Owais
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2005
- Messages
- 4,512
- Reaction score
- 0
Computerised refund system not pointing flaws in exporters' claims
ISLAMABAD (June 17 2006): The computerised 'risk-based refund analysis system' is not pointing out real flaws in the refund claims filed by exporters, resulting in blockage of refund payments.
Sources told Business Recorder on Friday that processing of refund claims is done through Sales Tax Automated Refund Repository computer system (Starr). Exporters' data is also checked through the 'risk-based analysis system'.
In certain cases, one system clears the application for issuance of refund, but the other raises serious objections, making it difficult for tax officials to sort out genuine cases.
Sources said that CBR has issued instructions to all collectors of sales tax to sanction sales tax refund in cases which are verified by the 'risk-based analysis system'. This system contains database of exporters including return, purchase invoices and invoice summary etc Starr system is operative for processing of refund claims for quite some time.
Keeping in view the Board's directive, the collectorates started issuance of refund after carrying out analysis of exporters' data available with the system, applying the Starr checks. The processing of refund claims under the 'risk-based system' has created many difficulties in processing of the claims. The collectors are not clear whether to issue refund or not in cases where the system raises objections.
Due to these objections the sales tax staff is unable to sanction or reject refund claims, which is increasing the overall pendency of refund claims at the level of collectorates. The collectors have communicated several ambiguities in the 'risk-based analysis system' for addressing.
Sources said that the system analyses the data only to the extent of 'purchase invoices'. No analysis is made regarding 'bill of entry' or 'shipping bill' filed by exporters under the system. Thus, the system raises objections pertaining to 'bill of entry'/'shipping bill'.
The system declares sales tax invoices as valid where the Starr refund program shows objection as 'blacklisted, non-filer, invoice summary not furnished, abnormal tax profile' and other such objections.
The refund claims due to these objections are inadmissible under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act, whereas the same are declared as admissible under the risk-based system, which is very confusing, sources added.
The system is also raising objections that an exporter has filed multiple sales tax returns resulting in blockage of refund. On the other hand, a registered taxpayer is entitled to file revised sales tax return to correct any omission or wrong declaration under section 26(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
The objection of 'multiple return' does not clarify whether a claimant is filing multiple return erroneously or revised sales tax return has been filed to correct the error.
The system also contains data of utility bills of the exporters. But it invariably shows objections as violations of different sections of the Sales Tax Act. This issue also needs to be addressed by the Board. The Board should clarify to the collectors whether only the risk-based analysis system is to be followed, or Starr objections be also taken into consideration, sources said.
ISLAMABAD (June 17 2006): The computerised 'risk-based refund analysis system' is not pointing out real flaws in the refund claims filed by exporters, resulting in blockage of refund payments.
Sources told Business Recorder on Friday that processing of refund claims is done through Sales Tax Automated Refund Repository computer system (Starr). Exporters' data is also checked through the 'risk-based analysis system'.
In certain cases, one system clears the application for issuance of refund, but the other raises serious objections, making it difficult for tax officials to sort out genuine cases.
Sources said that CBR has issued instructions to all collectors of sales tax to sanction sales tax refund in cases which are verified by the 'risk-based analysis system'. This system contains database of exporters including return, purchase invoices and invoice summary etc Starr system is operative for processing of refund claims for quite some time.
Keeping in view the Board's directive, the collectorates started issuance of refund after carrying out analysis of exporters' data available with the system, applying the Starr checks. The processing of refund claims under the 'risk-based system' has created many difficulties in processing of the claims. The collectors are not clear whether to issue refund or not in cases where the system raises objections.
Due to these objections the sales tax staff is unable to sanction or reject refund claims, which is increasing the overall pendency of refund claims at the level of collectorates. The collectors have communicated several ambiguities in the 'risk-based analysis system' for addressing.
Sources said that the system analyses the data only to the extent of 'purchase invoices'. No analysis is made regarding 'bill of entry' or 'shipping bill' filed by exporters under the system. Thus, the system raises objections pertaining to 'bill of entry'/'shipping bill'.
The system declares sales tax invoices as valid where the Starr refund program shows objection as 'blacklisted, non-filer, invoice summary not furnished, abnormal tax profile' and other such objections.
The refund claims due to these objections are inadmissible under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act, whereas the same are declared as admissible under the risk-based system, which is very confusing, sources added.
The system is also raising objections that an exporter has filed multiple sales tax returns resulting in blockage of refund. On the other hand, a registered taxpayer is entitled to file revised sales tax return to correct any omission or wrong declaration under section 26(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
The objection of 'multiple return' does not clarify whether a claimant is filing multiple return erroneously or revised sales tax return has been filed to correct the error.
The system also contains data of utility bills of the exporters. But it invariably shows objections as violations of different sections of the Sales Tax Act. This issue also needs to be addressed by the Board. The Board should clarify to the collectors whether only the risk-based analysis system is to be followed, or Starr objections be also taken into consideration, sources said.