 
.
Well, since the gross reserves are in the negative, you know the answer to that question already.

You have little idea about it.

Ye apki khushi kay liye hai. Araam se chadar orrh kar sojaen
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom